Title: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 05, 2005, 09:21:26 PM Me and Foxy in.
$4000 for 2nd, $10,000 Amsterdam Main event seat for 1st. 14 runners. I'm in 10th after running my AK top pair into a set... ... but Foxy is in 4th. I believe Foxy is collins3. I'm snoopylq. Railbirds welcome. Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Foxy on October 05, 2005, 09:28:59 PM yes me and the snoop dog are playing on lads :)up playing to win a seat at the main event in the Dam and the 800 euro touney which I belive is a few days before, RailBirds wecome as lond as you are a bird qh gl to snoops
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 05, 2005, 09:39:04 PM 9 left.
gl foxy. It's there for the taking. Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: dan on October 05, 2005, 09:48:04 PM do you need to have money in an account to watch?
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 05, 2005, 09:49:48 PM do you need to have money in an account to watch? not sure bud. 9 left. Foxy in 4th, I'm in 7th. Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 05, 2005, 10:09:50 PM Has anyone got an ace they could lend me? :'(
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Dewi_cool on October 05, 2005, 10:19:50 PM I find it useful to pretend that u have the ace, but seems to me that everyones playin so tight, it might be a mistake
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 05, 2005, 10:32:31 PM Ah well.
Next time... Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Dewi_cool on October 05, 2005, 10:36:25 PM bit harsh, but these are the joys of the game :'(
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 05, 2005, 10:37:22 PM Got there for $5, but still hurts.
My cards had been on a day trip to the North Pole. Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Robert HM on October 05, 2005, 10:38:53 PM ul snoopy1239
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Heid on October 05, 2005, 10:49:13 PM Robert...he hates being called that!
isn't that right Fred Basset? Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: RED-DOG on October 05, 2005, 10:52:40 PM No, he hates being called Laser Quest
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Robert HM on October 05, 2005, 10:53:43 PM Robert...he hates being called that! isn't that right Fred Basset? I was being nice for a change, don't worry it won't last Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 05, 2005, 11:15:11 PM ul snoopy1239 ta. Just out of interest, the hand where I never recovered from was a as follows. I had 3800 in th sb. Dealt AK off suit. Button was nothingatall - agressive - he had 1900 blinds 15/30. He makes it 90. I decide to try and trap him and flatcall. flop comes 56K all clubs. I have no clubs. I bet a tad above the pot, he raises. I move all-in. He holds trip 5s and doubles up. I didn't put him on a set. Thought he either flat call or reraise more preflop with 5s or 6s. I thought he had the ace of clubs or KQ/KJ, or maybe even nowt. Any thoughts on this hand? Opinions would be much appreciated. Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 05, 2005, 11:53:31 PM last 3
foxy is low. Any1 free to railbird? I think he'd appreciate the support. Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Royal Flush on October 05, 2005, 11:56:53 PM M3 boy is HU 2-1 lead in the slovenia HPC sat on BSQ
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 06, 2005, 12:04:46 AM ul Foxy.
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Wayneo on October 06, 2005, 01:55:15 PM Hi snoop, my opinion on the hand is as follows:
I re-raise it up pre-flop with AKo in sb, to around 270, 300. Few reasons, a) you say you try to trap him, if he's button raising steal 45 in chips then its quite worthless, maybe AJ - Axs are the only hands u like to trap. b) he's likely to throw suited connectors in this spot, and depending on the player low pocket pairs. With the flop the way it comes, there are varying ways to play this hand. Betting out is fine, but when he raises, I dont feel he particularly has just a high club, so you can fold (bet to see where you are works), and moving over the top of the raise, certainly doesnt look like your holding a flush. I may check-raise him here, try representing the flush but you have top pair top kicker, and if he moves all in, easy fold. Obviously checking deems to be giving him a free card, but he might also be giving you a free card. If another club falls you can bet it, see what he does (more than likely he'll just call with his set). In short the hand is a very tricky one, but not one you need to lose all your chips on.( Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: TightEnd on October 06, 2005, 02:02:32 PM welcome Wayneo, Nice first post
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: RED-DOG on October 06, 2005, 02:24:14 PM Hi Wayneo, nice to talk to you instead of folding to your re raise on Laddies
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Robert HM on October 06, 2005, 02:59:58 PM Welcome Wayneo. Not a bad first post indeed.
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: Wayneo on October 06, 2005, 03:17:19 PM cheers, good to be here, duno how I havent come across this forum before, it's excellent!
Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: jammer on October 06, 2005, 07:43:20 PM Aye, welcome wayneo. Good to see you on blonde.
Jammer (jiminez) Title: Re: Ladbrokes Amsterdam $1000 Satellite Post by: snoopy1239 on October 06, 2005, 07:56:39 PM Hi snoop, my opinion on the hand is as follows: I re-raise it up pre-flop with AKo in sb, to around 270, 300. Few reasons, a) you say you try to trap him, if he's button raising steal 45 in chips then its quite worthless, maybe AJ - Axs are the only hands u like to trap. b) he's likely to throw suited connectors in this spot, and depending on the player low pocket pairs. With the flop the way it comes, there are varying ways to play this hand. Betting out is fine, but when he raises, I dont feel he particularly has just a high club, so you can fold (bet to see where you are works), and moving over the top of the raise, certainly doesnt look like your holding a flush. I may check-raise him here, try representing the flush but you have top pair top kicker, and if he moves all in, easy fold. Obviously checking deems to be giving him a free card, but he might also be giving you a free card. If another club falls you can bet it, see what he does (more than likely he'll just call with his set). In short the hand is a very tricky one, but not one you need to lose all your chips on.( Hi Wayneo. Good to see you on board. We've had some fun Ladbrokes banter on several occassions and it's always a good laugh. The player was nothingatall and I 've always found him to be an agressive player. In fact, at that point of time he was raising a lot of hands. He was also calling the reraises. I didn't bet preflop because I didn't want to raise, see him call and then miss the flop as I knew he wouldn't need to have much to reraise a bluff on the flop. Also, if I checked, he would no doubt bet and I still wouldn't know where I stood. That's why I decided to keep it cheap. What I should have done was raise a chunky amount preflop to let him know I meant business. A definite mistake by me in hindsight. Having said that, it's tricky to fold the AK once I hit my flop as, unless I think he's hit the flush, I have to deem myself to be ahead. Not an easy hand to fold. If I check and he bets (which he would have done), what would I do then. I think most people would decide that he didn't have the flush and reraise. By then I'd be pot virtually pot committed anyway and would find it hard to release if he raised again. If he had him down as a less agressive player, I would have folded to the reraise on the flop. Not my normal play, but I believed that he would reraise me with many hands. I think the fact that he only raised a smallish amount instead of pushing all-in should have been an indicator that he had a strong hand. Thx for the response. I think you're right. My mistake was not reraising preflop. |