blonde poker forum

Community Forums => Betting Tips and Sport Discussion => Topic started by: Woodsey on July 29, 2010, 11:07:02 AM



Title: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on July 29, 2010, 11:07:02 AM
Ok a bit early to start this, but the Aussies are already getting excited...........

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdST6D4idOg


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on July 31, 2010, 10:11:34 AM
That's a pretty good advert to be fair to them.
KP needs to start making some runs. Can't imagine going into an Ashes without him.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on July 31, 2010, 10:31:20 AM
I am pretty excited to be fair as well. We geniunely do stand a chance this time round down under, mainly due to the fact that this is most mediocre Australian team in a generation.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on August 06, 2010, 02:55:01 PM
Pakistan are really giving us a good test ready for the winter...


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on August 31, 2010, 02:54:46 PM
KP dropped from T20 and one day squad apparently.
Angrily tweeted about it days after being warned not to tweet sensitive information.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on August 31, 2010, 02:58:16 PM
KP dropped from T20 and one day squad apparently.
Angrily tweeted about it days after being warned not to tweet sensitive information.

I don't get this, he needs time at the wicket not being dropped. Despite his slump in form he is deffo still our top limited overs player, I understand he is going to get some games for Surrey but surely he is better playing for England.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on August 31, 2010, 03:05:27 PM
Yeh seems weird. Forcing him to play before the tests would have made sense. Hampshire offered him reserve games and he refused. Don't see the point in not getting him at the crease now.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on August 31, 2010, 03:09:20 PM
Yeh seems weird. Forcing him to play before the tests would have made sense. Hampshire offered him reserve games and he refused. Don't see the point in not getting him at the crease now.

Yes, but arguably time at the crease in T20/ODI's is not necessarily to best preparation for the type of innings they will need from him in the tests in oz. I would hazard a guess they have some more appropriate preparation planned for him.............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 05, 2010, 06:53:35 PM
Bump, cuz I'm already getting excited about this after seeing how bad the aussies have been recently ;D

Was trying to get to the game in Perth, but the dates don't quite fit around my other travel plans over Xmas/NY........... >:(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 05, 2010, 07:23:48 PM
I can't see how the aussies are favourites for this series, even though they are at home, are bowling attack is so much stronger than theres and the batting lineups are pretty even.

And by the looks of things the media are getting on there backs already, which they are not used to at all. All the pressure is on the aussies and i don't think they can cope with it.

I predict a 3-1 victory to England.

Get as much money as possible on england to win the series imo.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on November 05, 2010, 07:27:37 PM
Our best pace bowler (Anderson) is useless in Australian conditions and none of the others are all that anyway.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 05, 2010, 07:58:07 PM
Our best pace bowler (Anderson) is useless in Australian conditions and none of the others are all that anyway.

4 years ago he was shocking, but he is a much improved bowler in all conditions and will lead the attack well, and keep things tight when the bowl is not swinging!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 05, 2010, 08:07:33 PM
Yeh think Broad top english bowler might be worth a shout at 4/1. Swann is obviously favourite but price indicates that. Jimmy has always been poor in Australia and Finn is playing in his first Ashes so we can't expect alot from him.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 06, 2010, 04:10:42 AM
Could go 1 of 2 ways, Anderson blasts thru them in 15 overs with the new ball, or they get off to a flyer and take advantage of the lifeless 20 over + ball. A lot of pressure on Swann in the middle overs could take its toll. Gonne be a long hard grind for the bowlers this winter i think.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 06, 2010, 07:13:48 AM
Finn is playing in his first Ashes so we can't expect alot from him.

On bouncier quicker pitches ? I think he will do well myself.

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 06, 2010, 10:07:52 AM
Finn is playing in his first Ashes so we can't expect alot from him.

On bouncier quicker pitches ? I think he will do well myself.

Sandy
I think he'll do alright but I don't expect him to be top wicket taker.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 06, 2010, 11:34:20 AM
Why all the negativity about out bowling attack? we have a excellent attack and a team we should get behind and be proud of, unlike those that kick a ball a around!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 06, 2010, 12:42:09 PM
Why all the negativity about out bowling attack? we have a excellent attack and a team we should get behind and be proud of, unlike those that kick a ball a around!

I think they will do pretty well too, our attack is certainly a lot better than the aussie one, that is our big advantage currently...........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 06, 2010, 03:14:17 PM
Finn is playing in his first Ashes so we can't expect alot from him.

On bouncier quicker pitches ? I think he will do well myself.

Sandy
I think he'll do alright but I don't expect him to be top wicket taker.

If Anderson/Broad don't do it with the new ball he might get a chance and then he has a good shout. If they do well he has little chance since he has an older Kookaburra and less wickets to get.

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 06, 2010, 03:16:48 PM
Why all the negativity about out bowling attack? we have a excellent attack and a team we should get behind and be proud of, unlike those that kick a ball a around!

I think they will do pretty well too, our attack is certainly a lot better than the aussie one, that is our big advantage currently...........

mitchel johnson will be pretty devastating though on the bouncy pitches, they haven't got much else though. Anderson is full on ordinary in benign conditions. Broad our best bet probably. Assume Swan will do the best overall. I can't wait, not tken any holidays yet, going to take a week off for the first test and go nocturnal.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 06, 2010, 03:20:06 PM
Why all the negativity about out bowling attack? we have a excellent attack and a team we should get behind and be proud of, unlike those that kick a ball a around!

I think they will do pretty well too, our attack is certainly a lot better than the aussie one, that is our big advantage currently...........

mitchel johnson will be pretty devastating though on the bouncy pitches, they haven't got much else though. Anderson is full on ordinary in benign conditions. Broad our best bet probably. Assume Swan will do the best overall. I can't wait, not tken any holidays yet, going to take a week off for the first test and go nocturnal.

Will switch my body clock so I can see a few hours each night I reckon too...........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 06, 2010, 05:40:10 PM
UK time what time is play going to be? I remember catching some of it before work last time.
Work from home these days so 6-2's rather than 9-5's might be an option.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 06, 2010, 05:46:27 PM
Midnight starts except Perth which is around 3am iirc.

SAndy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 17, 2010, 09:03:02 AM
The sponsors sure are confident...........

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/post/Company-offers-free-beer-to-all-Aussies-if-team-;_ylt=AokigIJxQ.T1XQxdB6PZDck5nYcB?urn=top-286127


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 18, 2010, 09:23:18 PM
http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/486576.html (http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/486576.html)

Some analysis of spinners performances away from home. I'm confident Swann will take wickets but it does suggest that a seamer may be decent value for top English bowler.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 18, 2010, 09:25:39 PM
Didn't realise that sky are showing the warm up game on currently, managed to watch a couple of hours last night...............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 18, 2010, 11:48:17 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EIwhljK2PA

Bresnan's sprinkler is world class


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 19, 2010, 11:48:37 PM
Englands back up seamers all looking good in this game, if england bat well in this series then we will win easy.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 23, 2010, 01:14:32 AM
I know this is completely against anything that Woodsey would ever do so it's probably not the thread I should be posting such thoughts on BUT.....

Are Australia value @ 13/10 in the first test?

Last 5 series 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw
Last 5 series down under 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw

Not sure if it counts as betting against your team still but Australia to win the test and England to win the series is 12/1. I expect a close series but don't ever remember us being quick starters in the Ashes.
http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double (http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 02:04:56 AM
I know this is completely against anything that Woodsey would ever do so it's probably not the thread I should be posting such thoughts on BUT.....

Are Australia value @ 13/10 in the first test?

Last 5 series 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw
Last 5 series down under 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw

Not sure if it counts as betting against your team still but Australia to win the test and England to win the series is 12/1. I expect a close series but don't ever remember us being quick starters in the Ashes.
http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double (http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double)

Mmm, I'd say not tbh, Clarke is a doubt for the first game now too. I suppose the 12/1 isn't the worst thing I dunno, the thing is if the Aussies win the first game it will be a close series, if we win I think we will take the series 3-1 minimum.........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 02:14:10 AM
I know this is completely against anything that Woodsey would ever do so it's probably not the thread I should be posting such thoughts on BUT.....

Are Australia value @ 13/10 in the first test?

Last 5 series 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw
Last 5 series down under 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw

Not sure if it counts as betting against your team still but Australia to win the test and England to win the series is 12/1. I expect a close series but don't ever remember us being quick starters in the Ashes.
http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double (http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double)

Mmm, I'd say not tbh, Clarke is a doubt for the first game now too. I suppose the 12/1 isn't the worst thing I dunno, the thing is if the Aussies win the first game it will be a close series, if we win I think we will take the series 3-1 minimum.........

How about this market? England to win by 2 is 10/1, that's not bad imo........

http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/winning-margin

Or a cheeky 40/1 on 4-0 to England, take your pick...........

http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/series-correct-score


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 02:17:26 AM
The 13/24 for England to win the series is still value imo. I genuinely think England are slight favourites for the series even though the Aussies are at home. Can't believe the aussies are even money tbh...........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 23, 2010, 02:17:38 AM
I know this is completely against anything that Woodsey would ever do so it's probably not the thread I should be posting such thoughts on BUT.....

Are Australia value @ 13/10 in the first test?

Last 5 series 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw
Last 5 series down under 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw

Not sure if it counts as betting against your team still but Australia to win the test and England to win the series is 12/1. I expect a close series but don't ever remember us being quick starters in the Ashes.
http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double (http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double)

Plus those two draws, one was a last day thunderstorm that saved us, and the other was the last wicket heroics of Panesar and Anderson.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 02:19:58 AM
I know this is completely against anything that Woodsey would ever do so it's probably not the thread I should be posting such thoughts on BUT.....

Are Australia value @ 13/10 in the first test?

Last 5 series 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw
Last 5 series down under 1st test - 4 Australia wins 1 draw

Not sure if it counts as betting against your team still but Australia to win the test and England to win the series is 12/1. I expect a close series but don't ever remember us being quick starters in the Ashes.
http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double (http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/international/ashes/australia-v-england-%5B1st-test%5D/match-and-series-double)

Plus those two draws, one was a last day thunderstorm that saved us, and the other was the last wicket heroics of Panesar and Anderson.

I think you can throw history out the window for this series. The team that put those wins in was basically the best team in the history of cricket..........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 23, 2010, 02:23:18 AM
I agree. I was gonna add no Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist, Hayden, Langer etc makes it irrellevent but i cba.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 23, 2010, 02:39:07 AM
Meh I think the bookies have it about right imo. I would deffo take England at a neutral venue(s) over 5 tests which is pretty much the first time in 25 yrs I can honestly say that.

Think recent Ashes tests have little bearing especially in Australia where England have been so inferior in every department. We are properly prepared this time and injury free the exact opposite of 2006. The value in picking 1st tests out against the whole series is when touring teams are under done/ in completely alien conditions (think England in May on green tops).

Really looking forward to this series and am expecting to be tarding up this thread on a regular basis.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 09:07:56 AM
What are people doing for watching this ? I'm debating whether to change my schedule around so I can watch this but it makes it awkward when I have to go to real work Monday morning,sigh.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 23, 2010, 09:12:51 AM
Got loads of holiday left so will probably take the 2nd test off work but for this one i'm going for 5-6am wake ups and start my 9-5 work from home job early.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on November 23, 2010, 09:23:29 AM
Got loads of holiday left so will probably take the 2nd test off work but for this one i'm going for 5-6am wake ups and start my 9-5 work from home job early.

Won't you only catch an hour watching up from 5? or is tea at 4.40am?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 09:25:37 AM
Got loads of holiday left so will probably take the 2nd test off work but for this one i'm going for 5-6am wake ups and start my 9-5 work from home job early.

Won't you only catch an hour watching up from 5? or is tea at 4.40am?

For the first one the programme finishes at 8 so I'm guessing they expect the cricket to finish about 7,the only test that'll be different is the third at Perth.Pretty sick that the fourth test starts Christsmas Day/Boxing Day.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 09:45:52 AM
At the Gabba in the last 10 tests Aussies have won 8 drawn 2. They won the toss 3/10.

4 times they won by an innings including 2 out of the last 3. Smallest win was by 149 runs.

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 23, 2010, 10:19:47 AM
At the Gabba in the last 10 tests Aussies have won 8 drawn 2. They won the toss 3/10.

4 times they won by an innings including 2 out of the last 3. Smallest win was by 149 runs.

Sandy


Of course, but the plain fact is the Aussies were better than our team in the last ten tests. Now shorn of McGrath and Warne especially but also Gilchrist, Hayden, Langer and Gillespie its a lot closer in terms of ability.

I think it will be a close series, with us having the advantage in a few areas counter-balanced by the fact that the Aussies are so strong at home


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on November 23, 2010, 10:26:32 AM
I'll be doing my usual of watching the first session (11pm-1am) then catching up with highlights on the morrow.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 23, 2010, 10:28:33 AM
First session 12-2, hour build up on Sky beforehand


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 23, 2010, 11:13:45 AM
So 12-2, 2.40-4.40, 5-close of play?
That's what I thought it was and thought i'd catch the last session each day.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 11:16:07 AM
Sod's law I have to leave for work at 6am on Thurs am which I basically never have to do. Gotta watch the first few overs tomorrow night though.........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 23, 2010, 11:30:45 AM
Very doubtful I can go fully nocturnal for Test 1 as I have daytime commitments and an event to run at the weekend but thinking of watching session 1 and the radio then goes on low volume through the night while I slumber.

Perth and certainly the Xmas test, I am going to be pulling the all nighters


Hoping we show up, as I think it could be an exciting month


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 11:32:10 AM
Was hoping to get to Perth, had it started 2 days later I would have been there................


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 23, 2010, 11:33:25 AM
Was hoping to get to Perth, had it started 2 days later I would have been there................

never been, told it is fantastic.

One day, Woodsey, one day


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 11:36:35 AM
Was hoping to get to Perth, had it started 2 days later I would have been there................

never been, told it is fantastic.

One day, Woodsey, one day

Yeah, I wasn't even due to be especially close to it tbh, I'll be in south east asia at the time, but I would have gone out of my way for a week for sure if the dates fitted.............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 11:57:11 AM
At the Gabba in the last 10 tests Aussies have won 8 drawn 2. They won the toss 3/10.

4 times they won by an innings including 2 out of the last 3. Smallest win was by 149 runs.

Sandy


Of course, but the plain fact is the Aussies were better than our team in the last ten tests. Now shorn of McGrath and Warne especially but also Gilchrist, Hayden, Langer and Gillespie its a lot closer in terms of ability.

I think it will be a close series, with us having the advantage in a few areas counter-balanced by the fact that the Aussies are so strong at home


All tests, not just ashes tests.

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 23, 2010, 12:00:06 PM
fair enough, but the point still stands. India and SA apart at times, who has been capable of challenging the Aussies at home, especially in a first test? Not many world sides for a long time

The Aussie team is weaker than at any time since about 1980-5 I reckon, pre Border.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 12:15:28 PM
fair enough, but the point still stands. India and SA apart at times, who has been capable of challenging the Aussies at home, especially in a first test? Not many world sides for a long time

The Aussie team is weaker than at any time since about 1980-5 I reckon, pre Border.

Not to mention the pressure they are under and the disarray they seem to be in............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 23, 2010, 12:16:39 PM
Granted, they still might win. They are Aussies, at home, and we're English chokers.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on November 23, 2010, 12:17:16 PM
fair enough, but the point still stands. India and SA apart at times, who has been capable of challenging the Aussies at home, especially in a first test? Not many world sides for a long time

The Aussie team is weaker than at any time since about 1980-5 I reckon, pre Border.

Not to mention the pressure they are under and the disarray they seem to be in............

Isn't it when they're dangerous though, when there backs are against the wall with everyone writing them off?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 12:21:16 PM
In Australia since Warne/McGrath retired there have been 17 tests. Australia have won 12 drawn 2 lost 3.

2 losses 2 SA who they then went on to beat over a series in SA and 1 loss to India who still lost the series.

Aussies maybe weaker than in recent history but they are no Bangladesh and by the same token England are better than recent history but the are no 70s/80s Windies.

Sandy



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 12:23:37 PM
fair enough, but the point still stands. India and SA apart at times, who has been capable of challenging the Aussies at home, especially in a first test? Not many world sides for a long time

The Aussie team is weaker than at any time since about 1980-5 I reckon, pre Border.

Not to mention the pressure they are under and the disarray they seem to be in............

Isn't it when they're dangerous though, when there backs are against the wall with everyone writing them off?

Dunno, I can barely recall them being in this position before, I reckon its more likely they will cave to the pressure than the other way round but we will see I guess. If they don't win this first test, its gg for them.........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on November 23, 2010, 12:26:02 PM
if Clarke is fit, 7/1 best Aus bat is massive no?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 12:29:35 PM
if Clarke is fit, 7/1 best Aus bat is massive no?

Series or 1st test or 1st innings ?

Either way it is if he's fit but if it's series then given the doubt not so much.

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on November 23, 2010, 12:31:40 PM
if Clarke is fit, 7/1 best Aus bat is massive no?

Series or 1st test or 1st innings ?

Either way it is if he's fit but if it's series then given the doubt not so much.

Sandy

series, I think Totesport


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 12:33:39 PM
So who's betting on what then?

I would liked to have had a massive lump on England for the series when the odds were better, but can't afford it as I've got a ton of upcoming stuff I have to pay for. So I'll probably had a crack with a couple of hundo on a correct series score or something like that...........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 12:36:55 PM
A day normally lasts about 8-9 hours yeah ? It normally starts 10:30 here and finsihes between 18:30-19:00 ? So I thought it would be 00:00 - 08:00 roughly.

I'm not having a bet as I wouldn't bet enough that would make me any more interested.CMON ENGLAND!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 12:39:11 PM
http://www.cricketweb.net/fantasycricket/article.php?CategoryIDAuto=22&NewsIDAuto=6492

Anyone want to organise a fantasy ashes pool ?

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 12:40:42 PM
http://www.cricketweb.net/fantasycricket/article.php?CategoryIDAuto=22&NewsIDAuto=6492

Anyone want to organise a fantasy ashes pool ?

Sandy

CBA organising but would participate.........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 01:00:47 PM
http://www.cricketweb.net/fantasycricket/article.php?CategoryIDAuto=22&NewsIDAuto=6492

Anyone want to organise a fantasy ashes pool ?

Sandy

CBA organising but would participate.........

Ok well i've set up a league and the key needed to join is 1290517014.

What kind of stake ? £50 max for me but £25 ok

Who would collect the money ? (i would as a last resort but nobody really knows me so if someone wants to collect and distribute winnings)

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 01:22:09 PM
I won't be around for the second half of the series, so probably better be someone else, but I would have done. See what everyone else says about the amount, I think £50 is too much to get a decent number maybe £20 or something, I don't care personally...........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on November 23, 2010, 01:28:39 PM
I'm in for £20 but not much more because i don't really know about cricket but i'm looking forward to The Ashes


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 01:38:24 PM
Ok make it £20.

5 people winner take all. 6+ 1st and 2nd ?

Team entered by start of play and payment by 5pm Friday (once we have a banker sorted)

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on November 23, 2010, 01:42:43 PM
Wow I'm becoming a little distressed with how upbeat everyone seems to be in regards to England beating the Aussies, far too confident for my liking. I think the Aussies are alot better than they're getting credit for and I dont think England are as good as people are making out. I'm just hoping its a close contest and England dont take a pasting.


Either way i have been on late nighters for a couple of weeks now in preparation for the Ashes so at least i have my late night viewing sorted for the next couple of months, hoping for a belting series and really hope England crush, Im cautiously optimistic but I honestly would'nt be surprised if they choke.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 01:44:46 PM
Wow I'm becoming a little distressed with how upbeat everyone seems to be in regards to England beating the Aussies, far too confident for my liking. I think the Aussies are alot better than they're getting credit for and I dont think England are as good as people are making out. I'm just hoping its a close contest and England dont take a pasting.


Either way i have been on late nighters for a couple of weeks now in preparation for the Ashes so at least i have my late night viewing sorted for the next couple of months, hoping for a belting series and really hope England crush, Im cautiously optimistic but I honestly would'nt be surprised if they choke.

Optimism ftw! If my hopes get dashed then it will be nothing new :D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on November 23, 2010, 01:48:52 PM
Wow I'm becoming a little distressed with how upbeat everyone seems to be in regards to England beating the Aussies, far too confident for my liking. I think the Aussies are alot better than they're getting credit for and I dont think England are as good as people are making out. I'm just hoping its a close contest and England dont take a pasting.


Either way i have been on late nighters for a couple of weeks now in preparation for the Ashes so at least i have my late night viewing sorted for the next couple of months, hoping for a belting series and really hope England crush, Im cautiously optimistic but I honestly would'nt be surprised if they choke.

Optimism ftw! If my hopes get dashed then it will be nothing new :D

Theres just something not quite right about the English expecting to beat the Aussies in their own backyard, it gives me an eerie feeling in the pit of my stomach


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 01:52:00 PM
Wow I'm becoming a little distressed with how upbeat everyone seems to be in regards to England beating the Aussies, far too confident for my liking. I think the Aussies are alot better than they're getting credit for and I dont think England are as good as people are making out. I'm just hoping its a close contest and England dont take a pasting.


