|
Title: Correct ruling ? Post by: the sicilian on September 19, 2012, 01:23:29 PM This is a bit of a comedy from start to finish but would just like to clarify the proper ruling :
During the summer a few of us went to Malta and played the local casino comps regularly... there was a raise i look down at Aces re raise and Vinny 'Celtic ' Calenti is in the BB shoves..original raiser folds... now as we are buddies and for full comedy effect and the fact Ive been waiting around 5 years to get him back i decide to have a comedy slow roll dwell ( yes Karma is about to strike ) after a good minute i announce call and turn my hand over, Vince turns his over and had A 8...for some reason the dealer (whose English is the wrong side of Pigeon ) asks Vince who is in seat 1 at his elbow what i said..and Vince being the comical genius he is said.. ' oh his folded ' with that the dealer gathers all the mucked cards and pack cards and starts going through a wash still leaving our two hands over and exposed... ensue chaos as I attempt to stop him.... much giggling and laughing comes from seat one as Vince requires the help of a Tenna lady to calm him... After the initial shock I'm pissing myself to as the poker gods have stuck it in my eye for the comedy slow roll... a ruling is called and the floor declares both hands dead and splits the pot ? is this correct ? Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: JustinSayne on September 19, 2012, 01:35:05 PM Common sense should come into play here!
Incredibly stupid ruling. Just shuffle the deck and deal a board? Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: SolarCarro on September 19, 2012, 01:36:42 PM Surely it is the same as dealer dropping the deck?
Therefore he shuffles the pack leaving out the AA and A8 and deals the board, winner scoops! Dave Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: JK on September 19, 2012, 02:23:23 PM Common sense prevails, deal a board with the new deck
Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: CHIPPYMAN on September 19, 2012, 02:34:11 PM Common sense prevails, deal a board with the new deck None of the above . The correct ruling r , why slow roll at 1st place ? Serve u right ... Lol Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: the sicilian on September 19, 2012, 03:51:16 PM Common sense prevails, deal a board with the new deck None of the above . The correct ruling r , why slow roll at 1st place ? Serve u right ... Lol Please read op again for comedy japes and reason... Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: luther101 on September 19, 2012, 03:58:55 PM Obv the pot gets awarded to 'Maltese Vin' - because he's better looking than you!
Next case ...... Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: Chompy on September 19, 2012, 04:02:06 PM His never folding AA here. Ridic ruling. Correct etiquette is to smash they'm all up and tip the table over.
Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: luther101 on September 19, 2012, 04:07:19 PM Correction His never folding A 8 here. Ridic ruling. Correct etiquette is to smash they'm all up and tip the table over. Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: the sicilian on September 19, 2012, 04:21:11 PM Obv the pot gets awarded to 'Maltese Vin' - because he's better looking than you! Next case ...... Glasses crooked again ? Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: celtic on September 19, 2012, 07:31:06 PM Common sense prevails, deal a board with the new deck None of the above . The correct ruling r , why slow roll at plce ? Serve u right ... Lol You tell him Frankie Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: Cf on September 19, 2012, 08:09:48 PM A8 wins the pot for japes and karma.
Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: LB44 on September 19, 2012, 09:09:14 PM Wait...who was it seat 1?
Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: CHIPPYMAN on September 19, 2012, 11:51:17 PM Common sense prevails, deal a board with the new deck None of the above . The correct ruling r , why slow roll at plce ? Serve u right ... Lol You tell him Frankie just did...and he didnt c at the end of my sentences.....looool Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: relaedgc on September 20, 2012, 12:06:49 AM At this point, I agree the pot should be split.
If you deal a board using cards that have been mucked, you can theoretically win/lose the hand thanks to cards that ought not to be in play. Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: Jon MW on September 20, 2012, 06:18:14 AM At this point, I agree the pot should be split. If you deal a board using cards that have been mucked, you can theoretically win/lose the hand thanks to cards that ought not to be in play. I'm amazed anybody would agree with the ruling other than for karma Every card that has been taken out of play is still an unknown, the odds for the 2 players that are still in the hand doesn't change when the others players hole cards get dealt back in to the deck. The deck gets shuffled and a new board gets played out seems like one of the most trivially correct rulings ever. Title: Re: Correct ruling ? Post by: jgcblack on September 20, 2012, 08:10:28 AM At this point, I agree the pot should be split. If you deal a board using cards that have been mucked, you can theoretically win/lose the hand thanks to cards that ought not to be in play. I'm amazed anybody would agree with the ruling other than for karma Every card that has been taken out of play is still an unknown, the odds for the 2 players that are still in the hand doesn't change when the others players hole cards get dealt back in to the deck. The deck gets shuffled and a new board gets played out seems like one of the most trivially correct rulings ever. This ainec. Close thread. |