poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 21, 2024, 06:03:39 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272713
Posts in
66756
Topics by
16723
Members
Latest Member:
callpri
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
The Lounge
COVID19
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
105
106
107
108
[
109
]
110
111
112
113
...
305
Author
Topic: COVID19 (Read 365084 times)
Woodsey
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 15846
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1620 on:
April 23, 2020, 01:43:18 AM »
Quote from: MintTrav on April 23, 2020, 01:16:03 AM
Quote from: neeko on April 22, 2020, 05:12:59 PM
No one was complaining that the only factory on earth that made nasal swabs was situated in the northern Italy, its ability to produce was limited by events. Who’re knew that so much PPE was made in Hubei.
Not the general public, but there are people whose job it is to know such things and to highlight the risk of too much sourcing being from one place.
Aye.....much like the people who were sourcing pasta and bog roll who were likely getting it from way wider providers than PPE providers and still couldn’t cope #anotherbellendwithapoliticalslantthathasnopositivecontributiontomakewhatsoever
Logged
MintTrav
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3401
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1621 on:
April 23, 2020, 01:53:53 AM »
Quote from: Woodsey on April 23, 2020, 01:43:18 AM
Quote from: MintTrav on April 23, 2020, 01:16:03 AM
Quote from: neeko on April 22, 2020, 05:12:59 PM
No one was complaining that the only factory on earth that made nasal swabs was situated in the northern Italy, its ability to produce was limited by events. Who’re knew that so much PPE was made in Hubei.
Not the general public, but there are people whose job it is to know such things and to highlight the risk of too much sourcing being from one place.
Aye.....much like the people who were sourcing pasta and bog roll who were likely getting it from way wider providers than PPE providers and still couldn’t cope #anotherbellendwithapoliticalslantthathasnopositivecontributiontomakewhatsoever
You’re such an idiot. There was nothing political about that post at all. I was referring to civil servants in the Department of Health.
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3892
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1622 on:
April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM »
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
Logged
Jon MW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6191
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1623 on:
April 23, 2020, 06:44:19 AM »
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
.
Like I said in my original response the odd thing was that it didn't quite match the national guidelines. Given that the job of a doctor is to put down what they think are the most likely causes of death on the death certificates I suspect that the investigation will find no material difference was made
Edit: and as a reminder, the trusts guidance didn't instruct them not to put COVID19 down, it passively noted that they weren't required to put it down
«
Last Edit: April 23, 2020, 06:46:25 AM by Jon MW
»
Logged
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
kukushkin88
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3892
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1624 on:
April 23, 2020, 07:14:39 AM »
Quote from: Jon MW on April 23, 2020, 06:44:19 AM
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
.
Like I said in my original response the odd thing was that it didn't quite match the national guidelines. Given that the job of a doctor is to put down what they think are the most likely causes of death on the death certificates I suspect that the investigation will find no material difference was made
Edit: and as a reminder, the trusts guidance didn't instruct them not to put COVID19 down, it passively noted that they weren't required to put it down
In guidance that was specific to deaths where Covid was proven, they said Covid did not need to be mentioned on the death certificate. They accept fully, that they were wrong. Add in the fact that the GLP indicate that the situation was brought to their attention by someone within the trust who was concerned that deaths were being certified incorrectly and I think we can safely say it’s not as clear cut as you suggest. Let’s wait and see what the investigation finds.
There’s no reason to think it’s linked but I noticed that yesterday Barking put up 70 extra Covid deaths, which was a bit out of the blue on the trends.
Edit: and as a reminder. We are clear from the actuary reports that a lot of Covid deaths are being missed, so instances like this are of some interest.
«
Last Edit: April 23, 2020, 07:26:13 AM by kukushkin88
»
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3892
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1625 on:
April 23, 2020, 07:50:42 AM »
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 07:14:39 AM
Quote from: Jon MW on April 23, 2020, 06:44:19 AM
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
.
Like I said in my original response the odd thing was that it didn't quite match the national guidelines. Given that the job of a doctor is to put down what they think are the most likely causes of death on the death certificates I suspect that the investigation will find no material difference was made
Edit: and as a reminder, the trusts guidance didn't instruct them not to put COVID19 down, it passively noted that they weren't required to put it down
In guidance that was specific to deaths* where Covid was proven, they said Covid did not need to be mentioned on the death certificate. They accept fully, that they were wrong. Add in the fact that the GLP indicate that the situation was brought to their attention by someone within the trust who was concerned that deaths were being certified incorrectly and I think we can safely say it’s not as clear cut as you suggest. Let’s wait and see what the investigation finds.
