blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => Poker Hand Analysis => Topic started by: TightEnd on January 14, 2008, 11:06:20 PM



Title: Call?
Post by: TightEnd on January 14, 2008, 11:06:20 PM
8 left

flat payout to top three

blinds 6,000-12,000

you are second short stack, on bb with 100,000

 Ahrt 2h

Short stack pushes 42,000 in from the cut-off

Folded to you

Chip leaders have 600,000 plus, 2m in play

Short stack is a conventional tight player, has hung around for level after level, doubled up a few times, dropped back again/blinded away

60,000 in the middle its 32,000 to you

Call?


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: Newportlad on January 14, 2008, 11:15:14 PM
I dont particularly like it, but i call here.
You need to gamble to get to the top 3 where the money improves (and the medals start)


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: jezza777 on January 14, 2008, 11:39:14 PM
In a flat payout scenario I think it is a pass. 1/3rd of your chips is a high price.


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: Longy on January 14, 2008, 11:41:54 PM
I would call, he has to be super tight to pass this. If you think he would pass big broadways here it is a fold, but not even most nits pass qjs here with 3.5bbs in the CO in an unopened pot.


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: Dewi_cool on January 14, 2008, 11:46:26 PM
I fold & look for a better hand next orbit (when sober) all in if drunk


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: jezza777 on January 14, 2008, 11:48:32 PM
He should be pushing practically any 2 here but if he is tight and conventional it does narrow his range. He definately pushes any A most K's and some good queens. I just think that in a flat structure your chips are a lot more useful for raising with than calling with A2.

Sorry Longy I dont really understand your post. "I would call, he has to be super tight to pass this. If you think he would pass big broadways here it is a fold,"


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: Longy on January 15, 2008, 12:01:30 AM
He should be pushing practically any 2 here but if he is tight and conventional it does narrow his range. He definately pushes any A most K's and some good queens. I just think that in a flat structure your chips are a lot more useful for raising with than calling with A2.

Sorry Longy I dont really understand your post. "I would call, he has to be super tight to pass this. If you think he would pass big broadways here it is a fold,"

Yeah sorry bit lazy with my English there. Im calling. This is essentially a pot odds question, with 8 left and this structure anything that is +ev is closely related to +CEV (chip equity). So we need to be around 35% to win the hand (2 to 1 odds to call).

So to get to this we need to assign villain a range and thats what im doing. If kq is in villains range thats about breakeven point, any looser and the more we gain by calling, any tighter we loose more by calling.

--
 232,873,344  games     0.005 secs    46,574,668,800  games/sec

Board:
Dead: 

   equity    win    tie          pots won    pots tied   
Hand 0:    35.090%     33.65%    01.44%          78361835      3354267.50   { Ah2h }
Hand 1:    64.910%     63.47%    01.44%         147802974      3354267.50   { 22+, ATs+, KQs, ATo+, KQo }

My view is that most people even if they are tight are pushing wider than this range including hands like qjs.


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: jezza777 on January 15, 2008, 12:06:30 AM
I agree that qjs is well in the range here however in a flat payout structure I still fold. I don't think it is as simple as a pot odds question. If you go broke here you are done and I think that I would sooner push any two from the button than call here. A shortcoming in my game perhaps.

Also chips change value during tournaments, " what you gain by winning a chip is not quite as much as you lose when you lose a chip" there fore should we take this into account when calculating pot odds? Especially in a fixed payout structure.


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: TightEnd on January 15, 2008, 12:08:26 AM
you are not broke if you lose, you have 68,000 left and a sliver of fold equity for one orbit into anyone bar the two big stacks


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: Graham C on January 15, 2008, 12:10:20 AM
I call with a cringe for effect.  Ax is above the shove range first in for a shorty and she can't wait much longer


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: jezza777 on January 15, 2008, 12:17:01 AM
you are not broke if you lose, you have 68,000 left and a sliver of fold equity for one orbit into anyone bar the two big stacks

Yeah good point - pisses on my bonfire


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: Longy on January 15, 2008, 12:24:46 AM
I agree that qjs is well in the range here however in a flat payout structure I still fold. I don't think it is as simple as a pot odds question. If you go broke here you are done and I think that I would sooner push any two from the button than call here. A shortcoming in my game perhaps.

Also chips change value during tournaments, " what you gain by winning a chip is not quite as much as you lose when you lose a chip" there fore should we take this into account when calculating pot odds? Especially in a fixed payout structure.

I understand where you are going here and alas we are not privy to the exact structure. I would be surprised by using ICM here that we found that +cEV and +EV were that far apart. I think villain range here is always going to be wide enough to give us a margin of error that any ICM effect is still going to make the call +ev.


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: jezza777 on January 15, 2008, 12:30:22 AM
I think I agree the call is +ev, the range here is so so wide its not funny. I just think that chip preservation is more important than making thin +ev calls at this stage. We can pass up a possible +ev situation now to give us more(better) +ev situations in the future. It is unusual for me because normally ev is  god I just feel differently here.


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: AlexMartin on January 15, 2008, 01:04:20 AM
Call, i dont think its too close either. His range is wiiiiiiiide.


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: NoflopsHomer on January 15, 2008, 04:04:32 AM
I pass. Better to push ATC than call here.

Oh, and wot Jezza sez.


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: jezza777 on January 15, 2008, 04:11:08 PM
Did you call?


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: TightEnd on January 15, 2008, 04:45:47 PM
Did you call?

it wasn't me, I was updating

The player folded, I would have called. It struck me as an interesting one


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: TheChipPrince on January 16, 2008, 12:24:12 PM
dwell, then call...


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: Alverton on January 18, 2008, 04:21:53 AM
Hello
1st time poster long time reader. I'm pretty sure i'm the short stack tightend is talking about. (the apat event?)
I got to such a short stack by being card dead and having no opportunities to push, (everybody raised before i could push).  I had the 2 chipleaders directly to my left, so i made a decision to push from the cutoff with almost any 2 into the other short stack (liv boeree).  What i had seen from her play, she was the most likely on the table to fold a marginal hand for such a small price , which she did.  If it was in her place, i call everytime and it would have been the correct decision as i had  Jd 9h


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: temp0r on January 18, 2008, 11:49:32 AM
i fold. if we call we aren't out technically but pretty much out of a shot at making a payout. as its a flat payout i'd rather fold and try and find spots to push instead. very close though. problem is though due to his image we're soooooo likely to be dominated. i'd rather call with j10 sooted than a2 sooted here!


Title: Re: Call?
Post by: TightEnd on January 18, 2008, 12:07:34 PM
Hello
1st time poster long time reader. I'm pretty sure i'm the short stack tightend is talking about. (the apat event?)
I got to such a short stack by being card dead and having no opportunities to push, (everybody raised before i could push).  I had the 2 chipleaders directly to my left, so i made a decision to push from the cutoff with almost any 2 into the other short stack (liv boeree).  What i had seen from her play, she was the most likely on the table to fold a marginal hand for such a small price , which she did.  If it was in her place, i call everytime and it would have been the correct decision as i had  Jd 9h


Welcome to blonde Sam!