blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => The Rail => Topic started by: Royal Flush on January 19, 2007, 10:34:14 PM



Title: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Royal Flush on January 19, 2007, 10:34:14 PM
Seat 1: Threeaces (2635 in chips)
Seat 2: John18048 sits out
Seat 3: Whoshot (8771 in chips)
Seat 5: Margy001 (5220 in chips)
Seat 6: Flushy (3485 in chips)
Seat 7: Horsehair (4230 in chips)
Seat 8: Tere05011 (7108 in chips)
Seat 9: Shades23 (8765 in chips)
Seat 10: ezrider (2305 in chips)
Margy001: posts small blind 50
Flushy: posts big blind 100
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to Flushy [Qh 3h]
Horsehair: calls 100
Tere05011: folds
Shades23: folds
ezrider: folds
Threeaces: folds
John18048: folds
Whoshot: folds
Margy001: calls 50
Flushy: checks
----- FLOP ----- [As 4c Ad]
Margy001: checks
Flushy: checks
Horsehair: checks
----- TURN ----- [As 4c Ad][9d]
Margy001: bets 100
Flushy: folds
Horsehair: calls 100
----- RIVER ----- [As 4c Ad 9d][Kc]
Margy001: bets 300
Horsehair: raises to 1200
Margy001: calls 900
----- SHOW DOWN -----
Horsehair: shows [9h Ah] (A Full House, Aces full of Nines)
Margy001: shows [4s Ac] (A Full House, Aces full of Fours)


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Horneris on January 19, 2007, 10:38:15 PM
I think its safe to say that Margy001 did well not to go broke there


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Royal Flush on January 19, 2007, 10:39:13 PM
I think its safe to say that Margy001 did well not to go broke there

Margy's play is truely shocking, not going broke should not be a consideration with Aces full


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Horneris on January 19, 2007, 10:52:33 PM
I know i was joking. Stunning stuff.


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Royal Flush on January 19, 2007, 10:53:44 PM
Sadly i have been moved table, although i did scalp horsehair. At least i am 1/125 now with 15k :D


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Royal Flush on January 19, 2007, 11:40:29 PM
Scrap all that came 55th, lol


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: I KNOW IT on January 19, 2007, 11:46:44 PM
How come u only got 2k off stu rutter in the GP-T event when u had A full vs his set


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Royal Flush on January 20, 2007, 01:47:14 AM
Because he had A7 on a A84A2 board on level 1 when we both played 200BB unfortunately for me he is not a moron and so correctly deduced there is no hand i can have that he beats that calls a raise.


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: I KNOW IT on January 20, 2007, 01:54:18 AM
LOL took u long enough to reply, good job hands were not reversed, he would have got the lot


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Royal Flush on January 20, 2007, 01:59:00 AM
LOL took u long enough to reply, good job hands were not reversed, he would have got the lot

lol funny you should say that in the £200 i had 67 on a K62 board, we both called a bet, turn 6 i check called stuarts bet, river Q. I check with the intention of letting the mug hang himself, he bets quite big though and i get all lost now and end up calling to see his Q6.......was nice to get some revenge the next day!


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: TightEnd on January 20, 2007, 02:00:51 AM
LOL took u long enough to reply, good job hands were not reversed, he would have got the lot


standard.


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: I KNOW IT on January 20, 2007, 02:07:28 AM
LOL took u long enough to reply, good job hands were not reversed, he would have got the lot


standard.
?


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: suzanne on January 20, 2007, 05:18:57 AM
Seat 1: Threeaces (2635 in chips)
Seat 2: John18048 sits out
Seat 3: Whoshot (8771 in chips)
Seat 5: Margy001 (5220 in chips)
Seat 6: Flushy (3485 in chips)
Seat 7: Horsehair (4230 in chips)
Seat 8: Tere05011 (7108 in chips)
Seat 9: Shades23 (8765 in chips)
Seat 10: ezrider (2305 in chips)
Margy001: posts small blind 50
Flushy: posts big blind 100
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to Flushy [Qh 3h]
Horsehair: calls 100
Tere05011: folds
Shades23: folds
ezrider: folds
Threeaces: folds
John18048: folds
Whoshot: folds
Margy001: calls 50
Flushy: checks
----- FLOP ----- [As 4c Ad]
Margy001: checks
Flushy: checks
Horsehair: checks
----- TURN ----- [As 4c Ad][9d]
Margy001: bets 100
Flushy: folds
Horsehair: calls 100
----- RIVER ----- [As 4c Ad 9d][Kc]
Margy001: bets 300
Horsehair: raises to 1200
Margy001: calls 900
----- SHOW DOWN -----
Horsehair: shows [9h Ah] (A Full House, Aces full of Nines)
Margy001: shows [4s Ac] (A Full House, Aces full of Fours)

Did he really play this so badly??

