blonde poker forum

never done one of these before but sitting here bored so thought id give it a go.


scored 131  is that good bad or indifferent?

what IQ are the rest of you (no cheating please)  just curious

link?

I'll have a bash later - I did the mensa test years ago (under duress)

I tried to do one of these tests once, unfortunately all I could find was a website for a gameshow starring Stephen Fry

 rotflmfao Another classic Sark - you are brilliant mate!

the one i took was:

http://uk.tickle.com/test/iq.html

I got 133 so you are marginally more rubbish than me!

134 :D

131.1

Your IQ score is 118!       Bloody numbers killed me, I really struggle with them

geek :D

135

Marginally geekier!

129

It's Rigged >:(

133   8)

geek with one of those propellor hats!

I don't think you are far wrong! I just went through the test in seconds, hitting as many wrong answers as I could (not really that hard lol) It STILL gave a score of 100?! Hmmmmmm

I thought the results were a little on the high side....

i wonder if it is a true reflection of the actual answers then?  Without wishing to sound like a geeky geek, my score on this was actually a fair bit lower than when I did the supervised mensa test a few years mentioned earlier.

The average IQ is about 100.  I am sticking with my 118  :D.  The test is 100% accurate, it is a brilliant example of what an IQ test should be

Well, according to that site most blondes are bordering on genius, take from that what you want.....  ;goodvevil;

No Jane, it is accurate. I have already altered my CV, it now reads that I got a score of 118 on an IQ test  :D

'Proper' IQ tests have lots more questions and a time limit.

But as I get a propellor hat with this one, I declare it to be extremely accurate and no-one can argue cos I'm the cleverest...  ::)

Indeed, and the time limits are set so it is very difficult to answer all the questions in the allocated time.  The questions on a 'proper' test get gradually harder too - much more 'testing' than the online one.

the 'sex IQ' test on that page caught my eye, might have a go at that ;)

 ;letsparty;

138

http://www.highiqsociety.org/iq_tests/

These are real iq tests. I gave up trying to do that hard one.

just tried that whilst multitabling - better take a raincheck for now!

135 on the first one

131 - they must have some of the answers wrong.

lol.  as a 30 something like me take comfort in the fact that they give us lower scores due to our perceived wisdom.  I'm saying I'm 21 next time!  :p

On the tickle one?

edit got 111 on the other one but then i don't have any general knowledge.

115 on that hard one.  That's very general knowledge based I thought rather than decent IQ questions.  Plus there was a US one in there that us decent folk in the UK aren't likely to know ;)

Wahye, I did the second one again and got 124 (but i used google for the general knowledge questions).

I have an incredibly high IQ and no social skills, anyone wanna swop? :) :blonde:

I really should be hitting the sack, but I'm going to have a ciggie and then give this hard one a bash first (as the actress said to the bishop......)

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

I can't do either mate.  But I can make good cheese on toast

I'm in the high 60s. 160s that is

Sorry, but I am useless at most things in life except useless facts, trivia and boffin like sums!

well I am dead chuffed to have got 119.  I must be very good at guessing because I only 'knew' two answers on the whole test!

131 on the first


cant do 2nd



i have a headache

139 on the first

276381763278163218763872163w8717 on the first

I got that! I had a 'y' instead of a 'w' though.

Thats impressive mate.  You should go on a quiz show

136 - how do they rate it??

Are some questions worth more than others??

I am hopeless with those shape thinngs

I hate those proper IQ tests on the net.

Spend an hour or so on them, then you have to pay to get your results.

Fok that, I'll pretend I'm 133 with the rest of ya :)

150

Where is Mikkyt?

He said his IQ is over 160!!! :o

rotflmfao (http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/8044/bullshittu2.gif)<<<<<

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=12086.msg253304#msg253304

He made the post on a WAP phone on which, one could summize, the "one" key is a little loose.

our mikky was back on "holiday" last time I heard from him, i await further confirmation

wow good for me 128 :)   my blonde roots showing aswell lol

Is he in jail again?

