|
Title: blind on blind Post by: byronkincaid on May 04, 2007, 05:30:05 PM Seat 1: -gotCHA- (£100 in chips)
Seat 2: zuse (£98.50 in chips) Seat 3: Ramirez (£55 in chips) Seat 4: mymaximus (£91.25 in chips) Seat 5: sakalas1 (£53.75 in chips) Seat 6: lok123 (£141.43 in chips) lok123: posts small blind £0.50 -gotCHA-: posts big blind £1 ----- HOLE CARDS ----- dealt to -gotCHA- [As 8d] zuse: folds Ramirez: folds mymaximus: folds sakalas1: folds lok123: raises to £4 -gotCHA-: calls £3 ----- FLOP ----- [Ah 7h 5c] lok123: bets £5 -gotCHA-: calls £5 ----- TURN ----- [Ah 7h 5c][Ad] lok123: checks -gotCHA-: checks ----- RIVER ----- [Ah 7h 5c Ad][7c] lok123: checks -gotCHA-: bets £12 lok123: calls £12 ----- SHOW DOWN ----- -gotCHA-: shows [As 8d] (A Full House, Aces full of Sevens) lok123: shows [Ac Js] (A Full House, Aces full of Sevens) lok123 collected £20 from Main pot -gotCHA- collected £20 from Main pot villain is regular multitabling TAG 15.8/9.3/3.4 over zillions of hands. He prob sees me pretty much the same except I'm a bit looser at around 18/13. 1) Does my opponent play this hand goodly or badly? 2) Do I play this goodly or badly? 3) What can I learn from this hand that will help me to win money off this guy in the future? I am interested in the turn and river decisions mostly. Title: Re: blind on blind Post by: AlexMartin on May 05, 2007, 12:37:38 AM All looks fine, dont understand why he doesnt ship all-in on the river.
Title: Re: blind on blind Post by: Smart Money on May 09, 2007, 08:56:12 AM Both play all streets fine, except his river play which is poor. I imagine he's trying to induce a bluff, but he'd get better value long-term putting in a value bet.
Title: Re: blind on blind Post by: boldie on May 09, 2007, 01:35:11 PM All looks fine, dont understand why he doesnt ship all-in on the river. I bet the turn..and his river checkcall is obviously disastrously weak..and, unless it turned out to be Jeniffer Tilly, I would guess a misclick. |