|
Title: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on January 10, 2007, 04:08:28 AM PokerStars Game #7856656634: Tournament #39201182, $150+$12 Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (150/300) - 2007/01/09 - 22:57:44 (ET)
Table '39201182 137' 9-max Seat #8 is the button Seat 1: rookieITB (3190 in chips) Seat 2: lynum (9035 in chips) Seat 3: The_Agent32 (2355 in chips) Seat 4: Slade232 (10290 in chips) Seat 6: Pokerstud (5700 in chips) Seat 7: gmac0522 (13645 in chips) Seat 8: WhiteEars (2235 in chips) Seat 9: L1Surgical (8465 in chips) rookieITB: posts the ante 15 lynum: posts the ante 15 The_Agent32: posts the ante 15 Slade232: posts the ante 15 Pokerstud: posts the ante 15 gmac0522: posts the ante 15 WhiteEars: posts the ante 15 L1Surgical: posts the ante 15 L1Surgical: posts small blind 150 rookieITB: posts big blind 300 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to rookieITB [9d 9s] lynum: raises 300 to 600 The_Agent32: folds Slade232: folds Pokerstud: calls 600 gmac0522: folds WhiteEars: folds L1Surgical: folds rookieITB: ? I am 220/250 remaining with avg being 8.5k. Just moved to table.. what do you do? Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: Royal Flush on January 10, 2007, 04:11:09 AM insta ship.
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on January 10, 2007, 04:12:52 AM Another....?
PokerStars Game #7856790841: Tournament #39201182, $150+$12 Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (150/300) - 2007/01/09 - 23:05:07 (ET) Table '39201182 137' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 1: rookieITB (4060 in chips) Seat 2: lynum (8405 in chips) Seat 3: The_Agent32 (1973 in chips) Seat 4: Slade232 (10057 in chips) Seat 5: italian09 (7835 in chips) Seat 6: Pokerstud (4920 in chips) Seat 7: gmac0522 (13045 in chips) Seat 8: WhiteEars (3705 in chips) Seat 9: L1Surgical (8135 in chips) rookieITB: posts the ante 15 lynum: posts the ante 15 The_Agent32: posts the ante 15 Slade232: posts the ante 15 italian09: posts the ante 15 Pokerstud: posts the ante 15 gmac0522: posts the ante 15 WhiteEars: posts the ante 15 L1Surgical: posts the ante 15 rookieITB: posts small blind 150 lynum: posts big blind 300 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to rookieITB [8s 8h] The_Agent32: folds Slade232: raises 300 to 600 italian09: folds Pokerstud: folds gmac0522: calls 600 WhiteEars: folds L1Surgical: folds rookieITB: .... Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: Royal Flush on January 10, 2007, 04:15:09 AM push again.
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on January 10, 2007, 04:20:53 AM shouldnt i make a feeler bet so i can define my hand?? :D
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: Royal Flush on January 10, 2007, 04:22:14 AM shouldnt i make a feeler bet so i can define my hand?? :D oh yeah do that. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on January 10, 2007, 04:30:29 AM You push here flushy or not?
PokerStars Game #7857103824: Tournament #39201182, $150+$12 Hold'em No Limit - Level IX (200/400) - 2007/01/09 - 23:22:51 (ET) Table '39201182 137' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 1: rookieITB (7090 in chips) Seat 2: lynum (10950 in chips) Seat 3: lexvegasfish (35341 in chips) Seat 4: Slade232 (6012 in chips) Seat 5: italian09 (7070 in chips) Seat 6: Pokerstud (4555 in chips) Seat 7: gmac0522 (11550 in chips) Seat 8: WhiteEars (3030 in chips) Seat 9: L1Surgical (9155 in chips) rookieITB: posts the ante 20 lynum: posts the ante 20 lexvegasfish: posts the ante 20 Slade232: posts the ante 20 italian09: posts the ante 20 Pokerstud: posts the ante 20 gmac0522: posts the ante 20 WhiteEars: posts the ante 20 L1Surgical: posts the ante 20 rookieITB: posts small blind 200 lynum: posts big blind 400 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to rookieITB [Kh Qs] lexvegasfish: folds Slade232: folds italian09: folds Pokerstud: folds gmac0522: folds WhiteEars: folds L1Surgical: raises 1600 to 2000 rookieITB: ..... Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: thetank on January 10, 2007, 04:32:28 AM No, as KQ is mince there
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: Royal Flush on January 10, 2007, 04:36:56 AM I would need a good table image, so no, lol.