Either way i have been on late nighters for a couple of weeks now in preparation for the Ashes so at least i have my late night viewing sorted for the next couple of months, hoping for a belting series and really hope England crush, Im cautiously optimistic but I honestly would'nt be surprised if they choke.

Optimism ftw! If my hopes get dashed then it will be nothing new :D

Theres just something not quite right about the English expecting to beat the Aussies in their own backyard, it gives me an eerie feeling in the pit of my stomach

I we can't get excited about having a great chance this time, then I think we never will..........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 02:23:53 PM
In for the game,have joined league.

If everyone's happy to ship funds via Tilt then can send to me if you like as I never use that account.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 02:32:24 PM
Works for me. Make it $30.

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 02:33:34 PM
Send to mondonewc on Tilt then.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 02:51:09 PM
Works for me. Make it $30.

Sandy

Yup


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 23, 2010, 03:42:22 PM
A day normally lasts about 8-9 hours yeah ? It normally starts 10:30 here and finsihes between 18:30-19:00 ? So I thought it would be 00:00 - 08:00 roughly.

I'm not having a bet as I wouldn't bet enough that would make me any more interested.CMON ENGLAND!!!!!!!!!!!

11-6 are the official times over here, which can be extended to 6.30 if the required overs haven't been bowled. Then a further 30 mins can added if any weather delay.

I'm in for the fantasy league, will ship later.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 03:48:03 PM
Money sent.

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 04:46:35 PM
Money sent.

Sandy

Shipped from account name susannie


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on November 23, 2010, 04:46:59 PM
3 teams in the league so far.

A few of the "experts" seem to be awol. ;)

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 23, 2010, 04:47:49 PM
Got loads of holiday left so will probably take the 2nd test off work but for this one i'm going for 5-6am wake ups and start my 9-5 work from home job early.

Won't you only catch an hour watching up from 5? or is tea at 4.40am?

For the first one the programme finishes at 8 so I'm guessing they expect the cricket to finish about 7,the only test that'll be different is the third at Perth.Pretty sick that the fourth test starts Christsmas Day/Boxing Day.

This is a massive tradition in Australia the Boxing day test match, it happens every year and is always at the MCG (Melbourne Cricket Ground).

My plan for the ashes is to grind in the evenings, watch the whole thing at night and then go to bed at 7am etc. God knows how this is going to work tomorrow as I am flying back from the US today.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 04:50:14 PM
3 teams in the league so far.

A few of the "experts" seem to be awol. ;)

Sandy

My team is shite anyway, just got frustrated trying to juggle to get who I wanted and just thought fuck it and picked a couple of randoms in the end........ :D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 23, 2010, 04:51:30 PM
Monda can i pay by bank transfer?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 06:02:06 PM
Monda can i pay by bank transfer?

Yeah ok then,will pm you details.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 06:50:47 PM
Recvd monies from Henrik and Woodsey.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 07:01:15 PM
Recvd monies from Henrik and Woodsey.

Someone start a separate thread imo, so more people see it and doesn't get mixed in here with all the chatter.......


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 07:05:54 PM
Recvd monies from Henrik and Woodsey.

Someone start a separate thread imo, so more people see it and doesn't get mixed in here with all the chatter.......

Go on then  :P


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 23, 2010, 07:12:30 PM
Recvd monies from Henrik and Woodsey.

Someone start a separate thread imo, so more people see it and doesn't get mixed in here with all the chatter.......

Go on then  :P

LOL I'm grinding 6 tables, I'll do a quick alert thread........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 23, 2010, 07:14:58 PM
Recvd monies from Henrik and Woodsey.

Someone start a separate thread imo, so more people see it and doesn't get mixed in here with all the chatter.......

Go on then  :P

LOL I'm grinding 6 tables, I'll do a quick alert thread........

I'll fire one up then since I'm doing jack


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Nico29 on November 24, 2010, 12:23:08 PM
I've had a few bets on the ashes for sweat reasons.

£25 KP Top Series Bat@9-1

£25 Swann Top Series Bowler@3-1

£25 England to win 2-1@9-1

£12.50 2-2 Draw@7-1

£6.25 England 4-0@40-1

£6.25 Australia 3-0@20-1


Last one i'd rather not win and am regretting placing it already!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 24, 2010, 12:52:26 PM
I've gone Mitchell Johnson top Aussie bowler- could be between just him and Hilfenhaus if things don't go well for the hosts. Bollinger could easily come in for Siddle and Hauritz for Doherty if they need to make changes so could be just 2 bowlers playing all 5 tests.

Broad top England bowler

Australia to win the first test and lose the series


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 24, 2010, 04:09:29 PM
England to win 3-1


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 24, 2010, 09:38:52 PM
GRASSY PITCH, CHANGEABLE WEATHER


good toss to lose imo, risky to stick them in but you don't mind bowling


Going to be a fun few days


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 24, 2010, 09:42:29 PM
Going out to get a couple of beers to drink during the first hour I'm allowing myself to watch. Getting really excited now, very few things I get this excited for apart from big England rugby games.......... :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Jamier-Host on November 24, 2010, 09:43:38 PM


£6.25 Australia 3-0@20-1



Sounds worth a go


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: 77dave on November 24, 2010, 11:18:37 PM
link anyone?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 24, 2010, 11:19:36 PM
England to win 3-1

£100 on this at 10/1

Also £100 on England to win the first test at 11/5


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 24, 2010, 11:20:10 PM
England to win 3-1

£100 on this at 10/1

Also £100 on England to win the first test at 11/5

GL mate,LETS DO THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on November 24, 2010, 11:28:43 PM
on the 3-1 England too, Cook series top batsman at 15.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 24, 2010, 11:31:49 PM
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiii ship the flip


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 24, 2010, 11:33:03 PM
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiii ship the flip

Let the ships continue......(http://smileys.on-my-web.com/repository/Leisures_and_Sports/cup-038.gif)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 24, 2010, 11:33:24 PM
Good start. 100-1 at lunch please.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: 77dave on November 24, 2010, 11:34:34 PM
link anyone?
.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: hugob055 on November 24, 2010, 11:35:30 PM

http://www.everythingon.tv/channel/view/sky-sports-1-1


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on November 24, 2010, 11:35:59 PM
Couple here

http://www.myp2p.eu/competition.php?competitionid=&part=sports&discipline=cricket

not tried though


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 24, 2010, 11:36:13 PM

Had a quick look couldn't find much. Cricket is pretty much the worst sport to find links for, due to a number of factors. There is always TMS.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 24, 2010, 11:48:17 PM
Sorry KP but please get rid of that horrible slug on your face......... >:(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on November 24, 2010, 11:50:17 PM
Had a bit on Trott to be Top England 1st Innings Bat @ 5/1


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: 77dave on November 24, 2010, 11:51:38 PM
perfect thx


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: geordieneil on November 24, 2010, 11:59:41 PM
lol got to up for 6am.....but fk it

c'mon ennnnggggeeeerrrrllllaaaannnndddd

5-0 on their soil my prediction


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 25, 2010, 12:03:51 AM
FUCK OFF


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on November 25, 2010, 12:04:23 AM
series over already :(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: geordieneil on November 25, 2010, 12:04:41 AM
oh dear


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Acidmouse on November 25, 2010, 12:04:59 AM
lol! anyone got link, listening  atm.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 25, 2010, 12:06:27 AM
series over already :(

PLease GTFO this thread with that kind of talk >:(

Optimism ftw please :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: geordieneil on November 25, 2010, 12:07:00 AM
lol! anyone got link, listening  atm.

http://www.everythingon.tv/channel/view/sky-sports-1-1


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 25, 2010, 12:07:29 AM
Such an unbelievably poor shout from Strauss,huge sigh.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 25, 2010, 12:08:49 AM
Lol, I reckon it is still a better start than we had in 06'.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on November 25, 2010, 12:10:27 AM
Lol, I reckon it is still a better start than we had in 06'.

Yeah, my optimism lasted a few balls extra :D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 25, 2010, 12:20:29 AM
How many times can they review it ?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 25, 2010, 12:21:30 AM
Well that referral was pretty confusing. I was sure he was out when they showed the technologic output, presumably ball was clipping leg and therefore decision on the field stands.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 25, 2010, 12:22:21 AM
Well that referral was pretty confusing. I was sure he was out when they showed the technologic output, presumably ball was clipping leg and therefore decision on the field stands.



Has to hit full on I think...........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 25, 2010, 12:23:37 AM
How many times can they review it ?

You are allowed 2 wrong reviews.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on November 25, 2010, 12:23:51 AM
caption was wrong, should have been original decision as it was clipping leg.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 25, 2010, 12:24:20 AM
Big 30 minutes this,we look really ragged.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Moskvich on November 25, 2010, 12:40:59 AM
Well that referral was pretty confusing. I was sure he was out when they showed the technologic output, presumably ball was clipping leg and therefore decision on the field stands.



Yeah, Atherton talked about 'clearing up the confusion' about that decision and managed to do absolutely no such thing, and Lloyd then kept going on about how it was sliding down leg, after it's already showed it hitting leg stump. Obviously is the 'just clipping' thing - not sure I agree with that as it happens, think it makes a bit of a mockery of the review process.

Anyway, anyone know if Australia lose a review for that, in spite of being correct in asking for it..? Obviously they shouldn't, but I don't know how they deal with it.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 25, 2010, 12:44:01 AM
Yeh they lose one. They weren't correct in asking for it as there was no clear error made by the umpire.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: amcgrath1uk on November 25, 2010, 12:44:33 AM
Well that referral was pretty confusing. I was sure he was out when they showed the technologic output, presumably ball was clipping leg and therefore decision on the field stands.



Yeah, Atherton talked about 'clearing up the confusion' about that decision and managed to do absolutely no such thing, and Lloyd then kept going on about how it was sliding down leg, after it's already showed it hitting leg stump. Obviously is the 'just clipping' thing - not sure I agree with that as it happens, think it makes a bit of a mockery of the review process.

Anyway, anyone know if Australia lose a review for that, in spite of being correct in asking for it..? Obviously they shouldn't, but I don't know how they deal with it.

yeah they lose one.

If its clipping, its whats classed as reasonable doubt. So whatever the original decision is, stands


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: dik9 on November 25, 2010, 12:49:39 AM
http://www.totalsportsmadness.com/2010/11/22/ashes-live-stream-online-2010-ashes-test-live-video-links/ link 1 is sweet


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 25, 2010, 01:16:26 AM
Bed for me I think. Hopeful that the situation will have improved when I wake up.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 25, 2010, 02:01:08 AM
Honours even I think, hopefully we can build on this as it looks a good wicket to bat on.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 25, 2010, 02:02:23 AM
Honours even I think, hopefully we can build on this as it looks a good wicket to bat on.

Agree,more of the same from KP and Cook after lunch plz.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: action man on November 25, 2010, 02:02:50 AM
how long is lunch?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 25, 2010, 02:04:14 AM
how long is lunch?

2.40am restart


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 25, 2010, 02:04:54 AM
wicket should get easier, ball softer. Got to make the next session pay. 50-50 1st session


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: action man on November 25, 2010, 02:08:15 AM
might nip to brothel


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 25, 2010, 02:09:05 AM
Slight advantage England i think, especially after losing Strauss so early. Their attack has looked ordinary imo.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 25, 2010, 03:22:35 AM
Sure is possible to go to sleep when watching the Ashes,sure am switching it off.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 25, 2010, 03:40:41 AM
Sigh, this isn't a 125-4 pitch.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on November 25, 2010, 04:56:13 AM
Pretty much the same as the 1st session I think the Aussies had seized the initiative with the 2 quick wickets but England fought back well to make it a close session.

Both sessions 86-2 bizarrely.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 25, 2010, 04:58:22 AM
this bowling attack is so ordinairy, all batsmen other than strauss getting starts, pitch is pretty decent, could do with a nice partnership between these two!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 25, 2010, 05:01:48 AM
Crucial partnershp,need to reach 250 without losing another wicket.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on November 25, 2010, 05:49:14 AM
Would be so sweet if an Aussie hattrick gets scratched on referral.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on November 25, 2010, 05:49:46 AM
Arses.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 25, 2010, 05:51:29 AM
Sighhhhhhh.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Singheee on November 25, 2010, 06:57:06 AM
Grame swann to be top england bowler 1st innnings 12/5 looks good to me as even doherty was getting it to spin, i think swanny will like this pitch


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 25, 2010, 07:17:55 AM
250 sighhhhhhhhhhhh


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on November 25, 2010, 12:35:07 PM
Trying find the positives, at least some of them posted some scores!



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on November 25, 2010, 12:40:50 PM
Katich is a sucker for LBW, next dismissal is 4/1 LBW, 9/4 LBW or bowled


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 25, 2010, 12:56:53 PM
We cant be having Bell bat at 6 when he is in such good form, just a waste that he has to bat with the tail and lower order, him and collingwood should swap!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 25, 2010, 11:25:51 PM
big first hour this. No or few wickets and I fear the game is lost, as its going to flatten out a lot from here on


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: DUNK619 on November 25, 2010, 11:37:41 PM
what time does it start?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 25, 2010, 11:41:51 PM
what time does it start?

12am


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 25, 2010, 11:48:48 PM
well a few people out there have said the pitch is gunna be better for bowling on days 2 and 3 so hopefully with the ball still relativly new we can nip a couple out sharpish and get back into it. if they get to lunch 100+ for none then i think were sturggling


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 25, 2010, 11:51:53 PM
well a few people out there have said the pitch is gunna be better for bowling on days 2 and 3 so hopefully with the ball still relativly new we can nip a couple out sharpish and get back into it. if they get to lunch 100+ for none then i think were sturggling

If that happens were fooked. Just had a good sleep, and no early work commitments tomorrow so reckon I will see half of it tonight...........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 26, 2010, 12:20:34 AM
BOWL IT UP FFS!!!!!!!!!!

Do these guys not learn anything?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 26, 2010, 01:05:41 AM
Sigh, flat pitch and we're bowling too short

We're 150+ short on first innings too


Match over by tonight I fear


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 26, 2010, 01:07:25 AM
Sigh, flat pitch and we're bowling too short

We're 150+ short on first innings too


Match over by tonight I fear

Tea is the crucial time, if we are into them big by then we are foooked............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 26, 2010, 01:29:02 AM
Right COME ON!!!!!!!!!

A couple more right now please.........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 26, 2010, 01:29:15 AM
A-ha!

Now this is a big half hour. Need Ponting cheap


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 26, 2010, 01:29:31 AM
Obv leave the sofa for the first time to make a coffee and we get a wicket.

Standard.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 26, 2010, 01:29:59 AM
THATS IT JIMMY

deserved it after last few overs, much more like it, come on, nip another 1 or 2 out before lunch and were still in it


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 26, 2010, 01:30:17 AM
Obv leave the sofa for the first time to make a coffee and we get a wicket.

Standard.

Please do the same 5 times more in the next hour.......... :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 26, 2010, 02:42:02 AM
GTFO Ricky!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Singheee on November 26, 2010, 02:44:09 AM


[/quote]
Obv leave the sofa for the first time to make a coffee and we get a wicket.
 
Standard.
Did u go for anuva cupa :p


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 26, 2010, 02:46:42 AM


Obv leave the sofa for the first time to make a coffee and we get a wicket.
 
Standard.
Did u go for anuva cupa :p
[/quote]

Ha the sick thing is I didn't see it live I was watching the NFL game and hadn't switched back for the afternoon session.

I saw all 10 of England's wickets yesterday!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 26, 2010, 02:55:25 AM
 :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 26, 2010, 02:55:34 AM
GTFI!!!!!!!!!!!

C'MON.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 26, 2010, 02:56:31 AM
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii. Great catch.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 26, 2010, 02:58:30 AM
Thought we'd got him there,sigh.Get another one quickly and where well back in this.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 26, 2010, 03:44:16 AM
I didnt go make coffee

But i did go make tuna and sweetcorn wraps and we took a wicket during that time.

would you guys like me to get even fatter over the course of the next 2 months? i dont mind


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 26, 2010, 04:03:57 AM
Get in there


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 26, 2010, 04:05:14 AM
BAMMMMMMM


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 26, 2010, 04:06:27 AM
North's a poor starter. Need him early.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Singheee on November 26, 2010, 04:08:06 AM
I might be hated for this lol, but had to back hussey to get a 100!!! Hes lookin in decent touch


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 26, 2010, 04:12:32 AM
North's a poor starter. Need him early.

 ;)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 26, 2010, 04:12:52 AM
I might be hated for this lol, but had to back hussey to get a 100!!! Hes lookin in decent touch

Please GTFO >:(

And wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii obv


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 26, 2010, 04:13:47 AM
barmy army barmy army barmy army!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 26, 2010, 04:13:58 AM
swanny pwns left handers!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 26, 2010, 04:14:01 AM
We are back in this, lets get a few more.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on November 26, 2010, 04:15:20 AM
Good fightback this, enjoying it.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 26, 2010, 05:26:22 AM
Get Jimmy back in,things need freshened up here.Haha spk off the devil.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on November 26, 2010, 09:15:13 AM
Katich is a sucker for LBW, next dismissal is 4/1 LBW, 9/4 LBW or bowled

mother fkin replays, grr


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 26, 2010, 11:47:43 PM
Damn could have done with Hussey then..... :'(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 26, 2010, 11:58:24 PM
Run better, Australia.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 27, 2010, 12:01:39 AM
Impressive start, good pressure.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 27, 2010, 12:03:42 AM
so sick how bad were running. on the plus side, bowing has been A+++ so far


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 27, 2010, 12:16:05 AM
Sick bowling, gotta happen soon surely?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 27, 2010, 12:16:58 AM
get 1 we get the lot i think


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: craigbetts on November 27, 2010, 12:20:17 AM
Sooo frustrating, Hussey is putting me on tilt... Anderson must want him to GTFO!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 27, 2010, 12:56:30 AM
FFS,Sky recording not worked due to snow and now whole thing not working :(



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Nakor on November 27, 2010, 01:02:40 AM
FFS,Sky recording not worked due to snow and now whole thing not working :(



You obv online so Sky Player? Unless you are playing a hundred tables of course


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on November 27, 2010, 01:02:58 AM
FFS,Sky recording not worked due to snow and now whole thing not working :(



You dont want to watch the 1st hour anyway If you have eaten anytime recently


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 27, 2010, 01:03:34 AM
FFS,Sky recording not worked due to snow and now whole thing not working :(



You obv online so Sky Player? Unless you are playing a hundred tables of course

Yeah I'm watching it on Sky Player but obv tv would be better.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 27, 2010, 01:20:51 AM
I think this is going to get painful quickly....... :'(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on November 27, 2010, 01:34:43 AM
We never get any wickets until I go to bed :(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on November 27, 2010, 01:37:51 AM
I cant hold out til lunch so I'm off to make a toasted sambo, there'd better be a wicket down by the time i get back.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 27, 2010, 01:39:34 AM
We never get any wickets until I go to bed :(

well **** of then u self c*** lol


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 27, 2010, 01:44:31 AM
So frustrating after bowling so well for the first hour and a half.
Commentators were saying if we restrict the lead to 100 and get 350 then that could be enough all of which is feasible but I wouldn't want to see the lead much bigger than that.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 27, 2010, 02:13:46 AM
No wicket in the first couple of overs and this test is over,if it isn't already :(

Pleased with our bowling attack though and we can bat a lot better so I'm still confident.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 27, 2010, 03:14:06 AM
we can bat alot better, but we haven't batted well for nearly 2 years now, the bowlers have been carrying the team for far to long , time for our batsmen to stand up and be counted.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 27, 2010, 03:22:41 AM
THIS IS SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 27, 2010, 03:38:54 AM
Fk this shit, its too painful to watch, I'm off to bed..............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Tractor on November 27, 2010, 05:19:51 AM
Fk this shit, its too painful to watch, I'm going back to bed..............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 27, 2010, 05:24:37 AM
What just happened, an Australian batsman walked off the pitch on his own. It doesn't appear to be Lunch or Tea.

Anyone enlighten me?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on November 27, 2010, 05:36:21 AM
What just happened, an Australian batsman walked off the pitch on his own. It doesn't appear to be Lunch or Tea.

Anyone enlighten me?

Think he had to go off to be treated for sunburn after being outside for too long.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 27, 2010, 06:08:29 AM
This is even more tilting, just shows what "might" have happened if we had made a breakthrough this morning/yesterday.

