|
Title: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: NoflopsHomer on January 25, 2007, 07:52:25 PM Seat 1 and seat 6 have exactly the same name or am just being a complete McCarthyite here?
Game #4290253484: Omaha H/L PL (7/15) - 2007/01/25 - 19:42:10 (UK) Table "1" Seat 3 is the button. Seat 1: EFFCOE (1000 in chips) Seat 2: Youngtubs (940 in chips) Seat 3: Foamer (970 in chips) Seat 4: Agresso (1090 in chips) Seat 5: Easyway (880 in chips) Seat 6: Effcoe (1000 in chips) Seat 7: Bigdazz69 (970 in chips) Seat 8: Mick_mc (1165 in chips) Seat 9: sticlebac (1000 in chips) Seat 10: mrnl (985 in chips) Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: Jim-D on January 25, 2007, 07:55:31 PM Unless "Effcoe" is some new cool term used by da kidz that i missed then it looks a little dodgy.
Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: barhell on January 25, 2007, 07:56:53 PM If it isn't the same person thats some coincidence.
If it is the same person they need to try harder. Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: taximan007 on January 25, 2007, 08:00:56 PM 2 people same family?
Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: thetank on January 25, 2007, 08:04:58 PM Effcoe plays a lot, is a decent player.
EFFCOE doesn't like him, a big fish, made a new account to be a Parody of the former. Or maybe it was a homage. Maybe Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: Nem on January 25, 2007, 09:59:45 PM Was it a Freeroll?
Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: doubleup on January 25, 2007, 10:15:19 PM I'm pretty sure that on the first page of "How to collude in online poker" it says:
"create two or more accounts, but make sure they are in different names NB the same name in capitals doesn't count as a different name" Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: Enzyme_ on January 26, 2007, 12:53:38 PM Its like Mitcch on ladbrokes theres about 20 other versions of Mitcch on laddies all people doing it to piss him off
i did have a photo of a MTT table where 6 outa 10 players had a version of Mitcch Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: thetank on January 27, 2007, 01:23:39 PM [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Hand Start.
[Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 1 : Son0fZeus has $1,980 [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 2 : Dmabes21 has $1,040 [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 3 : Poker Pablo has $3,200 [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 4 : zeus27 has $1,960 [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 5 : SPARKY H has $2,140 [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 6 : ellishouse has $2,000 [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 7 : tomo2000 has $2,000 [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 8 : woolpack has $2,000 [Jan 27 13:22:31] : Seat 9 : gun64 has $1,680 Cheetahs Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: bolt pp on January 27, 2007, 02:56:51 PM I'm pretty sure that on the first page of "How to collude in online poker" it says: "create two or more accounts, but make sure they are in different names NB the same name in capitals doesn't count as a different name" this is what i was going to say (I would've put it better) ::) Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: thetank on January 27, 2007, 03:02:29 PM I always shoplift in a stripy jumper, and put my free stuff into a brown sack bag cleary marked for S-W-A-G.
I've got a mate who films me doing it with his camcorder. We've been asked by security to stop filming a couple of times, but they never ask to look in the bag. :dontask: Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: KingPoker on January 27, 2007, 03:56:02 PM I always shoplift in a stripy jumper, and put my free stuff into a brown sack bag cleary marked for S-W-A-G. I've got a mate who films me doing it with his camcorder. We've been asked by security to stop filming a couple of times, but they never ask to look in the bag. :dontask: What the hell are you playing at?! you are doing all tht things which are going to get you caught! Your just asking for trouble. >:? Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: ifm on January 27, 2007, 04:35:08 PM TheClaimer has an alter ego on tribeca called.................The Claimer.
Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: thetank on January 27, 2007, 04:48:44 PM Whose rubdown wit is equal to that of his counterpart.
Title: Re: Worth speaking to support about? Post by: Royal Flush on January 27, 2007, 09:20:43 PM Whose rubdown wit is equal to that of his counterpart. JUSTICE |