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: boldie on January 10, 2007, 09:22:48 AM lol...even I agree with flushy on the first two...I haven't slept much last night...can you tell?. Just get them chippies in. and KQ is a fold
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: thetank on January 10, 2007, 12:13:48 PM Slowly but surely, we are loosening ol' boldie up.
When will we come clean and admit his play isn't over-tight after all, and it was all just a big weeze. ;goodvevil; Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: GreekStein on September 16, 2009, 12:13:44 PM someone ban me from PHA pls!
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: boldie on September 16, 2009, 12:40:53 PM someone ban me from PHA pls! won't be long if you keep this up....FFS, have to check dates on all the posts now! Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: bolt pp on September 16, 2009, 12:43:45 PM someone ban me from PHA pls! won't be long if you keep this up....FFS, have to check dates on all the posts now! it's extra confusing in ones youve posted in as you can tell from other peoples improvement whether its a new or old thread whereas your poker theory remains consistently terrible ::) Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: GreekStein on September 16, 2009, 12:46:12 PM someone ban me from PHA pls! won't be long if you keep this up....FFS, have to check dates on all the posts now! it's extra confusing in ones youve posted in as you can tell from other peoples improvement whether its a new or old thread whereas your poker theory remains consistently terrible ::) how do u work that one out Bolt? He normally just posts 'this' under the post above. If it happens to be 87 paragraphs of Mantis waffle or 1 line of Pab genius the 'this' always remains constant. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: bolt pp on September 16, 2009, 12:47:40 PM someone ban me from PHA pls! won't be long if you keep this up....FFS, have to check dates on all the posts now! it's extra confusing in ones youve posted in as you can tell from other peoples improvement whether its a new or old thread whereas your poker theory remains consistently terrible ::) how do u work that one out Bolt? He normally just posts 'this' under the post above. If it happens to be 87 paragraphs of Mantis waffle or 1 line of Pab genius the 'this' always remains constant. nah that's unfair, ive seen him do his fair share of +1's Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: boldie on September 16, 2009, 12:52:36 PM someone ban me from PHA pls! won't be long if you keep this up....FFS, have to check dates on all the posts now! it's extra confusing in ones youve posted in as you can tell from other peoples improvement whether its a new or old thread whereas your poker theory remains consistently terrible ::) how do u work that one out Bolt? He normally just posts 'this' under the post above. If it happens to be 87 paragraphs of Mantis waffle or 1 line of Pab genius the 'this' always remains constant. nah that's unfair, ive seen him do his fair share of +1's this. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: GreekStein on September 16, 2009, 12:54:52 PM someone ban me from PHA pls! won't be long if you keep this up....FFS, have to check dates on all the posts now! it's extra confusing in ones youve posted in as you can tell from other peoples improvement whether its a new or old thread whereas your poker theory remains consistently terrible ::) how do u work that one out Bolt? He normally just posts 'this' under the post above. If it happens to be 87 paragraphs of Mantis waffle or 1 line of Pab genius the 'this' always remains constant. nah that's unfair, ive seen him do his fair share of +1's I still love him though Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: boldie on September 16, 2009, 12:57:29 PM someone ban me from PHA pls! won't be long if you keep this up....FFS, have to check dates on all the posts now! it's extra confusing in ones youve posted in as you can tell from other peoples improvement whether its a new or old thread whereas your poker theory remains consistently terrible ::) how do u work that one out Bolt? He normally just posts 'this' under the post above. If it happens to be 87 paragraphs of Mantis waffle or 1 line of Pab genius the 'this' always remains constant. nah that's unfair, ive seen him do his fair share of +1's I still love him though +1 Self-love FTMFW! Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: MANTIS01 on September 16, 2009, 12:59:03 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams.
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: bolt pp on September 16, 2009, 01:37:27 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. are you suggesting greekstein used to get the blue bus to school? Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: GreekStein on September 16, 2009, 01:43:00 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: MANTIS01 on September 16, 2009, 01:43:43 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. are you suggesting greekstein used to get the blue bus to school? Not at all. I am merely suggesting that some people stand in front of a Picasso admiring it's beauty and some people think the eyes are in the wrong place & a 3 year-old could do better. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: bolt pp on September 16, 2009, 01:47:10 PM seriously though this is crap isnt it?...............................
