pretty funny ruling question

[dik9]

Its 2 actions that involve chips or 3 without chips.

[dik9]

FWIW, if a shuffle hasn't taken place then a new hand has not started. Action is given back and start again. Not rocket science really.

[gatso]

No aggro whatsoever.

I just had to argue the point because Gatso doesn't appear to available to put the world to rights on our behalf.

you're in charge of bullshit now matt and a good start you've made

I'm retiring from my policing duties as this forum is now just people posting their birdwatching photos so there's no real work for me any more

[JK]

FWIW, if a shuffle hasn't taken place then a new hand has not started. Action is given back and start again. Not rocket science really.

Even despite action?

[jgcblack]

Its 2 actions that involve chips or 3 without chips.

At DTD im 99% its this as my brodsky has told me before....

[JK]

Its 2 actions that involve chips or 3 without chips.

At DTD im 99% its this as my brodsky has told me before....

For all future rulings mate, if rich (dik9) posts, its gospel

[dik9]

PMSL ty JK but DTD's rules page has changed a little by the looks so somethings may be different.

But yes even if there has been action as a new hand has technically not started until the first riffle. Say for instance a dealer sits down with a new set up, a player notices they haven't been shuffled, he now knows everyones hand and what the board is going to run lol, the dealer will only clock on when the board is dealt so significant action would have taken place, the hand would have to be voided and there should be 2 minutes grace for the TD to kick shit out of the dealer

[kinboshi]

PMSL ty JK but DTD's rules page has changed a little by the looks so somethings may be different.

But yes even if there has been action as a new hand has technically not started until the first riffle. Say for instance a dealer sits down with a new set up, a player notices they haven't been shuffled, he now knows everyones hand and what the board is going to run lol, the dealer will only clock on when the board is dealt so significant action would have taken place, the hand would have to be voided and there should be 2 minutes grace for the TD to kick shit out of the dealer

Is the two minutes specific to DTD, or is that a standard rule everywhere?

[dik9]

TD's discretion, sometimes a good 2 hour face pounding is warranted.

[kinboshi]

TD's discretion, sometimes a good 2 hour face pounding is warranted.

This is the problem with poker rules.  There needs to be consistency.

[dik9]

TD's discretion, sometimes a good 2 hour face pounding is warranted.

This is the problem with poker rules.  There needs to be consistency.

Totally agree, I shall write to Matt Savage and ask him to include at the next TDA summit for discussion, but for the meantime as long as the dealer is in pain then it suffices.

[smashedagain]

TD's discretion, sometimes a good 2 hour face pounding is warranted.

my wife warrants this but i cant seem to last more than 30 seconds

[dik9]

TD's discretion, sometimes a good 2 hour face pounding is warranted.

my wife warrants this but i cant seem to last more than 30 seconds

I've told you before its -EV to go all-in with the nuts

[smashedagain]

TD's discretion, sometimes a good 2 hour face pounding is warranted.

my wife warrants this but i cant seem to last more than 30 seconds

I've told you before its -EV to go all-in with the nuts

[scottbrown]

TD's discretion, sometimes a good 2 hour face pounding is warranted.

my wife warrants this but i cant seem to last more than 30 seconds

Please sir, think through your words

And Rich, fancy giving the new TDs some training in ass whooping?