Title: Cloverfield Post by: TheChipPrince on February 03, 2008, 12:17:53 PM WOW
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Nakor on February 03, 2008, 02:46:19 PM Brilliant - camera work is interesting and the dialogue hard to hear in places but excellently shot.
The cgi is astonishing. The idea and execution of the idea is simply first class. The possabilities of where the franchise could go next are unlimited. A brave movie to make, an excellent movie to watch. WOW Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: AndrewT on February 03, 2008, 06:19:00 PM Just been to see this, it is very very good, but I can see that some people will absolutely hate it, as it is unlike any other film of this type. More films should be under 90 minutes long.
The possabilities of where the franchise could go next are unlimited. Can't see there being a Cloverfield 2 - the whole thinking behind this film is that isn't a 'franchise film'. They're trying to get away from all of that crap. Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Nakor on February 03, 2008, 06:22:08 PM Lets hope so Andrew - and I don't think JJ will do another, but the temptation for the studio to allow another director to do a 'straight' follow up must be massive.
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Jim-D on February 03, 2008, 08:24:37 PM Seen this last night with the Mrs, I have no bones intact in my hand as every 10 minutes she'd jump and crush it!!
Very very good movie! Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: ifm on February 03, 2008, 09:24:24 PM Seems to be very much a marmite film, i downloaded it a few days ago and i'm struggling to find the will to watch it, a lot of people really HATED it!
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: TheChipPrince on February 03, 2008, 09:48:15 PM I'll put this next bit in small incase anyone hasnt seen the movie and is reading this: ''The last footage shown depicts Rob and Beth ending their day at Coney Island, in which an object can be seen falling from the sky into the ocean surrounding them''
But did anyone else see it? Cos i missed this!!! Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: TheChipPrince on February 03, 2008, 09:51:53 PM Also, the director says this about the possibility of a sequel:
''There's a moment on the Brooklyn Bridge, and there was a guy filming something on the side of the bridge, and Hud sees him filming and he turns over and he sees the ship that's been capsized and sees the headless Statue of Liberty, and then he turns back and this guy's briefly filming him. In my mind that was two movies intersecting for a brief moment, and I thought there was something interesting in the idea that this incident happened and there are so many different points of view, and there are several different movies at least happening that evening and we just saw one piece of another'' Which sounds very interesting, so the 'sequel' may actually be the same time-frame as this one, but from someone else filiming the events... Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Sark79 on February 04, 2008, 12:19:34 PM I haven't seen it yet, however from the reviews I have read it sounds good. I will check it out after work tonight while playing poker.
I watched 'Into the Wild' last night. This was a fairly good movie that had an oscar worthy performance from Emile Hirsch . The music all the way through the movie is by Eddie Vedder and works really well with the flow of the film. It is worth having a look at. Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Cybertim on February 05, 2008, 08:19:33 PM absolute pants. This type of movie is nothing but an excuse to make a film cheaply and disguise it as " a new genre" or "an astonishing piece of film noir" its just a huge money making enterprise and it works. Its just movie making at its laziest. maximising profits is what this movie is about and THATS genius. the movie isn't
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: scotty2hatty on February 06, 2008, 11:03:59 PM Had to leave about 50-60 mins in. Felt really bad. Girlfriend was the same.
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: TheChipPrince on February 06, 2008, 11:14:37 PM Had to leave about 50-60 mins in. Felt really bad. Girlfriend was the same. I bet you got car-sick on the way home too right?! Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: scotty2hatty on February 06, 2008, 11:36:03 PM Had to leave about 50-60 mins in. Felt really bad. Girlfriend was the same. I bet you got car-sick on the way home too right?! Jibe? I'm pretty pissed cos I was enjoying it - lasted as long as I could. Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Sark79 on July 20, 2009, 01:56:06 AM Great movie, I just got round to watching it.
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Chompy on July 20, 2009, 10:31:07 AM Be a hundred times better watched at the cinema imo, a movie that needs a big screen to be seen at its best.
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: bolt pp on July 20, 2009, 10:54:35 AM good film
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Sark79 on July 20, 2009, 11:42:45 AM I was afraid it was going to be like the blair witch project. When I bought Cloverfield after work yesterday, everyone said it was like that movie only with monsters. Blair witch is crap. Cloverfield is quality.
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Scottish Dave on July 20, 2009, 03:33:08 PM I was afraid it was going to be like the blair witch project. When I FYP Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Sark79 on July 20, 2009, 05:28:17 PM lol, that is more accurate Dave
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: bolt pp on July 20, 2009, 05:30:06 PM sark you thieving bastard ;D
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: Sark79 on July 20, 2009, 08:12:52 PM It would be worse if I said the movie was crap, at least I said it was a quality film. If I hadn't seen it, one less person would have been able to appreciate the movie. My actions were positive rather than negative
Title: Re: Cloverfield Post by: bolt pp on July 20, 2009, 08:34:32 PM It would be worse if I said the movie was crap, at least I said it was a quality film. If I hadn't seen it, one less person would have been able to appreciate the movie. My actions were positive rather than negative you're a true hero sark ::) |