(http://www.studio-international.co.uk/studio-images/picasso_and_american_art/picasso_woman_b.jpg) Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: boldie on September 16, 2009, 01:48:08 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. are you suggesting greekstein used to get the blue bus to school? Not at all. I am merely suggesting that some people stand in front of a Picasso admiring it's beauty and some people think the eyes are in the wrong place & a 3 year-old could do better. and then you have the people standing next to the painting, waffling on for hours about how great Picasso is and using loads of fancy words.....whilst actually standing next to a Van Gogh ;) Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: MANTIS01 on September 16, 2009, 01:49:30 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: bolt pp on September 16, 2009, 01:53:41 PM ;popcorn;
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: GreekStein on September 16, 2009, 01:54:40 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who. Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum. I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: MANTIS01 on September 16, 2009, 02:10:07 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who. Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum. I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters. You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: GreekStein on September 16, 2009, 02:22:41 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who. Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum. I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters. You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different. When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: MANTIS01 on September 16, 2009, 02:48:24 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who. Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum. I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters. You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different. When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though. Dude, for someone who takes pride in this say what you think quality you don't seem to like it if somebody else says what they think. I reckon if many people know a truth then it would be easy to prove that truth, but w/e. Lets get it straight thou, you're not afraid to say what you think...unless somebody tells you not to....or there is a risk of comeback...then you wont say what you think. What you're saying is you're happy to take pot shots at people on a poker forum and insinuate stuff on a poker show. That quality isn't quite so impressive/fearless but it entertains me so gl to you Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: EvilPie on September 16, 2009, 02:53:38 PM Mantis is my hero.
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: GreekStein on September 16, 2009, 03:05:15 PM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who. Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum. I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters. You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different. When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though. 1)Dude, for someone who takes pride in this say what you think quality you don't seem to like it if somebody else says what they think. 2)I reckon if many people know a truth then it would be easy to prove that truth, but w/e. 3) Lets get it straight thou, you're not afraid to say what you think...unless somebody tells you not to....or there is a risk of comeback...then you wont say what you think. 4) What you're saying is you're happy to take pot shots at people on a poker forum and insinuate stuff on a poker show. That quality isn't quite so impressive/fearless but it entertains me so gl to you 1) Actually I welcome it. You seem to think this because I've critisized your posts. Not without good reason though - a lot just contain complete rubbish. If I genuinely didn't like the discussion or criticism I would have pm'd you and told you to fuck off by now but that's not the case. As someone who dishes it out I fully expect to take it sometimes too. 2) Not in this scenario. If said cheats had mentioned what they were doing to several people and this had got round it doesn't mean it's possible to prove or that it's untrue. 3) A little different when it concerns legal matters. If you don't see that then you are thick. 4) I sure did say that. I'm glad I entertain you, generally you have the opposite effect on me but I'll say exactly the same stuff in person so your last post is just drivel. 5) Evilpie - don't start on your future brother-in-law! 6) Rooks - all in. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: faireycakes on September 16, 2009, 04:55:23 PM ;popcorn; ;popcorn; ;popcorn;
Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: MANTIS01 on September 18, 2009, 09:24:16 AM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who. Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum. I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters. You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different. When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though. 1)Dude, for someone who takes pride in this say what you think quality you don't seem to like it if somebody else says what they think. 2)I reckon if many people know a truth then it would be easy to prove that truth, but w/e. 3) Lets get it straight thou, you're not afraid to say what you think...unless somebody tells you not to....or there is a risk of comeback...then you wont say what you think. 