Title: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Nem on May 12, 2006, 01:20:46 PM It should have been longer.
Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: bolt pp on May 12, 2006, 01:48:18 PM he got 15 months in jail, not suspended?
he's gonna get BATTERED!!! Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Nem on May 12, 2006, 01:52:16 PM He will buy his way through. Be a Daddy's bitch. ;)
Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: bolt pp on May 12, 2006, 01:55:53 PM He will buy his way through. Be a Daddy's bitch. ;) He already is, but he's the only one who dont know it! Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Triple X on May 12, 2006, 03:14:55 PM this sentencing sounds about right (without being controversial, maybe a bit tougher than i would have expected from the courts)
the only problem is that there is such inconsistency between reckless driving and drink driving - some get sentences, some just get bans etc. I would like to see a far higher level of consistency Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Nem on May 12, 2006, 03:16:15 PM this sentencing sounds about right (without being controversial, maybe a bit tougher than i would have expected from the courts) the only problem is that there is such inconsistency between reckless driving and drink driving - some get sentences, some just get bans etc. I would like to see a far higher level of consistency I read on another site that this is Naz's 4th driving conviction/ban. He was lucky to get 15 months. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: bolt pp on May 12, 2006, 03:18:39 PM poor naz still sitting in the cells at court waiting for his soliciter to come and tell him that he dont have to go to jail at 5pm.
rotflmfao Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: GlasgowBandit on May 12, 2006, 03:36:39 PM Maximum sentence you can get for a driving offence is 5 years so in the scheme of things I think its "fair" However I would like to see more severe penalties handed out for driving convictions.
Steeley68 will agree with me when I say that some drivers are plane thick and don;t understand that by exceeding the speed limit it makes them a bad driver, this has a bearing on your insurance policies and there are drivers who don't understand thatd riving fast and beyond the legal limit makes them more likely to be involved in a smash they quantify it by saying everyone has a speeding conviction. Thats pure nonsense there not everyone has been caught speeding and not everyone speeds!! Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Nem on May 12, 2006, 03:38:42 PM Maximum sentence you can get for a driving offence is 5 years so in the scheme of things I think its "fair" However I would like to see more severe penalties handed out for driving convictions. Steeley68 will agree with me when I say that some drivers are plane thick and don;t understand that by exceeding the speed limit it makes them a bad driver, this has a bearing on your insurance policies and there are drivers who don't understand thatd riving fast and beyond the legal limit makes them more likely to be involved in a smash they quantify it by saying everyone has a speeding conviction. Thats pure nonsense there not everyone has been caught speeding and not everyone speeds!! Everyone breaks the speed limit. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: bolt pp on May 12, 2006, 03:42:12 PM i did fancy that he would recieve a light sentence even when i heard what he had done to the guy.
I am supprised its that long. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: MrMoves on May 12, 2006, 04:16:43 PM Sounds like a fair sentence. Although had he killed the other guy, a max. of 5 years would of been very light indeed.
Everybody does or has broken speed limits. There are occasions when it is safe to do so, 80mph on an empty motorway in clear weather for example. Crossing an unbroken white line at 90mph on the brow of a hill is perhaps not the greatest idea. It's the un-insured, un-taxed that really wind me up. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: GlasgowBandit on May 12, 2006, 04:29:14 PM Sounds like a fair sentence. Although had he killed the other guy, a max. of 5 years would of been very light indeed. Everybody does or has broken speed limits. There are occasions when it is safe to do so, 80mph on an empty motorway in clear weather for example. Crossing an unbroken white line at 90mph on the brow of a hill is perhaps not the greatest idea. It's the un-insured, un-taxed that really wind me up. So by the attitude of some on here what you are saying is that you have broken the speed limit? Not every driver has broken the speed limit thats absolute nonsense, how can you quantify that? If it where safe to break the speed limit then their wouldn't be speed restrictions in place. What really annoys me are these manufacturers that make cars that go in excess of a 100 mph, there is no need for it - it breaks the speed limit! Or even better are the numpties who increase their break horse power in a vehicle so can go faster, whats the point? Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: bolt pp on May 12, 2006, 04:42:27 PM the police are allowed to go as fast as they deem neccersary arnt they?
