Title: Michael Owen Post by: Rooky9 on November 17, 2006, 12:57:55 AM Is it really possible to be 5 or 6 months away from playing a game of football if you can currently cycle, row and treadmill? I sometimes wonder whether it would be in NUFC favour to really push him and see what the insurance would pay. (obviously the ideal would be pushing him back to scoring PL goals!)
Without doubt a great professional but will he ever be in a position to deviler his investment? (Can 16 million be returned whilst an NUFC? I don't think there is any chance being off to Liverpool for less than 13 million anytime soon (18 months) even if that is what he wanted. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: The Baron on November 17, 2006, 01:07:43 AM I'm not sure LFC could justify 13 mil on a guy we sold for 8m (plus Nunez who went for 3m) seeing as he will be rotated too.
I feel sorry for you guys as he's a top pro and a good lad who knows where the net is. Unless you get a good 5 or 6 years out of him whilst he's totally fit I doubt you'll ever get what's considered 16m worth. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: crip17 on November 17, 2006, 10:10:12 PM I bought Owen for liverpool for 13m in football manager 2007. The partnership of Crouch and Owen up front is lethal. Won the champions league and 2nd in leage. Wonder what they would be like if it really happened. lol
Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: The Baron on November 18, 2006, 03:57:32 PM I bought Owen for liverpool for 13m in football manager 2007. The partnership of Crouch and Owen up front is lethal. Won the champions league and 2nd in leage. Wonder what they would be like if it really happened. lol I must admit I would like to see it however I think Kuyt will be the main man for Liverpool for the forseeable future. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Rooky9 on June 12, 2007, 10:25:14 AM So on Friday last week the new manager comes out and says we have four top class strikers for the new campaign, two for each posistion. Sunday and he's saying if Michael Owen wants to leave he can't stop him.
Surely it would be a better idea to get some concrete assurances off him so we can make sure that we do have four top strikers next season. I suspect that 'Big Sam' has tried to do this, which makes his comments even more frustrating/worrying. I would be happy to pen a new deal without the clause unless we didnt qualify for europe this season if I was MO, on the basis that (fairly directly) him being injured was the major reason behind us not being there, and therefore activating this clause, but there is a major difference between me and MO. (Well okay there are many!) It got me thinking though. i) how many clubs can afford to pay MO's wages? ii) Are those clubs looking for a striker? iii) Are they interested in him? Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: kinboshi on June 12, 2007, 10:29:29 AM £9 million is cheap for Owen.
His wages aren't cheap though. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Graham C on June 12, 2007, 10:35:18 AM Cheap if he stays fit, sadly, he doesn't have a great track record when it comes to that. Feel really sorry for the guy, he has so much talent but has spent half of his career with the physio.
Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: kinboshi on June 12, 2007, 12:59:48 PM Cheap if he stays fit, sadly, he doesn't have a great track record when it comes to that. Feel really sorry for the guy, he has so much talent but has spent half of his career with the physio. Maybe that's why he left Liverpool. He knew that he'd never get close to the physio as Harry Kewell would always be in there? :dontask: Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: The Baron on June 12, 2007, 06:55:18 PM So on Friday last week the new manager comes out and says we have four top class strikers for the new campaign, two for each posistion. Sunday and he's saying if Michael Owen wants to leave he can't stop him. Surely it would be a better idea to get some concrete assurances off him so we can make sure that we do have four top strikers next season. I suspect that 'Big Sam' has tried to do this, which makes his comments even more frustrating/worrying. I would be happy to pen a new deal without the clause unless we didnt qualify for europe this season if I was MO, on the basis that (fairly directly) him being injured was the major reason behind us not being there, and therefore activating this clause, but there is a major difference between me and MO. (Well okay there are many!) It got me thinking though. i) how many clubs can afford to pay MO's wages? ii) Are those clubs looking for a striker? iii) Are they interested in him? Good post. Honestly I think he'd rather be anywhere that plays regular CL football - even Man Utd but the truth is he's too much of a risk at 9m for anyone else to want him. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Rooky9 on June 12, 2007, 07:39:23 PM Aparently it decreases further than 9m at each transfer window.
It would probably be best to flog him for about 5m now. We could then buy a few African nations with the money saved from his wages, and bring through some talented african youth players. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Rooky9 on June 20, 2007, 04:52:42 PM http://sport.independent.co.uk/football/premiership/article2679011.ece
Shearer's response to the claims of Bellamy being linked with a return. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: The Baron on June 20, 2007, 05:20:05 PM http://sport.independent.co.uk/football/premiership/article2679011.ece Shearer's response to the claims of Bellamy being linked with a return. LOL! That is quality. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Acidmouse on June 20, 2007, 05:24:46 PM Never has one been so sure of his own ability then Bellamy, what a wanker.
Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: booder on June 20, 2007, 05:30:04 PM Never has one been so sure of his own ability then Bellamy, what a wanker. he has plenty of ability , sadly he suffers from SMS Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Rooky9 on June 20, 2007, 06:09:32 PM Never has one been so sure of his own ability then Bellamy, what a wanker. he has plenty of ability , sadly he suffers from SMS LOL!!! I think his finishing is poor. His conversion of on on one's must be less than 50%. For me he's part of a growing number of players that get by at being average at football and having great pace. Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: booder on June 20, 2007, 06:17:35 PM Never has one been so sure of his own ability then Bellamy, what a wanker. he has plenty of ability , sadly he suffers from SMS LOL!!! what do you think is funny about SMS ? Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Rooky9 on June 20, 2007, 06:22:04 PM Never has one been so sure of his own ability then Bellamy, what a wanker. he has plenty of ability , sadly he suffers from SMS LOL!!! what do you think is funny about SMS ? Is it clinically proven?! Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: booder on June 20, 2007, 06:23:30 PM what do you attribute the letters SMS to be representing ?
Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Rooky9 on June 20, 2007, 06:37:51 PM what do you attribute the letters SMS to be representing ? SMS - Small Man Syndrome. Taken from men of average or below average height/stature being over aggressive to compensate for their size. This not what you meant? Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: booder on June 20, 2007, 06:40:35 PM yes spot on...just checking we were on the same wavelength
Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: Rooky9 on June 22, 2007, 07:42:32 PM Bye Bye Michael. I geniunely don't think he'll be winning anything with arsenal too soon.
Title: Re: Michael Owen Post by: The Baron on June 22, 2007, 08:09:45 PM I doubt it - Wenger is not a fan of injury prone players one bit.
The minute they get older and start spending more time on the treatment table he ships them out - not in. |