I fear this may be done by close tomorrow.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 27, 2010, 06:33:17 AM
come on boys, we can still win


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Singheee on November 27, 2010, 06:34:37 AM
I'm on strauss to get over 24.5 at 4/7 cmon show a captains innings


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Singheee on November 27, 2010, 06:36:16 AM
I'm on strauss to get over 24.5 at 4/7 cmon show a captains innings

bloody hell!!! phewwwww


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 27, 2010, 06:38:08 AM
I thought that was out in real time.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 27, 2010, 07:50:15 AM
gunna be one hell of a slog. new ball was doing stuff like, these 2 gotta see it thru and it gets so much esier to bat. hollllllllldddddddddddddd


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 27, 2010, 08:29:38 AM
that first hour yesterday was sick. Anderson bowled fantastically

Need Swann to come to the party quick for Adelaide.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 27, 2010, 11:17:24 AM
 >:(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on November 27, 2010, 02:16:03 PM
That first hour was so frustrating, we were a whisker from wrapping them up, and instead got nothing! I had to go to bed!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 12:05:05 AM
New day,new hope,Lets gogogogo.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 12:41:01 AM
so far so good. i intend to stay up until the finish tonight to watch the heoric opening partnership of 289. looks like it might be a mitchell johnson 'on' day though.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 01:05:50 AM
anybody else tuned in?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 01:08:27 AM
yep, going about it totaly the correct way imo, being agresiv.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 01:09:05 AM
anybody else tuned in?

Yup,really good start.Pretty sure where going to win this.Lets do this.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Nakor on November 28, 2010, 01:20:16 AM
Ricky lookin grumpy for the first time this series - lots more of that please.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 01:27:24 AM
Pretty surprised Aus are 2/1,I'm not betting against England but that's valuooooooo imo.Draw is 1.67 on Betfair.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 01:35:45 AM
anybody else tuned in?

If it is on you can assume I am watching.

Really good morning so far.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 01:37:28 AM
wuuuuuuueyyyyyyyyyyyy i love mitchell johnson!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 01:39:36 AM
WOW,massive let off,GTFI.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 28, 2010, 01:39:42 AM
well Johnson hasn't dropped the ashes...but he has dropped the 1st test now!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 01:53:48 AM
still a hell of a long way to go and a lot of time left in match, england gotta bat tilt lunch time 2moro minimun to get out of it


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 02:05:05 AM
what a let off! but it definitely took the wind out of our sails against the spinners.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 02:35:05 AM
Meh, just came 15th in the 50rb at DTD so a bit disappointed. This has got me back on the right track :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 02:37:56 AM
Meh, just came 15th in the 50rb at DTD so a bit disappointed. This has got me back on the right track :)

Disappointed ?? You get away from the pokers to watch the Ashes,shippppppppppp!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 02:39:49 AM
Meh, just came 15th in the 50rb at DTD so a bit disappointed. This has got me back on the right track :)

Disappointed ?? You get away from the pokers to watch the Ashes,shippppppppppp!!!

LOL would still prefer £14k tbh :D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 02:40:34 AM
Meh, just came 15th in the 50rb at DTD so a bit disappointed. This has got me back on the right track :)

Disappointed ?? You get away from the pokers to watch the Ashes,shippppppppppp!!!

LOL would still prefer £14k tbh :D

Meh,it's close.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 02:57:40 AM
PHEW!!!!!!!! Take it easy Strauss.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: geordieneil on November 28, 2010, 03:04:05 AM
PHEW!!!!!!!! Take it easy Strauss.

he's defo losing it......pressure massive on him.....but he can handle it :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 03:05:31 AM
PHEW!!!!!!!! Take it easy Strauss.

he's defo losing it......pressure massive on him.....but he can handle it :)

I certainly wouldn't say losing it,Incred knock from Strauss after his first innings putting the pressure right on him to deliver.Keep it going plzzzzzzzz.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 03:09:25 AM
 :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 03:09:38 AM
boooom superb straussy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 03:09:48 AM
GET IN THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WP STRAUSS SICK GOOD.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 03:10:31 AM
Vwp Strauss, captains innings.

Lets make it a big hundred.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: geordieneil on November 28, 2010, 03:10:45 AM
goooooo straussy....great knock...now go get a double century


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 03:11:48 AM
Loving hearing the Barmy Army belting it out,sure not jealous.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 03:14:35 AM
crowd starting to make noise for the first time all match, come on the boys!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 03:24:55 AM
Have we got an outside sniff of winning this? They seem to be scoring fairly quicky, maybe 300 ahead by tomorrow lunch time and stick 'em in for a shot? :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 03:27:09 AM
Have we got an outside sniff of winning this? They seem to be scoring fairly quicky, maybe 300 ahead by tomorrow lunch time and stick 'em in for a shot? :)

19/1 on bf,Aus 5/1 is still massive though.We still got a lot of work to do.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 03:30:08 AM
would never do it, but aussie's 5/1 is very good value imo. if we lose 2 or 3 wickets before tea were still in a bit of trouble


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 03:35:18 AM
The big period as Botham said is the 2nd new ball, hopefully we can get there with these 2 still there.

Don't think England winning is realistic, if we are lucky enough to get that far ahead I can't see Strauss being that adventurous with any decleration. The one scenario I see us winning is that are all out for 470ish and we set Aussies about 250 in about 50 overs and they collapse going for it.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 03:54:50 AM
fuckkkkk


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 03:55:44 AM
Huge moment in the game now,got to add another 50 without loss.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 03:56:35 AM
Damn, just got to keep it going here.

No collapse plz.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 03:58:38 AM
would never do it, but aussie's 5/1 is very good value imo. if we lose 2 or 3 wickets before tea were still in a bit of trouble

this


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 03:59:01 AM
If Strauss doesn't hesitate he probably stays in,surely his instincts should've been instant ? Obv not criticising him just strange that he pauses ?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:02:37 AM
massively crucial 10/15 overs now. get 30 ahead for no more wickets would be huge.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 04:04:04 AM
I'm fooked, bedtime soon for me ;sleep;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 04:04:23 AM
get to tea no more wickets on time!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:07:44 AM
I'm fooked, bedtime soon for me ;sleep;

distinctly un-patriotic


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 04:09:14 AM
I'm fooked, bedtime soon for me ;sleep;

distinctly un-patriotic

I want to stay up trust me!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:10:15 AM
I'm fooked, bedtime soon for me ;sleep;

distinctly un-patriotic

I want to stay up trust me!

Coffee/Red Bull FTW.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 04:11:17 AM
I'm fooked, bedtime soon for me ;sleep;

distinctly un-patriotic

I want to stay up trust me!

Coffee/Red Bull FTW.

Had a bottle of wine now so too late for that...........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:13:33 AM
how long till tea?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:14:40 AM
Can't be bad being Shane Warne,already multaii and getting paid for doing two jobs in the same place,niceeeeeeeeeeeee.

Think teas around 5ish.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 04:14:56 AM
tea is at 4.40am our time


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:16:11 AM
Can't be bad being Shane Warne,already multaii and getting paid for doing two jobs in the same place,niceeeeeeeeeeeee.

Think teas around 5ish.

refreshing to have warne back in the commentary box. he might be my favourite australian.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 04:17:40 AM
anyone see/hear gower getting destroyed by nasser's chair leg?lol


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:18:15 AM
yeh

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob75JKIElbM


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:18:27 AM
Yeah his commentary is good.PMSL when Gower yelped out,gg.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:19:32 AM
Proper com when Bumble was asking Warne if he was connected,haha.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:25:17 AM
what was the comment when they were corpsing about 'throbbing with anticipation'?


how can our opening batsman (cook) be completely unable to play the drive?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 04:27:06 AM
in the lead!!

HOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 04:28:05 AM
We haz a lead.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:28:42 AM
We haz a lead.

i clapped


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:29:55 AM
what was the comment when they were corpsing about 'throbbing with anticipation'?


how can our opening batsman (cook) be completely unable to play the drive?

Not really sure why you'd want to criticise Cook when he's hit +50 in both innings ? I very much doubt he can't either.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:31:25 AM
what was the comment when they were corpsing about 'throbbing with anticipation'?


how can our opening batsman (cook) be completely unable to play the drive?

Not really sure why you'd want to criticise Cook when he's hit +50 in both innings ? I very much doubt he can't either.



i'm not unhappy with him but he simply doesn't have that shot.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:32:54 AM
what was the comment when they were corpsing about 'throbbing with anticipation'?


how can our opening batsman (cook) be completely unable to play the drive?

Not really sure why you'd want to criticise Cook when he's hit +50 in both innings ? I very much doubt he can't either.



i'm not unhappy with him but he simply doesn't have that shot.

The shot he just played there was a peach.Hope he reaches a ton,deserves it.I like Alisdair.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:37:16 AM
Test cricket may be long but it's by far the best form of cricket,absolutely no doubt.Loving this,keep it going boys.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:39:42 AM
Test cricket may be long but it's by far the best form of cricket,absolutely no doubt.Loving this,keep it going boys.

100%, it should be boring buts its utterly engrossing.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:41:56 AM
Test cricket may be long but it's by far the best form of cricket,absolutely no doubt.Loving this,keep it going boys.

100%, it should be boring buts its utterly engrossing.

I keep moving towards the edge of my seat haha,great to watch.If all results are on for tmoro which they hopefully will be it'll be an incred last day.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 04:44:08 AM
Wp boys, hopefully Chef can get his ton.

Game is probably close to even now, the Aussies still stand a better chance to win because of the time restrictions.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:48:22 AM
draw is so so likely, we can't risk hitting out. great result from our position.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:49:20 AM
Just put £20 on us @ 22's :)

Lets gogogogogogo.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:52:05 AM
Just put £20 on us @ 22's :)

Lets gogogogogogo.

i would have laid it for you!!!!   no way they can take ten wickets on this pitch in 2 sessions.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:53:59 AM
Just put £20 on us @ 22's :)

Lets gogogogogogo.

i would have laid it for you!!!!   no way they can take ten wickets on this pitch in 2 sessions.

Jimmy mfkn Anderson can.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on November 28, 2010, 04:54:27 AM
Just put £20 on us @ 22's :)

Lets gogogogogogo.

i would have laid it for you!!!!   no way they can take ten wickets on this pitch in 2 sessions.

Jimmy mfkn Anderson can.

i hope so


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:56:09 AM
Just put £20 on us @ 22's :)

Lets gogogogogogo.

i would have laid it for you!!!!   no way they can take ten wickets on this pitch in 2 sessions.

Jimmy mfkn Anderson can.

i hope so

As long as we don't lose I'll be happy.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 05:11:38 AM
Nice one Cook, very solid innings.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 05:17:58 AM
Great knock,more plz.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 06:02:39 AM
Ponting's getting desperate, that never looked out.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 06:19:02 AM
Gambolllll!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on November 28, 2010, 06:35:18 AM
pwning


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 12:46:06 PM
Ship :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 28, 2010, 12:52:51 PM
England's best hope of a win tonight is to collapse and get bowled out...set them 200 and hope the pitch crumbles

that apart should be a draw!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Singheee on November 28, 2010, 01:03:03 PM
This just shows how weak australia are without a world class spinner! Strauss and cook absoulte class!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 01:05:12 PM
England's best hope of a win tonight is to collapse and get bowled out...set them 200 and hope the pitch crumbles

that apart should be a draw!

You never know what will happen in this game, if Anderson bowls like he did in the first innings he could easily knock out 3 or 4 early, they start getting nervous then and anything can happen........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on November 28, 2010, 01:21:07 PM
Lol at this talk of England winning - if they get bowled out wth a lead of 250 they won't be thinking 'great, we can win this now' - they'll be bricking it.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 01:24:48 PM
Lol at this talk of England winning - if they get bowled out wth a lead of 250 they won't be thinking 'great, we can win this now' - they'll be bricking it.

Of course its LOL realistically, but you never know in this game. A lead of 250 would give us a better chance to win the game anyway, by the time we get there the aussies would have to take big risks to get to it...............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 28, 2010, 02:55:09 PM
No declaration for me, keep them out there all day. The 2nd test starts in a few days, at Adelaide the best wicket in Australia, win the toss there and the Aussies could be in the field for four days in just over a week.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 02:56:24 PM
No declaration for me, keep them out there all day. The 2nd test starts in a few days, at Adelaide the best wicket in Australia, win the toss there and the Aussies could be in the field for four days in just over a week.

Nah gotta have a punt! :D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 28, 2010, 03:09:28 PM
Lol at this talk of England winning - if they get bowled out wth a lead of 250 they won't be thinking 'great, we can win this now' - they'll be bricking it.


Yes but its their best chance of winning, by being put in a position where they have to take wickets


they aren't going to declare otherwise are they? they need to be bowled out to stand a chance of the win, thats my point


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 28, 2010, 03:23:18 PM
I would declare but not in attempt to win the game, it just isn't realistic with the time left in the game especially on this pitch.

If we do get to a point just after Tea where we are 300 ahead, I would put the aussies in for an hour. Just to rough them up a bit and maybe give Swanny some extra overs. It is exactly what the Convicts wouldn't want to do, which is exactly the reason to do it.

Lets just save the game first.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on November 28, 2010, 03:51:31 PM
There will be no declaration - even if the game is saved Strauss would rather players got more batting time rather than tiring out bowlers. After the first innings a draw will feel like a win so it will be advantage England - five draws will suit us fine.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 28, 2010, 04:05:55 PM
There will be no declaration - even if the game is saved Strauss would rather players got more batting time rather than tiring out bowlers. After the first innings a draw will feel like a win so it will be advantage England - five draws will suit us fine.

No they won't, I have zero interest retaining the ashes that way >:(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 04:20:43 PM
There will be no declaration - even if the game is saved Strauss would rather players got more batting time rather than tiring out bowlers. After the first innings a draw will feel like a win so it will be advantage England - five draws will suit us fine.

No they won't, I have zero interest retaining the ashes that way >:(

Totally agree,If where going to win it I don't want it to be by default.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on November 28, 2010, 06:32:21 PM
I think the point is valid though, there's no point in us risking losing to gain a win right now. Also Strauss has never been very adventurous with his declarations so I doubt he'll start now.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 28, 2010, 06:34:40 PM
so it logically follows that our best chance of winning is to collapse this morning then bowl them out!

but I'd take the bat for two sessions and move on, now, lol


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: nirvana on November 28, 2010, 09:04:23 PM
I'm not much of a statto but we can't have had many 25 year old openers for England who've played as many tests with such a solid record. Take a bow.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 09:08:52 PM
I'm feeling pretty tired already,going to be a longgggggggggggg night.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 28, 2010, 11:56:04 PM
 rotflmfao rotflmfao At spot the Aussie.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on November 28, 2010, 11:59:04 PM
Actually got to go out in the morning so giving it a miss tonight. Can't be anything but a draw.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 12:01:49 AM
Actually got to go out in the morning so giving it a miss tonight. Can't be anything but a draw.

I'm guna watch first couple hours and see,be so devd if I went to sleep and we won but not really looking to right off 2 days as I'd have to go all the way through with work at 8.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on November 29, 2010, 12:16:37 AM
what was the comment when they were corpsing about 'throbbing with anticipation'?


how can our opening batsman (cook) be completely unable to play the drive?

Not really sure why you'd want to criticise Cook when he's hit +50 in both innings ? I very much doubt he can't either.



i'm not unhappy with him but he simply doesn't have that shot.

That cover drive seemed tasty enough to me...


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on November 29, 2010, 12:17:26 AM
going to goto bed to listen to tms

it will be called a draw at tea

and i am feeling like crap so hoping

an early night with tms will sort me out


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 12:19:30 AM
what was the comment when they were corpsing about 'throbbing with anticipation'?


how can our opening batsman (cook) be completely unable to play the drive?

Not really sure why you'd want to criticise Cook when he's hit +50 in both innings ? I very much doubt he can't either.



i'm not unhappy with him but he simply doesn't have that shot.

That cover drive seemed tasty enough to me...

I was quite amused when half hour after ACE2M posted this Warne said "Another great cover drive from Cook" :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 12:56:12 AM
LOL


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 12:56:21 AM
ROFL


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 01:05:41 AM
I really don't get why with 9 wickets in hand and a reaonable lead why we can't have a blast at this ?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 01:12:09 AM
I really don't get why with 9 wickets in hand and a reaonable lead why we can't have a blast at this ?

Another 50 and I'd agree with you.......

Safety first n all that.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on November 29, 2010, 01:13:26 AM
I really don't get why with 9 wickets in hand and a reaonable lead why we can't have a blast at this ?

Because we've got back to back tests and we want to grind them into submission in the field.

Oh and we can't win this test but if we tried something silly we could possibly still lose.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 01:13:53 AM
I really don't get why with 9 wickets in hand and a reaonable lead why we can't have a blast at this ?

Another 50 and I'd agree with you.......

Safety first n all that.

Pretty sure where not going to at any point though,hope I'm wrong.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 01:15:55 AM
I really don't get why with 9 wickets in hand and a reaonable lead why we can't have a blast at this ?

Because we've got back to back tests and we want to grind them into submission in the field.

Oh and we can't win this test but if we tried something silly we could possibly still lose.

It wouldn't be impossible to win this,if we smash some runs and make it 280 runs ahead with 50 overs if we got 1 or 2 wickets in the first few overs they'd be bricking it and with them nervous anything could happen.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on November 29, 2010, 01:18:07 AM
Doesn't it make your heart glad, seeing us flay the Aussies?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 01:18:24 AM
The way where batting maybe we are :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 29, 2010, 01:21:57 AM
If we go 1 up in the series then there really is no way back for the aussies, there bowling attack is so weak, siddle bowled the spell of his life on day 1 and i doubt he will even get close to that again.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 29, 2010, 01:28:20 AM
406-1 never seen anything like it


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on November 29, 2010, 01:30:13 AM
So sweet. I'm gonna be fecked in the morning but can't go bed just yet!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 01:30:44 AM
So sweet. I'm gonna be fecked in the morning but can't go bed just yet!

Haha,same here.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on November 29, 2010, 01:31:33 AM
‎5th day of the test must be fancy dress, the Aussies have all come as plastic seats!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 01:33:19 AM
‎5th day of the test must be fancy dress, the Aussies have all come as plastic seats!!


LOL


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on November 29, 2010, 01:39:31 AM
‎5th day of the test must be fancy dress, the Aussies have all come as plastic seats!!

tms


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on November 29, 2010, 01:40:26 AM
Think I'll just watch Cook get his double century & Trott his ton before bed.

;D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on November 29, 2010, 01:42:13 AM
kp must be hating this. doubt he's ever been padded up this long


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 01:52:41 AM
Ship the 200 cooky......


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on November 29, 2010, 01:53:30 AM
 ;tightend;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 01:54:11 AM
;tightend;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 01:57:09 AM
Reckon we should be having a punt now.

[  ] will happen


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 02:00:29 AM
Oi Oi Oi Trotty........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on November 29, 2010, 02:01:03 AM
Bloody well done lads! I'm going to bed with a smile on my face.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 02:01:43 AM
Incred stuff from all three,vvwp.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 02:02:41 AM
Honestly don't think they can lose now. Have a bang after lunch IMO........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on November 29, 2010, 02:03:01 AM
ridic good


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 02:09:27 AM
We've got no reason not to have a go now.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on November 29, 2010, 02:29:10 AM
kp must be hating this. doubt he's ever been padded up this long

He's probably gutted at missing his chance to score 200!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 03:06:39 AM
I don't think we are appreciating this 456/1 score tbh. We may never see this again in our lifetimes......


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: George2Loose on November 29, 2010, 03:14:33 AM
never out


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 03:16:40 AM
I don't think we are appreciating this 456/1 score tbh. We may never see this again in our lifetimes......

It is an amazing score,the performance we put in yesterday was incredible.It was that good am not even shortening it to incred.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 03:18:47 AM
never out

Tough, I wasnt sure tbh....


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 29, 2010, 03:18:58 AM
never out

I think it was, which is even better.

Ponting throwing his toys out of the pram, is one of the greatest sights in sport.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on November 29, 2010, 03:19:12 AM
Tez Aussie performance now I think England should make it exciting and declare go for the win


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: George2Loose on November 29, 2010, 03:19:21 AM
think we're getting carried. Flattest wicket ever with Aussies least threatening attack ever equals current score


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on November 29, 2010, 03:22:35 AM
think we're getting carried. Flattest wicket ever with Aussies least threatening attack ever equals current score
Yeah but if we want to win we need a fee overs as wicket is so flat


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on November 29, 2010, 03:28:37 AM
never out

I think it was, which is even better.

Ponting throwing his toys out of the pram, is one of the greatest sights in sport.

this

looks like they've started to go for it a bit now


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 03:30:17 AM
never out

I think it was, which is even better.

Ponting throwing his toys out of the pram, is one of the greatest sights in sport.

The greatest sight ever in sport was ponting getting the permanent scar on the side of his face from Harmison as a reminder of the 2003 win...... ;D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 03:36:16 AM
The mighty, mighty army!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 29, 2010, 03:38:07 AM
This is so com, complete and utter dominance.

Deffo should stick them in before tea.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 03:40:16 AM
Might cancel my holiday and go watch us win this instead.......


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 03:42:58 AM
Might cancel my holiday and go watch us win this instead.......

If I had the money I'd 100% be there,incred scenes with the barmy army rocking in the gabba.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 03:44:02 AM
Been watching cricket for 30 years, don't think i've ever seen 500/1......lol


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 03:59:36 AM
 :)

Am pissed now but will stay up for anther 30 mins or so.......


