on the river you beat 44, AQ, AJ, KQ, QJ, KK, AA and a hell of a bluff with 109.
his turn bet looks very suckerish having check-called the flop. which would look like QQ. but would he really flat call preflop with QQ?
is AJ sooted of spades more likely? was the turn bet a blocker as he took you for weakness having bet the flop like that?
i think everyone shoves here with a made flush. as well as QQ. so i fold like a whimp.
notice he didn't go all in on the river, so a made flush or qq would be unlikely?
anyway i called and he showed AQ
!!!!!SHIP IT!!!!!just thought id put a winning post on here for a change, try and cause a bit of confusion
You say that because he didnt go all in, you thought a made flush or QQ would be unlikely?
If he had gone all in, would you have folded? Maybe i'm being extremely simple, but when i am unsure as to the standard of my opponnent and think he is playing ABC poker, i would have thought the smaller the bet, the less likely it is to be a bluff. If i interpret your comments right (and i might not have) then you are suggseting that the bigger the bet, the better you thought his hand would be?? In this case, if he had gone all in, i would have called him in a new york minute as i doubt many people would have gone all in with a hand that i cant beat.
Author