To be honest I probably would have played it exactly the same.

You flop the full house with only 1 other ace out there...go allin and everyone will fold...so milk it.

Turn brings a diamond...small bet to make it cheap enough for the flush chaser.

River brings a king..no flush but keep it cheap so he will call with a 9 or K.

Hold onnnn...hes raised...so what has he got...44, 99, KK Ax (presuming hes trapping too) so im  up... but A9 AK and im fkd so I would have called too.

Plan B go allin on the flop...matey boy sucks you out with his 9 and u r left with less than 1k.

Can we have some more opinions on this please.

Flushy and Horneris I know are winning players so im curious as to why they think this hand was played so badly.






Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Royal Flush on January 20, 2007, 07:04:37 AM
You answered your own question. You are beating 44 99 KK and the other Ace, you are losing to AK A9. We can pretty much rule out KK and AK. So we are up against (that will call a push) Ax 44 99 or A9. A9 represents a much smaller frequency than the others so we want to push here and get our chips in killing the oppos range.


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Horneris on January 20, 2007, 07:21:31 AM
Playing like this hes going to be missing out on a lot of money in the long term.

I just reckon he could easily have any other ace from AJ to A 2 (suited probs if hes called pre) with his re raise, and had been slow playing and he would possibly call with these hands if we pushed.
Theres only one hand realistically which he can beat us with, which is A 9 (im ruling out AK as no pre flop action) ,and he could so easily have 44, any ace or 99 if hes the type to limp with mid pocket pairs

So its gona be a winning play in the long run by re shipping.


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: matt674 on January 20, 2007, 10:02:25 AM
So your claiming Margy001 is one of the worst players in poker for not going broke having flopped an aces full full-house, yet the title of your post says "the two worst players in poker?" - who is the other and why?

Also out of curiosity what was the buy in for this tourney and what was the site?


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: tikay on January 20, 2007, 11:20:19 AM
So your claiming Margy001 is one of the worst players in poker for not going broke having flopped an aces full full-house, yet the title of your post says "the two worst players in poker?" - who is the other and why?

Also out of curiosity what was the buy in for this tourney and what was the site?

The other "worst player"? Flushy, obviously.


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: Royal Flush on January 20, 2007, 06:57:23 PM
So your claiming Margy001 is one of the worst players in poker for not going broke having flopped an aces full full-house, yet the title of your post says "the two worst players in poker?" - who is the other and why?

Also out of curiosity what was the buy in for this tourney and what was the site?

The other "worst player"? Flushy, obviously.

Tikay is right! Clearly i could have won this pot with Q hi......

Was £25 i think on Crypto.


Title: Re: The two worst players in poker?
Post by: suzanne on January 21, 2007, 06:09:00 AM
You answered your own question. You are beating 44 99 KK and the other Ace, you are losing to AK A9. We can pretty much rule out KK and AK. So we are up against (that will call a push) Ax 44 99 or A9. A9 represents a much smaller frequency than the others so we want to push here and get our chips in killing the oppos range.

Far too often I have been sucked out on hands just like this.

A4 is not a great hand and although the flop has hit him straight in the face with a full house..matey boy is always going to call with his Ace and as was shown he hit his kicker...ok he might not have but it just seems to happen too often.

Enter sigh here (              )

Tonight for example...im on BB ...UTG calls...someone mid table calls and sb calls.

Flop is 535..UTG goes allin with his 33 ...mid position is in there with his JJ...small blind raises with AA...I have ...53....whack them chips in there....Jack on the fkin river...im gone.

I understand what u r saying about getting ur chips in when you have the nuts but to me A4..even when the deck smacks u in the face is dangerous.

Would just like to say btw that i would have shoved all my chips in too on a Saturday night  :-)

Is being so cautious my problem maybe?