Title: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: M3boy on January 16, 2007, 05:29:14 PM Game #4186116364: Hold'em NL ($1/$2) - 2007/01/16 - 13:16:34 (UK)
Table "Temptation" Seat 3 is the button. Seat 1: Vas170810 ($178.50 in chips) Seat 2: HarrisMP ($37.75 in chips) Seat 3: sper3 ($197.75 in chips) Seat 4: M3Boy ($184 in chips) Seat 5: Simmkin ($242 in chips) Seat 6: hydral ($288.97 in chips) M3Boy: posts small blind $1 Simmkin: posts big blind $2 ----- HOLE CARDS ----- dealt to M3Boy [Ks Kh] hydral: raises to $10 Vas170810: calls $10 HarrisMP: folds sper3: folds M3Boy: raises to $26 Simmkin: folds hydral: folds Vas170810: calls $16 ----- FLOP ----- [7s 8c 5h] M3Boy: bets $35 Vas170810: raises to $152.50 and is all-in What do you do? Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: WellChief on January 16, 2007, 05:37:06 PM Raise quite a bit more preflop, you're out of position all hand, to 40ish maybe. Then bet a bit bigger on the flop. Dunno what to do as played, depends on the player, probable fold.
Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: Smart Money on January 16, 2007, 06:48:28 PM (Disclaimer: I am a full-handed cash table player, and so my opinions may not always fit in so well to questions relating to 6-handed play!! :) :) )
I'd probably play pre-flop and flop the same. (Betting too big on the flop with a high pair is one of the biggest mistakes people make at the cash tables. It gives excellent value to anyone calling pre-flop with any pair.) I would guess he has AA, set, or 66. (99 and 44 are remote possibilities) making you approx. a 10% dog in the first two, and slight favourite (60%) in the latter. What's your opponent like? What percentage of flops does he see? (If he's very tight pre-flop it adds weight to him having a set.) Or is he a loose maniac? With no info on him, I'd fold. Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: Royal Flush on January 16, 2007, 07:38:31 PM The weak lead was surely to induce the raise, i am thinking QQ-99, possible he has a set but he is more likely to flat call your weak bet thinking you have missed.
Interestingly why did the first player raise and then fold for just 16 more?? What would the cash game players on here do that with, my guess is hands that are so hard to play to a re-raise like AJ/AQ? Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: jakally on January 16, 2007, 07:55:04 PM Quote Posted by: Royal Flush Interestingly why did the first player raise and then fold for just 16 more?? What would the cash game players on here do that with, my guess is hands that are so hard to play to a re-raise like AJ/AQ? Very few occasions I would flat call a large raise UTG+1. Almost never with hands that I would put down to a reraise. Would probably fold to the all in unless I had some info, but would do it through gritted teeth, and wouldn't need much history to turn it into a call. Jak. Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: boldie on January 16, 2007, 07:59:43 PM Game #4186116364: Hold'em NL ($1/$2) - 2007/01/16 - 13:16:34 (UK) Table "Temptation" Seat 3 is the button. Seat 1: Vas170810 ($178.50 in chips) Seat 2: HarrisMP ($37.75 in chips) Seat 3: sper3 ($197.75 in chips) Seat 4: M3Boy ($184 in chips) Seat 5: Simmkin ($242 in chips) Seat 6: hydral ($288.97 in chips) M3Boy: posts small blind $1 Simmkin: posts big blind $2 ----- HOLE CARDS ----- dealt to M3Boy [Ks Kh] hydral: raises to $10 Vas170810: calls $10 HarrisMP: folds sper3: folds M3Boy: raises to $26 Simmkin: folds hydral: folds Vas170810: calls $16 ----- FLOP ----- [7s 8c 5h] M3Boy: bets $35 Vas170810: raises to $152.50 and is all-in What do you do? I don't get the 35$ raise. any overpair to the board would stick you in here. I call and pray he hasn't hit a set. Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: M3boy on January 16, 2007, 08:01:12 PM As James has said, the weak lead on the flop was to induce a re raise.
Boldie - I lead out on the flop, not raised Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: M3boy on January 16, 2007, 08:02:09 PM Of course I called, gladly :
M3Boy: calls $117.50 ----- TURN ----- [7s 8c 5h][Ts] ----- RIVER ----- [7s 8c 5h Ts]
Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: boldie on January 16, 2007, 08:03:46 PM As James has said, the weak lead on the flop was to induce a re raise. Boldie - I lead out on the flop, not raised sorry my bad...yeah the lead out is what I meant. I was confused because you asked what to do. and that's why I was questioning the 35$ bet as, as you said, it was to induce the re-raise. Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: Royal Flush on January 16, 2007, 08:32:11 PM N1 M3.
Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: M3boy on January 16, 2007, 08:39:57 PM N1 M3. Ta, although they are not all like that :( lol UL in Bolton BTW Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: Royal Flush on January 16, 2007, 08:55:43 PM Should have been out on level 1 of day 2 so i cant complain!
You be having a crack at the walsall sats? The event really is first class. Title: Re: Some hands for discussion - 3 Post by: M3boy on January 16, 2007, 09:04:24 PM Should have been out on level 1 of day 2 so i cant complain! You be having a crack at the walsall sats? The event really is first class. Oh yes indeed! |