blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => Poker Hand Analysis => Topic started by: pswnio on October 01, 2006, 04:24:25 PM



Title: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: pswnio on October 01, 2006, 04:24:25 PM
This came from a three handed home game. Player A is weak, player B maybe has a slight edge over player C heads up.

Player A - 790 chips
Player B - 1220 chips
Player C - 990 chips

Blinds 20/40

Player A (dealer) folds.
Player B calls
Player C raises to 100.
Player B re-raises to 300.
Player C re-raises all in.

There are now 1290 chips in the middle.

It would cost player B 690 chips to call. He'd get a little under 1.9-1 on his money.

Player B holds K7 suited. He has a decent read on player C and puts him on an ace and any kicker above 5.

If you were player B would you call?

Help settle an argument!


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: jakally on October 01, 2006, 04:52:49 PM
IMO a no-brainer - fold.

Depending on the kicker it's a marginal call based on odds alone (just under 2 to 1 if kicker is 8 or above).
But the inference from your post is that player B has an edge over the other two, and the blinds mean there is still some play left in the game.
Fold probably gives a greater positive expectation than a call.

Having said that, I don't think you can be too critical of a call.

Jak.


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: Ironside on October 01, 2006, 04:58:14 PM
getting 2-1 for your money and you know your only a 6-4 dog you would be stupid not to call



Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: thetank on October 01, 2006, 05:07:20 PM
I guess it would completely depend on payout, is it a winner takes all thingymebob?

I don't like the range he's put him on, Coming over the top of a meaty re-raise for all his chips, I doubt he has A6o, A7o etc. (Then again, I don't know the guy, so he may be right)
Sounds like a case of putting your opponent on some cards that let you call though, the betting suggests a far stronger holding (like AK or similar pretty cards)


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: Dewi_cool on October 01, 2006, 05:19:54 PM
 ;iagree;  you dont go over the top of a raise and with Ax   player c holding AK makes player B a 3/1 dog - fold


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: Dewi_cool on October 01, 2006, 05:53:15 PM
sorry?


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: boldie on October 01, 2006, 09:32:38 PM
if he puts him on A 5+ it's a fold.


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: snoopy1239 on October 01, 2006, 09:50:54 PM
Don't forget that pot odds don't include the con of actually being eliminted from the comp. With 600+ you're still in with a good shout, especially if you consider yourself to be considerably more skillful than your opponents.

It's a marginal decision in my eyes.


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: thetank on October 02, 2006, 02:08:55 AM
If you've managed to get 25 big blinds in the pot with K7 sooted, how much edge can you have against this field?


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: Royal Flush on October 02, 2006, 04:54:13 PM
If you've managed to get 25 big blinds in the pot with K7 sooted, how much edge can you have against this field?

lol my thought aswell.


Title: Re: A live hand that caused arguments
Post by: Dewi_cool on October 02, 2006, 05:32:06 PM
If you've managed to get 25 big blinds in the pot with K7 sooted, how much edge can you have against this field?

lol my thought aswell.

in that case  ;all-in; :D