Title: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 19, 2007, 11:27:06 PM boruc 9 goalkeeper mcgregor 7
who gives a toss 5 right back cafu hutton 10 naylor 2 left back papac 2.01 mcmanus 8 centre back weir 7.99 take your pick 3 centre back cuellar 9.75 brown 8 mid right beasley 7 donati 6 cente mid ferguson 9 hartley 5 centr mid hemdani 8 mcgeady 8 left mid mculloch 8 jvh 3 forward darchville 7 mcdonald 9 forward boyd 7 (helicopter sunday fame) Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 19, 2007, 11:32:16 PM 4.5 to 6.5
mcgeady v mculloch is really dependent on which style u prefer Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 19, 2007, 11:34:09 PM breaking news, mcgeadys a walloper he loses 0.01
mcgeady 7.99 left mid mculloch 8 overall score 4-7 Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: lazaroonie on December 19, 2007, 11:47:46 PM you been at the glue again ?
mcgeady vs mcculloch football vs caber tossing pmsl Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 19, 2007, 11:49:29 PM you been at the glue again ? mcgeady vs mcculloch actual tosser vs caber tosser pmsl fixed it Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: lazaroonie on December 19, 2007, 11:55:20 PM you been at the glue again ? mcgeady vs mcculloch actual tosser vs caber tosser pmsl fixed it help from the SFA again ? Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 19, 2007, 11:57:39 PM i didnt even know the little cherab was suspended, cafu hutton would have had him in his pocket anyway, this way he can keep his reputation demolishing falkirks and the inver......yea the falkirks of this world, intact
Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: Scottish Dave on December 20, 2007, 12:26:18 AM darchville 7 Aha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha i can't listen to little weirdo rodants anymore im off to bed lol Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: turny on December 20, 2007, 11:37:45 AM boruc 9 goalkeeper mcgregor 7 who gives a toss 5 right back cafu hutton 10 naylor 2 left back papac 2.01 mcmanus 8 centre back weir 7.99 take your pick 3 centre back cuellar 9.75 brown 8 mid right beasley 7 donati 6 cente mid ferguson 9 hartley 5 centr mid hemdani 8 mcgeady 8 left mid mculloch 8 jvh 3 forward darchville 7 mcdonald 9 forward boyd 7 (helicopter sunday fame) never heard of any of em lol this a lower league side? Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 20, 2007, 12:03:10 PM listen for the sum of chelskis parts there a very poor side, glass houses and all that
Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: turny on December 20, 2007, 12:10:22 PM listen for the sum of chelskis parts there a very poor side, glass houses and all that someone please translate? thanks Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: Colchester Kev on December 20, 2007, 12:13:32 PM listen for the sum of chelskis parts there a very poor side, glass houses and all that someone please translate? thanks I think he said something about kilts ? Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: Suited_Jock on December 20, 2007, 12:15:07 PM listen for the sum of chelskis parts there a very poor side, glass houses and all that someone please translate? thanks Something something some oot of champions league something something mickey mouse uefa cup something something £10million for hutton wtf lol Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: turny on December 20, 2007, 12:18:06 PM listen for the sum of chelskis parts there a very poor side, glass houses and all that someone please translate? thanks Something something some oot of champions league something something mickey mouse uefa cup something something £10million for hutton wtf lol lmao thank you kind sir ! Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 20, 2007, 12:26:32 PM for the amount of money chelski have spent, there not very good.
ppl who support teams that arnt very good shouldnt be slagging other teams, it just dosnt work Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: TightEnd on December 20, 2007, 12:29:15 PM for the amount of money chelski have spent, there not very good. ppl who support teams that arnt very good shouldnt be slagging other teams, it just dosnt work Rangers are cack Love A Leicester City Supporter. Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 20, 2007, 12:35:56 PM you dont even have a glasshouse, you have a frame covered in cling film
Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: TightEnd on December 20, 2007, 12:41:02 PM my frame is amply padded tyvm
my point, as unsubtly made as it was, was that when it comes to football banter all's fair as long as flaming is not involved and everyone keeps a sense of humour..I could support East Stirlingshire and still have a jokey crack at an Old Firm team and that's the way it should be :)up Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: turny on December 20, 2007, 03:02:50 PM for the amount of money chelski have spent, there not very good. ppl who support teams that arnt very good shouldnt be slagging other teams, it just dosnt work wasn,t slagging teams off fergus i just stated that i had not heard of the majority of players you named. now that could be due to my ignorance or the fact that they ply there trade in a mickey mouse league. the only person coming on here slagging teams i think you'll find is yourself. if more than 8 trophies in 5 years in one of europe's top 3 leagues does make us not very good then i accept it. blah blah money blah blah money blah money blah blah. dont you just love the jealousy! Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: turny on December 20, 2007, 03:07:36 PM my frame is amply padded tyvm my point, as unsubtly made as it was, was that when it comes to football banter all's fair as long as flaming is not involved and everyone keeps a sense of humour..I could support East Stirlingshire and still have a jokey crack at an Old Firm team and that's the way it should be :)up heres one for you rich see if you can guess the answer. leicester feature heavily in a chelsea terrace song "we'll all follow the chelsea over land and sea and LEICESTER!" any idea why they say leicester? theres hardly much hostile history between the sides (except erland johnsons dive in the fa cup to win us a penalty in 97 quater finals and the song was about long before then lol) Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: Rod Paradise on December 20, 2007, 03:21:52 PM [wasn,t slagging teams off fergus i just stated that i had not heard of the majority of players you named. now that could be due to my ignorance or the fact that they ply there trade in a mickey mouse league. the only person coming on here slagging teams i think you'll find is yourself. if more than 8 trophies in 5 years in one of europe's top 3 leagues does make us not very good then i accept it. blah blah money blah blah money blah money blah blah. dont you just love the jealousy! I think that attitude has more to do with things than jealousy I'm afraid. Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: TightEnd on December 20, 2007, 03:35:50 PM my frame is amply padded tyvm my point, as unsubtly made as it was, was that when it comes to football banter all's fair as long as flaming is not involved and everyone keeps a sense of humour..I could support East Stirlingshire and still have a jokey crack at an Old Firm team and that's the way it should be :)up heres one for you rich see if you can guess the answer. leicester feature heavily in a chelsea terrace song "we'll all follow the chelsea over land and sea and LEICESTER!" any idea why they say leicester? theres hardly much hostile history between the sides (except erland johnsons dive in the fa cup to win us a penalty in 97 quater finals and the song was about long before then lol) I did see the answer to this once a lot of clubs end their chants in AND LEICESTER if we ever play them again I'd hear them lolol Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: boldie on December 20, 2007, 04:04:30 PM for the amount of money chelski have spent, there not very good. ppl who support teams that arnt very good shouldnt be slagging other teams, it just dosnt work rotflmfao rotflmfao rotflmfao I always thought being an a*** about being a supporter of a certain team didn't work..might just be me though Title: Re: old firm 11 Post by: fergus8 on December 20, 2007, 06:58:58 PM i need an interpreter
|