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 29, 2010, 04:01:10 AM
Lets shake em up boys.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on November 29, 2010, 04:03:11 AM
I was at Trent Bridge with an Aussie mate in 1989, when Mark Taylor and Geoff Marsh batted through the first day finishing 310-0. This makes up for all the piss taking that day. Plus i'm seeing him tomorrow night. It's payback time.  :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 04:15:44 AM
Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy Anderson...


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on November 29, 2010, 04:34:03 AM
Who knows eh?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on November 29, 2010, 04:34:25 AM
There's one!

Would love to get Ponting cheap, really put the pressure on the captain.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 04:34:39 AM
HOWZATTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CMON :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 04:44:39 AM
We've caused more problems in them three overs there than they did in two days.The fact we've even got one wicket so quickly is obv so deflating for there bowling attack,can't wait for Adelaide.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2010, 11:34:16 AM
2nd Test commencing Friday. Australia 3.65, England 3.6, Draw 2.18.

Very rare to see the draw that short in Aus.

May be worth a punt that England win the toss, bat, and put up a score on the flattest track in Aus......?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 29, 2010, 11:37:37 AM
lol

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pht2ApNG53U


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on November 29, 2010, 12:28:49 PM
Def gonna be a draw in Adelaide without some sort of collapse



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on November 29, 2010, 07:27:33 PM
lol

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pht2ApNG53U

Check about 5 pages back  ;whistle;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Matt50 on November 30, 2010, 02:26:20 PM
Def gonna be a draw in Adelaide without some sort of collapse



Even money though seems very stingey and is surely too low.
Think i will lay it at those odds and hope for something in the pitch.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on November 30, 2010, 02:30:46 PM
Def gonna be a draw in Adelaide without some sort of collapse



Even money though seems very stingey and is surely too low.
Think i will lay it at those odds and hope for something in the pitch.

that's my view. Yes the draw is favourite, but its in the price. Value is elsewhere


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on November 30, 2010, 04:39:48 PM
Def gonna be a draw in Adelaide without some sort of collapse



Even money though seems very stingey and is surely too low.
Think i will lay it at those odds and hope for something in the pitch.

Adelaide Oval groundsman Damian Hough is preparing a pitch that should deliver a positive result in the second Test.
Full story: Adelaide Advertiser (http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/the-ashes/adelaide-curator-to-prepare-a-pitch-he-hopes-will-produce-a-result/story-fn67x4c9-1225962879570)



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 02, 2010, 10:55:30 PM
It's unlikely to happen, but i would like to see Bresnan in for Collingwood. I've been saying for 12 months that i don't think think we can win in Australia with just 4 bowlers. 5 tests in 6 weeks on flat wickets is a hell of a task for a 4 man attack. The Aussies know this hence their approach to Swann in the first test, if he is unable to tie up an end Anderson and Broad are going to be bowled into the ground.

There was some talk of Shazad replacing Finn to exploit his reverse swing, but they have had quite a lot of rain apparantly so if the outfield is lush i can't see it happening.

Lets win the toss and bat for 5+ sessions.

COME ON.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 02, 2010, 11:05:37 PM
LET'S GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOOOOOOO


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 02, 2010, 11:25:53 PM
Come on England!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 02, 2010, 11:28:14 PM
What price Strauss wins the toss?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 02, 2010, 11:32:14 PM
Nooooooooooo but I prefer to watch England bowl


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on December 02, 2010, 11:32:24 PM
What price Strauss wins the toss?

10/11


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on December 02, 2010, 11:34:02 PM
When i worked at Skybet a customer always used to ring up and have like £5,500 on a team to win the toss @ 10/11



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 02, 2010, 11:36:00 PM
is it midnight kickoff?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 02, 2010, 11:36:21 PM
When i worked at Skybet a customer always used to ring up and have like £5,500 on a team to win the toss @ 10/11



Epic lol


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Moskvich on December 02, 2010, 11:39:50 PM
Have managed to reverse my body clock completely, so looking forward to watching/listening to Australia rack up 350-3...


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 02, 2010, 11:49:45 PM
is it midnight kickoff?

yip


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on December 02, 2010, 11:53:57 PM
When i worked at Skybet a customer always used to ring up and have like £5,500 on a team to win the toss @ 10/11



not sure if they still do it but laddies used to go 11/10 one side, always amused me.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 02, 2010, 11:54:33 PM
When i worked at Skybet a customer always used to ring up and have like £5,500 on a team to win the toss @ 10/11



Proper tosser obv.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on December 03, 2010, 12:03:01 AM
Get in there!  Great start


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 12:03:09 AM
GTFIIIIIIIIIIIIII


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 03, 2010, 12:03:13 AM
GET OUT


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 03, 2010, 12:03:28 AM
booooooooooooooooom


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Moskvich on December 03, 2010, 12:03:45 AM
so good...


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 12:03:59 AM
OH HI DER!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: The Baron on December 03, 2010, 12:04:15 AM
GTFO Katich


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 03, 2010, 12:04:16 AM
Run better, Australia.




Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 03, 2010, 12:04:28 AM
wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 12:04:43 AM
wiiiiiiiiiii. awesome start


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: redarmi on December 03, 2010, 12:05:16 AM
When I used to run the trading for a big US sportsbook we used to bet on the Superbowl coin toss and one day in the run up I had to leave early and left my assistant in charge.  The next day when i came in I was looking through the prices and noticed that we were betting 4/6 head and 11/10 tails.  When I queried it the girls said "I took a big bet on heads and thought I had better move the line in case they knew something".....I didn't know where to start explaining why this was wrong and had a bit of a hangover so I said...."move it back...i quite fancy tails so will take a bit more!!!"


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 12:05:33 AM
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Acidmouse on December 03, 2010, 12:05:38 AM
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on December 03, 2010, 12:05:41 AM
LOL OMG!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 03, 2010, 12:05:42 AM
GET OUT RICKY


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 03, 2010, 12:05:46 AM
yyyyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 03, 2010, 12:05:54 AM
bye bye Ricky


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 12:05:58 AM
Is this Real ?

FUKN CMON


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 12:06:05 AM
zomg


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: amcgrath1uk on December 03, 2010, 12:06:13 AM
WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: The Baron on December 03, 2010, 12:06:21 AM
GTFO Ponting!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Dubai on December 03, 2010, 12:06:30 AM
Wow


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Moskvich on December 03, 2010, 12:06:38 AM
Have managed to reverse my body clock completely, so looking forward to watching/listening to Australia rack up 350-3...

good job i'm not a betting man


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 03, 2010, 12:06:46 AM
Good toss to lose?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 03, 2010, 12:06:55 AM
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, get out Ponting.

Incred scenes, the England supporters in the background was amazing.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: craigbetts on December 03, 2010, 12:07:06 AM
yeeehaaaaa laters ponting.. am dancing round my lounge!! unreal


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 12:07:32 AM
OH JIMMY JIMMY,JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY ANDERSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 03, 2010, 12:14:12 AM
WEEEEEEEEE GTFO RICKY!


WEEEEEEEEEEEEE GTFO PUP!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 12:14:21 AM
Is this fucking real?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on December 03, 2010, 12:14:24 AM
This is superb!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 12:14:30 AM
OH JIMMY JIMMY,JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY ANDERSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 03, 2010, 12:14:37 AM
I am dreaming!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 12:14:41 AM
Is this Real ?

doubt it somehow


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 03, 2010, 12:15:00 AM
Is this fucking real?

Please don't let it be a sick Aussie joke.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 03, 2010, 12:15:05 AM
gtfo aussies


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 03, 2010, 12:15:25 AM
Pretty incred dream i am having, might post about it on blonde tomorrow.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: NoflopsHomer on December 03, 2010, 12:15:57 AM
Anyone know any online links where I can watch?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on December 03, 2010, 12:16:36 AM
FFS. trying to finish a challenge on COD, fine to miss the first 15 mins surely i thought!!!!


come on boys.....


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 12:16:57 AM
Is this fucking real?

Please don't let it be a sick Aussie joke.

CGI obv ;D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 12:17:17 AM
Aus 3-3

Will someone  confirm this score isn't just on my TV


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 03, 2010, 12:17:20 AM
Are you watching Blatter?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: NoflopsHomer on December 03, 2010, 12:17:28 AM
lol Richard Herring on twitter: Australia have lost their top run scorer! Sorry, their run scorer!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 12:17:36 AM
gratz to australia for finally taking the lead, now 6-3 up


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Singheee on December 03, 2010, 12:19:21 AM
sorry to be the party pooper but On hussey to make a century again


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 12:20:13 AM
sorry to be the party pooper but On hussey to make a century again

 ;nemesis;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 03, 2010, 12:20:34 AM
Nooooooooooo but I prefer to watch England bowl

Me too, regardless of the pitch i just feel more comfortable watching England bowl, I always fear a batting collapse and every ball has me on edge where as if theyre bowling you can be more relaxed watching imo.

P.s Unbelievable start, Jimmy is the man!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: NoflopsHomer on December 03, 2010, 12:28:06 AM
Found a link yay!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on December 03, 2010, 12:33:08 AM
Epic star!

Katich out not having faced a ball? That can't of happened too many times to a top of the order batsman?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 12:34:11 AM
Norrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Anderson's shit.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 12:35:46 AM
first test top 3 english batsmen score centuries. second test top 3 aussies score zero. gotta love it


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 03, 2010, 12:37:07 AM
When Anderson gets it to swing, he is absolutely lethal.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 03, 2010, 12:37:32 AM
Aussies have steadied the ship at 14/3.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 03, 2010, 12:38:36 AM
When Anderson gets it to swing, he is absolutely lethal.

As Mikey Holden says he's the King of Schwing!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 03, 2010, 12:46:57 AM
Sloe gin poured. Dominos ordered. Mr Cricket's wicket now please


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 12:52:41 AM
PMSL @ Bumble,blokes abs com,legend!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 01:06:58 AM
Sloe gin poured. Dominos ordered. Mr Cricket's wicket now please

U can have domino's this late?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 01:08:48 AM
Sloe gin poured. Dominos ordered. Mr Cricket's wicket now please

U can have domino's this late?

order up to 12.30, 1.30 tomorrow and saturday


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 03, 2010, 01:09:22 AM
5am close in West Bridgford


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 01:10:01 AM
5am close in West Bridgford

Is it? Used to be 11pm.............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 01:10:42 AM
5am close in West Bridgford

really, wow. times I posted must just be my local then. I run bad


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 03, 2010, 01:18:01 AM
Yeh that's 7 days a week too. I'd say it's mad but it's pretty good for an Ashes series down under so can't complain.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 03, 2010, 02:07:02 AM
Would have taken that for sure at the start of the day. Just annoying the pitch seems to be getting better to bet on. Hopefully Jimmy can do something with the ball after Lunch.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 02:51:42 AM
Huge wicket,GTFI


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 02:58:10 AM
kp holding a catch. now I know it's a dream


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 03:37:38 AM
kp holding a catch. now I know it's a dream

LOL,was a good catch too.Time for another I reckon,Swanny ?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 03, 2010, 04:30:09 AM
YESSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 03, 2010, 04:46:52 AM
michael hussey is an absolute class act, such a good temprement. Bowling been very very good so far, pitch really isnt 160-5!! come on boys, nip them out before the end of the day


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Amatay on December 03, 2010, 05:50:49 AM
sorry to be the party pooper but On hussey to make a century again


oiuhutdfhrtrytyhuijk


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 03, 2010, 06:13:21 AM
tht is huge wicket!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Tractor on December 03, 2010, 06:13:57 AM
Yessss, Swanie!! Get in there..

Bye, Hussey.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Tractor on December 03, 2010, 06:18:31 AM
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Swanie on for Hat trick, come on my son.

207-7


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Moskvich on December 03, 2010, 06:23:12 AM
Great time to pick up a couple of wickets, but the referral system is an absolute nonsense a lot of the time. Harris knows 100% that he's hit that, and everyone else knows it as well since otherwise he wouldn't refer it.

In cases like this you actually get a worse decision with the referral system than you do without. Without referrals, the umpire gives it and everyone says 'ah well, might have hit it might have not, but swings and roundabouts etc etc' - with referrals everyone knows the decision is wrong but there's not enough evidence to overturn it. And the team doing the referring lose a referral, even though they were right...


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 03, 2010, 06:28:34 AM
blatent inside edge there, the pakistani team must have had a bet on though so the wicket still stands!!!!BOOOOOOOOOOOM COME ON SWANNAAAAAAY


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on December 03, 2010, 09:17:35 AM
What was Ponting fuming about at the end?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 03, 2010, 11:08:57 AM
Excellent stuff, fell asleep at Lunch first bit of the series I have missed, meh.

Aussies are at least 150 short on this track, bat all day tomorrow and significant portion of the 3rd day plz.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 03, 2010, 12:25:57 PM
usually i would say i wouldnt wanna have to chase to many last on a pitch against australia. im really not concerned, imo we declare over night on zero, bowl them out again 2moro, and knock off the runs on day 3 so we dont have to worry about batting on day 4/5 pitch


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 03, 2010, 01:05:26 PM
Great time to pick up a couple of wickets, but the referral system is an absolute nonsense a lot of the time. Harris knows 100% that he's hit that, and everyone else knows it as well since otherwise he wouldn't refer it.

In cases like this you actually get a worse decision with the referral system than you do without. Without referrals, the umpire gives it and everyone says 'ah well, might have hit it might have not, but swings and roundabouts etc etc' - with referrals everyone knows the decision is wrong but there's not enough evidence to overturn it. And the team doing the referring lose a referral, even though they were right...

I wasn't watching live but If you have 2 referrals and 3 wickets left and the rest are bunnies I think you're going to be referring close to 100% of decisions.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Moskvich on December 03, 2010, 01:07:48 PM
Great time to pick up a couple of wickets, but the referral system is an absolute nonsense a lot of the time. Harris knows 100% that he's hit that, and everyone else knows it as well since otherwise he wouldn't refer it.

In cases like this you actually get a worse decision with the referral system than you do without. Without referrals, the umpire gives it and everyone says 'ah well, might have hit it might have not, but swings and roundabouts etc etc' - with referrals everyone knows the decision is wrong but there's not enough evidence to overturn it. And the team doing the referring lose a referral, even though they were right...

I wasn't watching live but If you have 2 referrals and 3 wickets left and the rest are bunnies I think you're going to be referring close to 100% of decisions.

Yeah, I take your point, but it was obvious that he was referring it because he knew he wasn't out, rather than on the off chance.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 01:18:08 PM
really struggling with the crossword today, 10 down: Australian start to an innings (2,4,3)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 03, 2010, 01:39:08 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on December 03, 2010, 02:22:43 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen

Does the coaches' challenge system in NFL get used in the same, tactical way?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 02:25:48 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen

I think it works pretty well tbh, I don't see a problem with tactical use.

That was an interesting one with Harris last night though, I think its likely he did feather the ball but the conclusive evidence was not there to overturn the decision.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 03, 2010, 02:26:52 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen

Does the coaches' challenge system in NFL get used in the same, tactical way?

Yeah sort of,but  it works differently as the coaches have headsets to their staff upstairs who are watching replays of the incident to advise them whether to challenge


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: The Camel on December 03, 2010, 02:28:37 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen

Does the coaches' challenge system in NFL get used in the same, tactical way?

They would not challenge a call that is clearly wrong if it meant reversing a 3 yard gain.

Yet a 5% chance of overturning a touchdown to the opposition would almost always be challenged.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 03, 2010, 02:44:38 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen

I think it works pretty well tbh, I don't see a problem with tactical use.

That was an interesting one with Harris last night though, I think its likely he did feather the ball but the conclusive evidence was not there to overturn the decision.

There was definitely enough evidence there to overturn that decision imo, hotspot showed there was a nick there albeit faint, you could also see the ball deviate in real time with your own eyes and obviously Harris was convinced he hit it with his immediate call for the review. A bit disappointed  with all the technology that a guy who hits the ball Is still gave out lbw. I would have been steaming if it was the other way round.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 03, 2010, 02:45:15 PM
Can they use hotspot for the referrals?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 02:47:38 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen

I think it works pretty well tbh, I don't see a problem with tactical use.

That was an interesting one with Harris last night though, I think its likely he did feather the ball but the conclusive evidence was not there to overturn the decision.

There was definitely enough evidence there to overturn that decision imo, hotspot showed there was a nick there albeit faint, you could also see the ball deviate in real time with your own eyes and obviously Harris was convinced he hit it with his immediate call for the review. A bit disappointed  with all the technology that a guy who hits the ball Is still gave out lbw. I would have been steaming if it was the other way round.

I'm not convinced of that tbh, if you think about how clearly the nicks normally show up it was hard to overturn it, bearing in mind it was barely visible.........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 03, 2010, 02:52:47 PM
Hotspot is used yes, Snicko is not


there was one in Brisbane, no evidence on hotspot, snicko was clear


The whole thing is still a bit unsatisfactory to my mind, but its early days...


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 03:01:23 PM
Hotspot is used yes, Snicko is not


there was one in Brisbane, no evidence on hotspot, snicko was clear


The whole thing is still a bit unsatisfactory to my mind, but its early days...

I don't get not using snicko tbh, that probably would have been conclusive............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 03, 2010, 03:05:08 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen

I think it works pretty well tbh, I don't see a problem with tactical use.

That was an interesting one with Harris last night though, I think its likely he did feather the ball but the conclusive evidence was not there to overturn the decision.

There was definitely enough evidence there to overturn that decision imo, hotspot showed there was a nick there albeit faint, you could also see the ball deviate in real time with your own eyes and obviously Harris was convinced he hit it with his immediate call for the review. A bit disappointed  with all the technology that a guy who hits the ball Is still gave out lbw. I would have been steaming if it was the other way round.

I'm not convinced of that tbh, if you think about how clearly the nicks normally show up it was hard to overturn it, bearing in mind it was barely visible.........


lol barely visible is still visible isnt it

I heard the comms say last night that Snicko takes too long to use thats why it aint being used.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 03, 2010, 03:05:48 PM
snicko can't be set up in time. takes 6 minutes or something like that at the moment to analyse a particular delivery


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 03:08:53 PM
the referral system is not being used in the way it was designed....its being used far more as a game of tactics ("they're 12-3 and if we can get another one now we're in great shape, even if its only 10% to be overturned") than a game of "that's obviously wrong, we must overturn it"

I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it is a poorly thought out systen

I think it works pretty well tbh, I don't see a problem with tactical use.

That was an interesting one with Harris last night though, I think its likely he did feather the ball but the conclusive evidence was not there to overturn the decision.

There was definitely enough evidence there to overturn that decision imo, hotspot showed there was a nick there albeit faint, you could also see the ball deviate in real time with your own eyes and obviously Harris was convinced he hit it with his immediate call for the review. A bit disappointed  with all the technology that a guy who hits the ball Is still gave out lbw. I would have been steaming if it was the other way round.

I'm not convinced of that tbh, if you think about how clearly the nicks normally show up it was hard to overturn it, bearing in mind it was barely visible.........


lol barely visible is still visible isnt it

I heard the comms say last night that Snicko takes too long to use thats why it aint being used.

Its was probable and not conclusive though, even sky had to trawl through the replay a number of times afterwards to spot it, I didn't see it till they pointed it out either. I doubt the umpire even saw it first time round let alone be able to give it.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 03, 2010, 03:14:28 PM
I'm gonna declare Woodsey, will you take a draw?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 03:15:51 PM
I'm gonna declare Woodsey, will you take a draw?

But I wanna win :D

Whatever you get the general point  :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 03, 2010, 03:16:37 PM
Snicko would be used in the UK but the host broadcaster chooses what to use.
Aussies chose hotspot and whatever the southern hemisphere version of hawk eye is.

The point of the refferal is to overturn the obvious bad decisions and leave it in the hands of the umpires. If it was barely visable on hotspot it shows why the umpire didn't give it so it wasn't an obviously wrong decision.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 03, 2010, 03:18:28 PM
snicko can't be set up in time. takes 6 minutes or something like that at the moment to analyse a particular delivery

Really? Ii thought we used snicko here, or is it always several mins after they show it? :dontask:


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 03, 2010, 03:21:52 PM
I thought Snicko was bollocks because the sound graph and image had to be lined up by hand so the operator basically chooses whether there is an edge or not.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on December 03, 2010, 04:12:47 PM
apparently they can get away with hotspot decisions that are very faint if they have stickers on their bats where the ball hits as they don't show up like hitting the wood does. I suppose this decision is the reverse of that so it evens out?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 03, 2010, 06:30:20 PM
The referal system itself hasnt failed here, as the referal system is in place to take out the absolute stinking decision's. In real time, (and slowmotion for that matter) this is far from a stinker. One thing i hate about the referal system is that it can be used to really knock a team's confidence, ie james anderson being given a wicket, the whole team celebrating, it gets refferd, and the whole team is on a low, i dont think this is right.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 12:02:05 AM
WTF ??


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on December 04, 2010, 12:02:21 AM
i was about to take the piss out of bollingers face paint. twat


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 04, 2010, 12:03:39 AM
WTF ??

Hawkeye said it was going over...


