blonde poker forum

Community Forums => The Lounge => Topic started by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 10:58:55 AM



Title: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 10:58:55 AM

The offensive Post by bagel has been moved to the Deleted Posts Board to allow the Mods to consider whether it's contents are compliant.

 


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Linux on August 15, 2009, 11:09:42 AM
What did it say ;)


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 11:13:19 AM
What did it say ;)

Buggered if I can remember now......


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: boldie on August 15, 2009, 11:17:50 AM

The offensive Post by bagel has been moved to the Deleted Posts Board to allow the Mods to consider whether it's contents are compliant.

 

I would say no as it didn't make any sense whatsoever and he would probably have regretted posting it himself when reading it back later.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: matt674 on August 15, 2009, 12:36:32 PM

The offensive Post by bagel has been moved to the Deleted Posts Board to allow the Mods to consider whether it's contents are compliant.

 

I would say no as it didn't make any sense whatsoever and he would probably have regretted posting it himself when reading it back later.

Pot..............

Kettle..................

;whistle;


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: boldie on August 15, 2009, 12:37:38 PM

The offensive Post by bagel has been moved to the Deleted Posts Board to allow the Mods to consider whether it's contents are compliant.

 

I would say no as it didn't make any sense whatsoever and he would probably have regretted posting it himself when reading it back later.

Pot..............

Kettle..................

;whistle;

OI!..Racist monkey ban IMO!


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 12:56:06 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 12:56:20 PM

The Mods have now decided it can be reinstated, minus the personal flaming, & I shall communicate that to the OP.

That'll be a 3 page Mod Board Thread, & 4 PM's. All for want of a bit of creative wordage.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: mondatoo on August 15, 2009, 01:00:03 PM
Ohhh who got some stick ?


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 01:02:27 PM

OP has been told he can reinstate it, minus the flaming.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: TightEnd on August 15, 2009, 01:11:32 PM
Ohhh who got some stick ?
                  stevie g


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: G1BTW on August 15, 2009, 01:27:52 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 

Ban/suspension for this please.

It's *forums*.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: G1BTW on August 15, 2009, 01:29:33 PM
ps what happened to bigusdikus?


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: kinboshi on August 15, 2009, 01:33:01 PM
lol - very incisive.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 01:33:27 PM
ps what happened to bigusdikus?

Lol, funny you should say that. His name did get mentioned this morning.......

He got Banned from blonde, & then he introduced himself to me at the Luton Fessie. He & I have a very different recollection of what was said that evening at Luton.......


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: gatso on August 15, 2009, 01:35:18 PM
He got Banned from blonde, & then he introduced himself to me at the Luton Fessie. He & I have a very different recollection of what was said that evening at Luton.......

try not to let it bother you. old age catches up with us all eventually


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 01:36:48 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 

Ban/suspension for this please.

It's *forums*.

It can be "forums" or "fora". Neither is wrong.

I hereby appeal against the ban.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 01:37:54 PM
He got Banned from blonde, & then he introduced himself to me at the Luton Fessie. He & I have a very different recollection of what was said that evening at Luton.......

try not to let it bother you. old age catches up with us all eventually
Lol, not wrong.

He was......weird. Like VERY weird.

We shared an exchange of views subsequently on another Forum, but there was nobody at home.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: kinboshi on August 15, 2009, 01:40:04 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 

Ban/suspension for this please.

It's *forums*.

It can be "forums" or "fora". Neither is wrong.

I hereby appeal against the ban.

Tikay prefers to use the latin, and irregular English version of the plural.

Alternatively known as the 'old' version.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fora


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: RED-DOG on August 15, 2009, 01:40:34 PM


It can be "forums" or "fora". Neither is wrong.



I disagree. You can't go forums crap.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: StuartHopkin on August 15, 2009, 01:40:45 PM
He got Banned from blonde, & then he introduced himself to me at the Luton Fessie. He & I have a very different recollection of what was said that evening at Luton.......

try not to let it bother you. old age catches up with us all eventually
Lol, not wrong.

He was......weird. Like VERY weird.

We shared an exchange of views subsequently on another Forum, but there was nobody at home.

Lol I also had the pleasure of meeting bigusdikus a couple of weeks back at DTD

I couldnt help myself when I found out it was him, I was like a starstruck school girl!


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 01:49:08 PM
He got Banned from blonde, & then he introduced himself to me at the Luton Fessie. He & I have a very different recollection of what was said that evening at Luton.......

try not to let it bother you. old age catches up with us all eventually
Lol, not wrong.

He was......weird. Like VERY weird.

We shared an exchange of views subsequently on another Forum, but there was nobody at home.

Lol I also had the pleasure of meeting bigusdikus a couple of weeks back at DTD

I couldnt help myself when I found out it was him, I was like a starstruck school girl!

Was he "special" or was he "special"?

blonde is not ready for him yet, apparently. We may be a while.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 01:50:29 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 

Ban/suspension for this please.

