|
Title: supersize v superskinny Post by: cia260895 on January 27, 2009, 08:03:56 PM on now C4
errrggggggggg Title: Re: supersize v superskinny Post by: jizzemm on January 27, 2009, 08:04:47 PM Title: Re: supersize v superskinny Post by: cia260895 on January 27, 2009, 08:12:23 PM had to lol when they said lardy's thigh was bigger than matchsticks waist, should work though scaring them both into sorting out their diets
Title: Re: supersize v superskinny Post by: HOLDorFOLD on January 27, 2009, 09:19:31 PM had to lol when they said lardy's thigh was bigger than matchsticks waist, should work though scaring them both into sorting out their diets Has the programme stated that it's just their diets that are the cause of their weight problems? Curious. As you know I've had health problems and other issues that have caused my superskinny frame for the last two years and trust me I ate a LOT - well, you've seen how much I can shove down my gob lolol. Just wondered whether this programme has touched on any other reasons barring mis-handling their diets? (Pleased to say things are looking up though now and I am finally putting on weight and and more importantly keeping it on) Title: Re: supersize v superskinny Post by: cia260895 on January 27, 2009, 09:30:05 PM sy i had a call during the adverts so didnt see anymore willl see when its on again,ouldnt say u were super skinny.trim/fit yes but not skinny
Title: Re: supersize v superskinny Post by: HOLDorFOLD on January 27, 2009, 09:40:09 PM A UK size 4-6, which is what I was last 2 years, in my mind is flippin skinny lol. Thank god I'm now up to an 8.
It struck a chord with me about the diet thing as I was eating a lot and still losing weight. Hence wondering whether any of these girls had been medically checked out for other things rather than just assuming it's their diet and/or metabolism? |