|
Title: Two hands... Post by: NoflopsHomer on December 08, 2006, 12:02:56 AM Seat 1: Paisano (1530 in chips)
Seat 2: Needers76 (1395 in chips) Seat 3: vivekaa (1975 in chips) Seat 4: Fatnav (4730 in chips) Seat 5: Foaming_h (2010 in chips) Seat 6: Docthe (1170 in chips) Paisano: posts small blind 15 Needers76: posts big blind 30 ----- HOLE CARDS ----- dealt to Foaming_h [As 5s] vivekaa: folds Fatnav: calls 30 Foaming_h: calls 30 Docthe: calls 30 Paisano: calls 15 Needers76: checks ----- FLOP ----- [3h 4d 2c] Paisano: checks Needers76: bets 30 Fatnav: raises to 90 Foaming_h: raises to 210 Docthe: raises to 1140 and is all-in Paisano: folds Needers76: calls 1110 Fatnav: calls 1050 Can I pass here? 2nd one, dewd previously donked 2/3rds of his stack to me, he had min-raised with 44 and I had hit two pair on the flop with Q8 from the BB, he min c/raised me on the flop and tried to bluff the turn. Seat 1: pistolpate03 (735 in chips) Seat 2: 3silver3 (2175 in chips) Seat 3: dewdstud (1965 in chips) Seat 4: dpavsek (1200 in chips) Seat 5: Foaming_H (2350 in chips) Seat 6: skats-1 (1040 in chips) Seat 7: goldman187 (1825 in chips) Seat 8: Tooco19 (1655 in chips) Seat 9: OHASB1987 (555 in chips) is sitting out Foaming_H: posts small blind 15 skats-1: posts big blind 30 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Foaming_H [6s 8s] goldman187: folds Tooco19: folds OHASB1987: folds pistolpate03: folds 3silver3: folds dewdstud: raises 30 to 60 dpavsek: calls 60 Foaming_H: calls 45 skats-1: calls 30 *** FLOP *** [Qs Ad 7s] Foaming_H: checks skats-1: checks dewdstud: checks dpavsek: checks *** TURN *** [Qs Ad 7s] [2s] Foaming_H: bets 120 skats-1: folds dewdstud: calls 120 dpavsek: folds *** RIVER *** [Qs Ad 7s 2s] [8c] Foaming_H: bets 300 dewdstud: raises 540 to 840 Foaming_H: calls 540 *** SHOW DOWN *** dewdstud: shows [2h 2d] (three of a kind, Deuces) Foaming_H: shows [6s 8s] (a flush, Queen high) Foaming_H collected 2160 from pot Should I have re-raised on the river? Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: Wardonkey on December 08, 2006, 12:09:04 AM No and no..
Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: NoflopsHomer on December 08, 2006, 12:13:33 AM No and no.. Good, one out for a split.... Foaming_h: raises to 1980 and is all-in Needers76: is all-in 225 Fatnav: calls 840 ----- TURN ----- [3h 4d 2c]
Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: boldie on December 08, 2006, 09:26:05 AM No and no.. why not reraise on the river in the last example? I would 99% of the time take my flush to be good here. I would stick them in. In the first example..no you can't pass. Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: Highstack on December 08, 2006, 09:34:00 AM It is advocated that you should play the same game whatever the stakes and be profitable, but I think the first one it can make a huge difference. In hand 1 you will find draws and overpairs with a possible set overcalling in a £10 stt. At higher stakes you still get complete donks, but an overcall should usually represent a strong hand. You are ahead of a set (although tehy have 10 outs and two streets to improve ahead of you) and that is the minimum you should expect. 56 Would not be an unlikely probability.
The second one, I don't raise the river for value. You are unlikely to get called unless you are beat. Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: Highstack on December 08, 2006, 09:36:12 AM *btw, I still call in hand 1, I just think that there is a higher probability of a big hand. If I'm beat, dust myself down and get on with the next one. So many pump with so much less, that there is just too much value in the pot to let a big hand go here.
Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: Royal Flush on December 08, 2006, 04:56:56 PM It is advocated that you should play the same game whatever the stakes A sure fire recipe to bankruptcy Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: Highstack on December 08, 2006, 05:05:00 PM Totally agree mate, as I went on to say - but that is what the books try to tell us!
Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: Bongo on December 08, 2006, 05:58:26 PM Surely you don't change your game because of the stakes but because of the players?
Title: Re: Two hands... Post by: Royal Flush on December 08, 2006, 06:07:44 PM Surely you don't change your game because of the stakes but because of the players? And the players are dependant on the stakes |