Title: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: snoopy1239 on October 22, 2006, 06:08:53 AM These two hands occurred simultaneously at different tables. My theory is that if I can resist tilt after that, I can conquer the world.
Yes, I confess, this is not one, but two bad beat stories, but you can have your £1 for the tin, I really don't care, a quid isn't that much when you've just dropped 3 or 4 monkeys (no, not actual monkeys!). Although they are mere whines, I would appreciate some feedback. Could I have escaped from either, or both, of them. Part of me reckons I could have but I'm not 100%. Seat 1: Vanquish888 ( $581.60 ) Seat 2: Ninnu111 ( $357.30 ) Seat 5: antikiller1 ( $348 ) Seat 6: sweatpollock ( $306 ) Seat 3: snoopy1239 ( $386.50 ) Seat 4: JANNECA ( $233.50 ) sweatpollock posts small blind [$2]. Vanquish888 posts big blind [$4]. Dealt to snoopy1239 [ Tc Jc ] Ninnu111 raises [$20]. snoopy1239 calls [$20]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 3c, Qh, 9c ] Ninnu111 bets [$30] snoopy1239 raises [$125] Ninnu111 is all-In [$307.30] snoopy1239 calls [$212.30] ** Dealing Turn ** [ 9s ] ** Dealing River ** [ Ts ] snoopy1239 shows [ Tc, Jc ] two pairs, tens and nines. Ninnu111 shows [ Qs, Qc ] a full house, Queens full of nines. Ninnu111 wins $717.10 from the main pot with a full house, Queens full of nines. Seat 5: snoopy1239 ( $393.17 ) Seat 4: gnuller ( $349.55 ) Seat 3: dangerousned ( $439.86 ) Seat 6: DivisnByZero ( $223.82 ) dangerousned posts small blind [$2]. gnuller posts big blind [$4]. Dealt to snoopy1239 [ Kc Kd ] snoopy1239 raises [$15]. dangerousned raises [$34]. gnuller calls [$32]. snoopy1239 raises [$62]. dangerousned calls [$41]. gnuller calls [$41]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 9d, 4d, Jc ] dangerousned checks. gnuller checks. snoopy1239 bets [$100]. dangerousned calls [$100]. gnuller folds. ** Dealing Turn ** [ 4c ] dangerousned checks. snoopy1239 bets [$175]. dangerousned is all-In [$262.86] snoopy1239 is all-In [$41.17] ** Dealing River ** [ 7c ] snoopy1239 shows [ Kc, Kd ] two pairs, kings and fours. dangerousned shows [ Ac, Qc ] a flush, ace high. dangerousned wins $46.69 from side pot #1 with a flush, ace high. dangerousned wins $860.84 from the main pot with a flush, ace high. Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: Pab on October 22, 2006, 07:17:59 AM 1st one u flop a huge draw and are just unlucky to be against one of the 3 hands that could have u drawing dead by the turn.
2nd on, get that mug on the buddylist and take him for all he;s worth Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: GlasgowBandit on October 22, 2006, 02:35:40 PM 1st one u flop a huge draw and are just unlucky to be against one of the 3 hands that could have u drawing dead by the turn. 2nd on, get that mug on the buddylist and take him for all he;s worth I agree with everything Pab says. Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: NoflopsHomer on October 22, 2006, 04:02:09 PM I think we should change the Poker Hand Analysis name to "Ask Pab and Totalise" :D
Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: GlasgowBandit on October 22, 2006, 04:13:48 PM I think we should change the Poker Hand Analysis name to "Ask Pab and Totalise" :D Don't you value my input Floppy? :D Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: tantrum on October 22, 2006, 04:23:04 PM Sorry am i missing here something?
I thought bad beat is when you are favourite to win the hand not when you don't hit your outs? Jc Tc Qc Qs flop: 3c Qh 9c Result http://twodimes.net/h/?z=2142273 pokenum -h jc tc - qc qs / 3c qh 9c Holdem Hi: 1221759 enumerated boards cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Jc Tc 197249 16.14 1018610 83.37 5900 0.48 0.164 Qs Qc 1018610 83.37 197249 16.14 5900 0.48 0.836 Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: Longy on October 22, 2006, 06:13:41 PM 1st one is standard unlucky.
2nd i like 3 betting more here make it 3 time the re raise, pot is big enough to take down and i think your 3-bet is giving the other two odds preflop, your giving them 2 to 1 and 3 to 1 respectively. As Pab says get this muppet on your buddy list he is going to do his money somewhere might as well be you. Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: NoflopsHomer on October 22, 2006, 06:25:59 PM I think we should change the Poker Hand Analysis name to "Ask Pab and Totalise" :D Don't you value my input Floppy? :D lol, no, just following from a Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: Ironside on October 22, 2006, 10:40:59 PM Sorry am i missing here something? I thought bad beat is when you are favourite to win the hand not when you don't hit your outs? Jc Tc Qc Qs flop: 3c Qh 9c Result http://twodimes.net/h/?z=2142273 pokenum -h jc tc - qc qs / 3c qh 9c Holdem Hi: 1221759 enumerated boards cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Jc Tc 197249 16.14 1018610 83.37 5900 0.48 0.164 Qs Qc 1018610 83.37 197249 16.14 5900 0.48 0.836 i must be missing someting or twodimes is wrong noway with a straight and flush draw that your over 4-1 against a set Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: Ironside on October 22, 2006, 10:42:30 PM http://twodimes.net/h/?z=2142751
thats why as i thought he was only about 6-4 against not 4-1 tantrum you put the board cards in where the dead cards go Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: snoopy1239 on October 22, 2006, 11:58:42 PM If you flop an open ended straight and flush draw, would you fold?
Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: Ironside on October 23, 2006, 12:03:29 AM nope
tantrum put it into twodimes and came up with the wrong result with a flop like that you are only a dog v a set and even then you are not always that big a dog its a must ALL In hand Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: kinboshi on October 23, 2006, 12:46:27 AM Open-ended straight flush draw:
* Against top pair - about a 63-37 favourite * Against an overpair - about a 56-44 favourite * Against two pairs - about a 53-47 favourite * Against a higher flush draw - 44-56 underdog * Against a set - about a 42-58 underdog The range of hands you could be up against, I'm always happy to push on the flop - even if it means coming up against a set or higher flush draw occasionally. Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: tantrum on October 23, 2006, 09:18:21 AM yes sry my wrong,
;surrender; i would call, but if not hit, i would not call it a bad beat...... Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: snoopy1239 on October 23, 2006, 09:38:00 AM Would you like me to edit my original post?
Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: tantrum on October 23, 2006, 10:01:08 AM Quote Would you like me to edit my original post? No, but perhaps next time you can set up a post ; 'all the draws I failed to hit.....' ;goodvevil; the second hand - UL, - Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: snoopy1239 on October 23, 2006, 11:13:10 AM Sorry, didn't mean to be rude, it's been a rough week.
Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: tantrum on October 23, 2006, 11:27:23 AM No offence taken...
Sry to hear about your week, I hope this one will be better. Title: Re: Gone In 60 Seconds Post by: snoopy1239 on October 23, 2006, 11:49:51 AM Thx
Going to Dublin on Wednesday, need to perk up be4 then. Hard to do sometimes... |