There’s no reason to think it’s linked but I noticed that yesterday Barking put up 70 extra Covid deaths, which was a bit out of the blue on the trends.
Edit: and as a reminder. We are clear from the actuary reports that a lot of Covid deaths are being missed, so instances like this are of some interest.
a better edit: *In guidance that was specific to instances where it was proven that the dead person had Covid.
Logged
Jon MW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6191
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1626 on:
April 23, 2020, 07:52:25 AM »
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 07:14:39 AM
Quote from: Jon MW on April 23, 2020, 06:44:19 AM
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
.
Like I said in my original response the odd thing was that it didn't quite match the national guidelines. Given that the job of a doctor is to put down what they think are the most likely causes of death on the death certificates I suspect that the investigation will find no material difference was made
Edit: and as a reminder, the trusts guidance didn't instruct them not to put COVID19 down, it passively noted that they weren't required to put it down
In guidance that was specific to deaths where Covid was proven, they said Covid did not need to be mentioned on the death certificate.
They accept fully, that they were wrong. Add in the fact that the GLP indicate that the situation was brought to their attention by someone within the trust who was concerned that deaths were being certified incorrectly and I think we can safely say it’s not as clear cut as you suggest. Let’s wait and see what the investigation finds.
There’s no reason to think it’s linked but I noticed that yesterday Barking put up 70 extra Covid deaths, which was a bit out of the blue on the trends.
Edit: and as a reminder. We are clear from the actuary reports that a lot of Covid deaths are being missed, so instances like this are of some interest.
I was going by the link to the guidance that was provided by the same organisation that you are linking to, if they were actually saying don't put COVID19 down when the person has tested positive for COVID19 then that's a major enquiry - but I didn't see any evidence of that from the links GLP provided.
The ONS deaths count any mention of COVID19 anywhere on the death certificate so I don't see how it would change those - I don't know if the hospital counted deaths only include what's in part 1a, which would explain a bigger number for hospital deaths if they revised it. But I still don't see what benefit an NHS trust would get from deliberately trying to under report the COVID19 numbers.
EDIT EDIT: that's a new document they're linking to now
The original document was more like a letter and didn't have that COVID19 was proved - this seems something that an external enquiry should be looking at. I still don't understand the motive.
«
Last Edit: April 23, 2020, 07:56:40 AM by Jon MW
»
Logged
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
kukushkin88
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3892
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1627 on:
April 23, 2020, 08:00:46 AM »
Quote from: Jon MW on April 23, 2020, 07:52:25 AM
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 07:14:39 AM
Quote from: Jon MW on April 23, 2020, 06:44:19 AM
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
.
Like I said in my original response the odd thing was that it didn't quite match the national guidelines. Given that the job of a doctor is to put down what they think are the most likely causes of death on the death certificates I suspect that the investigation will find no material difference was made
Edit: and as a reminder, the trusts guidance didn't instruct them not to put COVID19 down, it passively noted that they weren't required to put it down
In guidance that was specific to deaths where Covid was proven, they said Covid did not need to be mentioned on the death certificate.
They accept fully, that they were wrong. Add in the fact that the GLP indicate that the situation was brought to their attention by someone within the trust who was concerned that deaths were being certified incorrectly and I think we can safely say it’s not as clear cut as you suggest. Let’s wait and see what the investigation finds.
There’s no reason to think it’s linked but I noticed that yesterday Barking put up 70 extra Covid deaths, which was a bit out of the blue on the trends.
Edit: and as a reminder. We are clear from the actuary reports that a lot of Covid deaths are being missed, so instances like this are of some interest.
I was going by the link to the guidance that was provided by the same organisation that you are linking to, if they were actually saying don't put COVID19 down when the person has tested positive for COVID19 then that's a major enquiry - but I didn't see any evidence of that from the links GLP provided.