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 12:09:41 AM
WTF ??

Hawkeye said it was going over...

LOL,Pretty terrible leave from Strauss,huge sigh!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: cia260895 on December 04, 2010, 12:16:22 AM
The new ball is a mare on this wicket

pukka looking ground btw


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Robert HM on December 04, 2010, 12:29:09 AM
Confusion sets in as I watch the feed on laptop and Primeval on BBC1. On the TV was guy with a white painted face and it's a horror story, on the laptop........ hmm let;s see.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 04, 2010, 12:33:05 AM
lol @ hussey getting nutmegged


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 12:36:46 AM
lol @ hussey getting nutmegged

Haha,we are riding our luck here,lets hope it continues.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 03:50:36 AM
Phew,reviews are great :)

 Keep it going Cook and Trott,great stuff already wpwp.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 04, 2010, 04:16:21 AM
looking forward to k.p coming in, if he keeps his head, theres no reason he cant make a big score


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 04:41:40 AM
Another session in the bag,hopefully KP steps up with a decent knock and Cook makes another ton,didn't someone say they'd backed him to be top Eng scorer for series ? MBN if so.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 05:25:43 AM
SICK GOOD FROM COOK  ;kneelsucker;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 04, 2010, 05:27:11 AM
just in incredible nick right now


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Amatay on December 04, 2010, 05:28:34 AM
on the commentry they said it might piss down day 4 n 5 without a ball being played?? mega sighhh if that happens


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 05:33:14 AM
on the commentry they said it might piss down day 4 n 5 without a ball being played?? mega sighhh if that happens

Yeah heard that,just Botham saying it.The actual forecast is possible showers.Hopefully not,be pretty sick if it is a washout.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 04, 2010, 06:09:43 AM
england should have a 300+ lead this time tomorrow no need to worry about batting on the poor wicket on fifth day if they can keep this up


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 04, 2010, 06:14:46 AM
Looking really good.

Pietersen is looking good and this is kind of circumstances where he can take an attack to the cleaners.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 06:17:36 AM
Looking really good.

Pietersen is looking good and this is kind of circumstances where he can take an attack to the cleaners.



Nevermind the cricket,how the hell did you get that score on Brick in the Wall ???


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 04, 2010, 06:29:38 AM
Australian bowling attack is just comical


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 04, 2010, 07:31:36 AM
Great day today,VWP England.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 04, 2010, 07:33:19 AM
reckon we should play 6 bowlers for the 3rd test. doesn't matter how long your tail is if you never reach it

great stuff yet again


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 04, 2010, 07:53:26 AM
Been waiting decades to see the Aussies in disarray like this. Hope the weather allows us to win it here

Cook has just got sensational temperament. Second only to Tendulkar for number of test centuries at the age of 25 (granted thats a modern day stat due the the greater number of tests played) and near the end went past Wally Hammond's English record of 370 runs without being dismissed

He's now batted over 1000 minutes without being dismissed and has been on the field for all the series bar 11 overs.





Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 04, 2010, 07:56:33 AM
he's an hour short of 3 full days since he was last out. ridid good


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: cia260895 on December 05, 2010, 12:05:09 AM
anyone know what the lump on pontings back is?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on December 05, 2010, 12:12:41 AM
anyone know what the lump on pontings back is?

I think the chip on his shoulder slipped.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: cia260895 on December 05, 2010, 12:14:54 AM
anyone know what the lump on pontings back is?

I think the chip on his shoulder slipped.

lol


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 05, 2010, 12:17:28 AM
Dreadful waste of their last review there, they've shot it mentally imo.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: cia260895 on December 05, 2010, 12:19:29 AM
Dreadful waste of their last review there, they've shot it mentally imo.

desperate times call for desperate measures

 lol loving it


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on December 05, 2010, 12:19:52 AM
Dreadful waste of their last review there, they've shot it mentally imo.

Ricky prob thought it was worth a gamble once the runs were signaled as leg-byes - from his viewpoint he wouldn't have seen it hit the batsman about a foot outside the line.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 12:27:37 AM
WD KP, he is such a glory boy though isn't he? :D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 05, 2010, 12:29:54 AM
well chuffed for kp. having him on form could make the difference this series


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 12:38:00 AM
 ;applause; Cookie  :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 05, 2010, 12:44:12 AM
"The fizz has gone out of Bollinger"


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 05, 2010, 01:00:37 AM
well chuffed for kp. having him on form could make the difference this series

100% this.Although tbf we crush them in every department.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 05, 2010, 01:01:58 AM
Even if Cook has seven ducks in the next seven innings this series, he averages 50 for the series


Now that is a stat!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 05, 2010, 01:05:38 AM
Low Aussie crowd again. I hope we've put them off cricket for life.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on December 05, 2010, 01:45:23 AM
at my brother in laws, he hasn't got sky  ;grr;. lets move on, link please.....


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 05, 2010, 01:51:22 AM
http://www.everythingon.tv/channel/view/sky-sports-1-1


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on December 05, 2010, 02:00:25 AM
http://www.everythingon.tv/channel/view/sky-sports-1-1

ta


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 05, 2010, 02:01:19 AM
what a great session again 132/1


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ACE2M on December 05, 2010, 02:08:31 AM
ha ha. pieterson is such a show pony.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 05, 2010, 02:11:39 AM
Pieterson has got his eye on something really big here, he's looking very focussed.

Nathan Hauritz is no world beater, but to pick this clown in front of him is unbelievable.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 05, 2010, 02:17:57 AM
Yeh North looks the better spinner for Australia.
Doherty has only played 37 games in 9 year. Don't know how he's playing for Australia.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 03:36:15 AM
When we declaring? Bearing in mind possible weather, 300 ahead and have a punt right? Hope they don't get too conservative..............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 05, 2010, 03:54:40 AM
350 for me. should give us about an hour to bowl at them tonight


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 05, 2010, 03:55:26 AM
declare sometime after tea give us 10-15 overs tonight


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 03:56:15 AM
350 for me. should give us about an hour to bowl at them tonight

They were suggesting 400 on Sky, that's too high for me, we can always bat again...............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 05, 2010, 03:57:29 AM
but they might give wait till peterson gets out after run of form they might want to give him chance of trebel
but i would assume they tell him to treat the last session as a T20 innings


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 05, 2010, 03:58:26 AM
400 lead 45 mins before the close i reckon.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 03:59:04 AM
but they might give wait till peterson gets out after run of form they might want to give him chance of trebel
but i would assume they tell him to treat the last session as a T20 innings

200 then swing for it imo..........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 05, 2010, 04:00:46 AM
no point leaving it too late imo, we can always bat again 4th innings!!! give them 20 overs tonight after the batsmen been in the feild for 2 days

5 of the top 6 in redic form

and coly looked nice for his brief innings


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 04:00:58 AM
400 lead 45 mins before the close i reckon.

I foooking hope not, too conservative............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 04:01:20 AM
no point leaving it too late imo, we can always bat again 4th innings!!! give them 20 overs tonight after the batsmen been in the feild for 2 days

5 of the top 6 in redic form

and coly looked nice for his brief innings

This............


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 05, 2010, 04:02:38 AM
yeah, 400 def too conservative. 300 is probs enough but the problem I have with it is we should be there by tea, it's still a good batting surface and the last thing we want is to declare too soon and watch their openers bat a whole session

350, throw fresh bowlers at them for an hour and then let swan bowl at them on a day 4 pitch


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 04:21:29 AM
yeah, 400 def too conservative. 300 is probs enough but the problem I have with it is we should be there by tea, it's still a good batting surface and the last thing we want is to declare too soon and watch their openers bat a whole session

350, throw fresh bowlers at them for an hour and then let swan bowl at them on a day 4 pitch

Yup, I'm rat arsed now anyway.......... :D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 04:22:27 AM
Good lad KP, peacock it up I don't mind.......... ;D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 05:02:14 AM
Rain  >:(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 05, 2010, 05:04:00 AM
norrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 05, 2010, 10:37:04 AM
delighted with my decision to go to bed at tea

what do we do now? I'd like to see us just declare overnight, we can't lose the test from here. got a feeling we're gonna bat for 1/2 hour though


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 05, 2010, 10:44:37 AM
delighted with my decision to go to bed at tea

what do we do now? I'd like to see us just declare overnight, we can't lose the test from here. got a feeling we're gonna bat for 1/2 hour though

I reckon it might depends what the conditions are like, but readless I would declare now and get straight into them. Hopefully Jimmy might get the ball to swing early in the morning.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 05, 2010, 11:24:33 AM
Having lost a session and with the forecast unsettled you have to declare now, on the assumption more time will be lost. Could be ok bowling conditions too, and North was spinning it square yesterday.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 05, 2010, 03:08:20 PM
I'd bat for a ball and then declare just to piss Ponting off.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 05, 2010, 03:58:01 PM
I'd bat for a ball and then declare just to piss Ponting off.

Pretty sure I would be pissed off than Ricky if this happened.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 05, 2010, 04:10:24 PM
Great plan bongo. We lose a couple of overs for the change of innings, then it rains a bit and the match finishes with us 1 run short. That's why you weren't captain in leeds


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 05, 2010, 11:29:42 PM
Meh no decleration yet, have just looked at the forecast for tomorrow and it looks horrid.

Think we should gamble a bit here (not that it is that much of a gamble).



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 05, 2010, 11:30:48 PM
Odd. They know that there might be little play tomorrow, they might need to bowl them out today, so why bat on?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 05, 2010, 11:32:09 PM
There's no gamble. Game is not losable from here. Anything but an overnight declaration would be terribad


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 05, 2010, 11:38:14 PM
Odd. They know that there might be little play tomorrow, they might need to bowl them out today, so why bat on?

Duuno I think they should declare, as they are in they should swing away for 30 mins max


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 05, 2010, 11:44:20 PM
i quite fany a geet sized burder now like


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 05, 2010, 11:46:43 PM
Sigh at not declaring,ridic decision imo.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 05, 2010, 11:57:04 PM
This all seems very pointless.

Given the fact that there is a horrid forecast, Australia are very unlikely to get that far ahead given that if they bat well. If there is zero rain and they set us say 150 (that is about the max) against this attack on this pitch we would massive faves to chase that easy.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on December 05, 2010, 11:59:18 PM
Be nice to get to 600 though now, it's a psychological barrier maybe.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 05, 2010, 11:59:34 PM
declare, please

Doherty turned one square to get KP, Swann can win this for us


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 06, 2010, 12:01:03 AM
Gift Doherty 3 wickets to keep him in for the next test.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: pleno1 on December 06, 2010, 12:07:17 AM
go for sixes till we are out.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 06, 2010, 12:11:26 AM
WHY ??


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 06, 2010, 12:12:01 AM
Finally,lets do this!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 06, 2010, 12:13:56 AM
Gift Doherty 3 wickets to keep him in for the next test.

27-3-158-1

Not sure that plan quite worked. I will be truly amazed if they pick him for the 3rd test.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 06, 2010, 12:15:16 AM
bring back mitchell johnson


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 06, 2010, 12:15:40 AM
Gift Doherty 3 wickets to keep him in for the next test.

27-3-158-1

Not sure that plan quite worked. I will be truly amazed if they pick him for the 3rd test.



No chance of him playing again, he should never have played in this match.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 06, 2010, 12:26:50 AM
Well Doherty has done his job, he was picked to get Pietersen out!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: pleno1 on December 06, 2010, 12:31:21 AM
WHY ??

Fun innit


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 06, 2010, 12:42:52 AM

Winning is more fun.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: pleno1 on December 06, 2010, 12:52:26 AM

FYP :P


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: maryhadalamb on December 06, 2010, 03:00:39 AM
Which commentators do you loathe most? Nasser and Botham are especially irritaing imo.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 06, 2010, 03:05:25 AM
Which commentators do you loathe most? Nasser and Botham are especially irritaing imo.

I think Nasser is actually the most informative of them tbh. Botham is not that great but is there for 'legend' value, and taking the piss out of Nasser of course......... :D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on December 06, 2010, 04:09:07 AM
Bumble and Warne the best 2 imo.

Come on England! Although a bit of a shame for my fantasy team that Watson is out.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 06, 2010, 07:31:40 AM
boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom tht is huge!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 06, 2010, 10:55:31 AM
Just watched the highlights and the Swann interview.

Can just imagine KP running in the changing room shouting "I'M AN ALL-ROUNDER"


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 06, 2010, 07:56:14 PM
Does it start 30mins early again tonight?

Is there any news on Broad? If he's injured could we see KP bowl a bit more today?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 06, 2010, 09:45:31 PM
Does it start 30mins early again tonight?

Is there any news on Broad? If he's injured could we see KP bowl a bit more today?

11:30 start.

No real news on Broad, doubtful is the word I have heard used.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 06, 2010, 09:48:16 PM
Does it start 30mins early again tonight?

Is there any news on Broad? If he's injured could we see KP bowl a bit more today?

11:30 start.

No real news on Broad, doubtful is the word I have heard used.



Anyone got any idea how much time we are likely to lose to rain today?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 06, 2010, 09:51:41 PM
Does it start 30mins early again tonight?

Is there any news on Broad? If he's injured could we see KP bowl a bit more today?

11:30 start.

No real news on Broad, doubtful is the word I have heard used.



Anyone got any idea how much time we are likely to lose to rain today?

It will rain but the forecast is getting better. Michael Holding is on Sky sports now saying that the forecast is for it not till rain till after tea.

England are 1.68 on betfair, which is shorter than when the innings started.

Should be a very interesting days cricket.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: The Camel on December 06, 2010, 09:55:45 PM
Does it start 30mins early again tonight?

Is there any news on Broad? If he's injured could we see KP bowl a bit more today?

11:30 start.

No real news on Broad, doubtful is the word I have heard used.



Anyone got any idea how much time we are likely to lose to rain today?

Just spoken to a guy who bets heavily on cricket and his latest info is that 50 overs are expected to be bowled today.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 06, 2010, 09:58:17 PM
Does it start 30mins early again tonight?

Is there any news on Broad? If he's injured could we see KP bowl a bit more today?

11:30 start.

No real news on Broad, doubtful is the word I have heard used.



Anyone got any idea how much time we are likely to lose to rain today?

Just spoken to a guy who bets heavily on cricket and his latest info is that 50 overs are expected to be bowled today.

That sounds like very few, is he lumping on the draw?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 06, 2010, 10:07:35 PM
Vaughan has said on twitter it looks similar yesterday.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 06, 2010, 10:37:34 PM
Broad has a torn stomach muscle, I gather


We need two wickets in the first session. Get that and we're in business, long tail and worsening pitch


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: thetank on December 06, 2010, 10:39:00 PM
50 overs should be plenty. Aussies going down.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on December 06, 2010, 10:39:33 PM
Today in Adelaide
Rain Amount    40-80mm

Tomorow in Adelaide

Rain Amount 1-5mm

which carries on until Friday when it gets less than 1mm

lol, good timing.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 06, 2010, 11:12:47 PM
Broad will fly home apparently - out of the series.
Will 2 bowlers need to come in?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 06, 2010, 11:16:06 PM
Tremlett for perth, monty for sydney. A big blow to the balance of the side though


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 06, 2010, 11:17:45 PM
Broad will fly home apparently - out of the series.
Will 2 bowlers need to come in?

I doubt anyone will come in. We have Bresnan, Shazad and Tremlett in the squad. Plus if we win today i can't see us playing 5 bowlers in the remaining tests.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 06, 2010, 11:22:24 PM
Although I think Broads very good I think he's been the weakest of the bowling attack so it's not a major setback.Still disappointing though.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 06, 2010, 11:24:39 PM
That's what I meant - would be need to go to 5 bowlers to make up for the loss. Decent batsman too. I'd probably get Bresnan in for him.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 06, 2010, 11:28:50 PM
This will be all over by lunch imo. Come on England.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on December 06, 2010, 11:30:04 PM
Swanny will clean them up no bother.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 06, 2010, 11:42:42 PM
SIGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 06, 2010, 11:53:24 PM
BBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CMONNNNNNNNNN,HUGE WICKET


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 06, 2010, 11:53:36 PM
huuuuuuuuge wicket


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: pleno1 on December 06, 2010, 11:56:36 PM
lol fans behind are incred


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 12:19:27 AM
 ;yippee; ;yippee; ;yippee;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sovietsong on December 07, 2010, 12:20:04 AM
do england get another go at batting when aus have been bowled out?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 07, 2010, 12:20:58 AM
this is clever. keeping north in so he gets picked again



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 07, 2010, 12:22:36 AM
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.

Oh Jimmy Jimmmy.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2010, 12:22:42 AM
WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 12:23:21 AM
OH JIMMY JIMMY..................

SHIPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On a hatrick lets do this


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 07, 2010, 12:23:51 AM
cheerio, cheerio, cheerio


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on December 07, 2010, 12:24:40 AM
shipppppppppppppppppppppppp

epic stuff


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 12:24:47 AM
Plz don't rain.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 07, 2010, 12:25:03 AM
Comedy leave from Harris. lol.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 07, 2010, 12:25:24 AM
Looking like an early night for a change :)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 07, 2010, 12:26:00 AM
This one's out imo.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2010, 12:27:00 AM
SWANN SWANN WILL TEAR YOU APART AGAIN


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 12:27:07 AM
GTFI


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: pleno1 on December 07, 2010, 12:27:30 AM
lol they are tez


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 07, 2010, 12:27:31 AM
This is brilliant.

I love cricket.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 07, 2010, 12:28:20 AM
What was the umpire thinking there btw?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on December 07, 2010, 12:28:40 AM
Hahahahahahahah this is brilliant, will be over before the niffle


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 07, 2010, 12:28:49 AM
do england get another go at batting when aus have been bowled out?

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say no

so pleased with this. though I was going to have to 2 table the ashes and MNF. can probs have the nfl on fullscreen now


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on December 07, 2010, 12:28:57 AM
Have had to get out of bed, turn the radio off and the TV back on.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 07, 2010, 12:28:57 AM
What was the umpire thinking there btw?

Think he thought North hit it first.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 12:29:25 AM
What was the umpire thinking there btw?

Reviews FTW


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 07, 2010, 12:30:04 AM
They could be all out before Anderson get's a go at his hat-trick.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2010, 12:30:17 AM
Jimmy's got to be happy with his hatrick chance now


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on December 07, 2010, 12:30:26 AM
doesnt get much more middle middle than that

gtfo aussies!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 12:31:10 AM
EH?????? How have the bails not fell


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2010, 12:31:11 AM
Aussies run good


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 07, 2010, 12:36:45 AM
Stat of the day

In two test matches, no player batting number 8 has made a run

Over 1,300 runs have been scored in that time


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 07, 2010, 12:41:28 AM
Stat of the day

In two test matches, no player batting number 8 has made a run

Over 1,300 runs have been scored in that time

give them a chance. the 2 no. 8s only faced 2 balls between them in this test


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 12:42:16 AM
SWANNYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: KarmaDope on December 07, 2010, 12:42:18 AM
One more. Hurry up Swanny, I need sleep.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 07, 2010, 12:42:22 AM
Start the car.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 07, 2010, 12:46:30 AM
a good sweepstake would be...how many Australia changes for Perth?


4? Katich, North, Doherty, Bollinger

more?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 07, 2010, 12:50:01 AM
Sounds about right Tighty

Replacements: Hauritz, Hilfenhaus, Ferguson and Hughes?????


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: KarmaDope on December 07, 2010, 12:50:01 AM
Katich out now...

For the series, that is.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 07, 2010, 12:50:25 AM
a good sweepstake would be...how many Australia changes for Perth?


4? Katich, North, Doherty, Bollinger

more?

I'm not sure Harris is fit, thought it was strange he didn't bowl yesterday.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 07, 2010, 12:51:42 AM
Katich out for the rest of the Series.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2010, 12:53:41 AM
Steve Smith a possibility? Can bat a bit.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 07, 2010, 12:54:28 AM
Sounds about right Tighty

Replacements: Hauritz, Hilfenhaus, Ferguson and Hughes?????


Something like that

Hughes
Watson
Punter
Clarke
Hussey
Ferguson
Haddin
Hauritz
Siddle
Hilfenhaus
Some other seamer

We can lag it up with Tremlett for bounce and wickets or tag it up for the batting of Bresnan


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 07, 2010, 12:55:46 AM
Johnson will be back.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2010, 12:57:58 AM
Winner


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: KarmaDope on December 07, 2010, 12:58:02 AM
WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: amcgrath1uk on December 07, 2010, 12:58:28 AM
WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 07, 2010, 12:58:40 AM
Awesome.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on December 07, 2010, 12:58:41 AM
Losing by an innings and 71 after winning the toss and batting in Adelaide - wp Ricky and Co.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 07, 2010, 12:58:55 AM
Go screw yourselves Australia, looking forward to 20 years of dominating your superior smug cricketing backsides


Next!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on December 07, 2010, 12:59:15 AM
Boom!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 12:59:28 AM
SHIP THE INNNINGS WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GET IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

INCRED STUFF BY ENGLAND,WP ALL


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 07, 2010, 01:01:12 AM
(http://smileys.on-my-web.com/repository/Leisures_and_Sports/cup-038.gif) (http://www.mysmiley.net/imgs/smile/party/party0036.gif)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 07, 2010, 01:02:07 AM
Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, leading a test series in Australia doesn't even seem real.

