Title: Insta call? Post by: Royal Flush on September 29, 2006, 01:24:08 AM Table Name Hand ID Game Stakes
MTT Table 3 12001489-163 Holdem No Limit 800/1,600 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Hand Start. [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 1 : dwyer1 has $31,520 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 2 : Flush Royal has $37,070 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 3 : animao has $20,610 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 4 : mjmjm1 has $13,790 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 5 : BEATONE has $39,290 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 6 : Kamikaze01 has $20,782.50 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 7 : doctpoker has $77,610 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 8 : ladyluck22 has $35,202.50 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 9 : ohatchee81 has $9,540 [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Flush Royal is the dealer. [Sep 29 00:12:52] : animao posted small blind. [Sep 29 00:12:52] : mjmjm1 posted big blind. [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Game [163] started with 9 players. [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Dealing Hole Cards. [Sep 29 00:12:52] : Seat 2 : Flush Royal has 9c 9s [Sep 29 00:12:54] : BEATONE folded. [Sep 29 00:12:56] : Kamikaze01 folded. [Sep 29 00:12:59] : doctpoker folded. [Sep 29 00:13:01] : ladyluck22 folded. [Sep 29 00:13:01] : ohatchee81 folded. [Sep 29 00:13:03] : doctpoker : ah okies [Sep 29 00:13:05] : dwyer1 called 1,600 [Sep 29 00:13:07] : Flush Royal called 1,600 and raised 3,200 [Sep 29 00:13:21] : animao folded. [Sep 29 00:13:22] : mjmjm1 folded. [Sep 29 00:13:24] : dwyer1 called 3,200 [Sep 29 00:13:25] : Dealing flop. [Sep 29 00:13:25] : Board cards [Ts 4h Td] [Sep 29 00:13:33] : dwyer1 bet 26,720 and is All-in Just moved to the table. It's the last 4 tables of the Tribeca 15k so bubble time with 3 tables paid. Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: Bongo on September 29, 2006, 01:29:33 AM I think I'd have to call
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: ifm on September 29, 2006, 01:33:47 AM I wouldn't, Lucy would though...............:D
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: TightEnd on September 29, 2006, 01:39:23 AM He's not going all in with a 10, there are no draws he has to have two overs....call in a flash
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: ifm on September 29, 2006, 01:42:12 AM He's not going all in with a 10, there are no draws he has to have two overs....call in a flash and lose to pocket Jacks............. Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: Colchester Kev on September 29, 2006, 01:42:51 AM fold ... he has JJ and is scared .
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: Royal Flush on September 29, 2006, 01:44:23 AM and lose to pocket Jacks............. fold ... he has JJ and is scared . Are you 2 related? Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: Colchester Kev on September 29, 2006, 01:45:43 AM yes ... we are twins, i got the brains and the looks, he got the ginger barnet .... thems the breaks :D
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: TightEnd on September 29, 2006, 01:47:56 AM He's not going all in with a 10, there are no draws he has to have two overs....call in a flash and lose to pocket Jacks............. it's two overs. Bleeding obvious. JJ value bets not pushes. James calls and the guy hits an over to become 2nd chip leader I would think. I predict James went out about 4 hands later. Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: ifm on September 29, 2006, 01:48:13 AM yes ... we are twins, i got the brains and the looks, he got the ginger barnet .... thems the breaks :D How did you get out of the attic Dorian? Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: totalise on September 29, 2006, 01:49:23 AM I'd fold....I dont like these limp/call/push lines, ..I would be really really surprised if he had a no-pair hand here like AK/AQ/QK etc. He prolly has 44/10J/scared overpair and hopes you think he cant push with a big hand.
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: ifm on September 29, 2006, 01:50:10 AM it's two overs. Bleeding obvious. JJ value bets not pushes. Even knowing flushy will call? Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: TightEnd on September 29, 2006, 01:52:43 AM thats a very fair point, I concede that
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on September 29, 2006, 02:02:26 AM He could just as well have 55 - 88
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on September 29, 2006, 02:03:52 AM I would call too btw.. KQ/QJ for him?
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: SupaMonkey on September 29, 2006, 10:10:21 AM I don't think he would push with k-high, i think his limp-call is a pp and his push is protection. I have him on a smaller pp than yours.
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: Royal Flush on September 29, 2006, 11:17:19 AM According to the HH i took a whole 1 second to call, i must be getting old.
He had KQo and spiked the K, 50p. Tigtends prediction was pretty amazing, its almost like i told him on MSN.... Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: tantrum on September 29, 2006, 11:24:19 AM For me is a fold.
You don't know much about the player and frankly it might cost you a tournament to find out if he has you beat. Too many people go broke on two pairs/ one pair online esp. in MTT. If you fold you are still in a good shape and can go on and win it. I mean this guy might be sneaky little limper for what you know, limping in the hope for the raise and then pushing on the flop when hit. ( very effective BTW) and if it is a bluff let it be, you have still chips left to go on and with the tourney. Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: tantrum on September 29, 2006, 11:25:38 AM Ah posted straight after your reply Royal Flush, still without knowing his hand I would fold.
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: portfolio on September 29, 2006, 11:36:53 AM great read, but the tribeca bubble/table balancing knock u out squeeze more rake out of u mtt fairy will always win ;goodvevil;
Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: SupaMonkey on September 29, 2006, 11:38:26 AM I don't think he would push with k-high, i think his limp-call is a pp and his push is protection. I have him on a smaller pp than yours. I console myself by thinking that for every 10 i get wrong i usually get one right. Title: Re: Insta call? Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on September 29, 2006, 11:43:52 AM Hehe, i like to think that my prediction was pretty accurate 8)
|