The ONS deaths count any mention of COVID19 anywhere on the death certificate so I don't see how it would change those - I don't know if the hospital counted deaths only include what's in part 1a, which would explain a bigger number for hospital deaths if they revised it. But I still don't see what benefit an NHS trust would get from deliberately trying to under report the COVID19 numbers.
EDIT EDIT: that's a new document they're linking to now
The original document was more like a letter and didn't have that COVID19 was proved - this seems something that an external enquiry should be looking at. I still don't understand the motive.
I guess the question (and I genuinely don’t know). Is....could an NHS Trust Chief Exec be put under political pressure in the same way that civil servants within governmental departments are?
Logged
Woodsey
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 15846
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1628 on:
April 23, 2020, 09:07:59 AM »
Quote from: MintTrav on April 23, 2020, 01:53:53 AM
Quote from: Woodsey on April 23, 2020, 01:43:18 AM
Quote from: MintTrav on April 23, 2020, 01:16:03 AM
Quote from: neeko on April 22, 2020, 05:12:59 PM
No one was complaining that the only factory on earth that made nasal swabs was situated in the northern Italy, its ability to produce was limited by events. Who’re knew that so much PPE was made in Hubei.
Not the general public, but there are people whose job it is to know such things and to highlight the risk of too much sourcing being from one place.
Aye.....much like the people who were sourcing pasta and bog roll who were likely getting it from way wider providers than PPE providers and still couldn’t cope #anotherbellendwithapoliticalslantthathasnopositivecontributiontomakewhatsoever
You’re such an idiot. There was nothing political about that post at all. I was referring to civil servants in the Department of Health.
Idiot or not my point still stands.......
Logged
Woodsey
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 15846
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1629 on:
April 23, 2020, 09:10:33 AM »
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
Fox killer!
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3892
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1630 on:
April 23, 2020, 09:21:08 AM »
Quote from: Woodsey on April 23, 2020, 09:10:33 AM
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
Fox killer!
We’re the closest that we’ve been in years to being troll free on this forum. It’s a real shame that you keep posting.
Logged
Woodsey
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 15846
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1631 on:
April 23, 2020, 09:22:10 AM »
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 09:21:08 AM
Quote from: Woodsey on April 23, 2020, 09:10:33 AM
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 05:59:58 AM
An update on the NHS Trust telling docs not to put Covid on death certificates:
https://goodlawproject.org/covid-19-deaths/
Fox killer!
We’re the closest that we’ve been in years to being troll free on this forum. It’s a real shame that you keep posting.
It’s a shame you keep posting your one eyed nonsense........did you look at who is behind that website?
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3892
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1632 on:
April 23, 2020, 09:48:32 AM »
The PPE from Turkey farce:
https://www.ft.com/content/8d1522cd-d699-4902-bbce-79f220fc1e09
Cliffs: Thankfully Turkey took a charitable view of our incompetence and dishonesty.
Is it paywalled? I’m not sure, I should be able to post a link that works.
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3892
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1633 on:
April 23, 2020, 10:01:27 AM »
Might be one where Doobs can provide insight. Is there a chance that we are doing a better job than all the comparable nations (and Ireland) in getting seriously unwell people from care homes to hospital?
https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/1253245532572712961?s=21
Logged
MintTrav
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3401
Re: COVID19
«
Reply #1634 on:
April 23, 2020, 10:43:17 AM »
Quote from: kukushkin88 on April 23, 2020, 10:01:27 AM
Might be one where Doobs can provide insight. Is there a chance that we are doing a better job than all the comparable nations (and Ireland) in getting seriously unwell people from care homes to hospital?
https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/1253245532572712961?s=21
It says 57% of Covid deaths in Ireland are in care homes, compared with 13-14% here. After a slow start, Ireland is in the process of testing all care home staff and patients, which should be completed around the end of this week, whereas our official policy is to test the first five victims after they have shown symptoms and try to get to a point where all those showing symptoms get tested. Do you think it’s more likely that the disparity in the percentages is because we are identifying and getting the victims into hospital quicker or because Covid-related deaths in care homes are not being counted as such?
“All care home residents and social care staff with coronavirus (COVID-19) symptoms will be tested as capacity is built up.”
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-to-offer-testing-for-everyone-who-needs-one-in-social-care-settings
Logged
Pages:
1
...
105
106
107
108
[
109
]
110
111
112
113
...
305
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...