Title: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: George2Loose on August 11, 2009, 02:36:26 AM PokerStars Game #31486256212: Tournament #185960908, $10+$1 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XXX (5000/10000) - 2009/08/10 21:31:26 ET
Table '185960908 92' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: majesensei (201021 in chips) Seat 2: George2Loose (696949 in chips) Seat 3: DocHoliday66 (156941 in chips) Seat 4: Nat1665 (248524 in chips) Seat 5: Ze_worm (185251 in chips) Seat 6: loveTOtrapp (172776 in chips) Seat 8: xX_HoT71_xX (69199 in chips) Seat 9: Bebert004 (108436 in chips) majesensei: posts the ante 1250 George2Loose: posts the ante 1250 DocHoliday66: posts the ante 1250 Nat1665: posts the ante 1250 Ze_worm: posts the ante 1250 loveTOtrapp: posts the ante 1250 xX_HoT71_xX: posts the ante 1250 Bebert004: posts the ante 1250 Nat1665: posts small blind 5000 Ze_worm: posts big blind 10000 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to George2Loose [Qc Ad] loveTOtrapp: folds xX_HoT71_xX: folds Bebert004: folds majesensei: folds George2Loose: raises 12989 to 22989 DocHoliday66: raises 132702 to 155691 and is all-in Nat1665: folds Ze_worm: raises 28310 to 184001 and is all-in George2Loose:???? Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: EvilPie on August 11, 2009, 02:40:28 AM Fold
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: thetank on August 11, 2009, 02:41:09 AM The fold button is usually on the left if that's what you need help with?
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: George2Loose on August 11, 2009, 02:56:03 AM ok bit more history
I'm opening like 50% of pots. Still snap fold? Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: EvilPie on August 11, 2009, 03:01:16 AM Heads up snap call.
Once the other guy comes along snap fold. You might be opening 50% but the other guy isn't. Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: Woodsey on August 11, 2009, 03:33:09 AM Almost certainly fold, how many left?
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: boldie on August 11, 2009, 08:34:35 AM as soon as Ze worm comes along for the ride, it's a fold for me.
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: GreekStein on August 11, 2009, 09:36:04 AM ok bit more history I'm opening like 50% of pots. Still snap fold? I open loads too but don't level yourself into thinking this means people are re-shipping you with shit. Vs one oppo I beat him into the pot, vs two I sigh and pass. Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: outragous76 on August 11, 2009, 09:42:45 AM is there no justifictation for the call given stack sizes here?
both players are all in - he is getiing >2:1 - he has an A and a Q - and can call and lose and still have 45 BB's left? not a snap fold for me. If you have been super active - 1st guy could be going with a very light holding and 2nd guy could have 99-JJ (i know its the bottom of his range and I am trying to make the call look favourable) I dont think this is an easy fold given the set up - i think that I probably fold after consideraton - but i wouldnt hate the call given the above Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: GreekStein on August 11, 2009, 09:44:55 AM is there no justifictation for the call given stack sizes here? both players are all in - he is getiing >2:1 - he has an A and a Q - and can call and lose and still have 45 BB's left? not a snap fold for me. If you have been super active - 1st guy could be going with a very light holding and 2nd guy could have 99-JJ (i know its the bottom of his range and I am trying to make the call look favourable) I dont think this is an easy fold given the set up - i think that I probably fold after consideraton - but i wouldnt hate the call given the above I agree actually. Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: TheChipPrince on August 11, 2009, 09:48:39 AM Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: T_Mar on August 11, 2009, 03:40:40 PM Interesting the consensus is to fold, I dont dont mind calling here - plenty of scenarios where you are in decent shape, seems like a good spot to gamble to me
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: titaniumbean on August 11, 2009, 03:42:50 PM is there no justifictation for the call given stack sizes here? both players are all in - he is getiing >2:1 - he has an A and a Q - and can call and lose and still have 45 BB's left? not a snap fold for me. If you have been super active - 1st guy could be going with a very light holding and 2nd guy could have 99-JJ (i know its the bottom of his range and I am trying to make the call look favourable) I dont think this is an easy fold given the set up - i think that I probably fold after consideraton - but i wouldnt hate the call given the above Against 22+,A2s+,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,76s,A2o+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo and JJ+/AQs+/AQo+ we have ~22.4% Against 22+,A2s+,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,76s,A2o+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo and 88+/ATs+/AJo+ we have 30.6% If you're running good cawl and bink. I fold some of the time dependant on the players considering our stack size and just keep the ammo to keep opening. I think it all depends on the overshove range really. Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: T_Mar on August 11, 2009, 03:55:58 PM Interesting the consensus is to fold, I dont dont mind calling here - plenty of scenarios where you are in decent shape, seems like a good spot to gamble to me Just stoved this and its pretty tight actually, given pot odds we need 29% and we have 25% using following ranges so a fold looks correct - Even if you widen villian1's range which is reasonable it doesn't alter things that much equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 25.112% 20.12% 04.99% 2147936718 532825341.17 { AdQc } Hand 1: 28.128% 26.54% 01.59% 2833138841 169672432.67 { 22+, A7s+, KJs+, A7o+, KJo+ } Hand 2: 46.760% 42.07% 04.69% 4491336056 500522763.17 { 99+, AQs+, AQo+ } Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: T_Mar on August 11, 2009, 04:04:37 PM Interesting the consensus is to fold, I dont dont mind calling here - plenty of scenarios where you are in decent shape, seems like a good spot to gamble to me Just stoved this and its pretty tight actually, given pot odds we need 29% and we have 25% using following ranges so a fold looks correct - Even if you widen villian1's range which is reasonable it doesn't alter things that much equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 25.112% 20.12% 04.99% 2147936718 532825341.17 { AdQc } Hand 1: 28.128% 26.54% 01.59% 2833138841 169672432.67 { 22+, A7s+, KJs+, A7o+, KJo+ } Hand 2: 46.760% 42.07% 04.69% 4491336056 500522763.17 { 99+, AQs+, AQo+ } Lol, changed my mind again... villian 2's range is wider than what I assigned above... I'm calling!!! Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: EvilPie on August 11, 2009, 04:17:04 PM Interesting the consensus is to fold, I dont dont mind calling here - plenty of scenarios where you are in decent shape, seems like a good spot to gamble to me Just stoved this and its pretty tight actually, given pot odds we need 29% and we have 25% using following ranges so a fold looks correct - Even if you widen villian1's range which is reasonable it doesn't alter things that much equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 25.112% 20.12% 04.99% 2147936718 532825341.17 { AdQc } Hand 1: 28.128% 26.54% 01.59% 2833138841 169672432.67 { 22+, A7s+, KJs+, A7o+, KJo+ } Hand 2: 46.760% 42.07% 04.69% 4491336056 500522763.17 { 99+, AQs+, AQo+ } Lol, changed my mind again... villian 2's range is wider than what I assigned above... I'm calling!!! Can't see any problem with your assigned range here. He's effectively calling for his tournament life. Unless he has a read on villain 1 that says he likes to resteal shove then he isn't going in light here. Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: T_Mar on August 11, 2009, 04:59:22 PM Interesting the consensus is to fold, I dont dont mind calling here - plenty of scenarios where you are in decent shape, seems like a good spot to gamble to me Just stoved this and its pretty tight actually, given pot odds we need 29% and we have 25% using following ranges so a fold looks correct - Even if you widen villian1's range which is reasonable it doesn't alter things that much equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 25.112% 20.12% 04.99% 2147936718 532825341.17 { AdQc } Hand 1: 28.128% 26.54% 01.59% 2833138841 169672432.67 { 22+, A7s+, KJs+, A7o+, KJo+ } Hand 2: 46.760% 42.07% 04.69% 4491336056 500522763.17 { 99+, AQs+, AQo+ } Lol, changed my mind again... villian 2's range is wider than what I assigned above... I'm calling!!! Can't see any problem with your assigned range here. He's effectively calling for his tournament life. Unless he has a read on villain 1 that says he likes to resteal shove then he isn't going in light here. Yeah guess its player dependant as always - I could see myself shoving 77/88, AJ, maybe even AT if I was villian 2, figuring to squeeze out opener and likely be ahead againt the shortstack, including these hands would make it a call for AQ - prob not too much of a mistake either way Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: AlexMartin on August 11, 2009, 09:38:28 PM is there no justifictation for the call given stack sizes here? both players are all in - he is getiing >2:1 - he has an A and a Q - and can call and lose and still have 45 BB's left? not a snap fold for me. If you have been super active - 1st guy could be going with a very light holding and 2nd guy could have 99-JJ (i know its the bottom of his range and I am trying to make the call look favourable) I dont think this is an easy fold given the set up - i think that I probably fold after consideraton - but i wouldnt hate the call given the above yarp +1 Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: George2Loose on August 11, 2009, 10:40:43 PM Given stack sizes and image I think this was close.
Villian 1 had 44. Villian 2 had AK I did fold after banking Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: dousche on August 11, 2009, 11:45:37 PM not sure cash-type pokerstovage applies particularly well here. in tourneys not all chips have the same value, they have diminishing value (ie 20k worth less than 2x 10k) - im not saying that i think its not close but fwiw i fold here too
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: LuckyLloyd on August 12, 2009, 12:30:40 AM Whenever a situation is genuinely close (as this one is), the smaller the effective stacks are - the more I call. I'd have got it in bad here most of the time.
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: titaniumbean on August 12, 2009, 12:38:46 AM not sure cash-type pokerstovage applies particularly well here. in tourneys not all chips have the same value, they have diminishing value (ie 20k worth less than 2x 10k) - im not saying that i think its not close but fwiw i fold here too Yeah I get what you mean, just posted to show that even when you widen the range massively I dont think you can make this particularly clearly +EV, therefore I'd look for a better spot though not saying that at the time I would consider calling at least for just a while. Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: dousche on August 12, 2009, 03:12:13 AM another point not considered so far is that george is a donk so probably should look to get them in here and hope to spin up. he's unlikely to have any value to gain from playing future pots, especially at stakes as high as $10 mtts
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: George2Loose on August 12, 2009, 05:46:35 PM another point not considered so far is that george is a donk so probably should look to get them in here and hope to spin up. he's unlikely to have any value to gain from playing future pots, especially at stakes as high as $10 mtts 10$ rebuy I'll have you know :P Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: Blatch on August 12, 2009, 05:49:16 PM ummm call and bink 3 queens?
Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: George2Loose on August 12, 2009, 06:01:37 PM ummm call and bink 3 queens? I was going to but couldn't get the RNG alignment right so folded Title: Re: errrrrrrrrrrr Post by: dousche on August 12, 2009, 08:47:14 PM another point not considered so far is that george is a donk so probably should look to get them in here and hope to spin up. he's unlikely to have any value to gain from playing future pots, especially at stakes as high as $10 mtts 10$ rebuy I'll have you know :P wasnt judging, more pointing out that you could save your chips for better spots |