blonde poker forum

Community Forums => Betting Tips and Sport Discussion => Topic started by: Nem on May 18, 2006, 12:49:56 AM



Title: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: Nem on May 18, 2006, 12:49:56 AM
You views?


Title: Re: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: AdamM on May 18, 2006, 12:55:33 AM
a final has to be a big single event. I know it's sometimes not a popular thing to say but I think Pens are a perfectly fair way of ending a game too. infact if it were up to me it'd be 90 mins then straight to pens. great spectacle.


Title: Re: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: thetank on May 18, 2006, 03:57:47 AM
Gotta agree with Adam, apart from the penaltys after 90 minutes.

I love the extra time period, a great test of fitness and endurance.


Title: Re: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: GlasgowBandit on May 18, 2006, 07:33:00 AM
There is no reason for a final to be played over two legs, none whatsoever!


Title: Re: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: bolt pp on May 18, 2006, 01:08:36 PM
no way pedro.

final not finals.


Title: Re: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: Nem on May 18, 2006, 01:09:48 PM
Remember the UEFA Cup Final was a 2 leg affair. I voted yes.


Title: Re: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: bolt pp on May 18, 2006, 01:25:28 PM
The least credible of all major championship finals!

What good reason is there to make it a 2 leg affair?

i just dont see the point.



Title: Re: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: Nem on May 18, 2006, 01:26:40 PM
The least credible of all major championship finals!

What good reason is there to make it a 2 leg affair?

i just dont see the point.



I feel that over 2 legs, there is a better chance of the best team winning.

Why are the semi finals and q/f 2 leg?


Title: Re: Poll: Should all Cup Finals be settled over 2 leg matches?
Post by: bolt pp on May 18, 2006, 01:32:01 PM
erm....to give the better and therfore most deserving team a better chance of progression?

Theres got to come a point though when the best team is'nt always the most desrving and dos'nt always win( i'm not a communist) :D

why not just keep playing the match for about 3 hours if need be till the better team hits the front.

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!! give the underdogs a chance.