blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => Poker Hand Analysis => Topic started by: Rookie (Rodney) on October 13, 2006, 06:53:35 PM



Title: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on October 13, 2006, 06:53:35 PM
Its a $50 turbo on party. Blinds up every 5 mins. Normally dont end up playing a hand really until it turns 100/200 or even 200/400! But heres one a slight bit earlier. I have no info on the players, only that none of them are Yanks!!!!!

***** Hand History for Game 5366430313 *****
NL Texas Hold'em 55 Buy-in Trny:29966062 Level:3 Blinds(50/100) - Friday, October 13, 13:04:39 ET 2006
Table Speed #1285486 (Real Money)
Seat 6 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: schmuckem ( 1680 )
Seat 2: altoastral38 ( 3095 )
Seat 3: StalllioN ( 2450 )
Seat 7: Ryba_555 ( 2205 )
Seat 8: KentyKenti ( 1355 )
Seat 10: effeleven ( 2900 )
Seat 5: ErnieEls2 ( 3330 )
Seat 4: Ghost_x_Rider ( 1255 )
Seat 6: BPRookieITB ( 1730 )
Trny:29966062 Level:3
Blinds(50/100)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to BPRookieITB [  Jh Jc ]
>You have options at Speed #1285490 Table!.
effeleven raises [200].
schmuckem folds.
altoastral38 calls [200].
StalllioN folds.
Ghost_x_Rider calls [200].
ErnieEls2 calls [200].
>You have options at Speed #1285490 Table!.
BPRookieITB calls [200].
Ryba_555 folds.
KentyKenti calls [100].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 7h, 6s, 6c ]
KentyKenti checks.
effeleven checks.
altoastral38 checks.
Ghost_x_Rider is all-In  [1055]
ErnieEls2 calls [1055].
BPRookieITB ?

Now i have to say that it was an insta call from Ernie. Im just wondering what you would do here or if you would have done differently preflop. Im out till late and will post the rest then.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: Wardonkey on October 13, 2006, 07:05:59 PM
I would have pushed preflop. I'd push in now, you can't know if your ahead or not but the pot is huge and the odds are very tempting. In slower paced tourney I'd pass.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: CRIPPIN on October 13, 2006, 08:54:53 PM
In that type of tourney:
All in pre flop but having only called you must fold to the all in.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: thetank on October 13, 2006, 09:18:06 PM
Mini-raise and 3 flat callers.

Looks like a push pre-flop to me. Nab it then n there, 1k to win.

You're not hoping for much more than that with JJ


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: NoflopsHomer on October 13, 2006, 09:27:46 PM
Push preflop.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: SupaMonkey on October 13, 2006, 10:23:03 PM
The first bloke clearly doesn't have the 6 and the second bloke knows it so he could be calling with a pp here as well as the 6. I think QQ+ reraises preflop so you should call here.

Also, i would push preflop.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: GlasgowBandit on October 14, 2006, 09:57:54 AM
yep push pre flop here as well.  The last thing you want here is for someone to be limping in with A X and the flop coming A high.

Get thr money in first and give them a decision to make.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: SupaMonkey on October 16, 2006, 06:01:41 PM
Im out till late and will post the rest then.

I guess the beer killed a few brain cells.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: boldie on October 17, 2006, 10:22:40 AM
I'm with everyone else. push preflop. push after the flop.

guy nr1 probably doesn't have a 6 but might have..only guy nr2 can knock you out and you could get a sizeable paydday here if he decides to call your all in reraise (which he should)


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on October 17, 2006, 02:25:36 PM
Sorry, completely forgot about this thread.

I new i had played it wrong preflop tbh. On the flop i just gave it up after that action. The two allin guys had 45 and 10 8. The 9 came on the turn i think.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: LeKnave on September 14, 2009, 08:30:48 PM
you gotta know when to fold em m8


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on September 14, 2009, 08:31:45 PM
rofl, die.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: outragous76 on September 14, 2009, 09:39:46 PM
Easy push pre


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on September 14, 2009, 10:02:08 PM
Ahhh, thx Guy..


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: thetank on September 14, 2009, 10:08:21 PM
lol, I saw the title of the thread and wondered wtf rookie was doing wasting his time playing sitngos


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: titaniumbean on September 14, 2009, 11:19:45 PM
I dont play sngs, but a turbo and 4 people in for a min raise in front and we has one pair, jacks i'm pretty sure i'd just jam pre here.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: outragous76 on September 14, 2009, 11:23:00 PM
Ah! Didnt get past the first page on my phone. Sorry! :-)


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on September 15, 2009, 12:01:19 AM
Hmmm, i'm still not so sure, any other views with good reasoning why we should jam?


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: Longy on September 15, 2009, 12:05:09 AM
The games sure were tough in 2006.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: action man on September 15, 2009, 12:07:27 AM
[  ] horrible hand

quality bumpage jones


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: GreekStein on September 15, 2009, 12:42:46 AM
Make it 400 pre to isolate


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: action man on September 15, 2009, 12:54:11 AM
greekstein talking BS make it 300 pre to isolate


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: ZZZZZZZROPE on September 15, 2009, 05:31:21 AM
greekstein talking BS make it 300 pre to isolate

seems pretty solid to me


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: GreekStein on September 15, 2009, 09:38:47 AM
greekstein talking BS make it 300 pre to isolate

Hmm I just feel that making it 400 will help induce a shove from pocket tens.


Title: Re: SNG : That horrible hand, JJ
Post by: titaniumbean on September 15, 2009, 11:18:51 AM
lol didn't see the date when I replied to this.