|
Title: fao compo Post by: action man on December 14, 2008, 09:17:12 PM http://www.thehendonmob.com/pokercalc/index.html
jqs v 22 with other suits Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Ironside on December 14, 2008, 09:30:55 PM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs?
Title: Re: fao compo Post by: bolt pp on December 14, 2008, 09:37:25 PM I think 9 10 is the biggest favorite
Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Ironside on December 14, 2008, 09:40:06 PM 9T 89 78 not much in it barring a few split pots where they both play the board
Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Compo on December 14, 2008, 09:40:15 PM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs? Is that why I folded my pair then? Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Ironside on December 14, 2008, 09:42:00 PM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs? Is that why I folded my pair then? no idea Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Robert HM on December 14, 2008, 09:43:06 PM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs? Do you have any idea about poker? no idea FYQ Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Compo on December 14, 2008, 09:50:28 PM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs? Is that why I folded my pair then? no idea So why do you surmise i believe that a pair is always fav? Title: Re: fao compo Post by: bolt pp on December 14, 2008, 09:59:21 PM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs? Is that why I folded my pair then? no idea So why do you surmise i believe that a pair is always fav? erm........the OP? Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Compo on December 14, 2008, 10:01:02 PM It's very possible I just asked a general question.
then again............................... Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Chompy on December 14, 2008, 11:16:12 PM Compo only bets two overs into a dry side pot in my experience.
Title: Re: fao compo Post by: action man on December 14, 2008, 11:19:50 PM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs? yeh, i told him i didnt have a pair but i was still fav. he thought i was talking smack. tbh he was ul as i usaully am. Title: Re: fao compo Post by: Compo on December 14, 2008, 11:24:26 PM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs? yeh, i told him i didnt have a pair but i was still fav. he thought i was talking smack. tbh he was ul as i usaully am. Compo only bets two overs into a dry side pot in my experience. you're both shove monkeys Title: Re: fao compo Post by: boldie on December 15, 2008, 02:49:12 AM even with the same suit the QJs would be marginal why does he believe the myth than a pair is always a favourite v 2 overs? yeh, i told him i didnt have a pair but i was still fav. he thought i was talking smack. tbh he was ul as i usaully am. Compo only bets two overs into a dry side pot in my experience. you're both shove monkeys lol.. |