blonde poker forum

Community Forums => Betting Tips and Sport Discussion => Topic started by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 04:37:59 AM



Title: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 04:37:59 AM
You can Germany to win the World Cup at 9.4 on Betfair.

Betdaq will allow you to lay them at 9.3.

So am I correct in thinking you put £12 on them to win on Betfair and get back if they do £112.8

And lay them to lose on Betdaq for £100 to get back £112.05 if they lose.

So whatever happens, you get back more than the £112 you put on.

Am I wrong somewhere or can have a free bet on the host nation to win for 0.7% of whatever you have lying around.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: bolt pp on May 28, 2006, 04:43:33 AM
did you include the tax?


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 04:45:06 AM
I honestly have no idea. Is the tax factored in to the odds each site gives you, or is it taken from winnings?

If you back something at 9.4 for £10 and it comes in, do you get £94 back, or do they charge tax then?

The othe one is Japan, whom you can lay on Betdaq for 460 and back on Betfair for 470.



Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: bobby1 on May 28, 2006, 04:49:54 AM
yes, you are correct but you have to allow for commision taken from the winning bet which will be 5% if you have not had much turnover. So in theory yes, but the comm will take away part of the profit.



Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: bolt pp on May 28, 2006, 04:51:21 AM
theres a 5% commission on your winnings on betfair, betdaq probably have a similar charge but ive never used them.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 04:54:34 AM
Ah right ok, thought I'd got it wrong somehwere.

Cheers guys.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: bolt pp on May 28, 2006, 04:57:02 AM
Now gambling is no longer taxed by the goverment(the bookmakers are'nt i mean)
you can frequently find an event with only two runners,(snooker,tennis) being bet to a 95 -94% market with different bookmakers.

Its work getting your bets on, and you need to lay out a lump but i know people that make money doing this.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: bobby1 on May 28, 2006, 04:59:52 AM
Tank,

arbitage is rife on many sports and events. The example you gave features only a very small arb but imagine that you could bet at 10 with a bookie and lay at 9.3, yout thoughts were right but the comm would eat it up at such a small arb.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 05:18:22 AM
Sounds like fun, I'll look into it.





Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 08:11:04 AM
Yes, yes lots of fun. (I've made a spreadsheet  :D )

Backing at 9.4 with 5% commision on winning is the same as backing at 8.98 with no commision

Laying at 9.3 with 5% commision on winnings is the same as laying at 9.74 (to 2dp) with no commision

Now this is tons of fun, I can plug a price from Betfair into my spreadsheet and get the real price after commision has been taken into consideration.

I'm off to look for that arbitage stuff now. If I find some within 6 months, I'll be sure to check back and tell you all how to make a guaranteed 20p.

Any suggestions on good bookmakers/betting exchanges to look at. At the moment I'm just trawling Betfair and Betdaq.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 08:14:33 AM
My spreadsheet is telling me that, with the following prices before commision.....

If you can Lay at 9.3, to make any money, you'd need to be able to back at 10.2 or greater.

Similarly, if you can back at 9.4, you'd need to be able to lay at 8.5 or less to make dosh.



Just so you all know, I have been playing poker aswell. I haven't been at this exclusively for 3 hours.  ::)


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: Karabiner on May 28, 2006, 05:27:40 PM
Remember that only the profit is taxed, the stake is exempt.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: tikay on May 28, 2006, 05:41:03 PM
Tank has to re-format his spreadsheet now!


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 06:05:34 PM
Remember that only the profit is taxed, the stake is exempt.

I assumed this in the original spreadsheet thankfully, so no need to reformat.

It seemed like common sense. A commision on the stake when laying, or backing at a really short price, would mean that you'd get taxed for a greater amount than your winnings.



Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: Karabiner on May 28, 2006, 06:52:28 PM
Well when betting shops charged tax on bets they taxed the whole amount, stake and profit.

So just wanted to make sure that you weren't working on that principle.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: thetank on May 28, 2006, 06:57:35 PM
Ta, I do appreciate the help.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: Graham C on May 28, 2006, 07:03:29 PM
I have a wee calculator program that works out the arbs and takes commission into account if you are interested, just pm me your email or something and I'll send you it


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: bolt pp on May 28, 2006, 10:36:22 PM
Well when betting shops charged tax on bets they taxed the whole amount, stake and profit.

So just wanted to make sure that you weren't working on that principle.


you had the choice


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: Karabiner on May 29, 2006, 12:45:49 AM
Well when betting shops charged tax on bets they taxed the whole amount, stake and profit.

So just wanted to make sure that you weren't working on that principle.


you had the choice

Not really, even if you included tax when placing the bet you still paid tax on the stake.


Title: Re: Hmmmmm, is this normal?
Post by: bolt pp on May 29, 2006, 04:42:07 AM
yeah but i never backed a winner in 8 years so it was cheaper not to pay the ajax :D