|
Title: JUSTICE Post by: Colchester Kev on May 20, 2008, 12:45:23 PM Premier League footballer Joey Barton has been jailed for assault and affray.
Barton, 25, was arrested in Liverpool on 27 December 2007 after he was involved in a confrontation outside a McDonald's restaurant in the city. The midfielder, of Foxbank Close, Widnes, admitted the charges last month but reporting restrictions were only lifted on Tuesday. He appeared at Liverpool Crown Court where he was jailed by a judge for six months. Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: TheChipPrince on May 20, 2008, 12:55:30 PM Is 6 months '6 months', or suspended, or like 28 days?
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: boldie on May 20, 2008, 12:56:23 PM Premier League footballer Joey Barton has been jailed for assault and affray. Barton, 25, was arrested in Liverpool on 27 December 2007 after he was involved in a confrontation outside a McDonald's restaurant in the city. The midfielder, of Foxbank Close, Widnes, admitted the charges last month but reporting restrictions were only lifted on Tuesday. He appeared at Liverpool Crown Court where he was jailed by a judge for six months. well done judgey! Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: TheChipPrince on May 20, 2008, 01:49:53 PM He has got a bad reputation....
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/skynews/20080520/twl-donkey-sent-to-prison-for-attack-3fd0ae9.html Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Rooky9 on May 20, 2008, 04:39:27 PM Is 6 months '6 months', or suspended, or like 28 days? Its a proper 6 months, which will hopefully ( ;hide;) mean he'll be out in 2 or 3. (If he is still an employee of NUFC at that point) It'll be intersting to see how his court appearance for the Dabo thing goes in June. Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Nem on May 20, 2008, 07:27:17 PM He doesn't deserve to be a pro player.
You can take the boy out of the ghetto... Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Horneris on May 24, 2008, 12:12:12 PM ..
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Indestructable on May 24, 2008, 12:26:09 PM Is 6 months '6 months', or suspended, or like 28 days? Its a proper 6 months, which will hopefully ( ;hide;) mean he'll be out in 2 or 3. (If he is still an employee of NUFC at that point) It'll be intersting to see how his court appearance for the Dabo thing goes in June. I can't understand why they couldn't have sentenced him for both at the same time? Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: TheChipPrince on June 30, 2008, 03:40:07 PM He's on a roll...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7481822.stm Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: bolt pp on June 30, 2008, 03:48:27 PM lol, he's not having a great time is he
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: jizzemm on June 30, 2008, 03:50:36 PM He will be a bloody Monk soon the way hes going admitting stuff...
Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug. That it all. Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Indestructable on June 30, 2008, 05:44:21 PM I could never understand how he would defend it there were 20+ witnesses, what were they going to say it wasn't him? At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence.
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:13:33 PM Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug. Totally agree. At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence. The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is likely to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons: a: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and b: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead. Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one..... http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio Rant over, need to go lay down...... Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: bolt pp on June 30, 2008, 11:29:08 PM Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug. Totally agree. At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence. The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is likely to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons: a: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and b: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead. Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one..... http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio Rant over, need to go lay down...... LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law. Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:49:14 PM Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug. Totally agree. At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence. The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is likely to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons: a: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and b: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead. Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one..... http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio Rant over, need to go lay down...... LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law. But WHY is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ? Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: steeveg on June 30, 2008, 11:57:25 PM Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug. Totally agree. At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence. The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is likely to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons: a: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and b: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead. Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one..... http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio Rant over, need to go lay down...... LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law. But WHY is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ? by pleading guilty it also saves the victims the trauma of having to give evidence Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 12:00:47 AM Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug. Totally agree. At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence. The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is likely to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons: a: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and b: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead. Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one..... http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio Rant over, need to go lay down...... LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law. But WHY is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ? "pleading the obvious" seriously? it's obvious that if you're charged with an offence you're guilty? why not just sentence people at the police station, if you're arrested you must have done something wrong yeah? rule of law, ECHR, autonomy of the judiciary and anything that lends itself to the idea of inherent civil rights for the individual, might as well just forget about it all a? Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Colchester Kev on July 01, 2008, 02:01:01 PM http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7483078.stm
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 02:06:15 PM lol at the bird weighing in with punches, she hits harder than him
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on July 01, 2008, 02:06:48 PM ****
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: boldie on July 01, 2008, 02:24:35 PM He's VERY right handed isn't he?
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Josedinho on July 01, 2008, 02:57:21 PM The Sun has a longer version.
He goes back for more. Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on July 01, 2008, 03:00:00 PM The Sun has a longer version. He goes back for more. link FTW Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 03:03:16 PM The Sun has a longer version. He goes back for more. link FTW and does the bird bunk in again? if they were laying me out she'd be the one i'd be worried about, she looked MAD about something! Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: HaworthBantam on July 01, 2008, 03:07:56 PM Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug. Totally agree. At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence. The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is likely to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons: a: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and b: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead. Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one..... http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio Rant over, need to go lay down...... LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law. But WHY is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ? "pleading the obvious" seriously? With multiple witnesses could the accused plead anything else ? it's obvious that if you're charged with an offence you're guilty? why not just sentence people at the police station, if you're arrested you must have done something wrong yeah? Hmm, don't remember saying that. rule of law, ECHR, autonomy of the judiciary and anything that lends itself to the idea of inherent civil rights for the individual, might as well just forget about it all a? I have no problem with civil rights, up to a point. But when a guilty individual receives a lesser penalty through pleading guilty, and a bit of remorseful acting, the justice system becomes laughable imo. Still, I'm sure the victims of these people have a warm feeling in their heart knowing that the civil rights of these criminals are being protected so vigorously. Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 03:20:17 PM Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug. Totally agree. At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence. The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is likely to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons: a: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and b: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead. Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one..... http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio Rant over, need to go lay down...... LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law. But WHY is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ? "pleading the obvious" seriously? With multiple witnesses could the accused plead anything else ? it's obvious that if you're charged with an offence you're guilty? why not just sentence people at the police station, if you're arrested you must have done something wrong yeah? Hmm, don't remember saying that. rule of law, ECHR, autonomy of the judiciary and anything that lends itself to the idea of inherent civil rights for the individual, might as well just forget about it all a? I have no problem with civil rights, up to a point. But when a guilty individual receives a lesser penalty through pleading guilty, and a bit of remorseful acting, the justice system becomes laughable imo. Still, I'm sure the victims of these people have a warm feeling in their heart knowing that the civil rights of these criminals are being protected so vigorously. I'm sure the victims of these people have a warm feeling in their heart knowing that the civil rights of these criminals are being protected so vigorously We'll for the sakes of these victims to which you are referring i hope the above statement is true, for a person not to want human rights to be applied consistently thoughout mankind and to be deviated from for the sake of personal reprisal would make them petty, fickle, and abhorrently ignorant and it would be bad enough i imagine being a victim of crime without letting that crime affect you so significantly that you willingly reject the concept of civil liberties, lets hope there are some victims of crime out there with the intelligence to rise above such a malevolently blinkered point of view. Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Josedinho on July 01, 2008, 03:24:57 PM http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1363000.ece (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1363000.ece)
Title: Re: JUSTICE Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on July 01, 2008, 03:30:23 PM **** **** |