unless your off duty and pretend your practising, that was unreal Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Nem on May 12, 2006, 04:50:20 PM Not every driver has broken the speed limit thats absolute nonsense, how can you quantify that? Everyone has broken the speed limit. Even if 1mph over. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: GlasgowBandit on May 12, 2006, 05:01:34 PM Not every driver has broken the speed limit thats absolute nonsense, how can you quantify that? Everyone has broken the speed limit. Even if 1mph over. Nonsense! Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Nem on May 12, 2006, 05:10:33 PM Not every driver has broken the speed limit thats absolute nonsense, how can you quantify that? Everyone has broken the speed limit. Even if 1mph over. Nonsense! So you have NEVER broken the speed limit ever in your driving life? Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: MrMoves on May 12, 2006, 05:12:12 PM Sounds like a fair sentence. Although had he killed the other guy, a max. of 5 years would of been very light indeed. Everybody does or has broken speed limits. There are occasions when it is safe to do so, 80mph on an empty motorway in clear weather for example. Crossing an unbroken white line at 90mph on the brow of a hill is perhaps not the greatest idea. It's the un-insured, un-taxed that really wind me up. So by the attitude of some on here what you are saying is that you have broken the speed limit? Not every driver has broken the speed limit thats absolute nonsense, how can you quantify that? If it where safe to break the speed limit then their wouldn't be speed restrictions in place. What really annoys me are these manufacturers that make cars that go in excess of a 100 mph, there is no need for it - it breaks the speed limit! Or even better are the numpties who increase their break horse power in a vehicle so can go faster, whats the point? Absolutely yes. If you've held a licence and drive on a regular basis. There will be many instances when technically you've broken the speed limit. For example: Leaving a national speed limit area into a built up area catches out many people, despite braking hard they will often travel into the 30 zone at 30-35mph. I'm not saying everybody speeds through poor driving. Everybody speeds to a small degree in error at some point, this is why traffic police do not bother with speeding offences of a minor nature, 32mph in a 30 zone will not get you pulled over. 35 mph probably would. 32mph is still speeding. There is also the issue of speedometer accuracy. They are hardly ever 100% accurate. You may think you never speed, GlasgowBandit, but the chances are your speedometer gives a very minor false reading... sometimes one or two MPH. You could of been speeding everyday for years and not be aware of it. That said, you could of been driving slower than you think too. RE: 100mph+ cars & improving performance. I have friends that use their cars for track days. That is where they speed and where they use speeds in excess of 100mph. There are also un-restricted roads in Europe where 100mph+ is a common accurance. Some of us do drive outside of the UK. Improving the perrformance of a car will also improve the over taking speeds of a car. Thus making it a safer place to be when over taking a tractor or slow moving vehicle. I will freely admit I speed, but only in error by minor amounts and only when safe to do so. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Sark79 on May 12, 2006, 07:24:06 PM Bit of a shame a guy with his talent winds up like that. The guy he hit is the real loser though. poor guy
Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: steeley68 on May 13, 2006, 12:07:13 AM Speeding? My niece was almost killed by a speeding driver on a 30mph road 4 yrs ago. The driver was doing 40mph, oh and she had been drinking. I never break the speed limit intentionally and I will never, ever have an alcoholic drink - not ONE - if I have the car. Please don't patronise me by mentioning the old excuses 'But one drink doesn't put you over the limit.' Complete BS. One pint of alcoholic drink or measure of spirit is one too many. My niece still hasn't fully recovered. She can't use one eye and she has become very insecure where she used to be very confident. If the driver had been travelling at 30-32mph, Lisa wouldn't have spent 8 months in hospital, getting various brain scans etc.
If you drive in a 20mph zone and decide for some crazy reason that you will continue to drive at 30mph, then shame on you. You could kill a child. You could kill MY child. 'We all do it', 'we all speed' is nonsense. Once you are involved in a phone conversation with a 40 yr old father at 2am who is telling you that his daughter is about to die, then you will think twice about putting the foot down. The driver? She took the cowards way out. Those of you who know me, will know my views on suicide. No one has the right to take a life. Absolutely without question. DO NOT start a debate on this thread about it. If you see me driving on the road and try and get me to speed up by being aggresive towards me, it won't work. You are all talking about breaking the speed limit - you are exceeding the speed limit. If you won't get pulled over by the cops for driving at 32 in a 30 - then I would suggest that you are not breaking the law. Exceeding the speed limit, yes - but if you were breaking the law, the traffic police WILL pull you over. Lisa continues in her recovery and now works with children who have had similar head injuries. Thanks to the fabulous doctors and nurses in the Southern General and the Royal Infirmary, she will celebrate her 21st birthday this year. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: GlasgowBandit on May 13, 2006, 01:44:25 AM Steeley another point on this is we have seen and read the damage that is caused by idiots who do speed. Feck when people insurance goes up because they have had a speeding fine yet fail to see the consequences that this might have on others then have the cheek to moan at guys like us for infoming them of such things that the "faster you drive the more liely you are to be involved in an accident" some people just don't get it!!
