blonde poker forum

Community Forums => The Lounge => Topic started by: Colchester Kev on January 20, 2008, 02:41:50 PM



Title: Paul Burrell
Post by: Colchester Kev on January 20, 2008, 02:41:50 PM
He is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob, but im sick of the media bashing of the fella ... so he has made a killing on the back of the death of Di ... so what, good on him I say ... if the media didnt publicise everything he does, or the public didnt lap up his stuff, he wouldnt make a penny.

Lets face it, he was a flunky to air headed royals and was probably treated like shit off the bottom of their shoes for 99% of his time in service .. he found a way out and up, and good luck to him I say.



Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 20, 2008, 02:51:35 PM
He is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob, but im sick of the media bashing of the fella ... so he has made a killing on the back of the death of Di ... so what, good on him I say ... if the media didnt publicise everything he does, or the public didnt lap up his stuff, he wouldnt make a penny.

Lets face it, he was a flunky to air headed royals and was probably treated like shit off the bottom of their shoes for 99% of his time in service .. he found a way out and up, and good luck to him I say.



short and to the point, Quality


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Longy on January 20, 2008, 03:06:47 PM
He is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob, but im sick of the media bashing of the fella ... so he has made a killing on the back of the death of Di ... so what, good on him I say ... if the media didnt publicise everything he does, or the public didnt lap up his stuff, he wouldnt make a penny.

Lets face it, he was a flunky to air headed royals and was probably treated like shit off the bottom of their shoes for 99% of his time in service .. he found a way out and up, and good luck to him I say.



Kev stop sitting on the fence, what do you really think, lol.

Personally i really don't care, another one of these media hanger-ons that really don't interest me.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: MPOWER on January 20, 2008, 05:59:03 PM
Kev

I agree he is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob. He was paid to do a job
and should keep his mouth shut. He is nothing but a dirty thieving mardy
mustard batty boy.


Regards

M     



Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: kinboshi on January 20, 2008, 06:04:04 PM
Inbreds and weasels.  They all deserve each other.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: boldie on January 20, 2008, 06:20:48 PM
Kev

I agree he is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob. He was paid to do a job
and should keep his mouth shut. He is nothing but a dirty thieving mardy
mustard batty boy.


Regards

M     



The man is of course however not a thief. I have no sympathy for the man but it is quite funny how the queen only remembered on the day of the trial that the stuff he was selling was in fact his to sell and given to him.

I still don't see what all the fuss about Diana is about.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 20, 2008, 06:25:44 PM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: boldie on January 20, 2008, 06:27:02 PM
He was a dogs body to a slapper

 rotflmfao ;tightend; ;applause; :)up


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 20, 2008, 07:11:32 PM
and al fayed reckons that prince phil bumped her off well if your (""king"") surely one of the perks is bumping off someone that pisses u off????????


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TightEnd on January 20, 2008, 07:15:56 PM
Ironic, the monarchy brought to its knees by a poker forum...

Burrell I have no time for

Diana I find inspires extremes, those passionately "for" her and those "against" her and what she stood for


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: kinboshi on January 20, 2008, 07:21:59 PM
Ironic, the monarchy brought to its knees by a poker forum...

Burrell I have no time for

Diana I find inspires extremes, those passionately "for" her and those "against" her and what she stood for

She inspires apathy in me.

It's the whole 'establishment' thing that does my box in.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 20, 2008, 07:53:36 PM
Slapper or no, i'd have lent her mine  :P


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: AndrewT on January 20, 2008, 07:55:55 PM
Diana I find inspires extremes, those passionately "for" her and those "against" her and what she stood for

I don't think Diana stood for anything.

She certainly laid down for more.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: kinboshi on January 20, 2008, 08:28:46 PM
Diana I find inspires extremes, those passionately "for" her and those "against" her and what she stood for

I don't think Diana stood for anything.

She certainly laid down for more.

;D

She also fell down on a few occasions.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Rooky9 on January 20, 2008, 08:30:27 PM
Kev

I agree he is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob. He was paid to do a job
and should keep his mouth shut. He is nothing but a dirty thieving mardy
mustard batty boy.