4) What you're saying is you're happy to take pot shots at people on a poker forum and insinuate stuff on a poker show. That quality isn't quite so impressive/fearless but it entertains me so gl to you 1) Actually I welcome it. You seem to think this because I've critisized your posts. Not without good reason though - a lot just contain complete rubbish. If I genuinely didn't like the discussion or criticism I would have pm'd you and told you to fuck off by now but that's not the case. As someone who dishes it out I fully expect to take it sometimes too. 2) Not in this scenario. If said cheats had mentioned what they were doing to several people and this had got round it doesn't mean it's possible to prove or that it's untrue. 3) A little different when it concerns legal matters. If you don't see that then you are thick. 4) I sure did say that. I'm glad I entertain you, generally you have the opposite effect on me but I'll say exactly the same stuff in person so your last post is just drivel. 5) Evilpie - don't start on your future brother-in-law! 6) Rooks - all in. I like to discuss and debate this sort of stuff as well so I hope you don't pm me and tell me to fuck off. It does creep me out a bit when people do that numbered breaking down of posts type response thou, so try and avoid that if you can. You seem to think my angst stems from your criticism of my posts, but that's not it. I'm not even slightly bothered about that buddy. I don't like unprovoked flaming of fellow members because it contributes to the decline in attitude on a forum I enjoy using. I feel the same about the flaming of any member. I don't take this posting stuff as personally as you seem to. Yeah I was entertained pulling your strings about the I say what I think nonsense. I don't get what the special personality skill is. Who wouldn't say what they think? You are simply saying you have the courage of your convictions and mean what you say. Isn't that just normal behaviour for anybody? Normal behaviour also includes not saying exactly what you think on a phone-in show in case you get into trouble. If you propose that the special skill in yourself is you fearlessly speak out what's on your mind I will debate that you are actually just normal. It seems that this special skill boils down to the fact you wouldn't be afraid to bowl up to me at the poker table and say "Mantis your posts on that Blonde poker are rubbish". Errr, good special skill Greekstein. Fwiw I don't really think my posts are like the works of Shakespeare. I was joking about that. I think they could be like Picasso thou. Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: GreekStein on September 18, 2009, 09:32:23 AM I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams. Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!! Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class. Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who. Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum. I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters. You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different. When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though. 1)Dude, for someone who takes pride in this say what you think quality you don't seem to like it if somebody else says what they think. 2)I reckon if many people know a truth then it would be easy to prove that truth, but w/e. 3) Lets get it straight thou, you're not afraid to say what you think...unless somebody tells you not to....or there is a risk of comeback...then you wont say what you think. 4) What you're saying is you're happy to take pot shots at people on a poker forum and insinuate stuff on a poker show. That quality isn't quite so impressive/fearless but it entertains me so gl to you 1) Actually I welcome it. You seem to think this because I've critisized your posts. Not without good reason though - a lot just contain complete rubbish. If I genuinely didn't like the discussion or criticism I would have pm'd you and told you to fuck off by now but that's not the case. As someone who dishes it out I fully expect to take it sometimes too. 2) Not in this scenario. If said cheats had mentioned what they were doing to several people and this had got round it doesn't mean it's possible to prove or that it's untrue. 3) A little different when it concerns legal matters. If you don't see that then you are thick. 4) I sure did say that. I'm glad I entertain you, generally you have the opposite effect on me but I'll say exactly the same stuff in person so your last post is just drivel. 5) Evilpie - don't start on your future brother-in-law! 6) Rooks - all in. I like to discuss and debate this sort of stuff as well so I hope you don't pm me and tell me to fuck off. It does creep me out a bit when people do that numbered breaking down of posts type response thou, so try and avoid that if you can. You seem to think my angst stems from your criticism of my posts, but that's not it. I'm not even slightly bothered about that buddy. I don't like unprovoked flaming of fellow members because it contributes to the decline in attitude on a forum I enjoy using. I feel the same about the flaming of any member. I don't take this posting stuff as personally as you seem to. Yeah I was entertained pulling your strings about the I say what I think nonsense. I don't get what the special personality skill is. Who wouldn't say what they think? You are simply saying you have the courage of your convictions and mean what you say. Isn't that just normal behaviour for anybody? Normal behaviour also includes not saying exactly what you think on a phone-in show in case you get into trouble. If you propose that the special skill in yourself is you fearlessly speak out what's on your mind I will debate that you are actually just normal. It seems that this special skill boils down to the fact you wouldn't be afraid to bowl up to me at the poker table and say "Mantis your posts on that Blonde poker are rubbish". Errr, good special skill Greekstein. Fwiw I don't really think my posts are like the works of Shakespeare. I was joking about that. I think they could be like Picasso thou. zzZ Title: Re: 99 vs unknowns... Post by: boldie on September 18, 2009, 10:27:50 AM lol @ this entire thread.
|