|
Title: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: Newmanseye on July 14, 2008, 08:31:08 PM I watched the movie over the weekend, and what seemed to have a lot of potential just went all wrong as the plot progressed, after viewing I was just happy I didn't shell out the money to see it at the Cinema.
other opinions? Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? Post by: Grier78 on July 14, 2008, 08:35:41 PM I watched the movie over the weekend, and what seemed to have a lot of potential just went all wrong as the plot progressed, after viewing I was just happy I didn't shell out the money to see it at the Cinema. other opinions? Did you know the cinema version is completly different to the ones that you can download. The movie studio flooded the internet with B cuts that got bad reviews at test screenings to try and get people to go to the cinema instead of illegaly downloading. Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? Post by: Newmanseye on July 14, 2008, 08:37:18 PM I watched the movie over the weekend, and what seemed to have a lot of potential just went all wrong as the plot progressed, after viewing I was just happy I didn't shell out the money to see it at the Cinema. other opinions? Did you know the cinema version is completly different to the ones that you can download. The movie studio flooded the internet with B cuts that got bad reviews at test screenings to try and get people to go to the cinema instead of illegaly downloading. Now that would explain a lot Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? Post by: Indestructable on July 14, 2008, 08:47:43 PM I went to see it at last weekend and thought it was ok, i wouldn't go back to see it again, but it was ok for an evening out. I have seen a few films of late and they have tended to be like this rated as ok, nothing more, nothing less. desperate for a really good film to come out.
Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? spoilers in thread Post by: DaveShoelace on July 14, 2008, 09:02:01 PM SPOILERS WITHIN
Bloody american test audiences ruin everything, thats why the Simpsons movie was so shit. Regarding Hancock, it had loads of potential but I agree, they cocked it up the moment they revealed the lady with the super powers. From that point on it became to Lost/Heroes/any film with a plot twist esque. I had no idea if it was supposed to be a comedy or not from that point on. If they had just put another 15 minutes of Will Smith drunk, followed by 15 minutes of him trying to be a sober hero, it would have been a good film. Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? Post by: sledge13 on July 14, 2008, 09:26:15 PM I went to see it at last weekend and thought it was ok, i wouldn't go back to see it again, but it was ok for an evening out. I have seen a few films of late and they have tended to be like this rated as ok, nothing more, nothing less. desperate for a really good film to come out. Good films? Forgetting Sarah Marshall was excellent, even Russel Brand was great in it which I was surprised at. The Orphanage is a good thriller if you dont mind subtitles... Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: TheChipPrince on July 14, 2008, 10:26:56 PM I didnt mind Hancock at all, harmless fun all round...
Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: relaedgc on July 15, 2008, 12:41:50 PM I quite enjoyed it, personally.
Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: Ismene on July 15, 2008, 12:48:21 PM V good
Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: I Am Willis on July 16, 2008, 09:02:07 PM i liked it imo! lol decent film a bit short though, just like this post
Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: stallyon on July 19, 2008, 12:57:28 AM watched it...thought it was crud...oh kfc my life
Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: snoopy1239 on July 24, 2008, 03:48:00 PM Saw it, didn't like it. Like Barry said, as soon as it gets to the 'twist' it goes crap. Completely silly, and isn't sure whether it wants to be a comedy or not. And what about those bad guys, what's the point of them? So little character development in this story, it's incredible.
However, it was relatively enjoyable in parts, and there were some nice one liners. Up until she Theron revealed who she was, I thought it was pretty good. Will Smith rocks, pity about the shoddy script writer. Great opener too. Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on July 24, 2008, 03:53:58 PM Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: MC on August 13, 2008, 12:51:38 PM (Spoiler)
It was okay overall but totally know what you're saying... It was looking really good until the girl turned out to be a superhero too. Then it turned weird. Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? spoilers in thread Post by: Sunday8pm on August 13, 2008, 02:39:24 PM SPOILERS WITHIN This is hugely correctBloody american test audiences ruin everything, thats why the Simpsons movie was so shit. Regarding Hancock, it had loads of potential but I agree, they cocked it up the moment they revealed the lady with the super powers. From that point on it became to Lost/Heroes/any film with a plot twist esque. I had no idea if it was supposed to be a comedy or not from that point on. If they had just put another 15 minutes of Will Smith drunk, followed by 15 minutes of him trying to be a sober hero, it would have been a good film. Title: Re: Hancock or C*ck? SPOILERS IN THREAD Post by: bolt pp on August 18, 2008, 11:17:55 PM I work on the premise that all contempory movies are shit which they mostly are so you're never dissapointed, this DEF had potential but as usual story line, script, etc suffered as they focused mostly on special affects and will smith, that being said it was def watchable.
|