|
Title: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: fergus8 on May 20, 2007, 12:14:50 AM http://one.revver.com/watch/99898
Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: KingPoker on May 20, 2007, 12:26:00 AM without sounding like a smart arse i know about this stuff!
Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: Eck on May 20, 2007, 12:29:37 AM Standard
Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: suzanne on May 20, 2007, 12:41:04 AM gave up half way through lol
Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: LeKnave on May 20, 2007, 12:49:26 AM Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: Sark79 on May 20, 2007, 12:53:26 AM I lasted 22.1 seconds before giving up , I can't understand this kind of stuff unless it is presented by the teletubbies or a similar educational TV show
Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: doubleup on May 20, 2007, 12:57:37 AM When you're as pished as me it all makes sense
Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: AdamM on May 20, 2007, 11:38:35 AM this is wrong. god made it all 6000 years ago. atleast that's what the old couple at the door told me
Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2007, 07:27:37 PM The ant/newspaper comparison doesn't work because the ant would be capable of returning to it's starting point even if the paper were not folded. You can't just turn around and go back in time..
Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: fergus8 on May 20, 2007, 07:33:56 PM ive got one thing to say to that.......
.......88 mph Title: Re: sorry could you repeat that, i didn't quite catch it Post by: AdamM on May 21, 2007, 01:05:16 PM lol, cryptic
|