|
Title: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Suited_Jock on October 16, 2006, 02:06:49 PM PokerStars Game #6645316648: Tournament #32881058, $200+$15 Hold'em No Limit - Level III (100/200) - 2006/10/15 - 17:08:14 (ET) Table '32881058 341' 9-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: mattymillne (14980 in chips) Seat 2: jennicide (7400 in chips) Seat 3: kepler42 (18340 in chips) Seat 4: BadBert (16260 in chips) Seat 5: ChampSG (20720 in chips) Seat 6: SharpLuck (23220 in chips) Seat 7: palpierre (2900 in chips) Seat 8: ggbud (1340 in chips) jennicide: posts small blind 100 kepler42: posts big blind 200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to mattymillne [Ks Aspades] kielbax is connected BadBert: folds ChampSG: calls 200 SharpLuck: folds palpierre: folds ggbud: folds mattymillne: raises 400 to 600 jennicide: raises 900 to 1500 kepler42: folds ChampSG: folds mattymillne: raises 13480 to 14980 and is all-in jennicide: folds mattymillne collected 3400 from pot mattymillne: doesn't show hand *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 3400 | Rake 0 Seat 1: mattymillne (button) collected (3400) Seat 2: jennicide (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 3: kepler42 (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 4: BadBert folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: ChampSG folded before Flop Seat 6: SharpLuck folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: palpierre folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 8: ggbud folded before Flop (didn't bet) palpierre said, "she will not like that" palpierre said, "lol" mattymillne said, "shes not talking to me anyway" mattymillne said, "i was only trying to be nice" mattymillne said, "then make a joke assuming i was chatting her uo" mattymillne said, "up" mattymillne said, "like all her railbirds" palpierre said, "yep" mattymillne said, "but she was not amused" palpierre said, "guest not" mattymillne said, "so sometimes i have to 3bet with air" mattymillne said, "u know" mattymillne said, "all i ask is to have my jokes laughed at" palpierre said, "lol" jennicide said, "doubtful you'd shove it in with air" LOLOLOL Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: tantrum on October 16, 2006, 02:34:50 PM I think I am too old for this kind of sense of humour.
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: matt674 on October 16, 2006, 02:45:12 PM To me it appears as though she is making an observational comment - not only that but it was a accurate one because you weren't raising with air.
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Suited_Jock on October 16, 2006, 02:46:55 PM ok well i found it funny.. maybe im just immature.
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: boldie on October 16, 2006, 03:15:53 PM To me it appears as though she is making an observational comment - not only that but it was a accurate one because you weren't raising with air. yeah...doesn't seem to me like she's upset at all...she's probably actually quite happy that you shoved it in because now she's sure her Ace rag or King queen would not have been good enough if it hit on the flop. Overbet much? Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: MAF on October 16, 2006, 03:36:32 PM Matt,
That was only part of what was very entertaining table talk last night. From the title, I thought you were going to post the chat with the other 'pro' :D. I think you got more out of Jennicide then than most railbirds have managed for ages. M. Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on October 16, 2006, 03:43:16 PM To me it appears as though she is making an observational comment - not only that but it was a accurate one because you weren't raising with air. yeah...doesn't seem to me like she's upset at all...she's probably actually quite happy that you shoved it in because now she's sure her Ace rag or King queen would not have been good enough if it hit on the flop. Overbet much? Although i dont see the point of this thread... I dont know why you have said : overbet much? Could you please explain why you have put this?? Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: TheWhisper on October 16, 2006, 03:47:50 PM Who exactly is jennicide?
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: tantrum on October 16, 2006, 03:55:31 PM Quote Although i dont see the point of this thread... Perhaps Suited_Jock has developed secret crush on jennicide, and therefore the fact that the lady has spoken to him was too much to bear, and he had to share.... ;goodvevil; Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Jim-D on October 16, 2006, 03:58:39 PM Who exactly is jennicide? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Leigh Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Jim-D on October 16, 2006, 04:00:19 PM Lovely.
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: tantrum on October 16, 2006, 04:01:34 PM Now my theory falls nicely into place...
