Title: the real smoking question Post by: Ironside on October 27, 2005, 02:38:54 AM the choice is yours again
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: Junior Senior on October 27, 2005, 11:25:02 AM nice poll, slightly different options but i am expecting a similar result to others.
.... smoking should be banned Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: AdamM on October 27, 2005, 11:36:20 AM jeez Ironside give us a chance.
ah well, I'm also expecting the result to support my stance Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: snoopy1239 on October 27, 2005, 11:41:22 AM some1 should print out some of these threads and hand them into the gala or post them off to their head office.
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: AdamM on October 27, 2005, 11:44:08 AM once we get a decent ammount of votes I will be doing
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: AdamM on October 27, 2005, 11:45:23 AM see, in this poll the not bothereds support my case. if only 7% would stop going if a smoking ban was introduced the management have no option really
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: TheJagster on October 27, 2005, 11:49:23 AM Too be honest I would like to see smoking banned in all teh card rooms although yes I do smoke.
The true answer to this poll however is 'Not Bothered' because the smoking issue is unlikely to affect whether I go a card room or not. Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: mikkyT on October 27, 2005, 07:14:39 PM Better top this one so the old one doesnt get posted on.
To re-iterate the best arguement yet AGAINST a ban on smoking: On this issue (which is very current in Scotland - they WILL be non-smoking as of April 06) - I think that not enough attention was paid to ventilation systems - and with an adequate ventilation system I'd have no problem with smoking in pubs or Card-rooms, or airplanes - of course proper ventilation cost money - so just ban smoking :rolleyes: . Didn't mean that to read as pissed off as it did, sorry. I've not got time to debate it now... BUT I've previously posted about a pub in Glasgow where they invested in a hi-tec ventilation system (it blows in air at bar level, extracts above) & the tested air quality in the pub (an old blokes pub with lots of smokers) was better than the non-smoking pub in Glasgow tested at. If a premises can prove an adequate system, then why should they have to ban smoking? Airplanes are the same - I was (and am) asthmatic & used to fly 4 times a year or so, I never had a problem with smoke even though it wasn't banned on the flights - but the ventilation was run at 100% (complete refresh of air every 1/2 hour AFAICR) - now they run it at 10%, everyone on the flights catches everyone else's cold, they've banned smoking & they say it's more healthy - but it's just CHEAPER. I don't smoke (tobacco), will never start, but don't see bans as the best solution. It's happened in Ireland, and where the pubs near my brother's were never shut, they now are shut every afternoon except weekends, everyone complains about the farm workers smell, and the best conversations are outside in the smoker's shelter - so much so that non-smokers join their mates out in the shelter. Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: Royal Flush on October 27, 2005, 07:37:42 PM The reason smoking was banned on flights is because it is just far too dangerous. As for the passing of air through the cabin, there are JAA/FAA limits on this and nothing has changed, the only thing that is diffrent is that in newer a/c it's not all fresh air, some is circulated. This makes the are more Humid, which saves on the airlines carrying loads of water for the humidifers, it has nothing to do with any power setting on how fast the air goes.
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: mikkyT on October 27, 2005, 11:50:24 PM The reason smoking was banned on flights is because it is just far too dangerous. As for the passing of air through the cabin, there are JAA/FAA limits on this and nothing has changed, the only thing that is diffrent is that in newer a/c it's not all fresh air, some is circulated. This makes the are more Humid, which saves on the airlines carrying loads of water for the humidifers, it has nothing to do with any power setting on how fast the air goes. And everything to do with saving money. Nothing to do with safety. Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: The Truth on October 27, 2005, 11:53:46 PM you can still smoke on internal flights in cuba
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: ifm on October 28, 2005, 12:17:38 AM banning smoking on planes was never anything to do with safety, it was an excuse to save money simple as that, google it and i'm certain there will be a wealth of information
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: mikkyT on October 28, 2005, 12:34:11 AM Anything done by the airlines (or the regulatory body for that matter, at least in the states) is never done with safety first. Safety may get cited, but it never comes first.
If this was the case then we wouldn't be sitting 30,000 feet up in the air, strapped into great hulking chunks of metal built by the lowest bidder. Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: Royal Flush on October 28, 2005, 01:33:57 AM Mikky if your going to nick a quote make sure it's rellevant......aircraft are not built by the lowest bidder, Boeing's are all built in house.
It's dangerous to smoke on planes as simple as that. If it was purely money saving then it would have been done for pressurised aircraft only, but it wasn't. Mikky some things are done to save money, some are done for safety, aviation is a very safety concious industry, if something both saves money AND lives it is always adopted. Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: ifm on October 28, 2005, 01:47:59 AM if it was a safety issue, why was it allowed in the first place?
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: mikkyT on October 28, 2005, 01:52:58 AM Its as dangerous to smoke on an air plane as it is to cross the road... having said that, its probably conciderably less so!
Title: Re: the real smoking question Post by: RED-DOG on October 28, 2005, 01:56:42 AM Its as dangerous to smoke on an air plane as it is to cross the road... having said that, its probably conciderably less so! I like mikky, when theres no one left to contradict, he contradicts himself :respect: |