stt limp rrai squeeeeeze

[cia260895]

so i listened and...

PokerStars Game #24093961658: Tournament #135276089, $11+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (600/1200) - 2009/01/20 16:40:02 GMT [2009/01/20 11:40:02 ET]
Table '135276089 4' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: PYCVS (18085 in chips)
Seat 4: MOFpoker (37173 in chips)
Seat 5: CIA260895 (7420 in chips)
Seat 6: MacBooB (14715 in chips)
Seat 7: manfredHB (9935 in chips)
Seat 8: zockermen (27525 in chips)
Seat 9: FezioJnr (17348 in chips)
PYCVS: posts the ante 125
MOFpoker: posts the ante 125
CIA260895: posts the ante 125
MacBooB: posts the ante 125
manfredHB: posts the ante 125
zockermen: posts the ante 125
FezioJnr: posts the ante 125
CIA260895: posts small blind 600
MacBooB: posts big blind 1200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to CIA260895 [ ]
manfredHB: folds
zockermen: folds
FezioJnr: raises 2400 to 3600
PYCVS: folds
MOFpoker: folds
CIA260895: raises 3695 to 7295 and is all-in
MacBooB: folds
FezioJnr: calls 3695
*** FLOP *** [ ]
*** TURN *** [ ] []
*** RIVER *** [ ] []
*** SHOW DOWN ***
CIA260895: shows [ ] (two pair, Tens and Nines)
FezioJnr: shows [ ] (a flush, Ace high)
FezioJnr collected 16665 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 16665 | Rake 0
Board [ ]
Seat 1: PYCVS folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: MOFpoker (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: CIA260895 (small blind) showed [ ] and lost with two pair, Tens and Nines
Seat 6: MacBooB (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: manfredHB folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: zockermen folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: FezioJnr showed [ ] and won (16665) with a flush, Ace high

[gatso]

Ian, you seem to be struggling to recognise situations. all 3 hands posted in this thread are completely different yet from your posts it would appear that you think they're similar. the only similarity is that we have 99

in my op we have a full table with everyone playing deep and our hero goes for a squeeze play

in your first hand you're playing deepish and a shortstack has shoved so you should be iso shoving 99

in your 2nd hand it's you that is shortstacked and you've made a (correct) shove over a standard raise from a bigger stack

[cia260895]

in response the only reason i posted both hands was the relevance of the same hand being 99 as i said originally not a stt but apt due to being same hand, the 1st hand where i got told i should have shoved i didn't post anything on oppo's or how far off the money i was, which  was a deciding factor especially as i have been running real bad at the mo and just wanted to reach as deep as i could,and yes u are right that i am reading situations a bit wrong at the mo which is something i am trying to resolve,

 but I will take all comments on board.