Regards

M     



This quote puts you at a lower level than whatever you perceive him to be. You should take your own advice thats hidden in the middle of that, as I will from this point.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 20, 2008, 08:32:42 PM
Slapper or no, i'd have lent her mine  :P

many a boyhood moment thinking bout her and fergie  :)up


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: AndrewT on January 20, 2008, 11:00:10 PM
Slapper or no, i'd have lent her mine  :P

many a boyhood moment thinking bout her and fergie  :)up

(http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/na/archive/00167/sir_alex_ferguson___167634c.jpg)


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: seven2unsuited on January 20, 2008, 11:38:46 PM
He is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob, but im sick of the media bashing of the fella ... so he has made a killing on the back of the death of Di ... so what, good on him I say ... if the media didnt publicise everything he does, or the public didnt lap up his stuff, he wouldnt make a penny.

Lets face it, he was a flunky to air headed royals and was probably treated like shit off the bottom of their shoes for 99% of his time in service .. he found a way out and up, and good luck to him I say.



aye, hes a fudd


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 20, 2008, 11:39:44 PM
Slapper or no, i'd have lent her mine  :P

many a boyhood moment thinking bout her and fergie  :)up

(http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/na/archive/00167/sir_alex_ferguson___167634c.jpg)

 rotflmfao


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Graham C on January 21, 2008, 12:48:48 AM
He is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob

;iagree;

, but im sick of the media bashing of the fella ... so he has made a killing on the back of the death of Di ... so what, good on him I say ... if the media didnt publicise everything he does, or the public didnt lap up his stuff, he wouldnt make a penny.

Lets face it, he was a flunky to air headed royals and was probably treated like shit off the bottom of their shoes for 99% of his time in service .. he found a way out and up, and good luck to him I say.

Couldn't disagree more.  The guy was in the trust of the Royal Family and as such, has been privy to information and secrets that he should be made to keep to himself.  He clearly is a sneaky little shit with no talent of his own so he's making a living selling the secrets of others.  He, along with others in similar roles, should be made to sign an Official Secrets Act when they join the service and if they break it, they should pay the penalty. 

That Alistair Campbell is another one.

No talent to do something good, so they just become gossip mongers. 

I have little time for them.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Colchester Kev on January 21, 2008, 12:59:48 AM
He is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob

;iagree;

, but im sick of the media bashing of the fella ... so he has made a killing on the back of the death of Di ... so what, good on him I say ... if the media didnt publicise everything he does, or the public didnt lap up his stuff, he wouldnt make a penny.

Lets face it, he was a flunky to air headed royals and was probably treated like shit off the bottom of their shoes for 99% of his time in service .. he found a way out and up, and good luck to him I say.

Couldn't disagree more.  The guy was in the trust of the Royal Family and as such, has been privy to information and secrets that he should be made to keep to himself.  He clearly is a sneaky little shit with no talent of his own so he's making a living selling the secrets of others.  He, along with others in similar roles, should be made to sign an Official Secrets Act when they join the service and if they break it, they should pay the penalty. 

That Alistair Campbell is another one.

No talent to do something good, so they just become gossip mongers. 

I have little time for them.

Ah yes ... but these "gossip mongers" wouldnt earn a carrot unless there was demand for their stories, so who can blame them for cashing in.

If it wasnt for the sad people with "Celebrity" fixations, magazines like "Hello" etc etc wouldnt sell millions of copies and pay extortionate amounts for pics and stories.

Supply and demand.

Good luck Mr Burrell, write another crap book and get dumb Americans and gullible Brits to part with shitloads of cash for tittle tattle ... GENIUS !!!


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Graham C on January 21, 2008, 01:31:23 AM
5 million people buy The Sun every day, it doesn't make it a quality read and just because people buy this crap, doesn't mean I have to agree with it and it doesn't make it right either.

I'd think that if someone trusted me enough to put in a position where I am going to see and hear information that the blood sucking public would have a field day on, I'd have the decency to keep quiet about it.  He claims to have been loyal to Diana, I can't see how his actions have upheld that trust.

If you lack any talent to do anything else in your life, I guess it's the only way you can make a few quid.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 21, 2008, 02:08:02 AM
5 million people buy The Sun every day, it doesn't make it a quality read and just because people buy this crap, doesn't mean I have to agree with it and it doesn't make it right either.

