poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 08, 2024, 04:14:04 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272670
Posts in
66756
Topics by
16723
Members
Latest Member:
Aledkanny
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Ruling at IPO Side Event
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: Ruling at IPO Side Event (Read 1914 times)
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9168
Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
on:
October 21, 2009, 01:17:54 PM »
So I'm in a side event at the IPO at the weekend and we are about 7 places off the money, I have about 70k and the blinds are 3000/6000 with no antes. I have pocket jacks and raise to 15k from the hijack and it folds to a French guy on the button who has about 44k. He minraises to 30k, leaving himself about 14k. It folds back round to me and he says to me (I do this in a Borat voice) "I ave a good and".
So I am about to reraise him, from watching this guy play my pocket jacks were pretty much the nuts and I wasnt really worried about the min raise at all. He then says to me "If you raise, I call, I ave a good and".
So I reraised all in and he doesnt announce call, instead his instantly flips over ace-nine of clubs. I thought he had folded, as did the dealer, and I said in disbelief and with a chuckle "I cant believe you folded" and the dealer put his hand in the muck and started moving the pot towards me. Frenchy then started protesting saying he had called, I told him he hadnt called
after
I had gone all in, the only time he said the word 'call' was his speech before I had acted. The dealer then told him he never heard him call my bet, the first announcement of a call before I acted didn't count and he should have protected his hand.
The floor came over and eventually ruled that his 'intention was clearly to call' so it counts, and the dealer fished his cards out of the muck and played the rest of the hand out. Naturally the first card out was an ace and I was crippled (I min cashed in the end huzzah).
I remember this situation came up with Ian Frazer at a GUKPT, although the difference was this time I was hoping it was deemed a fold and the previous time Frazer was trying to force a call. Based on that, it was probably a correct ruling, but just about everyone else I have told this too thinks it should have been ruled a fold by Frenchy and prior to having heard the Frazer hand I would have 100% said so too. I personally was much happier to take down the 69k pot uncontested than gamble for an 84k pot even though I was the favourite, is that too nitty? I guess if I had aces I would have fought tooth and nail to make the call stand, so I am probably being a bit results orientated.
«
Last Edit: October 21, 2009, 01:19:48 PM by DaveShoelace
»
Logged
KarmaDope
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9283
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #1 on:
October 21, 2009, 01:21:51 PM »
TL; DR
His hand hit the muck. Therefore it's a fold.
Logged
StuartHopkin
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8163
Ocho cinco
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #2 on:
October 21, 2009, 01:24:24 PM »
Quote from: sharplea on October 21, 2009, 01:21:51 PM
TL; DR
His hand hit the muck. Therefore it's a fold.
Fuck the muck.
Sounds like he flipped his hand because he thought he had called.
Ruling sounds pretty fair to me.
Logged
Only 23 days to go until the Berlin Marathon! Please sponsor me at
www.virginmoneygiving.com/StuartHopkin
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #3 on:
October 21, 2009, 01:25:10 PM »
Quote from: sharplea on October 21, 2009, 01:21:51 PM
TL; DR
His hand hit the muck. Therefore it's a fold.
please never apply for a job in a cardroom
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13363
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #4 on:
October 21, 2009, 01:30:26 PM »
This is a call. Gukpt last year, a ruling was given on the same basis (although bloke didn't want to call but was forced to due to verbal declartion being binding.
gave correct ruling. Surely you don't think he is folding an ace getting a million to 1?
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44302
We go again.
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #5 on:
October 21, 2009, 01:37:14 PM »
He's French - he was obviously calling.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #6 on:
October 21, 2009, 01:44:05 PM »
Quote from: DaveShoelace on October 21, 2009, 01:17:54 PM
but just about everyone else I have told this too thinks it should have been ruled a fold by Frenchy
they said that so you'd stop complaining. it's like when someone tells me a badbeat story I tend to go 'oh that's sick' rather than taking the time to explain that in fact they played it horribly and it wasn't really a badbeat in the hope that it'll end the conversation
even if the verbal wasn't deemed as binding (which is cardroom dependent) flipping your cards certainly isn't a fold
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44302
We go again.