Go screw yourselves Australia, looking forward to 20 years of dominating your superior smug cricketing backsides
 

Think Tighty says it best, lol.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on December 07, 2010, 01:08:12 AM
Go screw yourselves Australia, looking forward to 20 years of dominating your superior smug cricketing backsides

Next!

So much latent torment just erupted there.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: craigbetts on December 07, 2010, 01:10:13 AM
A little credit must go to Strauss and Flower for deciding to bat on yesterday morning. In hindsight having the new ball this morning was very shrewd!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 07, 2010, 01:16:46 AM
GTFO Ricky,they sure have any bowlers anywhere near as good as Jimmy Anderson.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 07, 2010, 01:25:15 AM
Worst possible start to the day for me as the power went off after the 3rd over.  ;madasahatstand;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 07, 2010, 08:05:17 AM
Hammered it down too apparently. Wouldn't have been any play after lunch.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 07, 2010, 09:25:33 AM
 :)

http://www.sport24.co.za/Cricket/Ashes/Chappell-Botham-clash-at-Test-20101207


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on December 07, 2010, 09:52:50 AM
Have you seen the rain that fell after lunch? Makes the win sweeter !


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 07, 2010, 10:05:59 AM
(http://i484.photobucket.com/albums/rr210/jarv_1/rain_1779519i.jpg)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 07, 2010, 06:05:55 PM
Article of the day in the Sydney Morning Herald

No matter how low you might be, read the Aussie press the day after they lose


lololol


As the clouds of despair engulfed Australian cricket at a far greater rate than the storm clouds that were supposed to provide ill-deserved salvation, the inclination was to declare all hope lost. However, I remain confident Australia can win the series.

Yes, the opposing batsmen will plunder an attack that penetrates about as deeply as a picnic fork pressed on a chargrilled T-bone and the Australian top order urgently requires an alarm clock that rouses them before midday. Yet, with eight or nine changes, some favourable umpiring, the aid of seasonal monsoons and the possibility the series will be cancelled altogether because it clashes with the Indian Premier League, Australia remains capable of retaining its place in the top dozen or so Test playing nations after April's proposed tour of Bangladesh.

You thought I was referring to the current series against England? Are you 'avin' a laugh?
Advertisement: Story continues below

On the evidence presented, Australia has a snowball's hope at the 2022 World Cup of regaining the Ashes. Indeed, the idea of Ricky Ponting and his demoralised battlers halting the English juggernaut is like putting a toothpick on the tracks in the hope of derailing a speeding bullet train.

The final two days at Adelaide, we were assured, was when we would find out what this Australian team was made of. The results are not yet back from the lab, but it seems to be some sort of gooey, soft-centred material that melts rapidly when heat is applied, is easily removed from flat surfaces, does not bounce or spin and which stinks to high heaven.

The taste? Ask Alastair Cook, Kevin Pietersen or one of the other Englishmen who have dined out on the Australians for the past eight days of Test cricket.

Australia, of course, should not be disappointed by their dismal performance in Adelaide against an abundantly talented English line-up. They should be chastened, humiliated and utterly sick to the stomach.

Not merely because their ineptitude means the closest they will get to holding the Ashes is on a sightseeing tour at Lord's, but because they allowed the Barmy Army to complete the most chilling invasion of Australian soil since Japanese bombs rained down on Darwin. Listening to the endless choruses of Jerusalem and God Save Your Queen, you would have thought Adelaide was a small city in Shropshire, not the local home of mullets, serial killers and Christopher Pyne.

Which is not to say the Australians achieved nothing at the Adelaide Oval.

Xavier Doherty managed something that was, just two weeks ago, on the ''you must be daft'' side of implausible - he forced a nation to turn its lonely eyes (back) to Nathan Hauritz. Which is a bit like a chainsaw killer making you fondly reminisce about the home intruder who merely beat you on the head with a tyre lever rather than dicing up your spleen.

Marcus North, in his last match for Australia, provided a reminder of his significant place in the game's history - he was, according to Cricinfo's archive, the only Test player whose surname is also a point on the compass. North failed at the crease. But, without him, Australia might have lost all sense of direction.

In the second innings, Michael Clarke showed his backbone to someone other than the team physiotherapist. Yet he remains the most baffling figure. While you could easily forgive Clarke's decision not to walk on the (hastily tweeted) grounds he was devastated by his dismissal to Pietersen in the last over of the day, his later admission that he was trying to push the ball around the corner for a single so he could get off strike is not the type of revelation you want from the captain-apparent.

Otherwise, in the outer, we are left with nothing but our savage second-guessing of the selectors, our black humour and, for English friends, our overflowing message banks. And with the very real hope that, when required, those Bangladesh monsoons move at a greater rate than the sluggish Adelaide storm clouds.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 07, 2010, 06:15:57 PM
Lol very com Tighty, It had me at the start it was an M knight shamalamadingdong(sp) twist


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 08, 2010, 02:07:20 PM
nicked from Jaffa Cake on facebook

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3evE7s2LOu8


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on December 08, 2010, 03:34:37 PM
^^ Same guy did this, its good

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMqfLADC_20


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: jizzemm on December 08, 2010, 10:41:36 PM
^^ Same guy did this, its good

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMqfLADC_20

very good


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 08, 2010, 10:51:57 PM
good to see broad's staying with the squad and not flying home until after the next test. he deserves to be there when we retain the ashes


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 08, 2010, 11:45:50 PM
warne to play in this series has been backed from 16/1 to 6/1


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: The Camel on December 09, 2010, 01:41:23 AM
warne to play in this series has been backed from 16/1 to 6/1

I've played poker with Shane Warne.

He never mentioned anything to me about a comeback.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 09, 2010, 01:47:56 AM
warne to play in this series has been backed from 16/1 to 6/1

I've played poker with Shane Warne.

He never mentioned anything to me about a comeback.

how long ago? just before the 2009 ashes he said he'd consider it if asked


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 09, 2010, 01:51:41 AM
Would be sick if he came back, obviously I wouldn't want him to do well but then it would be awful if he was rubbish.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 09, 2010, 01:55:13 AM
Would be sick if he came back, obviously I wouldn't want him to do well but then it would be awfulsome if he was rubbish.

fyp  :)

I reckon Warney is the reason the price for a return has dropped, been lumping on his life savings imo............ ;D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on December 09, 2010, 01:56:41 AM
warne to play in this series has been backed from 16/1 to 6/1

I've played poker with Shane Warne.

He never mentioned anything to me about a comeback.

Did he mention anything about who the next Wales manager might be?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 09, 2010, 05:41:17 AM
warne to play in this series has been backed from 16/1 to 6/1

I've played poker with Shane Warne.

He never mentioned anything to me about a comeback.

i got him to pour me a glass of water at wsope cause it was too high for me
no idea who he was till i saw his sponsors logo on back of shirt and then it twigged

didnt mention comeback to me either but i think that was 2008


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: The Camel on December 09, 2010, 11:04:49 AM
warne to play in this series has been backed from 16/1 to 6/1

I've played poker with Shane Warne.

He never mentioned anything to me about a comeback.

Did he mention anything about who the next Wales manager might be?

No.

But, funnily enough, I think he did say he thought Ken Bates was a wanker.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on December 09, 2010, 11:38:48 AM
I love Warne, but pls don't come back.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 09, 2010, 12:40:11 PM
I love Warne, but pls don't come back.

This. Obviously a fantastic cricketer and seems like a good bloke too. For an Aussie obv.

Wouldn't want him to return as the morale-boosting effect he could have shouldn't be underestimated.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: pleno1 on December 09, 2010, 12:43:13 PM
Bring him on IMO.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 10, 2010, 05:13:45 PM
michael beer. bet none of you saw that coming

only 5 first class matches played but looks like he'll be in the XI


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 10, 2010, 05:53:19 PM
nope

"Beer's inclusion is the biggest stunner since Peter "Who" Taylor was given a baggy green cap against England in 1986-87, Sydney Morning Herald

Steve Smith to to maybe bat at 6.


Some odd decisions, looking like English Cricket selectors 1980-2005     



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on December 10, 2010, 07:24:22 PM
I loved the story about when England gave a cap to Darren Pattinson (11 first class matches) against SA a couple of years ago. The SA players asked their bowling coach if he had any videos of him bowling for them to study.

He said 'Videos? I can't even find him on Cricinfo.' (He was listed as an Australian).


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 10, 2010, 08:04:48 PM
michael beer. bet none of you saw that coming

only 5 first class matches played but looks like he'll be in the XI
When I saw the name Beer flash across the screen on SSnews, at first I thought they meant  Beer from Sussex


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 13, 2010, 12:02:16 PM
Quote
Slip inside Ricky Ponting’s mind
He’s trying to find
Some new players to play

He wants to play his older team
But that’s just a dream
They’re too old to play

He said he’d start a revolution in his head
But he’s been through all the players A to Z
Now there’s just a summertime of doom
If he loses the Ashes race
He is going to lose his place
Losing three would simply tear his heart out

So Ricky can wait
Shane Warne is too late
And there’s no Glenn McGrath
Gilchrist’s had his day
And don’t look back to Langer
He cannot play

Have to love the Barmy Army


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 13, 2010, 12:04:36 PM
Brilliant!

Perth on Wednesday night, time to replenish the sleepbanks!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Snatiramas on December 13, 2010, 12:25:28 PM
Trawling the Aussie newspapers online is quite my favourite pastime at the moment


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 13, 2010, 12:34:36 PM
Trawling the Aussie newspapers online is quite my favourite pastime at the moment

Yeah same, I thought ours were brutal........... ;D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: 77dave on December 13, 2010, 12:40:16 PM
Hauritz sells his kit outside his house

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ashes/story/0,26376,12340_6572988,00.html


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 13, 2010, 05:39:23 PM
love these

http://www.ecb.co.uk/news/england/england-in-australia-2010-11/vote-for-swanny,312758,EN.html


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 13, 2010, 07:12:55 PM
draw out to 4.0 for Perth. Reports of green result wicket


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 13, 2010, 09:18:25 PM
You'd expect some form of result pitch given the Aussies have to win 2 from 3.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Nakor on December 14, 2010, 02:03:38 PM
draw out to 4.0 for Perth. Reports of green result wicket

Gladstone Small on the wireless this morning stating that he had been to the group yesterday and could not even tell which pitch was to be cut for the test - "All wickets the same colour as the outfield".

Obviously they will trim a strip down before the start Thursday buy Jimmy and Finn must be bubbling over with anticipation.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 14, 2010, 02:24:59 PM
good article

http://betting.betfair.com/cricket/ashes-betting/match-previews/ashes-third-test-betting-australia-141210.html


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 15, 2010, 10:28:52 AM
SWANNNNN SWANNNNNN WILL TEAR YOU APARTTTTTT AGAIN, SWANNNN SWANNNN WILL TEAR YOU APART AGAINNNNN.

even though its actualy gunna be jimmy anderson and finn who ripp thru them

COME ON BOYS!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 16, 2010, 02:12:16 AM
The way they are talking on sky, they are expecting this pitch to do quite a bit. Not very often you see 2 captains adamant that they want to bowl first in a test match.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 16, 2010, 02:41:18 AM
oi oi tremlett!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 16, 2010, 02:41:28 AM
BOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get in there Tremlett


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 16, 2010, 02:53:33 AM
Stunning.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 16, 2010, 02:53:54 AM
Brilliant catch by Colly.

Must be in the running for best fielder in the world.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 16, 2010, 02:54:50 AM
gtfo punter. what a catch


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 16, 2010, 02:55:14 AM
Incredible catch and an abs hugeeeeeeee wicket,thought Ponting was going to put a big innings in.

Lets do this!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 16, 2010, 02:58:36 AM
was just saying to a few friends ponting is still class and is well over due a score and capable of punishing strauss' drop (more like cuple runs saved imo) and then colly manages to pluck that one out the air. hero!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on December 16, 2010, 03:08:54 AM
Incred stuff


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 16, 2010, 03:11:46 AM
love it. hopefully punter will get his wish of having a bowl on this wicket today


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on December 16, 2010, 03:15:03 AM
oh no, i put Hughes in my team.

Could get caught in this test, i fancied the Aussies to launch a fightback. Sure seems likely atm.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 16, 2010, 03:51:33 AM
Weeeeeeeee another one gone.

Like Warne and Bumble I don't get why they aren't batting Haddin at 6, he is deffo good enough.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 16, 2010, 04:33:15 AM
I don't get why we bowl Collingwood and not Swann!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 16, 2010, 06:18:21 AM
swann will tear you apartttt againnnn

BOOOOM


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 16, 2010, 07:48:43 AM
dont wanna bokk it but matt prior is shit hot with the gloves these days


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 16, 2010, 08:54:12 AM
Annoying we've let them get to 250. Would have liked them out for 220/230.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 16, 2010, 09:01:51 AM
norrrrrr at wagging tail :-(


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 16, 2010, 09:18:53 AM
I thought England bowled poorly today, tremlett apart, field placings were also poor at times.
Would of today that total by the Aussies at the start of the day but no way they should of got past 200.
Any batsmen that didn't give his wicket away looked very comfortable. Hope Englands batting form continues


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 16, 2010, 10:03:21 AM
Nice by Cook and Strauss. I know they get another crack at us tomorrow but we get another roll on the pitch. Survival was key. We've already seen 10+ overs of the new ball away.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 16, 2010, 11:16:11 AM
One of the sporting moments of the year

(http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Sport/Pix/pictures/2010/12/16/1292494533652/ricky-ponting-paul-collin-007.jpg)


this is very funny too

http://www.testmatchsofa.com/Highlights/?00285+Day+1+3rd+Test+Aus+v+Eng+2010-11


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 16, 2010, 02:10:05 PM
I thought England bowled poorly today, tremlett apart, field placings were also poor at times.
Would of today that total by the Aussies at the start of the day but no way they should of got past 200.
Any batsmen that didn't give his wicket away looked very comfortable. Hope Englands batting form continues

This.

I knocked it off last night after Hussey got out , I think it was about 130-6, was really hoping that they would be all out for under 200. I was a bit guttapointed to see what they ended up with but i guess I would have settled for it preflop.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 16, 2010, 04:20:45 PM
anyon watching SA/Ind in Pretoria? Morkel and Steyn on a quick one. Nasty and unplayable India 110-8


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 16, 2010, 10:13:20 PM
anyon watching SA/Ind in Pretoria? Morkel and Steyn on a quick one. Nasty and unplayable India 110-8
Yeah watched a bit. Don't think i've ever seen the indian batsmen look so uncomfortable


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 17, 2010, 02:45:33 AM
the fielding on the strauss edge was just laughable. you won't see anything that bad if you spend the rest of your life watching village cricket, can't believe neither player moved


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Delboy on December 17, 2010, 02:52:41 AM
the fielding on the strauss edge was just laughable. you won't see anything that bad if you spend the rest of your life watching village cricket, can't believe neither player moved

Very true

I've seen 25stone farmers dive and at least stop those!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 17, 2010, 03:03:10 AM
the fielding on the strauss edge was just laughable. you won't see anything that bad if you spend the rest of your life watching village cricket, can't believe neither player moved

It was amazingly bad.

The Aussies just look a complete mess, lets keep it that way.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 17, 2010, 03:36:08 AM
norrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

not mitchell johnson!! not after all that has been said


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 17, 2010, 03:36:20 AM
Here we go England collapsing and giving the Aussie confidence


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 17, 2010, 03:36:34 AM
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 17, 2010, 03:37:56 AM
meh still got plenty in the tank, just not as fun watching collingwood as it is to watching k.p


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 17, 2010, 03:55:08 AM
Oh fck


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 17, 2010, 04:02:26 AM
Oh fck


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 17, 2010, 04:35:36 AM
that late swing from Johnson must be tough to play.

Need to dig in now, up against it


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 17, 2010, 04:41:12 AM
Tms just claimed an Aussie booked paid out 400k today on all bets on England retaining ashes saying there is no fight in the Aussie team and noway they can regain momentum, big mistake


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 17, 2010, 04:53:55 AM
meh its only one session, ball is doing more in the air today than it was yesterday


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on December 17, 2010, 05:12:13 AM
Come on Australia!!!  ;hide;

Got money on them for this test and 7 in my fantasy team

Aussie! OI Aussie! OI Aussie Aussie Aussie!!! OI OI OI


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 17, 2010, 05:48:34 AM
run better prior


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 17, 2010, 06:49:29 AM
Unbelievable. Makes not getting them out for 200 even worse.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 17, 2010, 07:05:59 AM
Quick pitch and its swinging. Just about the only conditions they'll get us, and they did

Not sure too many of our numbers 5-11 liked it short, either, which is a technique thing. Don't see many quick pitches these days


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 17, 2010, 08:57:12 AM
Not had chance to really watch any of this. WTF!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 17, 2010, 09:11:03 AM
come on boys, grind them down!! some good needle out there and is actualy the most fun iv had watching in the whole series so far.

Obviously id rather win every game simple so we win the ashes, but this is actualy much better to watch for the cricket fan when its actualy a contest.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 17, 2010, 09:14:38 AM
It's a great match.

I hope the pitch flattens and we bat better/Johnson loses his radar. we might be able to chase down something


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TheChipPrince on December 17, 2010, 09:17:13 AM
It's a great match.

I hope the pitch flattens and we bat better/Johnson loses his radar. we might be able to chase down something

Just to clarify Tighty, have you pulled an all-nighter, and then are driving off to do a 3-day solo update?!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Acidmouse on December 17, 2010, 09:38:54 AM
I knew we needed more batting depth and Bresnan! :P


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 17, 2010, 10:21:30 AM
Quick pitch and its swinging. Just about the only conditions they'll get us, and they did

Not sure too many of our numbers 5-11 liked it short, either, which is a technique thing. Don't see many quick pitches these days

Just shows how bad England bowled yesterday.
Seems like Englands batting is back to usual form. I don't buy blaming it on swing either, thats what we get week in week out here


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Amatay on December 17, 2010, 02:17:41 PM
Not the best day today but remember...

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3evE7s2LOu8


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 17, 2010, 02:47:43 PM
Such a joke that Bell is at 6 and Collingwood at 5, think it may be time for Morgan to come in for Collie, i know he is a great fielder but he is in the side to score runs and hasn't done for over a year now.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 18, 2010, 08:31:23 AM
Such a joke that Bell is at 6 and Collingwood at 5, think it may be time for Morgan to come in for Collie, i know he is a great fielder but he is in the side to score runs and hasn't done for over a year now.

Agreed, bell needs to bat 5, such a waste him having to bat with the tail, and its definatly time for a change in Colly, be a superb servant to english cricket (maybe still a spot for him in the ODI and T20 side) but i think his test days are over. He did actualy bowl well today though.

We really need strauss to dig in here and try and see it thru the day, he looks very scratchy and could be out any ball. Come on boys, time to step up to the plate!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 18, 2010, 08:48:26 AM
It times like this that Colly will score runs. They will be in vain but people always seem to think he scores runs when we need to dig in. I think he scores them when it looks like the game is lost on there is no pressure.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 18, 2010, 08:49:38 AM
It times like this that Colly will score runs. They will be in vain but people always seem to think he scores runs when we need to dig in. I think he scores them when it looks like the game is lost on there is no pressure.

very good point lol


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 18, 2010, 09:56:11 AM
ffs. may as well give them the extra 1/2 hour and end this tonight


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 18, 2010, 10:04:11 AM
when did we forget how to bat???

just waving the bat round a foot outside off stump


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Biddy 62 on December 18, 2010, 10:23:09 AM
Kin hell pieterson always fails when he has chance to be the hero.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on December 18, 2010, 10:27:42 AM
when did we remeber how to play like england???

just waving the bat round a foot outside off stump

fyp


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 18, 2010, 01:15:07 PM
Disappointing.

Hussey leaves the ball for an hour first in and then looks to drive. Watson similar and both grind out two scores

We come in chasing 390 and play loads of shots on the front foot from the start and immediately get into trouble

Its about technique and mindset

and a repeat of the Wanderers against Morkel and Steyn last Winter.


