blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => The Rail => Topic started by: snoopy1239 on July 08, 2006, 03:33:22 AM



Title: Event 9
Post by: snoopy1239 on July 08, 2006, 03:33:22 AM
Thought you guys might be interested in this report:

http://www.blondepoker.com/index.php?q=node/3145 (http://www.blondepoker.com/index.php?q=node/3145)

I have to confess, I thought Hellmuth was yesterday's news, but this showing proves that he's still up there with the best, and he's got quite a few years left on Brunson and Chan too. With WSOP numbers increasing every year, surely Phill will, if he wins 2 more, become a record breaking bracelet winner whose feat will never be surpassed.

Or am I speaking booooooooooolocks?


Title: Re: Event 9
Post by: The Baron on July 08, 2006, 03:38:22 AM
There's life in Chan yet. When I saw him win his tenth last year I was in awe. Truly awesome to watch.


Title: Re: Event 9
Post by: tikay on July 08, 2006, 09:31:54 AM

I have often speculated on here & elsewhere that Mr Hellmuth will never win another WSOP Bracelet, on the grounds that he has "yesterday's game" and a suspect temprement.

Though he did not win this, it's clear he still has what it takes, & I'm happy to accept so.

But I still don't like his childish & rude behaviouir at the table......


Title: Re: Event 9
Post by: The Baron on July 08, 2006, 12:38:34 PM

I have often speculated on here & elsewhere that Mr Hellmuth will never win another WSOP Bracelet, on the grounds that he has "yesterday's game" and a suspect temprement.

Though he did not win this, it's clear he still has what it takes, & I'm happy to accept so.

But I still don't like his childish & rude behaviouir at the table......

I think a lot of names proved last year that "yesterday's game" is actually very successful at the WSOP.


Title: Re: Event 9
Post by: mikkyT on July 08, 2006, 01:02:32 PM

I have often speculated on here & elsewhere that Mr Hellmuth will never win another WSOP Bracelet, on the grounds that he has "yesterday's game" and a suspect temprement.

Though he did not win this, it's clear he still has what it takes, & I'm happy to accept so.

But I still don't like his childish & rude behaviouir at the table......

But without him, poker would be a duller place. Whilst rude behaviour can be quite upsetting and/or downright ignorant when you are on the recieving end, it makes great viewing. We don't just play to win either. Whilst there is a difference between being rude and table banter, ones poison is another mans pleasure. Then again, as red-dog says - you don't have to like a person to admire what they do. Like Eminem, John Lennon etc for example.