|
Title: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: snoopy1239 on August 03, 2008, 01:47:35 PM Click to read more...
http://blondepoker.com/?q=node/20514 (http://blondepoker.com/?q=node/20514) Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Longy on August 03, 2008, 02:59:43 PM Should blonde be having news/advertising UB on the main page?
Geniune (loaded) question. Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: kinboshi on August 03, 2008, 03:03:18 PM Does she get a superuser account?
Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: byronkincaid on August 03, 2008, 03:04:03 PM that's a copy/paste of their press release?
Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: DesD on August 03, 2008, 03:34:54 PM "UltimateBet has announced the addition of actress-turned-poker player Tiffany Michelle to its Star
Fixed Their Post. Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: boldie on August 03, 2008, 06:03:04 PM she screwed the guys who bought her in and now she works for a company that is beyond dodgy. This is not news..it's an incrimination. UB and Tiffany are joke.
To answer Longy's question I would not have posted this on the front page. Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Robbo63 on August 03, 2008, 06:15:39 PM Snoopy’s job is to bring the latest poker news whether we find it tasteful or not is secondary.
Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: boldie on August 03, 2008, 06:18:17 PM Snoopy’s job is to bring the latest poker news whether we find it tasteful or not is secondary. i know Snoopy is not plugging UB, I am just saying I wouldn't stick a UB press-release bigging them up on the forum. Just my opinion obviously. Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: GreekStein on August 03, 2008, 06:18:37 PM you still would though
Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Colchester Kev on August 03, 2008, 06:25:16 PM As far as i can see, its a press release.
its not as if blonde are in anyway endorsing the product or the person ... I kind of wish Snoopy did his own piece on the subject instead of just copying the press release, he writes good for a cartoon dog you know ;) Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: kinboshi on August 03, 2008, 06:26:28 PM Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: NoflopsHomer on August 03, 2008, 06:45:05 PM The best summary of the whole story is here imo: http://potcommitted.blogspot.com/2008/07/mo-money-mo-problems-tiffany-michelle.html
Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: boldie on August 03, 2008, 07:20:17 PM As far as i can see, its a press release. its not as if blonde are in anyway endorsing the product or the person ... I kind of wish Snoopy did his own piece on the subject instead of just copying the press release, he writes good for a cartoon dog you know ;) agreed, I would have preffered something Snoops has written himself. Blonde is not endorsing the product or person but by copying a press release issued by these cheating, no good B*stards has given them a subtle bit of publicity. Just my opinion obviously but I would not be giving this any good publicity at all. Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: boldie on August 03, 2008, 07:29:08 PM The best summary of the whole story is here imo: http://potcommitted.blogspot.com/2008/07/mo-money-mo-problems-tiffany-michelle.html that's a good post. Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Claw75 on August 03, 2008, 07:37:19 PM As far as i can see, its a press release. its not as if blonde are in anyway endorsing the product or the person ... I kind of wish Snoopy did his own piece on the subject instead of just copying the press release, he writes good for a cartoon dog you know ;) agreed, I would have preffered something Snoops has written himself. Blonde is not endorsing the product or person but by copying a press release issued by these cheating, no good B*stards has given them a subtle bit of publicity. Just my opinion obviously but I would not be giving this any good publicity at all. I agree too. Plus it wouldn't be at all clear to the casual blonde visitor that this wasn't a piece written by Snoopy for Blonde Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Graham C on August 03, 2008, 07:39:22 PM Apart from the bit that says that it was written by Poker Player Magazine?
Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Claw75 on August 03, 2008, 07:45:35 PM Apart from the bit that says that it was written by Poker Player Magazine? jeez I'm observant today ::) going to steer clear of the online tables I think :D Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: TightEnd on August 03, 2008, 09:50:33 PM Apart from the bit that says that it was written by Poker Player Magazine? I'll address this on another thread, we have a new arrangement with Poker Player Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: gatso on August 03, 2008, 10:07:12 PM Apart from the bit that says that it was written by Poker Player Magazine? I'll address this on another thread, we have a new arrangement with Poker Player hope it involves kev giving out their freeroll passwords Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Colchester Kev on August 03, 2008, 10:08:08 PM Apart from the bit that says that it was written by Poker Player Magazine? I'll address this on another thread, we have a new arrangement with Poker Player hope it involves kev giving out their freeroll passwords ! Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Graham C on August 03, 2008, 10:10:09 PM Apart from the bit that says that it was written by Poker Player Magazine? I'll address this on another thread, we have a new arrangement with Poker Player hope it involves kev giving out their freeroll passwords He'll be able to stop that now, we're obv going to get them pm'd to us on request. Title: Re: UB Sign Tiffany Michelle Post by: Robert HM on August 03, 2008, 10:11:44 PM Apart from the bit that says that it was written by Poker Player Magazine? I'll address this on another thread, we have a new arrangement with Poker Player hope it involves kev giving out their freeroll passwords He'll be able to stop that now, we're obv going to get them pm'd to us on request. No change then. I understand he was disappointed at the low request rate lately. |