|
Title: Mike Matusow interview in Inside Poker Post by: Pelham Boy on January 19, 2008, 07:03:54 PM Anybody read this?
A brilliant interview. I for one will be buying his autobiography. Title: Re: Mike Matusow interview in Inside Poker Post by: Grier78 on January 19, 2008, 09:21:53 PM Wow losing $2.5m online, he must have been following the advice from the 88percent blog. He does seem to think that he is the only person who knows how to play poker.
Not sure if he deserves the respect I used to give him, but he does serve as a lesson to us all. Title: Re: Mike Matusow interview in Inside Poker Post by: kinboshi on January 19, 2008, 10:43:57 PM Anybody read this? A brilliant interview. I for one will be buying his autobiography. Haven't read it yet. Can you give a synopsis? Title: Re: Mike Matusow interview in Inside Poker Post by: Pelham Boy on January 19, 2008, 10:59:57 PM It's just not your average 'big name' interview.
Some life he's had. He makes an interesting point about Phil Ivey,he says that Ivey is the best player he's played with. but he's got too much money that he cant be bothered to grind his way through 3 or 4 days of a tournament. I thought it was a cracking read. Title: Re: Mike Matusow interview in Inside Poker Post by: kinboshi on January 19, 2008, 11:02:24 PM Thanks. Will have to make sure I get hold of a copy.
:)up Title: Re: Mike Matusow interview in Inside Poker Post by: sovietsong on January 20, 2008, 12:05:13 AM anywhere online i can read it!?
Title: Re: Mike Matusow interview in Inside Poker Post by: Gryff on January 20, 2008, 05:43:08 PM Wow losing $2.5m online, he must have been following the advice from the 88percent blog. He does seem to think that he is the only person who knows how to play poker. Not sure if he deserves the respect I used to give him, but he does serve as a lesson to us all. His advice to someone with a $5k bankroll was to "take a shot at 10/20" and if he wanted to be conservative try some 5/10 with two buyins. Yes his bankroll management skills are a shining example ;) |