In a very small part of my degree we looked at intelligence and IQ tests.

The main problem with measuring intelligence is that it's impossible to define intelligence in a way that everybody agrees on. One of the first measures of intelligence was tried by the aristocracy in the 19th century - they decided that intelligence must be related to physical strength and ability. They discounted this after tests using this criteria showed that the working classes they employed were more 'intelligent' then them.  :D

The 3 basic definitions generally used are:

1) How much you know.
    The link to the hard test here has quite a lot of this, but general knowledge like this is probably the least accepted measure of intelligence because somebody who never had any formal education might be very intelligent but has just never had the opportunity to develop it. I think this website uses these measures more for a commercial reason.

2) Your capacity for learning.
    This is basically what most IQ tests try and measure. All the logic questions and questions to do with - what comes next in the series? - are measuring this. The original tests like this were used to try and identify schoolchildren who would need help with the curriculum. Most modern IQ tests are just revisions of previous ones so what they generally measure is how well they could do in school exams - but even within this it would be expected that some would under perform and some would over perform based on the amount of effort they put in.

3) Theory of multiple intelligences
    This is the theory that you can't measure intelligence as a single figure as it isn't a single thing. Some people are logically intelligent, some people are verbally intelligent, some are spacially intelligent, (there are seven). This is the theory I think makes most sense - there's more information here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_intelligence (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_intelligence) - but it would be quite dull to type out what this article explains better.

So because of this last theory I'm not bothered about IQ tests at all - none of them really mean anything, what you lack in one small definition of intelligence you almost certainly make up for in another.

Guess who scored 95

pmsl

Gosh how I hate IQ tests, the result of one had far reaching consequences for me. There I was dawdling about happily in school, not working, see I was a lazy bugger even then, I didn't need to as I was coping well with no work and had the ability to keep up by working on the spur of the moment, you know the score - do your maths homework on the way to school and all that.. An interfering headmistress thought I ought to have an IQ test because she could "see something there", I took it got an "interesting" result, pushed up to a class were I was out of my depth and would have had work hard to catch up, couldn't be bothered to do that sort of thing and fell behind. Now if she had just let me go on my own sweet way I would have been fine.

I had a maths teacher at secondary school that used to mark the homework "per page"!

I'm not joking he didnt check the results just started from G and worked his way forward!!

The clever kids that got all the answers right and done all the homework crammed into 2 pages used to get Fs and us lot that done 2 sums per page got A+.

He got pulled up about it after one of the clever kids parents complained to the school.

He was even moaning about it to us lot saying" you always get someone who thinks they know best"!!!

Even if you think IQ tests do give a meaningful result the online ones aren't in the slightest bit reliable.

The only IQ test I've taken was a timed, supervised one under exam conditions, I scored 147.

It doesn't alter my opinion that IQ doesn't provide a meaningful measure.  8)

lol

Yep - I got a similar result to Jon in a 'proper' test.  All it means is that I am good at IQ tests (in effect, logic and reasoning).  My quiz teammates will testify after BB3, I'm sure, that being good at IQ tests is no good when it matters!

I have a similar thing in that i am just about the most unacademic and lazy person around but i do well on iq tests so i was in top class for everything but didn't remotely have the interest or drive to achieve anything with it.

At last - I have found my forum twin!

and there was me thinking i hadn't got one. woohoo

did you drop out of school and scrape 3 GCSEs as well?!

Not so much dropped out as escorted out, i did get a few more gcse's though and some higher education a few years later.

I got 124

did the first one - 144

Sure that when i did an IQ test when i was younger that the result came out higher, maybe i'm getting thicker in my old age!!  :D

You're just your average genuis now,

I'm an above average thickie :D

Nice one Matt - I got 142, 129 on the other one. I've done a few of these though - I enjoy those types of test.

havent tried the 2nd one yet - my brain needs a rest.

Going to go find a dark room to lie down in!!  :D