I'd think that if someone trusted me enough to put in a position where I am going to see and hear information that the blood sucking public would have a field day on, I'd have the decency to keep quiet about it.  He claims to have been loyal to Diana, I can't see how his actions have upheld that trust.

If you lack any talent to do anything else in your life, be a poker player, it's the only way you can make a few quid.

FYP


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Dingdell on January 21, 2008, 02:35:31 AM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 21, 2008, 03:27:11 AM
tart - a woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money
bawd, cocotte, cyprian, fancy woman, harlot, lady of pleasure, prostitute, sporting lady, whore, woman of the street, working girl

I think not.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: celtic on January 21, 2008, 04:45:57 AM
Had several extra marital affairs, played different men off against each other. Yep, i would say she is a slapper / tart.

And before i get abuse, i know what charles was up to, but two wrongs dont make a right.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Newmanseye on January 21, 2008, 06:39:26 AM
Correct me if i am wrong, I believe that Charlied was slipping the sausage to horseface Bowles before Diana had to go seeking her marital needs outside the marital union.

Two wrongs don't have to make a right but fair is fair and everyone needs some pleasure, you cant deny the woman that.

Funny how Charles took the blame for "prince" Harry though


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Ecosse on January 21, 2008, 09:00:40 AM
The inquest :-



Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Ecosse on January 21, 2008, 09:05:09 AM

The interview :-



Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Colchester Kev on January 21, 2008, 09:30:11 AM
Hang on, its not a "lets bash Diana's morality" thread.

Its intended to create a debate on the fickle british press .... they pay Burrell telephone number cash amounts for his gossip, and then slate him for being a traitor... its comical.

It really is quite simple, if he wasnt paid for his rubbish, he would disappear from public life, so its the press and the public that have fuelled his efforts.

Burrell was cast aside after the death of Diana, his career in the royal circle was finished as the royals wanted no part of him due to him working for Diana ... he made a fortune (estimated 30 million) since then ... whatever you think of the ethical side of what he did, you surely cant blame him for cashing in, and as long as there is demand he would be daft not to supply !


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 09:39:28 AM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 09:40:16 AM
Slapper or no, i'd have lent her mine  :P

many a boyhood moment thinking bout her and fergie  :)up

(http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/na/archive/00167/sir_alex_ferguson___167634c.jpg)

pmsl err no


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 09:47:15 AM
Hang on, its not a "lets bash Diana's morality" thread.

Its intended to create a debate on the fickle british press .... they pay Burrell telephone number cash amounts for his gossip, and then slate him for being a traitor... its comical.

It really is quite simple, if he wasnt paid for his rubbish, he would disappear from public life, so its the press and the public that have fuelled his efforts.

Burrell was cast aside after the death of Diana, his career in the royal circle was finished as the royals wanted no part of him due to him working for Diana ... he made a fortune (estimated 30 million) since then ... whatever you think of the ethical side of what he did, you surely cant blame him for cashing in, and as long as there is demand he would be daft not to supply !

nope cant blame him for it he spotted a opening and took the oportunity fair play, but still would like to slap him round the face with a wet packet of shit


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Claw75 on January 21, 2008, 10:05:40 AM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO

Interesting viewpoint.  And how would you label a man that had had sex with 5 or 6 women?



Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 10:10:49 AM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO

Interesting viewpoint.  And how would you label a man that had had sex with 5 or 6 women?



a slapper as well


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Rod Paradise on January 21, 2008, 10:21:41 AM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO

Interesting viewpoint.  And how would you label a man that had had sex with 5 or 6 women?



a slapper as well

Narrow minded point of view?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Snatiramas on January 21, 2008, 10:25:58 AM
Hang on, its not a "lets bash Diana's morality" thread.

Its intended to create a debate on the fickle British press .... they pay Burrell telephone number cash amounts for his gossip, and then slate him for being a traitor... its comical.

It really is quite simple, if he wasn't paid for his rubbish, he would disappear from public life, so its the press and the public that have fuelled his efforts.