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #7 on:
October 21, 2009, 01:55:23 PM »
The TD made a good ruling during the main event.
Drunk Irish fella who'd been annoying the table since his late arrival was trying to get under everyone's skin (and on the whole, succeeding) was giving a speech to another player who he was heads-up with on the flop. The other player bet and drunken-Irish man called and flipped his cards over, showing he had top pair with a king kicker. The other player asked if that was a fold (presumably before he mucked his own cards), and dealer then looked to see the revealed cards. The TD was called, and he asked the drunken-Irishman if he'd intentionally flipped his cards or if it was an accident. He said it was an accident, at which point it was made clear it was no accident.
The TD said that as he'd intentionally revealed his cards, his hand was now dead, and then told him he had a one orbit penalty before he could continue playing.
A decision warmly appreciated by everyone at the table. The player was also later warned that if he continued with his borderline-abusive speech play he'd receive another penalty.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9168
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #8 on:
October 21, 2009, 02:04:25 PM »
Quote from: gatso on October 21, 2009, 01:44:05 PM
Quote from: DaveShoelace on October 21, 2009, 01:17:54 PM
but just about everyone else I have told this too thinks it should have been ruled a fold by Frenchy
they said that so you'd stop complaining. it's like when someone tells me a badbeat story I tend to go 'oh that's sick' rather than taking the time to explain that in fact they played it horribly and it wasn't really a badbeat in the hope that it'll end the conversation
even if the verbal wasn't deemed as binding (which is cardroom dependent) flipping your cards certainly isn't a fold
You are probably right, especially as what immediately followed from the ruling story was a bad beat story.
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #9 on:
October 21, 2009, 02:06:06 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on October 21, 2009, 01:55:23 PM
The other player bet and drunken-Irish man called and flipped his cards over
so how is ruling his hand dead a good ruling?
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44302
We go again.
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #10 on:
October 21, 2009, 02:10:49 PM »
Quote from: gatso on October 21, 2009, 02:06:06 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on October 21, 2009, 01:55:23 PM
The other player bet and drunken-Irish man called and flipped his cards over
so how is ruling his hand dead a good ruling?
...as he intentionally revealed his cards during the hand and this was obviously against the rules they were using.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #11 on:
October 21, 2009, 02:15:07 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on October 21, 2009, 02:10:49 PM
Quote from: gatso on October 21, 2009, 02:06:06 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on October 21, 2009, 01:55:23 PM
The other player bet and drunken-Irish man called and flipped his cards over
so how is ruling his hand dead a good ruling?
...as he intentionally revealed his cards during the hand and this was obviously against the rules they were using.
it's heads up, A bets, B calls and flips his cards. that is not against the rules of any card room on the planet
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9168
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #12 on:
October 21, 2009, 02:17:56 PM »
Quote from: gatso on October 21, 2009, 02:15:07 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on October 21, 2009, 02:10:49 PM
Quote from: gatso on October 21, 2009, 02:06:06 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on October 21, 2009, 01:55:23 PM
The other player bet and drunken-Irish man called and flipped his cards over
so how is ruling his hand dead a good ruling?
...as he intentionally revealed his cards during the hand and this was obviously against the rules they were using.
it's heads up, A bets, B calls and flips his cards. that is not against the rules of any card room on the planet
It was on the flop and not all in.
Logged
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8089
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #13 on:
October 21, 2009, 02:19:14 PM »
Quote from: gatso on October 21, 2009, 02:15:07 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on October 21, 2009, 02:10:49 PM
Quote from: gatso on October 21, 2009, 02:06:06 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on October 21, 2009, 01:55:23 PM
The other player bet and drunken-Irish man called and flipped his cards over
so how is ruling his hand dead a good ruling?
...as he intentionally revealed his cards during the hand and this was obviously against the rules they were using.
it's heads up, A bets, B calls and flips his cards. that is not against the rules of any card room on the planet
course it is.
heads up in a pot in a cash game is fine.
heads up in a pot in a tourney is not. unless the tourney itself is down to heads up.
Logged
Blue text
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: Ruling at IPO Side Event
«
Reply #14 on:
October 21, 2009, 02:19:48 PM »
oh right. I should've read that bit as well instead of assuming it was on the river
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...