blonde poker forum

come from behind victory, he done a few shots in the final set that were out of this world, gonzalez flung the toys out of the pram at the end, quite amusing

He's 18 months away from winning a slam I think

mm i dont know tighty, i think that could be a little optimistic, i hope youre right though

He's playing very well at the moment and his stamina has improved too.  Could well be a contender soon.

there are no slams in 18 months time

Yeah i think we're finally gonna see a Brit win a grand slam

a grand slam is all 4 events in the same year dont think murray is that good

he might win a slam event

you mean a scot ;)

in golf and tennis if you win a slam event it is commonly referred to as "winning a slam"

I think Andy Murray needs to distance himself from the whole Scottish/British thing and just get on with winning these slams tighty is talking about.

He's too good an athlete to be bogged down by the pundetry politics of national labels. Swing yer racket son, your legacy will take care of itself.

He will not win a slam event within the next 5 years. But he is very very good

Ten pound bet?

Offers virtual hand for virtual handshake.

(Only if doubles events count  ;) )

LOL

I nearly said: done, but then I noticed the small print

only among the hoy poly

those of us in the know try to educate those that dont

hoi polloi

don't start, I know more about sport than you've had punctures. And I mean that


Nemesis, why don't you think he will WIN A SLAM in that time frame?

good kid, very talented, the press have already made sure he has all the pressure and expectation put upon him to secure 5 years of underachievment

 ;tightend; <<<<<<----------- (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Federer)

And, errr...

 ;tightend; <<<<<<<------------ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Nadal)

i was only joking tank because of previous threads on this board!

You used the universal "only joking" smiley  ;)

 ;)

i think he will win a slam event but he wont win a slam

i think he might win the aussie open in 2008

i dont think he will win the french or wimbledon in his carear though

aussie and the US opens are well away from europe and the UK press

they are also in different time zones so that many brits wont know he is into the semis in the aussie till after he has played it

The blondes will know.

Brad'll keep us updated  ;)

The only one he would have a chnace in is the Aussie open - as it is the only Slam event Federer and Nadal don't take seriously. :D

you trying to get wide? ;)

Murray will never win a slam , simple as that , he will never be as good as federer or Nadal. Nadal will dominate tennis in the coming years. Just as soon as his clay game transfers to grass and hard court.

words begin to fail me.......

Pffft, that's what they said about Napoleon.

did Napolean ever win a slam event?

Just the opposite, but I have botheredness problems where going to the gym and eating less pies are concerned.

 :) ;) ;D >:( :( :o ::) :-X :-* ^-^ 0:-)

 :dontask:

Napoleon's attempt to WIN A SLAM, was blown apart.

is that because he only won 3 out of the 4 majors?

Going back to converse with the Hoy Poly

No, but that's only because he got tennis Elba.  ;D

atrocious



















but I laughed

brilliant  :D

its just puppy fat,go swimming once a week , that should work :cheers:

He is good, but compared to Nadal, Hewitt, Federer at the same age, he isn't in that league. He will have to do something special to get past these guys.  And there is also another problem for him in the coming years, Monfils. He is awesome.

  I think he will win alot in his career but the hype is over the top. Other players who are often overlooked include Nalbandian and Safin. Those two guys are gifted.  Baghdatis and Roddick are handy as well.

It is going to be tough to beat these guys.