I hope Sydney and Melboure are flat, but if I were the Aussies I'd try and prepare another bouncy wicket and test us out again.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 18, 2010, 03:20:10 PM
Another failure from Collingwood, can't see him getting dropped, but if it was anyone else then they would be on the brink.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 18, 2010, 03:40:45 PM
talking Bresnan for Collingwood

  Aggerscricket  Jonathan Agnew
Aus plan: green pitches. 4 seamers. What do Eng do? Drop Swann? No. Play extra seamer and weaken batting? http://bbc.in/gLb06a Fascinating


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 18, 2010, 04:03:33 PM
talking Bresnan for Collingwood

  Aggerscricket  Jonathan Agnew
Aus plan: green pitches. 4 seamers. What do Eng do? Drop Swann? No. Play extra seamer and weaken batting? http://bbc.in/gLb06a Fascinating


The way Collie is playing, it doesn't really weaken the batting!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 19, 2010, 03:24:21 AM
3-1 to aussie?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on December 19, 2010, 04:00:31 AM
3-1 to aussie?

not a chance
 
we couldnt play much worse in this game if we tryed, our bowling barring tremlett and a little bit of swann was actualy very very poor. we can bowl so much better than we have in this match, the aussie's bowled very very close to their peak imo.

and we might aswel not have batted with how easily we gave our wickets away.

would hate to see us got with 4 front seem bowlers, we need to strength in the batting, if prior was in decent nick with the bat i wouldnt mind this so much but we need 6 front line batsmen. Also, bell needs to bat at 5, far too much class to be batting with the tail.probably Morgan should come in for Collingwood and bat at 6 i think, Colly just looks so out of form so might aswel give somebody else a bash. Morgan is a pretty cool customer so i dont think being thrown into the middle of an Ashes series will phase him too much.

one things for sure we can improve from this performence so much, and i fully expect us to come back flying after some turkey and gravy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 19, 2010, 04:48:03 AM
If anyone listened to what Hussain said after the test, then he pretty much got it spot onto the state of both sides, even though we were outplayed in this test, we are the better side.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 19, 2010, 05:39:32 AM
Colly has to go, will be for Bresnan as we need the extra bowler.
Would love to see Shazad(sp)picked. His skiddy, swinging style would bring a different element to the line up. He can also bat a bit.
I would probs rest Finn, he doesn't bowl well consistently enough, and always gives too many runs away.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Rod on December 19, 2010, 05:41:19 AM
3-1 to aussie?
2-2 imho

England are the better team but The Aussies are not going to want to get beat on their own patch and will prepare wickets similar to this one. They will also now be motivated.

The rerun of the 2005 series is good - that was hell of a series.

Surprised Aussies are favourites though.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: ripple11 on December 19, 2010, 02:44:15 PM

Need to play 5 bowlers, but need to have batting strength down the order............how we miss Fred.

 Agree with Vegas

Colly has to go, will be for Bresnan as we need the extra bowler.
Would love to see Shazad(sp)picked. His skiddy, swinging style would bring a different element to the line up. He can also bat a bit.
I would probs rest Finn, he doesn't bowl well consistently enough, and always gives too many runs away.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on December 19, 2010, 04:24:15 PM

Need to play 5 bowlers, but need to have batting strength down the order............how we miss Fred.

 Agree with Vegas

Colly has to go, will be for Bresnan as we need the extra bowler.
Would love to see Shazad(sp)picked. His skiddy, swinging style would bring a different element to the line up. He can also bat a bit.
I would probs rest Finn, he doesn't bowl well consistently enough, and always gives too many runs away.
This test:

ST Finn   15   1   86   2   5.73    (Watson and Johnson when scored 50+)

ST Finn   21   4   97   3   4.61  (Hughes, Ponting, Harris)

2nd Test

ST Finn   16   1   71   1   4.43    (North)

ST Finn   18   2   60   2   3.33   (Watson, Hussey)

1st Test

ST Finn   33.4   1   125   6   3.71    (Katich,Clarke,Hussey,Johnson,Doherty,Siddle)

ST Finn   4   0   25   0   6.25   



Desreves to be dropped ? You drink herbal tea by any chance ?

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 19, 2010, 04:30:30 PM
I think the question with Finn is his physical strength, or not. Looked to be under pressure, on his body, at times in Perth

Doubt they'd drop him, but wouldn't be surprised to see him break down before the end of ther tour

His wicket taking of course compensates for the too many 4-balls he bowls


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 20, 2010, 10:57:51 AM
 >:( just as well I missed seeing any of that......


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: vegaslover on December 20, 2010, 09:24:43 PM

Need to play 5 bowlers, but need to have batting strength down the order............how we miss Fred.

 Agree with Vegas

Colly has to go, will be for Bresnan as we need the extra bowler.
Would love to see Shazad(sp)picked. His skiddy, swinging style would bring a different element to the line up. He can also bat a bit.
I would probs rest Finn, he doesn't bowl well consistently enough, and always gives too many runs away.
This test:

ST Finn   15   1   86   2   5.73    (Watson and Johnson when scored 50+)

ST Finn   21   4   97   3   4.61  (Hughes, Ponting, Harris)

2nd Test

ST Finn   16   1   71   1   4.43    (North)

ST Finn   18   2   60   2   3.33   (Watson, Hussey)

1st Test

ST Finn   33.4   1   125   6   3.71    (Katich,Clarke,Hussey,Johnson,Doherty,Siddle)

ST Finn   4   0   25   0   6.25   



Desreves to be dropped ? You drink herbal tea by any chance ?

Sandy
Herbal tea? obviously not. Anyone can see he is shot to bits. Tremlett providing decent height and bounce gives England the chance to get a different type of bowler in whilst giving Finn the rest he obviously needs


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Robert HM on December 20, 2010, 10:02:20 PM
ITV 4 schedule for tonight:

"Mark Nicholas presents action from the fifth and final day's play in the 3rd Test from WACA in Perth"

Sigh


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on December 25, 2010, 10:34:51 PM
It's cri kiiiiittttttttt


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 25, 2010, 10:49:49 PM
Good ole Santa. He's saved the best pressie till last.


I hope.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 25, 2010, 11:35:43 PM
Collingwood in the side for his fielding and he drops one already lol


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 26, 2010, 02:05:21 AM
After the second drop I was starting to think we'd forgotten how to play.

Very good session for us in the end though!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 02:19:59 AM
good session for us but we need to bowl them out for less than 230, otherwise we could be under pressure again, conditions will suit Hilfanhaus, Harris and Watson here if there will be rain around, and we saw how some of the england batsmen performed this summer  against Pakistan when the ball moved about, like Strauss said before the game, the batsmen need to show some patience when out in the middle.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 02:30:14 AM
I really think we should bowl them out for less than 200 but i don't want to be too optimistic.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 03:44:23 AM
78 for fkin 8, must be dreaming, jingle bells jingle bells,jingle all the way, oh what fun it is to have when england win away oi!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 26, 2010, 04:01:45 AM
So foooooking tilting not being able to watch this anywhere apart from the BBC website.......


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Laxie on December 26, 2010, 04:02:05 AM
Did ye win the lot yet?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 04:03:45 AM
So foooooking tilting not being able to watch this anywhere apart from the BBC website.......

92-9. u got got a link online for it?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: NoflopsHomer on December 26, 2010, 04:04:03 AM
I really think we should bowl them out for less than 100 but i don't want to be too optimistic.

fyp


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 26, 2010, 04:06:09 AM
So foooooking tilting not being able to watch this anywhere apart from the BBC website.......

92-9. u got got a link online for it?

No, if you have one please post. But I doubt my Internet is fast enough for me to watch it.....


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 04:13:16 AM
So foooooking tilting not being able to watch this anywhere apart from the BBC website.......

92-9. u got got a link online for it?

No, if you have one please post. But I doubt my Internet is fast enough for me to watch it.....

www.my2p2.eu


http://www.crictime.com/


i'm watching it on sky, but have used the bottom link before when i've bot been able to watch it on sky and it's ok.

98 all out...good shout homer



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 26, 2010, 04:15:27 AM
When was the last time (with referals in use) that a team got bowled out without using a single one?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 26, 2010, 04:19:33 AM
So was it the conditions? Us being good? The Aussies bad?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 04:29:04 AM
So was it the conditions? Us being good? The Aussies bad?

Bit of all 3, they all bowled well. To think that Bresnan and Tremlett had 8 test matches between them before this game, then it just shows how far superior we are all all departments, if smith was in the england side he would behind swann imo, eveyone on here was saying that Anderson wouldn't be affective in this series before it all started, and i know he has got 4 wickets here in helpful conditions, but he has been our best bowlers in all 3 tests, lets just hope that england learn from what they have seen so far today and don't chase the bowl and take there time, if we are 100-3 at close then we have done superb, wicket gets better obv.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 04:31:49 AM
So was it the conditions? Us being good? The Aussies bad?

 if smith was in the england side he would behind swann imo,

batting wise, not bowling obv


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 26, 2010, 04:32:49 AM
Lol underprepare a green seamer - they were watering it as late as last night. All fine for aussies if they win the toss! Eng got to grit it out now, batting last wouldn't be fun as it'll go really low. Need a nice lead


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Ironside on December 26, 2010, 05:07:14 AM
wtf i am on way to bed thought great i will get to listen to the aussie innings as i goto sleep and england are batting

UNREAL can see england losing a match after a start like that if they do then someone needs shooting


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 05:12:38 AM
Ponting will be signing on by the 29th of december at the latest!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 26, 2010, 05:30:28 AM
and here's some help for him

http://australia.gov.au/topics/benefits-payments-and-services/jobseekers-payments-and-services/jobseekers-payments-and-allowances


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Tractor on December 26, 2010, 08:16:25 AM
Ashes: England dominate woeful Australia in Melbourne

Fourth Ashes Test: Australia 98 v England 157-0 (stumps, day one)


Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 26, 2010, 09:12:06 AM
tremlett 12/176 in the series I make it. not bad at all


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on December 26, 2010, 09:17:09 AM
Much joy as I am sharing Xmas with some Australian relatives this year!

Wiiiiiiiiiiiiii

The only joke I could muster so far was " I hear the Aussies have been setting records overnight"

Pause, wait to see smug look

"most people through the turnstiles in 1 go leaving the ground"

Today could be fun!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 26, 2010, 10:37:12 AM
Just woke up. Looks like we've won the ashes!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 26, 2010, 11:40:16 AM
Just woke up. Looks like *God-willing and without wishing in any way, shape or form to put the mockers on it, kybosh it, bok anyone, we should, all things being equal retain the ashes!!!!!!!!!!

FYP

* ffs boshi! I don't believe in God, it's just an expression.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Chompy on December 26, 2010, 11:44:38 AM
Awesome!

Gave up after the rain break last night and never expected what we've got. Get a 200 lead without losing a wicket, stick'em back in, knock'em over for 50 and then hit the beach. We are so much better than them.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 26, 2010, 12:58:11 PM
Fk me just go back and seen the score, unbelievable!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 26, 2010, 03:20:13 PM
Awesome!

Gave up after the rain break last night and never expected what we've got. Get a 200 lead without losing a wicket, stick'em back in, knock'em over for 50 and then hit the beach. We are so much better than them.

In fantasy land I think we could afford to bat until at least half way through day 3, possibly a bit longer... Bat once, get a big total and have 2 and a bit days to bowl them out.

I'm just hoping we don't mess up from here and bat until at least lunch tomorrow (or is it today?)!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 26, 2010, 05:03:41 PM
Awesome!

Gave up after the rain break last night and never expected what we've got. Get a 200 lead without losing a wicket, stick'em back in, knock'em over for 50 and then hit the beach. We are so much better than them.

In fantasy land I think we could afford to bat until at least half way through day 3, possibly a bit longer... Bat once, get a big total and have 2 and a bit days to bowl them out.

I'm just hoping we don't mess up from here and bat until at least lunch tomorrow (or is it today?)!

thank god fantasy land doesn't exist. if it did strauss would bat through to tea on day 5 just to be sure. it's great to be in a position where, barring world records being smashed for every partnership, he can't go over cautious


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 27, 2010, 12:00:34 AM
 TMS scorer Andrew notes that Cook's series average has dropped to a mere 115.4 - having already pointed out that yesterday was only the second time a side fielding first had ended day one of a Test with a first-innings lead and all 10 wickets in hand. Top stat!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on December 27, 2010, 03:48:04 AM
absolute blow up merchants the last half hour, Collingwood and Bell have no reason to be playing the hook, and with 2 men deep on the boundary.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 27, 2010, 04:19:48 AM
Especially Bell with the ball above his head and way wide.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 27, 2010, 04:26:37 AM
I started to write a long post about what i witnessed in that session but scrapped it. I'll just say this could be Ponting's last test match, taking into account his past record there is every chance he will be banned for Sydney, and if the series is lost that will be the end for him.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 27, 2010, 05:12:49 AM
Missed Pontings blow up. Was it bad?

Few people are a bit negative about the batting today. Disappointing way to give away 2 wickets but i'm happy with a 200+ lead.
Is Morgan set to play the last test after another Colly failure or is Bresnan a good innings away from keeping his place?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Matt.NFFC. on December 27, 2010, 08:28:21 AM
Missed Pontings blow up. Was it bad?

Few people are a bit negative about the batting today. Disappointing way to give away 2 wickets but i'm happy with a 200+ lead.
Is Morgan set to play the last test after another Colly failure or is Bresnan a good innings away from keeping his place?

Just seen it briefly on SSN and it was shocking.  Seems like he disagreed with technology, and the best bit for me was when I could see him say "unbelievable". 

What a cock!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 27, 2010, 10:25:49 AM
Looks like he got off pretty lightly. 40% match fee. Bumble said the aussie Channel 9 team were saying anything from 100% match fee to suspension to cricket aus sacking him.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Bongo on December 27, 2010, 12:09:00 PM
What do you think the plan is now? Declare when overhead conditions suit and keep batting if they don't until we have 400-450 and 2.5 days to bowl them out?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 27, 2010, 12:15:48 PM
What do you think the plan is now? Declare when overhead conditions suit and keep batting if they don't until we have 400-450 and 2.5 days to bowl them out?

get another 150, guarantee we don't have to bat again. Declare now they could get 500 in two days and l;eave us 150 so need to avoid that

Hand the ball to Swann. Bowl them out in 2.5 days

time declaration for when overhead conditions suit the new ball. Of course having a dash and getting bowled out removes that decision


and Ponting is a lucky boy. Ask for a review and then harangue the umpire who didn't see the video tecnology about it for 5 mins when it fails. lol!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on December 27, 2010, 12:28:19 PM
Let Trott get his 200 and Prior his 100 in rapid time, then declare half an hour before lunch.

Actually Prior could possibly overtake Trott if he sticks around.

I reckon we'll win this with a day to spare, and I agree with Bumble in that Ponting should have been red-carded.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: henrik777 on December 27, 2010, 12:38:12 PM
Let Trott get his 200 and Prior his 100 in rapid time, then declare half an hour before lunch.

Actually Prior could possibly overtake Trott if he sticks around.

I reckon we'll win this with a day to spare, and I agree with Bumble in that Ponting should have been red-carded.

It's only day 3 tomorrow. Bat until just after tea, if possible, 600 lead 6 and a half sessions to bowl them out.

Sandy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 27, 2010, 12:49:27 PM
Yeh just carry on I reckon. Were scoring quite well towards the end. Would certainly let Bresnan and Swann have a swing with 3 days to go.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on December 28, 2010, 04:57:03 AM
Go on Tim Bresnan! West Yorkshire, West Yorkshire!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 28, 2010, 05:02:12 AM
Go on Tim Bresnan! West Yorkshire, West Yorkshire!!!

Bowling really well.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 28, 2010, 07:25:00 AM
Wouldn't imagine it is going to last too long tomorrow morning, bit of a victory parade for retaining the ashes.

"Retaining the ashes", wow that sounds good.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 28, 2010, 08:25:19 AM
Had TMS on while going to sleep. Aggers starts shouting at one point about "they've done it! England have won!" I instantly sit bolt upright...."Andy Caddick takes the final wicket" It was lunch and I was being woken by some classic commentary. Not happy.
Good day though. Got work Wednesday but reckon I'll have to stay up tomorrow to see it end.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: craigbetts on December 28, 2010, 02:58:28 PM
In the commentary last night, they mentioned how during the Ponting blow up, KP told the Aussie skipper 'Yeah, I nicked it'.

This has to be the best level of all time!

That 3 - 1 scoreline is looking very good now.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 28, 2010, 10:50:00 PM
Come on England, let's get those last three wickets mopped-up early!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 28, 2010, 11:25:57 PM
Here we go. I've waited a long long time for this.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 28, 2010, 11:26:46 PM
lets dooooo it. looking forward to this and should be in bed by lunch


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 28, 2010, 11:28:08 PM
Getting ready to celebrate with a few Christmas Baileys!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 28, 2010, 11:38:42 PM
What a ball that was. Real bowling strength we have these days.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 29, 2010, 12:09:28 AM
Generous of Warney to be coaching Monty


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 29, 2010, 12:48:55 AM
1 more to go. Was starting to worry I'd gone too soon on the Baileys!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 29, 2010, 12:54:21 AM
Fk off aussies. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 29, 2010, 12:54:27 AM
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, only taken 24 years!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on December 29, 2010, 12:56:35 AM
Brilliant response after Perth! Well done!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 29, 2010, 01:47:45 AM
WP England

Must say i really enjoyed the pieces Nasser did the last couple of days, one about leaving the ball the other about how big the MCG is, very funny imo


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 29, 2010, 02:06:38 AM
WP England

Must say i really enjoyed the pieces Nasser did the last couple of days, one about leaving the ball the other about how big the MCG is, very funny imo

yeah, today's one was excellent. loved his impression of kp fielding at gully


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on December 29, 2010, 02:31:43 AM
Andy Flower, top player, top coach, top bloke.  ;applause; ;applause;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on December 29, 2010, 10:38:46 AM
Hilarious

http://www.ecbtv.co.uk/video/20101229/swannys-ashes-diary-no6_2276252_2253295


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Acidmouse on December 29, 2010, 12:09:47 PM
Hilarious

http://www.ecbtv.co.uk/video/20101229/swannys-ashes-diary-no6_2276252_2253295

lol very good


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Woodsey on December 29, 2010, 01:33:12 PM
Wiiiiiiiiiiii, a late GFTI.........


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on December 29, 2010, 01:40:48 PM
Important to win it now.
There is going to be some big selection headaches when everyone is fit.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on December 29, 2010, 02:51:53 PM
Hilarious

http://www.ecbtv.co.uk/video/20101229/swannys-ashes-diary-no6_2276252_2253295

hahahaha starts off brilliantly.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 29, 2010, 03:51:02 PM
Hilarious

http://www.ecbtv.co.uk/video/20101229/swannys-ashes-diary-no6_2276252_2253295

Brilliant, Swanny is a very funny man.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 29, 2010, 06:23:45 PM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVUCiWDLavY.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on December 29, 2010, 08:44:50 PM
I hate to link to daily mail articles but I quite enjoyed this

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1342343/If-win-Test-match--just-point-Australia.html


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on December 30, 2010, 02:50:38 AM
Ponting out of 5th test, no word on who will be captain though I would have thought it will be Clarke.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2010-11/content/current/story/494663.html


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 02, 2011, 11:05:58 PM
Wow, bat first?

Overcast, humid, green

Come on lads, knock em over


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 02, 2011, 11:07:08 PM
Happy new year Jimmy Anderson, conditions are made for him.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Karabiner on January 02, 2011, 11:22:15 PM
Strange one.

Might as well have not bothered tossing at all.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 02, 2011, 11:33:58 PM
sometimes I really hate blonde, I had no idea this was on til I opened this thread. was about to go to bed. gg sleep now


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 03, 2011, 12:43:07 AM
this is as close to as well as weve bowled all series, just cant get a bit of luck!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 03, 2011, 12:51:05 AM
this is as close to as well as weve bowled all series, just cant get a bit of luck!!

A yard too short imo. Too carried away with the bounce.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on January 04, 2011, 12:23:53 AM
GTFI Collingwood,knock the tail over then bat for 2 days lets gogogogogogogo


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 04, 2011, 12:25:30 AM
Ha can't believe Colly broke the partnership!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 04, 2011, 12:30:02 AM
Possibly his last ever ball in test cricket.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 04, 2011, 12:34:31 AM
What do batsmen say to each other at the end of the over when they come together? I've not played properly for about 6 years when I was in college. Then I'd just walk down and say either "He's shit", "he's quick" or "you out tonight?" and my partner would probably say "don't just swing, move your feet" or talk about said night out but I wonder what pro's say to each other.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on January 04, 2011, 12:35:21 AM
Possibly his last ever ball in test cricket.

lets say he comes out and knocks a dbl hundred

will he still be dropped? and if not - then why is there talk of dropping him?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 04, 2011, 12:39:37 AM
This isn't going to be Colly's last chance to prove himself as he is pretty certain to be involved in the one day team.

I would imagine they have eleventy billion one dayers in Australia like usual, before going to the world cup.

England have bowled pretty well and the Aussies have completely changed their style of batting this innings to cope with it. Not many times in recent test history have they faced the 2nd new ball with less than 200 on the board.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 04, 2011, 12:41:21 AM
Lol I say that and Smith plays an airy fairy shot and is out.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on January 04, 2011, 12:42:59 AM
rumour is we are dropping him as a number 5





and bringing him in as a front line bowler         ;D


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 04, 2011, 12:54:28 AM
England have bowled pretty well and the Aussies have completely changed their style of batting this innings to cope with it. Not many times in recent test history have they faced the 2nd new ball with less than 200 on the board.

change of style but much the same end result. I like

gotta love the bowling figures, no-one's gone for 3 and 3 of the 5 bowlers have gone for less than 2/over


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 04, 2011, 01:00:59 AM
Possibly his last ever ball in test cricket.

lets say he comes out and knocks a dbl hundred

will he still be dropped? and if not - then why is there talk of dropping him?


