Title: Get a Grip FFS Post by: The Camel on March 29, 2009, 06:50:38 PM How is this headline news ffs:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7970731.stm I bet you would struggle to find one journo who hasn't put in a dodgy expenses claim. It's £10 ffs! And you can hardly blame the geezer wanting to watch porn if he's unlucky enough to be married to Jacqui Smith. Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: KarmaDope on March 29, 2009, 06:53:03 PM Agreed.
Something like this should be news, not that rubbish. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/7970710.stm Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: TightEnd on March 29, 2009, 06:53:18 PM very funny though, one must admit
Maximum embarrassment quotient for a politician Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: gatso on March 29, 2009, 06:58:04 PM Something like this should be news, not that rubbish. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/7970710.stm err, it is. you linked to a news site and as for the op, anyone who has never expensed porn needs to get more creative Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: KarmaDope on March 29, 2009, 07:15:27 PM Something like this should be news, not that rubbish. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/7970710.stm err, it is. you linked to a news site and as for the op, anyone who has never expensed porn needs to get more creative oops - insert "headline" in front of news. Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: thetank on March 29, 2009, 07:21:38 PM This pisses me off too. What's the point of having "free press" if this is what we do with it?
Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: Royal Flush on March 30, 2009, 06:49:41 AM Agreed. Something like this should be news, not that rubbish. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/7970710.stm I saw this coming tbh Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: thetank on March 30, 2009, 06:55:15 AM rotflmfao
Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: Rod Paradise on March 30, 2009, 10:09:58 AM While I agree, it's a minor mistake & a minor embarassment and shouldn't be headline news, her own department takes the stance of "NO IFS, NO BUTS. Fraud means you will get a criminal record".
If that's her attitude to the poor, then she deserves hoisted by her own petard. I feel sorry for her hubby though, twice. (http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/media/image/0/b/makeafewquid.jpg) Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: cia260895 on March 30, 2009, 10:12:00 AM What a wanker...
Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: kinboshi on March 30, 2009, 10:42:38 AM Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: Rod Paradise on March 30, 2009, 10:49:35 AM gfy - both of you ;D
Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: boldie on March 30, 2009, 11:54:42 AM While I agree, it's a minor mistake & a minor embarassment and shouldn't be headline news, her own department takes the stance of "NO IFS, NO BUTS. Fraud means you will get a criminal record". If that's her attitude to the poor, then she deserves hoisted by her own petard. I feel sorry for her hubby though, twice. (http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/media/image/0/b/makeafewquid.jpg) funny thing is that people focus on the 2 adult movies....a total of 5 movies were claimed for...(under the wrong address). Why can MPs claim for watching normal movies that aren't work related? ..Oh wait, they can't. she broke the rules over all 5 movies and I bet ya it won't be the only time they've claimed movies. Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: cia260895 on March 30, 2009, 01:49:00 PM While I agree, it's a minor mistake & a minor embarassment and shouldn't be headline news, her own department takes the stance of "NO IFS, NO BUTS. Fraud means you will get a criminal record". If that's her attitude to the poor, then she deserves hoisted by her own petard. I feel sorry for her hubby though, twice. (http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/media/image/0/b/makeafewquid.jpg) funny thing is that people focus on the 2 adult movies....a total of 5 movies were claimed for...(under the wrong address). Why can MPs claim for watching normal movies that aren't work related? ..Oh wait, they can't. she broke the rules over all 5 movies and I bet ya it won't be the only time they've claimed movies. but they work oh so extremely hard in a very stressful enviroment surely they need the tax payer to fund their pleasure time until they retire? on a, oh wait very nice pension.. Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: boldie on March 30, 2009, 01:57:51 PM Ms Smith's husband probably would have had to sleep on the ouch though, eh?...Or would have done but luckily they have 2 houses.
Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: cia260895 on March 30, 2009, 02:03:59 PM Ms Smith's husband probably would have had to sleep on the ouch though, eh?...Or would have done but luckily they have 2 houses. The couch is being cleaned ;) Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: AndrewT on March 30, 2009, 02:34:19 PM Ms Smith's husband probably would have had to sleep on the ouch though, eh?. Yes, but she's taking the TV remote control with her. Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: boldie on March 30, 2009, 05:07:56 PM Ms Smith's husband probably would have had to sleep on the ouch though, eh?. Yes, but she's taking the TV remote control with her. lol Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: G1BTW on March 31, 2009, 12:31:02 PM We never had this kind of problem with Blunkett.
Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: boldie on March 31, 2009, 02:22:12 PM We never had this kind of problem with Blunkett. his dog never ordered porn Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: jizzemm on March 31, 2009, 04:02:55 PM We never had this kind of problem with Blunkett. pmsl Title: Re: Get a Grip FFS Post by: bolt pp on July 09, 2009, 11:14:53 AM (http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/media/image/0/b/makeafewquid.jpg) If jeremy kyle did Kipling............. |