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Sark79 on October 16, 2006, 04:05:09 PM Not only is she very very attractive, but she could also teach me how to win at poker. I wonder if she likes mushrooms? I could invite her round for dinner next time she is in Kilmarnock
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: boldie on October 16, 2006, 04:08:07 PM To me it appears as though she is making an observational comment - not only that but it was a accurate one because you weren't raising with air. yeah...doesn't seem to me like she's upset at all...she's probably actually quite happy that you shoved it in because now she's sure her Ace rag or King queen would not have been good enough if it hit on the flop. Overbet much? Although i dont see the point of this thread... I dont know why you have said : overbet much? Could you please explain why you have put this?? ah...most people don't get that...Ace Ventura reference.....I'm a big child. I referred to reraising the 900 reraise by 13k. slightly disproportionate IMO. and I generally feel a bad move. what happens if she has a highish pocketpair (J's up) and is trying to find out what was raised with in the first place. she already stuck in a fair % of her stack and the all in is a BIG overbet with AK sooted. If she had found J's up you're in a raise..simply because you stuck in a massive overbet and she doesn't take you for very good stuff. the overbet screams AK to me and you might find yourself getting called by a hand that is ahead by some way. (although you would still have 6k left if she calls and you, as the raiser, lose) If the reraise had been 4500-6k you're effectively saying the same thing (all in or not) but showing more strenght. some people will still see it as a "9X what I stuck in raise" and that's a bit much, it even makes people with shorter stacks than yourself inclined to call. even the pro's. (Although I have watched a couple of videos of her playing and wasn't all that impressed...she might be better looking then most pro's but she's not a better player than most....actually she can't make a living from playing live events...maybe a great online player though) Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: TheWhisper on October 16, 2006, 04:09:44 PM Who exactly is jennicide? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Leigh Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on October 16, 2006, 04:34:27 PM To me it appears as though she is making an observational comment - not only that but it was a accurate one because you weren't raising with air. yeah...doesn't seem to me like she's upset at all...she's probably actually quite happy that you shoved it in because now she's sure her Ace rag or King queen would not have been good enough if it hit on the flop. Overbet much? Although i dont see the point of this thread... I dont know why you have said : overbet much? Could you please explain why you have put this?? ah...most people don't get that...Ace Ventura reference.....I'm a big child. I referred to reraising the 900 reraise by 13k. slightly disproportionate IMO. and I generally feel a bad move. what happens if she has a highish pocketpair (J's up) and is trying to find out what was raised with in the first place. she already stuck in a fair % of her stack and the all in is a BIG overbet with AK sooted. If she had found J's up you're in a raise..simply because you stuck in a massive overbet and she doesn't take you for very good stuff. the overbet screams AK to me and you might find yourself getting called by a hand that is ahead by some way. (although you would still have 6k left if she calls and you, as the raiser, lose) If the reraise had been 4500-6k you're effectively saying the same thing (all in or not) but showing more strenght. some people will still see it as a "9X what I stuck in raise" and that's a bit much, it even makes people with shorter stacks than yourself inclined to call. even the pro's. (Although I have watched a couple of videos of her playing and wasn't all that impressed...she might be better looking then most pro's but she's not a better player than most....actually she can't make a living from playing live events...maybe a great online player though) I know what an overbet is, i was wondering what reference it has to this play. IMO, none. You say he has rereraised another 13k, but, he hasnt, he has reraised 5900 more on top of the 1500 in bet. He cannot lose his whole stack. You say that you are in a race at best, but the fact is, you are only in a race at best when/if she calls. His tournament is not on the line here... I dont see how a 4.5k-6k raise can make any more difference at all, you are going to be calling the remaining 1500-2000 all in if thats what she does, in which case, again, you are a race at best!! There are many ways of playing this but i dont think you can make a statement of "overbet much?" here. Sorry, but it just wound me up seeing you put a comment like this. Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: boldie on October 16, 2006, 04:36:51 PM yes..i got that. and I also explained my thinking behind that (including the statement about him still having 6k left if she calls).
I hate to upset other blondes...but there was a reason behind my post. Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Suited_Jock on October 16, 2006, 04:39:07 PM I didnt really mean for it to be a Hand analysis.
Beisdes the fact if u add in to the fact i have been very active at the table and jennicide is more than capable of a resteal with nowt (notice im on the button) Im pushing this every day of the week. Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: bhoywonder on October 16, 2006, 09:39:00 PM did u buy straight in SJ?
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Suited_Jock on October 17, 2006, 02:00:35 PM yes bhoy
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Rolandinho05 on October 18, 2006, 12:19:29 AM why mushrooms Sark?
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: mikkyT on October 18, 2006, 12:25:53 AM He has an obsession with mushrooms. Apparently he seems to think they are magic.
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: riverdave on October 18, 2006, 12:30:41 AM Who exactly is jennicide? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Leigh Almost certain she is a member of this forum from railing one of the update threads maybe an old EPT one, can't remember the username though and it wasn't the obvious. Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Sark79 on October 18, 2006, 01:44:38 AM why mushrooms Sark? Like mikky says, they are magic :D. They come in many different varieties and they are also free. I like them on toast and with loads of pepper. Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Claw75 on October 19, 2006, 12:20:11 PM Is it just me, or does anyone else think Ms Leigh's screen-name is in rather poor taste?
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: SupaMonkey on October 19, 2006, 12:23:26 PM Yes.
Title: Re: Winding up "pros" and getting a reaction Post by: Zebediah on October 19, 2006, 01:40:31 PM No for me
|