|
Title: Question about the rules Post by: johnbhoy76 on August 24, 2008, 01:51:54 PM was playing in a home game the other night and one of the guys got knocked out when it would have been his turn to post the big blind next hand.
So we came to the next hand and the guy who was sort of in charge said there was no big blind just a small blind to which I replied that, that was incorrect and that the big blind just moves onto the next player. anyway this was my first time at this home game and I was out-voted 5-1 about this rule. I didn't make a big deal about it as it's only a wee friendly game but I am 100% correct aren't I ? Also on this topic are there any circumstances in which a hand can start with no Big Blind being posted Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: AndrewT on August 24, 2008, 01:53:22 PM You were right, they were wrong - there is always a big blind.
Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: PocketLady on August 24, 2008, 01:58:04 PM Nope, there must always be a big blind. If the person who was due to be small blind gets knocked out then you can have no small blind and just a big blind, but not the other way around.
Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: TheDJ on August 24, 2008, 02:40:47 PM Nope, there must always be a big blind. If the person who was due to be small blind gets knocked out then you can have no small blind and just a big blind, but not the other way around. I agreaa with the above, so guess your correct! Usually its a dead small blind and big blind only then the DB will be dead next hand Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: KarmaDope on August 24, 2008, 02:48:38 PM You were right, they were wrong.
There HAS to be a BB in every hand. In your case, the BB just moves to the next player along, SB and button stay where they are. Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: Grier78 on August 24, 2008, 03:11:08 PM Also on this topic are there any circumstances in which a hand can start with no Big Blind being posted Yes there is an exception, but I will let people tell me I am wrong before saying. Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: gatso on August 24, 2008, 03:24:34 PM Also on this topic are there any circumstances in which a hand can start with no Big Blind being posted Yes there is an exception, but I will let people tell me I am wrong before saying. I agree with the wrestler bloke, it is possible to start a hand with no bb being posted. there will still be a bb though. Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: celtic on August 24, 2008, 03:31:04 PM Also on this topic are there any circumstances in which a hand can start with no Big Blind being posted Yes there is an exception, but I will let people tell me I am wrong before saying. I agree with the wrestler bloke, it is possible to start a hand with no bb being posted. there will still be a bb though. when the bb hasnt got enough to cover the bb? Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: gatso on August 24, 2008, 03:33:42 PM Also on this topic are there any circumstances in which a hand can start with no Big Blind being posted Yes there is an exception, but I will let people tell me I am wrong before saying. I agree with the wrestler bloke, it is possible to start a hand with no bb being posted. there will still be a bb though. when the bb hasnt got enough to cover the bb? ish. when they're AI for the ante. then they do not post the bb Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: celtic on August 24, 2008, 03:35:58 PM thats what i meant
ish ;) Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: Grier78 on August 24, 2008, 03:44:25 PM Also on this topic are there any circumstances in which a hand can start with no Big Blind being posted Yes there is an exception, but I will let people tell me I am wrong before saying. I agree with the wrestler bloke, it is possible to start a hand with no bb being posted. there will still be a bb though. when the bb hasnt got enough to cover the bb? ish. when they're AI for the ante. then they do not post the bb Not what I was thinking, but it does open the question if a player can't post a full ante what proportion of the pot can they win? Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: gatso on August 24, 2008, 03:46:32 PM Not what I was thinking, but it does open the question if a player can't post a full ante what proportion of the pot can they win? they can win what they posted x the number of players unless there's a player with even less what were you thinking of then? Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: Grier78 on August 24, 2008, 03:48:43 PM Not what I was thinking, but it does open the question if a player can't post a full ante what proportion of the pot can they win? they can win what they posted x the number of players unless there's a player with even less what were you thinking of then? The OP did not state what variant of poker they were playing, if they had decided to play a few rounds of 5 Card Draw then there are no blinds, only antes. Title: Re: Question about the rules Post by: FuglyBaz on August 24, 2008, 04:35:20 PM Not what I was thinking, but it does open the question if a player can't post a full ante what proportion of the pot can they win? they can win what they posted x the number of players unless there's a player with even less what were you thinking of then? The OP did not state what variant of poker they were playing, if they had decided to play a few rounds of 5 Card Draw then there are no blinds, only antes. lolz |