Dean pearson plz

30,000 very approx, counted from a distance

ty sir

Dean pearson plz

updates on Dean pearson, if/when you get the chance later on thanks.

Might be a leak but no way I'm folding here

this

[and u can happily set mine off these stacks]

I don't like the idea of 4 bet folding pre! So yeah probs getting it in now we got to this point, but pretty sure you only beat aq ak here,

I prefer the flat and re assess pre (and u can happily set mine off these stacks).

orly?

well he has to call 400 with over 5k behind, so its not ideal, but yes he can - whats ur point?

Your not getting close to the implied odds to setmine profitably. Also given the the limited information we have that he sets baby pairs aswell, we can probably safely assume he 3bets a wide enough range that everytime we hit a set we aren't guranteed to win his stack everytime.

Also OP i think you should point out this seems to be a 4max MTT which changes things somewhat. Also his 3bet size is altered in the hands (3bets to 500 wth 22, 600 this time) making me think he has it this time, esp given the previous hand. I'd 4bet call it off but i also wouldn't play an online MTT

providing you arent doing it 100%  of teh time there is nothing wrong taking shots getting 10:1 implied oddds imo

Granted i don't play MTT's but if you show me the Math that setmining 60bb's profitably (even from a 6bb 3bet) i'll happily backtrack on my statement. Although it perhaps opens a can of worms as to whether you can profitably setmine fairly shallow in 4max mtt's where people are "at it" more. I think IP calling the 3bet and playing in a majestic manner postflop may nearly have the same EV as 4bet calling, against this guy in this tournament any route you choose will be high variance, but never folding pre. LOL donkaments.

[and u can happily set mine off these stacks]

I don't like the idea of 4 bet folding pre! So yeah probs getting it in now we got to this point, but pretty sure you only beat aq ak here,

I prefer the flat and re assess pre (and u can happily set mine off these stacks).

orly?

well he has to call 400 with over 5k behind, so its not ideal, but yes he can - whats ur point?

Your not getting close to the implied odds to setmine profitably. Also given the the limited information we have that he sets baby pairs aswell, we can probably safely assume he 3bets a wide enough range that everytime we hit a set we aren't guranteed to win his stack everytime.

Also OP i think you should point out this seems to be a 4max MTT which changes things somewhat. Also his 3bet size is altered in the hands (3bets to 500 wth 22, 600 this time) making me think he has it this time, esp given the previous hand. I'd 4bet call it off but i also wouldn't play an online MTT

[and u can happily set mine off these stacks]

I don't like the idea of 4 bet folding pre! So yeah probs getting it in now we got to this point, but pretty sure you only beat aq ak here,

I prefer the flat and re assess pre (and u can happily set mine off these stacks).

orly?

worse than any of this is people that eat like animals at the table and get their greasy fucking hands all over the cards.

lol this. Also those who leave half there dry scalp on the tbl. Tons of those greasy businessmen types in the vic.

jam

3250+250 in bounties

musta bin soft

yea preflop is dangerous, against weak passive players calling down you need better starting hands. Maybe TJo plus to 3bet isolate. I'd probably call river FML we have a pair against a moron,

Don't jam river unless you are trying to fold out an overpair!

So you would only ever jam river with quads or tens full here*, anything else is a bluff?

*I'm assuming you never get to the river in this way with a 7

Its more an issue of balance If your playing this guy alot, its important you have some strong hands in your c/c range. If say you c/r AQ/KQ over 85% of the time, any1 observant will punish you for this and bomb 3streets almost regardless of board texture if there aware. Also this board is a good board to slowpay with very few scarecards ( Hes also likely to bomb cards good for his range but percieved bad for yours. ala the Ace). Given you think hes a TAG bot its unlikely he'll float and once he gets to the river your almost always toast vs some1 like this. The only way you can play this hand and jam river for value i if you have a very aggro/spewy image.

I'd say TK/Channing/Rolo would be sub 1% in a truly random UK survey.

I reckon Ivey/Negreanu/Hellmuth might ever so slightly transcend poker in the States. Hachem the same in Oz and a few others like that (Tony G is mahoosive in Lithuania)

I was talking to a guy in the Vic while ept was on from Lithuania. He said poker there is recognised as a sport and its very very popular there. They have national MTT events with no prizes lol! sounds mad but kinda cool aswell.

Thats actually a really good idea, I'm sure if some of the big names did this in the USA and across Europe it would really help get it recognised as a game of skill. They could televise them and thus still make it lucrative.

I forgot to add, that these events are also televised in Lithuania.

I'd say TK/Channing/Rolo would be sub 1% in a truly random UK survey.

I reckon Ivey/Negreanu/Hellmuth might ever so slightly transcend poker in the States. Hachem the same in Oz and a few others like that (Tony G is mahoosive in Lithuania)

I was talking to a guy in the Vic while ept was on from Lithuania. He said poker there is recognised as a sport and its very very popular there. They have national MTT events with no prizes lol! sounds mad but kinda cool aswell.

oh i misread HH, my bad. I think on this board i'd c/c aswell.

As played i think you can probably c/f the river against this guy.