Burrell was cast aside after the death of Diana, his career in the royal circle was finished as the royals wanted no part of him due to him working for Diana ... he made a fortune (estimated 30 million) since then ... whatever you think of the ethical side of what he did, you surely cant blame him for cashing in, and as long as there is demand he would be daft not to supply !

nope cant blame him for it he spotted a opening and took the opportunity fair play, but still would like to slap him round the face with a wet packet of shit

I agree I have wanted to hit Ferguson round the face with a wet packet shit for some time now..........as for Burrell you reap what you sow and that goes for the whole lot of them dating right the way through history.
Was Diana a slapper?? Who cares. She at least tried to do some good and the comfort she gave a friend of mine whose Husband, daughter and ultimately her own life were taken by Aids changed my opinion of her from one of absolute and utter loathing to a slightly more balanced position. She visited Rebecca on many occasions, unannounced and without any reporters and if you want to see a truly moving programme I recommend you see a programme called Rebecca's secret. Rebecca was given a blood transfusion during the birth of her second child in Canada. It was contaminated. Did Diana have to get involved? Of course not and she always respected the families right to privacy, so at least a part of what she did was sincere.

We on here are all poker players so our sense of reality is screwed anyway. I for one just think she found herself in an unhappy place and Mr. Burrell just happened to take advantage of that situation. His relationship with the press is to be expected. The motivation of the press is to do whatever is necessary to make up a good story. He has but himself to blame after all if you play with fire you are bound to get burned.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TightEnd on January 21, 2008, 10:28:14 AM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO


you are kidding!!!

surely?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Newmanseye on January 21, 2008, 10:31:56 AM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO

Interesting viewpoint.  And how would you label a man that had had sex with 5 or 6 women?



a slapper as well

Ohh behave, Live and let live, if a guy or a Woman wants to shag 15 people in any given weekend thats their choice and its their sexual preference not a definition of a tart/slapper etc etc.

In my youth i tried to shag my way through as many people as possible, does that make me a male slapper? No way, I still respected the women after the event and a fun time was had by all ( at least i had a fun time ).

Many of the Young women i was at college with had an open mind to their sexuality too, but they were not deemed as slappers, they just liked to explore and have fun in an intimate way. enjoy it for what it is.

dare i say it but i feel some of the views on this thread are heading in the direction of scarlet letters and no sex before marriage.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Claw75 on January 21, 2008, 10:46:26 AM
He was a dogs body to a slapper and before you all scream and rant at me lets face facts here..Diana i admit did do a lot of good charity work but come on thats all she had to do is'nt it and how many flings did she have quite a few more than Charlie boy ,who was probably pushed into it by the establishment, as the mum said in'bread'she was a TART!!!

ALL IMO

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO

Interesting viewpoint.  And how would you label a man that had had sex with 5 or 6 women?



a slapper as well

wow.  Well there's probably 80% of the adult population of Britain labelled in one fell swoop!


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 10:56:55 AM
A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TightEnd on January 21, 2008, 10:56:58 AM
I'm a slapper

anyone else?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Claw75 on January 21, 2008, 10:59:12 AM
I'm a slapper

anyone else?

I didn't realise I was, but apparently so!  Oh, and a tart!


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TightEnd on January 21, 2008, 10:59:56 AM
I'm a slapper

anyone else?

I didn't realise I was, but apparently so!


quite.

though I'd guessed you were  rotflmfao


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Claw75 on January 21, 2008, 11:01:06 AM

though I'd guessed you were  rotflmfao

:o  :P


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Newmanseye on January 21, 2008, 11:02:12 AM
I'm a slapper

anyone else?

    :hello:

;kneelsucker;


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Rod Paradise on January 21, 2008, 11:08:09 AM
A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

Your definition is too broad, numbers of sexual partners doesn't make a slapper (and acceptable numbers depend on the point of view of the person labelling someone a slapper). A slapper is promiscuous in the sense of cheating on people & generally unchoosy in sexual parners.

Personally if I met someone who'd only had 5-6 partners I'd be wary, if she's not good enough for other blokes I don't want her ;D


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Newmanseye on January 21, 2008, 11:10:23 AM
A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

Your definition is too broad, numbers of sexual partners doesn't make a slapper (and acceptable numbers depend on the point of view of the person labelling someone a slapper). A slapper is promiscuous in the sense of cheating on people & generally unchoosy in sexual parners.

