|
Title: Why? Post by: ACE2M on February 08, 2007, 03:20:03 PM I've never done it but why is it considered such bad form to take a long dwell before raising with the nuts?
Title: Re: Why? Post by: bhoywonder on February 08, 2007, 03:26:56 PM deception dear boy
deception of course the good players see through this Title: Re: Why? Post by: Suited_Jock on February 08, 2007, 03:27:07 PM I don't consider it bad form... just another way of inticing a call..
Title: Re: Why? Post by: Colchester Kev on February 08, 2007, 03:33:13 PM No problem in dwelling before raising, the bad form is to dwell before CALLING an all in with the nuts.
Title: Re: Why? Post by: bhoywonder on February 08, 2007, 03:36:55 PM No problem in dwelling before raising, the bad form is to dwell before CALLING an all in with the nuts. otherwise know as SLOWROLLING every poker players pet hate Title: Re: Why? Post by: ACE2M on February 08, 2007, 04:06:33 PM Anyone remember Trumper v Greenstein where trumper dwelled for 5 mins before raising all in with the nuts and greenstein threw a proper wobbler. I've seen it elsewhere and people going mad. I just don't see why it's a problem.
Title: Re: Why? Post by: londonpokergirl on February 08, 2007, 04:15:54 PM No problem in dwelling before raising, the bad form is to dwell before CALLING an all in with the nuts. otherwise know as SLOWROLLING every poker players pet hate yea some old git did it on me at sheffield last week and gave him a proper telling off Title: Re: Why? Post by: thetank on February 08, 2007, 06:08:42 PM Anyone remember Trumper v Greenstein where trumper dwelled for 5 mins before raising all in with the nuts and greenstein threw a proper wobbler. I've seen it elsewhere and people going mad. I just don't see why it's a problem. Trumper dwelled for a call, and got the call. End of story as far as I'm concerned, Greenstein's tantrum was pathetic. Title: Re: Why? Post by: ifm on February 08, 2007, 06:37:23 PM Anyone remember Trumper v Greenstein where trumper dwelled for 5 mins before raising all in with the nuts and greenstein threw a proper wobbler. I've seen it elsewhere and people going mad. I just don't see why it's a problem. Trumper dwelled for a call, and got the call. End of story as far as I'm concerned, Greenstein's tantrum was pathetic. I think that he was more upset that Trumper slowrolled when showing his cards Title: Re: Why? Post by: fergus8 on February 08, 2007, 06:40:32 PM anyone got a link for this
Title: Re: Why? Post by: ifm on February 08, 2007, 06:55:18 PM anyone got a link for this It originally broke on 2+2 i believe, here is Trumpers version. http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=788.0 |