Title: 1-2 Omaha hand Post by: boldie on June 04, 2007, 10:12:00 PM OK just sat down at the table about 3 rounds ago and mateyboy is the big stack who's fairly active when he has a hand which is why I called preflop.
What do people think of my shove here..the result is immaterial but I thought every 7 ten jack or queen would give me the nuts and he would not call me if a straight card came on the turn PokerStars Game #10270610160: Omaha Pot Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/06/04 - 17:02:46 (ET) Table 'Aralia II' 6-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 1: ACMastrpiece ($303.20 in chips) Seat 2: boldedge ($206.60 in chips) Seat 4: FourKing ($223.40 in chips) Seat 5: SLiCKYV ($41 in chips) Seat 6: JEUX D PLAGE ($41.40 in chips) SLiCKYV: posts small blind $1 JEUX D PLAGE: posts big blind $2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to boldedge [Qh Jc 6h Tc] ACMastrpiece: folds boldedge: calls $2 FourKing: raises $7 to $9 SLiCKYV: folds JEUX D PLAGE: calls $7 boldedge: calls $7 *** FLOP *** [8d 4s 9h] JEUX D PLAGE: checks boldedge: checks FourKing: bets $26.60 JEUX D PLAGE: folds boldedge: raises $79.80 to $106.40 FourKing: raises $79.80 to $186.20 boldedge: raises $11.40 to $197.60 and is all-in FourKing: calls $11.40 *** TURN *** [8d 4s 9h] [7s] *** RIVER *** [8d 4s 9h 7s] [5d] *** SHOW DOWN *** boldedge: shows [Qh Jc 6h Tc] (a straight, Seven to Jack) FourKing: mucks hand boldedge collected $421.20 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $423.20 | Rake $2 Board [8d 4s 9h 7s 5d] Seat 1: ACMastrpiece folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 2: boldedge showed [Qh Jc 6h Tc] and won ($421.20) with a straight, Seven to Jack Seat 4: FourKing (button) mucked [8h Jd 8s Js] Seat 5: SLiCKYV (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 6: JEUX D PLAGE (big blind) folded on the Flop Title: Re: 1-2 Omaha hand Post by: Royal Flush on June 04, 2007, 10:14:38 PM Super standard.
Title: Re: 1-2 Omaha hand Post by: boldie on June 04, 2007, 10:17:29 PM Super standard. that's what I thought...matey boy who lost it and some others actually claimed it was a poor shove and I don't play omaha that much (just the occasional cash game) that I thought I had lost my mind. Thanks mate. Title: Re: 1-2 Omaha hand Post by: Royal Flush on June 04, 2007, 10:23:43 PM A wrap (ok not a full one) on a 3 tone board is a monster, they only reason you wouldn't raise would be to see if the board pairs the turn before getting your money in!
Title: Re: 1-2 Omaha hand Post by: GlasgowBandit on June 04, 2007, 10:38:43 PM A wrap (ok not a full one) on a 3 tone board is a monster, they only reason you wouldn't raise would be to see if the board pairs the turn before getting your money in! Good point Mr Flushy. I think I am shoving here every time. And thats probably where I am going wrong by not waiting to see if the board pairs on the turn before getting it all in. I think its generally easier to pass a set to a danger card on the turn than it would be to pass on the flop. Title: Re: 1-2 Omaha hand Post by: rudders on June 05, 2007, 12:02:06 AM A wrap (ok not a full one) on a 3 tone board is a monster, they only reason you wouldn't raise would be to see if the board pairs the turn before getting your money in! this hurts but.... i agree Title: Re: 1-2 Omaha hand Post by: AlexMartin on June 05, 2007, 01:59:33 AM Standard shove, lost of FE and a strong nutdrawing hand anyways.
|