Personally if I met someone who'd only had 5-6 partners I'd be wary, if she's not good enough for other blokes I don't want her ;D


behave Rod, you could'nt pass a meat pie without assistance let alone a hairy one!


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 11:12:12 AM
A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

Your definition is too broad, numbers of sexual partners doesn't make a slapper (and acceptable numbers depend on the point of view of the person labelling someone a slapper). A slapper is promiscuous in the sense of cheating on people & generally unchoosy in sexual parners.

Personally if I met someone who'd only had 5-6 partners I'd be wary, if she's not good enough for other blokes I don't want her ;D
Promiscuity refers to sexual behaviour of a man or woman who engages in sexual relations with multiple partners on a casual and/or regular basis.

Regular being the operative word


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Rod Paradise on January 21, 2008, 11:14:36 AM
A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

Your definition is too broad, numbers of sexual partners doesn't make a slapper (and acceptable numbers depend on the point of view of the person labelling someone a slapper). A slapper is promiscuous in the sense of cheating on people & generally unchoosy in sexual parners.

Personally if I met someone who'd only had 5-6 partners I'd be wary, if she's not good enough for other blokes I don't want her ;D


behave Rod, you could'nt pass a meat pie without assistance let alone a hairy one!

You'll pay for that one Billy!


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Claw75 on January 21, 2008, 11:16:08 AM

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO


A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

so are you saying that, in your opinion, a woman in her mid-late 30s who has slept with 5 or 6 men is sexually promiscuous?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 11:21:42 AM

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO


A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

so are you saying that, in your opinion, a woman in her mid-late 30s who has slept with 5 or 6 men is sexually promiscuous?
depends on the regularity of it?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TightEnd on January 21, 2008, 11:22:17 AM

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO


A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

so are you saying that, in your opinion, a woman in her mid-late 30s who has slept with 5 or 6 men is sexually promiscuous?
depends on the regularity of it?


not as often as I'd like

AND THE ANSWER IS?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Claw75 on January 21, 2008, 11:24:51 AM

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO


A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

so are you saying that, in your opinion, a woman in her mid-late 30s who has slept with 5 or 6 men is sexually promiscuous?
depends on the regularity of it?

You said Princess Diana was a slapper.  When she died she was 36 or 37 and had slept with, apparently, 5 or 6 men in her life.  I don't quite understand what you mean about 'regularity'?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Ginger on January 21, 2008, 11:27:05 AM

So what you're saying is that if a woman has had sex with probably (that we know of) 5 or 6 men she is slapper and a tart? 

errr yes id say so IMO


A slapper is someone who is  sexually promiscuous male/or female.In my younger years i slept with untold women and that made me a male slapper but seeing as i am now married i am no longer a slapper,

so are you saying that, in your opinion, a woman in her mid-late 30s who has slept with 5 or 6 men is sexually promiscuous?
depends on the regularity of it?

You said Princess Diana was a slapper.  When she died she was 36 or 37 and had slept with, apparently, 5 or 6 men in her life.  I don't quite understand what you mean about 'regularity'?

Perhaps cia260895 doesn't realise that those 5 or 6 men weren't all at the same time....  ;carlocitrone;


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 11:34:46 AM
Right i know i'm digging myself into a hole but the masses perceived her as some kind of mother terasa which she clearly wasnt,(although i did say she done a lot of good) i mean at the time of her death who was she seeing dodi and the Dr Khan (i think thats his name). 2 blokes at once


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TightEnd on January 21, 2008, 11:37:47 AM
i mean at the time of her death who was she seeing dodi and the Dr Khan (i think thats his name). 2 blokes at once


You state this as a fact when you can't possibly know this

Indeed I read the interivew with Hasnat Khan recently that stated his relationship with HRH ended some time before the Fayed one started

Is this spin? no idea..but you certainly can't suggest what you do above as fact

and, even if she was seeing two men at once..its hardly unique..happens across the world every day and is in no way shape or form indicative of "slapper"dom as these types of situations can crop up for a variety of reasons in many lives.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 11:42:33 AM
i mean at the time of her death who was she seeing dodi and the Dr Khan (i think thats his name). 2 blokes at once