As for you stance on drink driving I know that only too well! And I totally agree with you. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: bolt pp on May 13, 2006, 07:42:13 AM I think the one point we can all agree on is that we were all.. rotflmfao rotflmfao rotflmfao about hamed having to endure the contraband searsh last night!!
squat champ Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: MrMoves on May 13, 2006, 09:50:14 AM Excessive speed is wrong and kills/causes injury to other people.
...phew!!! I'm glad we cleared that one up. Thanks. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Sark79 on May 13, 2006, 04:54:31 PM Do you think the beginning of Naz' failings as a boxer started when he dumped Brendan Ingle and Frank Warren?
I think Emanuel Stewart is great, but he didn't seem to put up with Naz' ego the way Ingle used to. Didn't Oscar Suarez do most of his training? I know before Naz went with Suarez and Stewart, he didn't like running. This seemed unusual for a boxer. Ingle said on the News yesterday that during Hamed's time in prison, he may be able to get back to his previous fitness if he worked at it. I always liked Hamed. I hope he can come back. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Nem on May 13, 2006, 05:55:54 PM I always liked Hamed. I hope he can come back. No chance. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Sark79 on May 13, 2006, 06:55:38 PM Thats what they said about David Hasselhoff after kNIGHT RIDER ended. Then he went onto have a successful recording career in Germany. Then came his finest role to date. Mitch Buchannon in Baywatch. Personally I always preffered his numerous co-stars better. Especially Gena Lee Nolan and Yasmin Bleeth. :D
Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: steeley68 on May 13, 2006, 10:55:34 PM Excessive speed is wrong and kills/causes injury to other people. ...phew!!! I'm glad we cleared that one up. Thanks. When it personally affects you so closely, you tend to have quite an opinion on the matter. But thanks for your sarcastic and cutting comment, whoever you are. Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: MrMoves on May 14, 2006, 09:18:29 AM Excessive speed is wrong and kills/causes injury to other people. ...phew!!! I'm glad we cleared that one up. Thanks. When it personally affects you so closely, you tend to have quite an opinion on the matter. But thanks for your sarcastic and cutting comment, whoever you are. I'm sure it does. [Edited in the interests of peace] Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: bolt pp on May 15, 2006, 12:37:41 PM I heard he's been moved to an open prison.
F***ing certainty, hes a celebrity!!!!!!!!!!!! Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: mex on May 15, 2006, 11:33:04 PM Its not always speed that kills, my niece was killed when her friend lost concentration (her own words) she killed both rear seat passengers,
Her punishment? 6 points no ban and 200 pound fine. The law concerning killing with a car is an ass. If you run someone over whilst drunk and doing 120mph and leave the accident in an untaxed uninsured car, you get 5years. Have 2 pints and get in a barney with some nutter who attacks you, you subsiquently push him over, he hits his head and dies,(as happened in our market place 10 years back) you get 7 years as for speeding. the 70 mph on the motorway is not actually a safe limit it causes traffic to bunch and causes ill lane discipline. look how freely the traffic on an unristricted autobahn moves and how much space users give each other? Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Sark79 on May 15, 2006, 11:41:55 PM I think it is crazy that Hamed only gets 15 months for his crime . When you compare this to the case of the animal rights protesters who were imprisoned for over 10 years for digging up the grave, something doesn't seem fair . Hameds crime was worse. Money talks I think.
Title: Re: PRINCE NASSEM GETS 15 MONTHS. Post by: Bongo on May 16, 2006, 12:02:52 AM I didn't follow the details of the case that closely but wasn't the 10 years for all the other things they did as well (over a period of many years)?
The farm itself isn't far from me, my ex gf lived in the same village as it, so all the things that happened (=lots) were reported in the local rag. Inappropriate speed kills but that is a very different thing to breaking the speed limit, indeed sometimes it would be inappropriate to drive at the speed limit. In general I think the standard of driving in this country is very poor, most people seem to leave their brains behind when they get behind the wheel. I don't really know what can be done about it though. |