Title: ruling reqd Post by: portfolio on November 04, 2007, 01:52:50 PM 10 handed live mtt
blinds 200-400 i limp utg utg +2 raises to 1000 action folded back to me i reraise to 1600 verbally declaring amount first and putting 2 x 1k chips over the line 2 players not in pot think i have underaised when the dealer finally understands thaT MY BET IS CORRECT, gives me my correct change of 400 and then DEALS THE FLOP, b4 collecting the reraise from the original raiser. what action should the td now take A regarding the uncalled reraise of 600 B the dealt flop, does the flop NEVER get burned, or should it be reshuffled into deck and redealt if the op calls the reraise?? opinions please. Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: ripple11 on November 04, 2007, 02:52:30 PM lump= limp !? Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: masterjackblack on November 04, 2007, 03:40:00 PM This is what should happen. If a dealer prematurely deals the flop with pre-flop action pending the flop is not allowed to stand. The flop is taken out of play and Utg+2 is given all options (fold, call the 600, or re-raise). When all pre-flop actions are complete the dealer reshuffles and deals a new flop, game on.
Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: portfolio on November 04, 2007, 04:19:37 PM lump= limp !? fairly obv, but ty for ur valued assisstance. Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: Ironside on November 04, 2007, 05:08:37 PM This is what should happen. If a dealer prematurely deals the flop with pre-flop action pending the flop is not allowed to stand. The flop is taken out of play and Utg+2 is given all options (fold, call the 600, or re-raise). When all pre-flop actions are complete the dealer reshuffles and deals a new flop, game on. i agree Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: londonpokergirl on November 04, 2007, 05:10:34 PM the inital raiser gets the chance to call
then flop is discarded completely the turn and river get dealt out as they would normally come out, then cards reshuffled and dealt as would nromally Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: redsimon on November 04, 2007, 05:12:54 PM the inital raiser gets the chance to call then flop is discarded completely the turn and river get dealt out as they would normally come out, then cards reshuffled and dealt as would nromally Face down and not reshuffle burn cards? That would maintain the old turn and river Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: portfolio on November 04, 2007, 05:26:41 PM the inital raiser gets the chance to call then flop is discarded completely the turn and river get dealt out as they would normally come out, then cards reshuffled and dealt as would nromally are you saying complete the full board then reshuffle and re-deal the whole board M ? or deal out turn and river as normal, THEN reshuffle and deal out flop?? if the latter. what on earth happens to betting?? Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: UpTheMariners on November 04, 2007, 07:05:57 PM Declare both hands dead and tell them there min raising faggots. Divide money to the rest of the table ;tracet;
Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: snoopy1239 on November 04, 2007, 08:42:26 PM There was a hand at the Dublin EPT which was missing a burn card. After it was decided that no one could be 100% sure which card should be the burn card, the cards were reshuffled and a new Flop dealt. Hole card bias aside, the players involved didn't seem to have a problem with this. I see no reason why this can't be applied to your situation with the initial raiser being given a chance to act.
However, the cardroom may have strict rules in place that counteract this view. Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: RioRodent on November 04, 2007, 09:01:14 PM From Robert's Rules of Poker version 10...
7. If the flop needs to be redealt because the cards were prematurely flopped before the betting was complete, or the flop contained too many cards, the boardcards are mixed with the remainder of the deck. The burncard remains on the table. After shuffling, the dealer cuts the deck and deals a new flop without burning a card. [See “Section 16 – Explanations,” discussion #4, for more information on this rule.] Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: bluenose724 on November 05, 2007, 12:57:32 AM Mels ruling is correct but she did not explain it properly.
The flop is destroyed and put to the side WITHOUT burn card. Card burnt, TURN face down. card burnt, RIVER face down. All options are now open to your opponent regarding the raise. If a flop is required the remaining deck along with the ORIGINAL flop cards will be shuffled and the flop dealt. Betting will continue as normal. The original flop cards must be given an 'opportunity' to come back into play. Shah Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: Delboy on November 05, 2007, 01:23:36 AM Mels ruling is correct but she did not explain it properly. The flop is destroyed and put to the side WITHOUT burn card. Card burnt, TURN face down. card burnt, RIVER face down. All options are now open to your opponent regarding the raise. If a flop is required the remaining deck along with the ORIGINAL flop cards will be shuffled and the flop dealt. Betting will continue as normal. The original flop cards must be given an 'opportunity' to come back into play. Shah Sounds OK for a cash game but not for a tourney.. The players in the hand gain more knowledge of what will or won't come on the turn and river. So there maybe less chance of one of the players busting out..The ruling could change the outcome of the tourney for the folded players. I feel the correct way would be to reshuffle and re-deal the whole board. Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: masterjackblack on November 05, 2007, 03:16:22 AM Mels ruling is correct but she did not explain it properly. The flop is destroyed and put to the side WITHOUT burn card. Card burnt, TURN face down. card burnt, RIVER face down. All options are now open to your opponent regarding the raise. If a flop is required the remaining deck along with the ORIGINAL flop cards will be shuffled and the flop dealt. Betting will continue as normal. The original flop cards must be given an 'opportunity' to come back into play. Shah Sounds OK for a cash game but not for a tourney.. The players in the hand gain more knowledge of what will or won't come on the turn and river. So there maybe less chance of one of the players busting out..The ruling could change the outcome of the tourney for the folded players. I feel the correct way would be to reshuffle and re-deal the whole board. Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: dik9 on November 05, 2007, 10:40:57 AM Most reputable cardrooms do not preseve the original turn and river face down in the middle of the table. The reason being is that it is not 100% secure and negates the very purpose of why cards are burned. Re-deal the whole board and bitch slap the players for the all the min raise malarkey. Shah has it spot on. How ya doing Fella long time no see? I was under the impression that most reputable cardrooms across the world did it the way Shah describes, as much as the original board should be preserved. But I do agree about bitch slapping min raisers :) Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: portfolio on November 06, 2007, 08:00:38 PM many thanks for all the constructive replies.
the ruling was...... the op was allowed to call and the flop STOOD according to the td on the night flops are never burned !!! so the op was allowed to see a flop, pay his raise and call my all in on a j j 10 flop holding q9. fortunately my aces held and got a timely double thru. i posted as i cannot believe the td took the correct action,and when i queried it and asked if he might like to consider some common sense or even check the casinos own rules, he v conclusively refused !! on checking retrospectively with the cardroom mgr the next day, casino rules state ops hand is dead and i take the pot. funny old game is poker............. ps min raising is normally gayhe, i agree but certain circumstances make it worthwhile ;ifm; Title: Re: ruling reqd Post by: phatomch on November 08, 2007, 03:48:09 PM the ruling should be that the person facing the bet , is out of luck . you win , they dont have the chance to call and the hand is over
|