You state this as a fact when you can't possibly know this

Indeed I read the interivew with Hasnat Khan recently that stated his relationship with HRH ended some time before the Fayed one started

Is this spin? no idea..but you certainly can't suggest what you do above as fact

and, even if she was seeing two men at once..its hardly unique..happens across the world every day and is in no way shape or form indicative of "slapper"dom as these types of situations can crop up for a variety of reasons in many lives.

well he would wouldn't he? who would like to admit to sharing HRH


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TightEnd on January 21, 2008, 11:43:36 AM

Is this spin? no idea..but you certainly can't suggest what you do above as fact




read my post!


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Newmanseye on January 21, 2008, 11:45:05 AM
i mean at the time of her death who was she seeing dodi and the Dr Khan (i think thats his name). 2 blokes at once


You state this as a fact when you can't possibly know this

Indeed I read the interivew with Hasnat Khan recently that stated his relationship with HRH ended some time before the Fayed one started

Is this spin? no idea..but you certainly can't suggest what you do above as fact

and, even if she was seeing two men at once..its hardly unique..happens across the world every day and is in no way shape or form indicative of "slapper"dom as these types of situations can crop up for a variety of reasons in many lives.

well he would wouldn't he? who would like to admit to sharing HRH

 :hello:


Royal threesome, sounds like a brag hand and you probably would brag too.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 21, 2008, 11:45:19 AM
There is NO WAY my Ex was a slapper, she was just very Sociable  ;whistle;

Me: I have always been a Tart.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Claw75 on January 21, 2008, 11:47:01 AM
There is NO WAY my Ex was a slapper, she was just very Sociable  ;whistle;


you went out with Princess Di? :D


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 21, 2008, 11:51:31 AM
There is NO WAY my Ex was a slapper, she was just very Sociable  ;whistle;


you went out with Princess Di? :D

In my dreams  :P  but I did use to enjoy a drink with Fergie and her family many years ago,  ;)


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 11:55:55 AM
"and, even if she was seeing two men at once..its hardly unique..happens across the world every day and is in no way shape or form indicative of "slapper"dom as these types of situations can crop up for a variety of reasons in many lives."

not saying it is unique but regularity and promiscuous= i didnt define the word slapper just used it IMO



Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 21, 2008, 12:05:23 PM
Hang on, its not a "lets bash Diana's morality" thread.

Its intended to create a debate on the fickle British press .... they pay Burrell telephone number cash amounts for his gossip, and then slate him for being a traitor... its comical.

It really is quite simple, if he wasn't paid for his rubbish, he would disappear from public life, so its the press and the public that have fuelled his efforts.

Burrell was cast aside after the death of Diana, his career in the royal circle was finished as the royals wanted no part of him due to him working for Diana ... he made a fortune (estimated 30 million) since then ... whatever you think of the ethical side of what he did, you surely cant blame him for cashing in, and as long as there is demand he would be daft not to supply !

nope cant blame him for it he spotted a opening and took the opportunity fair play, but still would like to slap him round the face with a wet packet of shit

I agree I have wanted to hit Ferguson round the face with a wet packet shit for some time now..........as for Burrell you reap what you sow and that goes for the whole lot of them dating right the way through history.
Was Diana a slapper?? Who cares. She at least tried to do some good and the comfort she gave a friend of mine whose Husband, daughter and ultimately her own life were taken by Aids changed my opinion of her from one of absolute and utter loathing to a slightly more balanced position. She visited Rebecca on many occasions, unannounced and without any reporters and if you want to see a truly moving programme I recommend you see a programme called Rebecca's secret. Rebecca was given a blood transfusion during the birth of her second child in Canada. It was contaminated. Did Diana have to get involved? Of course not and she always respected the families right to privacy, so at least a part of what she did was sincere.

We on here are all poker players so our sense of reality is screwed anyway. I for one just think she found herself in an unhappy place and Mr. Burrell just happened to take advantage of that situation. His relationship with the press is to be expected. The motivation of the press is to do whatever is necessary to make up a good story. He has but himself to blame after all if you play with fire you are bound to get burned.