Why is there talk of dropping him? He has pretty much been more out of form than in during the past 18 months. In his interview with Atherton after Melbourne he said himself he needs a score at Sydney. There's plenty of players who will be looking for a good start to the summer, Morgan, Hildreth, Lyth, Bopara etc.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on January 04, 2011, 01:17:39 AM
Possibly his last ever ball in test cricket.

lets say he comes out and knocks a dbl hundred

will he still be dropped? and if not - then why is there talk of dropping him?


Why is there talk of dropping him? He has pretty much been more out of form than in during the past 18 months. In his interview with Atherton after Melbourne he said himself he needs a score at Sydney. There's plenty of players who will be looking for a good start to the summer, Morgan, Hildreth, Lyth, Bopara etc.

my point is that no single score should save him

ie if he is gonna get dropped then a 200 shoudnt matter really - variance and all that


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 04, 2011, 01:26:34 AM
So tilting. If Hilfenhaus was anything near a batsmen he'd have got an edge to one of his play and misses.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 04, 2011, 01:30:17 AM
we dont really wanna mitchell johnson confidence lol

defo +1 to colly opening the bowling in future


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Madone on January 04, 2011, 03:03:19 AM
Strauss owes us a century after those terrible tactics there, putting everyone on the boundary when Johnson hasn't even got into double figures is just crazy.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 04, 2011, 05:57:35 AM
hahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahaahahahhahahahahahahaahaha lets all crack open a BEER


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 04, 2011, 05:58:34 AM
Wow, hilarious.

Beer getting a wicket with a no ball, pretty unforgivable for a spinner.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on January 05, 2011, 12:16:11 AM
THAT IS NOT CRICKET YOU CHEATING OZZY *****


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on January 05, 2011, 12:22:09 AM
Aussies showing a real lack of class today

gfy


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on January 05, 2011, 12:34:59 AM
Gg collingwood, enjoy your last tour piss up after the game game won't you


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 05, 2011, 12:38:54 AM
Gg collingwood, enjoy your last tour piss up after the game game won't you

anyone got a shotgun?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Acidmouse on January 05, 2011, 12:44:44 AM
what type of shots that? jeeez


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on January 05, 2011, 01:38:17 AM
It pains me to say it with him being a mackem but he's done a lot of good things for England over the years inc his incred knock at Cardiff in the previous Ashes series.Think there's too many good players to come in for him not to get dropped though.

Cook is just soooooo good,player of the series ainec,VVWP.

200+ ahead plz then we can have some fun bowling them out.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 01:38:43 AM
great stat

Cook at Lunch has batted for 2046 minutes this series, more than any English batsman in any test series, ever. Beating John Edrich 2005 minutes in 70-71


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 02:16:48 AM
At 26 Alastair Cook is the second youngest batsman in history to reach 5000 Test runs behind Sachin Tendulkar.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 05, 2011, 02:35:40 AM
At 26 Alastair Cook is the second youngest batsman in history to reach 5000 Test runs behind Sachin Tendulkar.

that sachin lad has done a=canny so far in his carear aswel


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 05, 2011, 02:44:41 AM
At 26 Alastair Cook is the second youngest batsman in history to reach 5000 Test runs behind Sachin Tendulkar.

that sachin lad has done a=canny so far in his carear aswel

Scored 140 odd again yesterday in South Africa, an all time great.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 11:39:33 AM
England favourites for fifth Test

 

England were made 4/11 favourites to win the fifth and final Ashes Test in Sydney after moving 208 runs ahead of Australia at the close of day three.

 

Alastair Cook led the way, yet again, scoring his third century of the tour as he made 189, while Ian Bell proved equally as difficult to remove for the Australian bowlers as he scored 115 in England’s 488-7.

 

Australia need something of a miracle if they are to draw the series now and are 33/1 to win this Test, with the draw at 9/4.

 

With Matt Prior still at the crease on 54 he is 6/5 to be the next man out while his batting partner, Tim Bresnan, is 8/13 to be removed first when play resumes on day four.

 

Click here for all Sky Bet’s Ashes fifth Test betting:

http://www.skybet.com/betting/cricket/the-ashes/australia-v-england---5th-test/e12615058.html



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 05, 2011, 06:52:53 PM
England favourites for fifth Test

England were made 4/11 favourites to win the fifth and final Ashes Test in Sydney after moving 208 runs ahead of Australia at the close of day three.


that seems very short to me, still a tricky match to win even though it's all but impossible to lose from here

when do we expect the pitch to take spin?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 06:59:07 PM
England favourites for fifth Test

England were made 4/11 favourites to win the fifth and final Ashes Test in Sydney after moving 208 runs ahead of Australia at the close of day three.


that seems very short to me, still a tricky match to win even though it's all but impossible to lose from here

when do we expect the pitch to take spin?

from now on, especially if day 4 is hot

the pitch is also a bit up and down now

So I reckon if we can get another 30-40, the Aussies would be doing pretty well to score 400, knock off a 250 deficit and set us say 150..a tricky chase on day 5..especially as our guys bowl to plans and keep the scoring rate down, typically

I don't think 4/11 is value, was just spamming Skybet!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 05, 2011, 07:00:55 PM
Nooooooooooo but I prefer to watch England bowl

Me too, regardless of the pitch i just feel more comfortable watching England bowl, I always fear a batting collapse and every ball has me on edge where as if theyre bowling you can be more relaxed watching imo.


still feel the same way? I was thinking about this post while watching last night. doubt I've ever felt more relaxed watching england bat


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 05, 2011, 07:04:48 PM
So I reckon if we can get another 30-40, the Aussies would be doing pretty well to score 400, knock off a 250 deficit and set us say 150..a tricky chase on day 5..especially as our guys bowl to plans and keep the scoring rate down, typically

can we ask for the extra 1/2 hour when batting? can't remember. if so we could probs just about win scoring like that

can't help but feel strauss is going to be over cautious and bat til lunch though


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 07:10:01 PM
So I reckon if we can get another 30-40, the Aussies would be doing pretty well to score 400, knock off a 250 deficit and set us say 150..a tricky chase on day 5..especially as our guys bowl to plans and keep the scoring rate down, typically

can we ask for the extra 1/2 hour when batting? can't remember. if so we could probs just about win scoring like that

can't help but feel strauss is going to be over cautious and bat til lunch though


I would think he would bat til we are bowled out

I'm assuming 30-40 runs could be more


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 05, 2011, 07:11:24 PM
Why would we want to declare before lunch? The Aussies have to try and win the match, i would be happy for us to bat until tea for a 450+ lead.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 05, 2011, 07:14:33 PM
Why would we want to declare before lunch? The Aussies have to try and win the match, i would be happy for us to bat until tea for a 450+ lead.

because we don't want only 4 sessions to bowl them out. even though they need to win to level it was very clear from the way they batted 1st innings that they'll be happy to get away without a loss


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 07:17:05 PM
Why would we want to declare before lunch? The Aussies have to try and win the match, i would be happy for us to bat until tea for a 450+ lead.

because we don't want only 4 sessions to bowl them out. even though they need to win to level it was very clear from the way they batted 1st innings that they'll be happy to get away without a loss


disagree. At 2-1 Bat for as long as you can. Make sure you don't have to bat again. 4 sessions, if the pitch is playing up enough, would be enough to force a win....especially if you can set fields knowing you don't have to worry about runs...which at 400 ahead you would. At 250 ahead you have to have one eye on not being set a target, so slightly more defensive fields


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 05, 2011, 07:18:23 PM
Why would we want to declare before lunch? The Aussies have to try and win the match, i would be happy for us to bat until tea for a 450+ lead.

because we don't want only 4 sessions to bowl them out. even though they need to win to level it was very clear from the way they batted 1st innings that they'll be happy to get away without a loss

I would be very surprised if they can bat for 120 overs to save the game, 4 sessions would be plenty on a final day pitch.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 05, 2011, 07:23:24 PM
all fairly acadamic as we'll probs be all out before lunch anyway


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 05, 2011, 07:23:55 PM
Not Ashes related, but did anyone see Kallis bat today? The bloke is a machine, yet rarely gets mentioned as an all time great.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 07:27:28 PM
Not Ashes related, but did anyone see Kallis bat today? The bloke is a machine, yet rarely gets mentioned as an all time great.


Ind/SA has been a wonderful series


Steyn/Morkel are superb

Tendulkar and co

Kallis

England's next task is to beat these two, comfortably the best two sides in the world


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 05, 2011, 07:40:01 PM
Can't wait for India this Summer at Trent Bridge.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 10:30:19 PM
!!

Betfair - live 5th Test match odds pre-day 4: England 1.44; Australia 70.00; draw 3.45.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on January 05, 2011, 10:55:13 PM
Breaking News,

Collingwood has retired from international test cricket after this test

Someone said that earlier didn't they?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 05, 2011, 10:56:34 PM
Vaughan says Colly has announced his test retirement to the team this morning


If so, right decision IMO. Jump before you are dropped and concentrate on one day team


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on January 05, 2011, 10:58:00 PM
Vaughan says Colly has announced his test retirement to the team this morning


If so, right decision IMO. Jump before you are dropped and concentrate on one day team

Typifies the man imo. Dogged and dignified. nh wp very, very good game  ;applause;


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 05, 2011, 10:59:49 PM
Nice one Colly.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: nirvana on January 05, 2011, 11:02:29 PM
Always seemed a decent man - pretty decent career stats too. Good for him


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 05, 2011, 11:33:48 PM
Meh don't like the timing, think the end of the match would be appropriate. Team should be concentrating on trying to win the match.

Having said that I have a lot of respect for Collingwood, made a lot of limited talent as a test match batsman. Helped England save at least 2 test matches (probably more) with his batting in a rearguard action when more talented batsman threw their wickets away.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on January 06, 2011, 12:18:01 AM
Nooooooooooo but I prefer to watch England bowl

Me too, regardless of the pitch i just feel more comfortable watching England bowl, I always fear a batting collapse and every ball has me on edge where as if theyre bowling you can be more relaxed watching imo.


still feel the same way? I was thinking about this post while watching last night. doubt I've ever felt more relaxed watching england bat

Ah yeah sure the Ashes have been retained , the Aussies were out cheap and England prob had a lead sure why wouldnt you be relaxed!

I was still dodgy at the start of the innings and would have took any sort of a lead but as is the way this series England have surpassed my expectations by miles. I guess I see it that you're kind of freerolling when they bowl, every ball can be a possible wicket and the worst that can happen is its hit for 6


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 06, 2011, 12:23:06 AM
Nooooooooooo but I prefer to watch England bowl

Me too, regardless of the pitch i just feel more comfortable watching England bowl, I always fear a batting collapse and every ball has me on edge where as if theyre bowling you can be more relaxed watching imo.


still feel the same way? I was thinking about this post while watching last night. doubt I've ever felt more relaxed watching england bat

Ah yeah sure the Ashes have been retained , the Aussies were out cheap and England prob had a lead sure why wouldnt you be relaxed!

I was still dodgy at the start of the innings and would have took any sort of a lead but as is the way this series England have surpassed my expectations by miles. I guess I see it that you're kind of freerolling when they bowl, every ball can be a possible wicket and the worst that can happen is its hit for 6

do you consider them to be your team or are you kinda watching as a neutral?


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on January 06, 2011, 12:35:16 AM
Lol I see them as my boys alright, Obv Ireland don't play tests so could have never supported them.

I guess because I liked cricket and England would have always been on telly that i may aswel have liked them to give me a proper interest.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on January 06, 2011, 01:22:49 AM
Absolutely loved every minute off this series,pretty safe to say we've won the series now,get in there.Very well done all involved,for me Cook and Anderson have been our two most important players but every single one of them has played there part.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 06, 2011, 01:31:51 AM
(http://i484.photobucket.com/albums/rr210/jarv_1/493287077v2_480x480_Front_Color-White.jpg)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 06, 2011, 03:19:10 AM
Ahahahaha great running Watson.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 06, 2011, 03:19:52 AM
lol imo


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 06, 2011, 06:48:50 AM
Brilliant stuff from the England quicks, ball is reversing quite a bit.

It is pretty good time to be an English cricket fan, haven't always been able to say that!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 06, 2011, 06:57:58 AM
unreal atmosphere there, one time finish it off now!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 06, 2011, 02:23:42 PM
Would of loved to have been there yesterday/today

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT93fLYuSLc


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on January 06, 2011, 03:02:25 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +1

Team for next test if all fit ?

Strauss
Cook
Trott
Pietersen
Bell
Prior
Bresnan
Broad
Swann
Tremlett
Anderson

Pretty ul for Finn as he hasn't really done much wrong but can't see how we don't play any of them.Do people think this team could've give the great Aussie team of 10 years ago a good game ? Maybe I'm getting carried away but I really think we would've.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 06, 2011, 03:11:47 PM
Morgan for Broad or Bresnan I reckon.
Morgan's got to be one of the best fielders in the team so will make up for the loss of the Brigadier.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on January 06, 2011, 04:49:38 PM
Morgan does deserve a run imo, be nice to have an Irishman in there ;)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 06, 2011, 07:10:16 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +1

Team for next test if all fit ?

Strauss
Cook
Trott
Pietersen
Bell
Prior
Bresnan
Broad
Swann
Tremlett
Anderson

Pretty ul for Finn as he hasn't really done much wrong but can't see how we don't play any of them.Do people think this team could've give the great Aussie team of 10 years ago a good game ? Maybe I'm getting carried away but I really think we would've.

This was the balance i wanted us to play in this series, but having won convincingly with four front line bowlers i can't see it changing. Definitely not in England in May against Sri Lanka. Morgan seems to be next in line and will probably get the nod. Bopara would be the ideal replacement if he can get his head together. Hopefully Gooch can get hold of him and sort his defense out, i think he is very talented. Needs to prove he really wants it.

As for beating the Australian side of 10 years ago, no chance.

This was the team that England played against in the 3rd test in 2002

Langer
Hayden
Ponting
Martyn
Lehman
S Waugh
Gilchrist
Warne
Lee
Gillespie
McGrath

I would say Pieterson for Lehman and Anderson for Lee would be the only 2 that would get into that side.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: iwillwinlots on January 06, 2011, 07:19:40 PM
broad for gilliesepe


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 06, 2011, 07:21:46 PM
broad for gilliesepe


Nah

Broad might not even get back in this England team

Trott or Bell for Martyn Maybe. Or Cook for Martyn and bat Langer at 3



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 06, 2011, 07:38:00 PM
broad for gilliesepe

Pre 2005 Gillespie was a great bowler. If it wasn't for injuries could have been very special.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 07, 2011, 12:28:34 AM
Collingwood doesn't want to bowl again. Happy to take his last ball as Hussey. I'd be tempted when they are 9 down if Straus looked at me.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 07, 2011, 12:59:05 AM
Weeeeeeeeeee, a well deserved 3-1 win.

An England team to be proud of.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 07, 2011, 01:01:04 AM
An England team to be proud of.

very much this

top stuff


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: technolog on January 07, 2011, 01:01:40 AM
Weeeeeeeeeee, a well deserved 3-1 win.

An England team to be proud of.



Absolutely! Let's hope we can carry on improving and here's to a series win against the Indians in the summer.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 07, 2011, 01:33:27 AM
Top stuff. Winning away feels great.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 07, 2011, 03:15:19 AM
with strauss the captain, we'l take the urn home!!!!! we'll take the urn hoooommmmeeeeeeeee, with strauss our captain, we'll take the urn home!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on January 07, 2011, 03:27:50 AM
Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: mondatoo on January 07, 2011, 03:19:10 PM
Thought this was pretty com

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/9327756.stm


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: nirvana on January 07, 2011, 03:24:57 PM
I've umpired when Steven Finn was a 15 year old playing for Langleybury, bowled our boys out for not very much. Just thought I'd mention my close links to the squad


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Pelham Boy on January 07, 2011, 03:55:17 PM
I've umpired when Steven Finn was a 15 year old playing for Langleybury, bowled our boys out for not very much. Just thought I'd mention my close links to the squad

meh

I've faced Graeme Swann at winter nets. I smashed him everywhere.






He was 11.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: nirvana on January 07, 2011, 08:02:55 PM
I've umpired when Steven Finn was a 15 year old playing for Langleybury, bowled our boys out for not very much. Just thought I'd mention my close links to the squad

meh

I've faced Graeme Swann at winter nets. I smashed him everywhere.

He was 11.

lol, nice one - I knew you were good but didn't know how good :-)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on January 07, 2011, 08:14:27 PM
I can't see how the aussies are favourites for this series, even though they are at home, are bowling attack is so much stronger than theres and the batting lineups are pretty even.

And by the looks of things the media are getting on there backs already, which they are not used to at all. All the pressure is on the aussies and i don't think they can cope with it.

I predict a 3-1 victory to England.

Get as much money as possible on england to win the series imo.


Pretty accurate post Sir nice prediction.

I wanted to quote another post on the 1st page from Madone in regards to Jimmy Anderon which also hit the nail on the head but was incapable, how do i do it?

When i quote the first comment then all i have below is the most previous comments so i cant get back to page 1, If anyone can comprehend what I'm trying to ask can you please help me out.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 07, 2011, 08:31:35 PM
either have quick reply turned on and then the first lot you quote will appear below the page you're on rather than the latest posts

or press quote then copy the quote text that appears and go back to the first page, quote the 2nd post and paste in the first quote. think that makes sense


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on January 07, 2011, 08:38:57 PM
Haven't read back through the thread but pretty sure I predicted Jimmy Anderson would be shit.

I sure know my cricket.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on January 07, 2011, 08:41:43 PM
Haven't read back through the thread but pretty sure I predicted Jimmy Anderson would be shit.

I sure know my cricket.

I can confirm you did, but I'm not in the business of making fun of someone I prefer the praise option myself!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on January 07, 2011, 08:44:22 PM
either have quick reply turned on and then the first lot you quote will appear below the page you're on rather than the latest posts

or press quote then copy the quote text that appears and go back to the first page, quote the 2nd post and paste in the first quote. think that makes sense

I never heard of this quick reply you speak of but nvm I understand the 2nd part and that will do the trick cheers.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: gatso on January 07, 2011, 08:55:00 PM
I never heard of this quick reply you speak

it means you've always got a reply box open at the bottom of the thread so don't need to press reply and then go to a new page

you can turn it on in 'look and layout preferences' in your profile


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: sweet potata! on January 07, 2011, 09:14:23 PM
I never heard of this quick reply you speak

it means you've always got a reply box open at the bottom of the thread so don't need to press reply and then go to a new page

you can turn it on in 'look and layout preferences' in your profile

William dolittle at your service AKA Will do


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 07, 2011, 10:20:03 PM
lolol

(http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2011/01/07/1225983/927687-thrashed-on.jpg)


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Rockstar on January 07, 2011, 10:50:37 PM
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/cricket/reasons-why-poms-wont-win/story-e6frey50-1225955985591


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 12, 2011, 09:11:55 AM
trenty20 match going on atm on SS1, aussie's off to a flyer thanks to a shane watson 50, just hit swann for 3 6's off his 1st 3 balls of the match, could be a big score on here!!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on January 12, 2011, 09:12:37 AM
hahaha Twenty Twenty is world! Watson just hit three 6s in a row against Swann and 26 runs in the over.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on January 12, 2011, 09:15:09 AM
Yeah thats right people, he hit three 6 of spades in a row, there were 3 in the deck somehow.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 12, 2011, 09:16:53 AM
Yeah thats right people, he hit three 6 of spades in a row, there were 3 in the deck somehow.

looool

hes out now, i bokked him


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on January 12, 2011, 10:28:25 AM
We pegged them back nicely - they didn't score enough.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on January 12, 2011, 11:31:31 AM
gonna be a close finish!


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Longy on January 12, 2011, 11:52:42 AM
Wow that was a pretty sick finish.



Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: outragous76 on January 12, 2011, 11:54:19 AM
great finish

gotta love 20/20

wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: buzzharvey22 on January 12, 2011, 11:54:47 AM
we just have the momentum at the moment against the Aussie's

sick performence from Shane Watson


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Josedinho on January 12, 2011, 11:55:44 AM
Good game that. Morgan is a pleasure to watch. Watson didn't deserve to lose.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Horneris on January 12, 2011, 11:57:02 AM
hahaha that was absolutely brilliant, i love 2020


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: TightEnd on January 12, 2011, 11:57:46 AM
Woakes is a sweet hitter of a ball


Funnily enough, we'll also be stronger in the Test arena with Bell at 5 and Morgan at 6 I reckon


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: AndrewT on January 12, 2011, 12:32:49 PM
We pegged them back nicely - they didn't score enough.

V thin value read.


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on January 16, 2011, 10:42:56 AM
Just backed England to win this ODI at 6.  Surely even at 5 we're pretty good value for this, they currently need 48 off 39 balls


Title: Re: 2010 Ashes
Post by: Graham C on January 16, 2011, 10:58:27 AM
Oh well, nm.  Great innings by Watson