 :goodpost:


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: taximan007 on January 21, 2008, 12:08:06 PM
It's my belief Kev has a hidden agenda by starting this thread.

He will let it run it's course then sell the contents to said Mr Burrell for publication in his next book.

Clever stuff that man  ;)


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 12:12:37 PM
It's my belief Kev has a hidden agenda by starting this thread.

He will let it run it's course then sell the contents to said Mr Burrell for publication in his next book.

Clever stuff that man  ;)

as long as i get my %


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TightEnd on January 21, 2008, 12:13:39 PM
It's my belief Kev has a hidden agenda by starting this thread.

He will let it run it's course then sell the contents to said Mr Burrell for publication in his next book.

Clever stuff that man  ;)

as long as i get my %


Slapper.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 21, 2008, 12:27:38 PM
It's my belief Kev has a hidden agenda by starting this thread.

He will let it run it's course then sell the contents to said Mr Burrell for publication in his next book.

Clever stuff that man  ;)

as long as i get my %


Slapper.

nah by taking my % i'd be a tart


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Snatiramas on January 21, 2008, 01:41:35 PM
It's my belief Kev has a hidden agenda by starting this thread.

He will let it run it's course then sell the contents to said Mr Burrell for publication in his next book.

Clever stuff that man  ;)

as long as i get my %


Slapper.

nah by taking my % i'd be a tart

 ;iagree; ;iagree;


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Dingdell on January 22, 2008, 04:48:24 PM
All you slappers should all be ashamed.  ;whistle; ;angel;


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Rod Paradise on January 22, 2008, 05:02:20 PM
All you slappers should all be ashamed.  ;whistle; ;angel;

This slapper's had such a dry spell I'm thinking about taking the pledge http://www.rebornvirgin.com/oath.html (http://www.rebornvirgin.com/oath.html) :(


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on January 22, 2008, 06:08:02 PM
All you slappers should all be ashamed.  ;whistle; ;angel;

This slapper's had such a dry spell I'm thinking about taking the pledge http://www.rebornvirgin.com/oath.html (http://www.rebornvirgin.com/oath.html) :(

How you gonna pee?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: ifm on January 22, 2008, 11:29:43 PM


Interesting viewpoint.  And how would you label a man that had had sex with 5 or 6 women?



A legend


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Claw75 on January 22, 2008, 11:32:30 PM


Interesting viewpoint.  And how would you label a man that had had sex with 5 or 6 women?



A legend

lol - wouldn't a guy need to sleep with a few more women than that to reach legend status?


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: ifm on January 22, 2008, 11:34:26 PM


Interesting viewpoint.  And how would you label a man that had had sex with 5 or 6 women?



A legend

lol - wouldn't a guy need to sleep with a few more women than that to reach legend status?

Thank you


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: cia260895 on February 21, 2008, 07:58:31 PM
He is a snakey weasle, and a complete knob, but im sick of the media bashing of the fella ... so he has made a killing on the back of the death of Di ... so what, good on him I say ... if the media didnt publicise everything he does, or the public didnt lap up his stuff, he wouldnt make a penny.

Lets face it, he was a flunky to air headed royals and was probably treated like shit off the bottom of their shoes for 99% of his time in service .. he found a way out and up, and good luck to him I say.



what is next in store for him????


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Colchester Kev on February 22, 2008, 04:39:14 PM
He pisses off to America to screw the gullible yanks for even more money.


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TheChipPrince on February 22, 2008, 04:48:23 PM
10c to the first one to tell me which football team he supports?!


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: Colchester Kev on February 22, 2008, 04:51:02 PM
10c to the first one to tell me which football team he supports?!

Wrexham, ship the monies :)


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: TheChipPrince on February 22, 2008, 04:51:41 PM
10c to the first one to tell me which football team he supports?!

Wrexham, ship the monies :)

I'll let you steal my BB if your on Blonde cash later... ;)


Title: Re: Paul Burrell
Post by: celtic on February 23, 2008, 04:52:08 PM
10c to the first one to tell me which football team he supports?!

Wrexham, ship the monies :)

Yeah i heard he likes going up the wrexham too.

do i win i prize?