It's *forums*.

It can be "forums" or "fora". Neither is wrong.

I hereby appeal against the ban.

Tikay prefers to use the latin, and irregular English version of the plural.

Alternatively known as the 'old' version.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fora

Yes. It's equally correct.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: kinboshi on August 15, 2009, 01:53:56 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 

Ban/suspension for this please.

It's *forums*.

It can be "forums" or "fora". Neither is wrong.

I hereby appeal against the ban.

Tikay prefers to use the latin, and irregular English version of the plural.

Alternatively known as the 'old' version.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fora

Yes. It's equally correct.

It's correct in Norway.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: G1BTW on August 15, 2009, 01:56:44 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 

Ban/suspension for this please.

It's *forums*.

It can be "forums" or "fora". Neither is wrong.

I hereby appeal against the ban.
redemptus es

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1430/1108285712_c2363c90f5.jpg)

Just for a  laugh


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bagel on August 15, 2009, 03:49:54 PM
original post
as a lifelong liverpool fan,i am appaled and amazed to see steven gerrard doing an exclusive interview with news of the world,sister paper of the s*n.some of you may be aware that this arserag of a paper is despised on merseyside after the disgusting lies they printed in the aftermath of the hillsborough disaster.the day after hillsborough, the s*n decided to publish an article alleging that fans were stealing wallets from corpses,and urinating on the dead.do you believe that?i dont.having read his autobiography,and learning that his ten year old cousin,john paul gilhooley,died at hillsborogh,what the f**k does he think he is doing.one things for sure he is gonna kop some stick up in the pool.people will be fuming.anyway steve,enjoy the five grand,or whatever they pay you.buy something nice.i know times are hard for you these last few years.last word has been edited out at request of blonde.


i would like to add,for the benefit of anybody who is wondering why this would make me so angry,is that 96 people died.at a football match on a sunny afternoon.thats a lot of heartbroken mothers,sisters,fathers and brothers.not to mention all of their friends.

lastly. i would like to thank tikay and mods for allowing me to express my opinion.tikay was very reasonable,but said he did not see the point of reposting.thats fair enough,he may be right.best thing is possibly to read and not reply and let it go.i apologise for posting about such a truly depressing and tragic subject on what should be a very exciting and happy day for all footy fans.i will make sure any future posts or threads that i make will be of a more positive nature.

boldie,i am not sure which part of original thread made no sense to you,i hope this has helped.and no i do not regret starting this thread.why on earth would i?

hope you all have a smashing weekend,unless you are a spurs fan.

bagel


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Colchester Kev on August 15, 2009, 03:52:42 PM


hope you all have a smashing weekend,unless you are a spurs fan.

bagel


BAN PLEASE !!!


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: boldie on August 15, 2009, 04:14:10 PM
Stevie G not talking to NOTW is like saying he can't talk to Skysports. Owned by the same evil empire after all.

I take it you don't have or watch Sky?

That's the part that doesn't make sense to me. For what it's worth, I would never even consider buying the Sun as I agree that it's filth...but what you are saying just doesn't make any sense.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: byronkincaid on August 15, 2009, 04:23:48 PM
(http://www.krankyscartoons.com/images/Rupert%27s_My_Space.jpg).


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Bainn on August 15, 2009, 04:34:04 PM

It's *forums*.


Fora is also correct, just more traditional in it's usage.



Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: G1BTW on August 15, 2009, 04:43:53 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 

Ban/suspension for this please.

It's *forums*.

It can be "forums" or "fora". Neither is wrong.

I hereby appeal against the ban.
redemptus es

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1430/1108285712_c2363c90f5.jpg)

Just for a  laugh

Mini RSQ. Name 3 monuments in this picture.
Simplus!


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bagel on August 15, 2009, 04:46:39 PM
i watch sky when in the pub.i have no control over what the landlord pays,beside i would be in the pub anyway.do i pay for sky?no.if i won the lottery i would never pay that crook a bean.any liverpool supporter who subscribes to sky is a disgrace.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bolt pp on August 15, 2009, 04:56:15 PM
any liverpool supporter who subscribes to sky is a disgrace.


lol


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: boldie on August 15, 2009, 04:58:49 PM
any liverpool supporter who subscribes to sky is a disgrace.


lol


this.

You really are overreacting just a tad IMO.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bagel on August 15, 2009, 05:07:19 PM
just my opinion.lol is just wrong.you win gg.please lock or delete this thread mods,i have made my point.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: henrik777 on August 15, 2009, 05:24:05 PM
(http://www.cocktail.uk.com/images/shop/products/34734.jpg)

Sandy


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 15, 2009, 05:29:09 PM

Is it OK to read The Times?

Or work for Sky?


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: KarmaDope on August 15, 2009, 05:32:50 PM
any liverpool supporter who subscribes to sky is a disgrace.


lol


As a Liverpool supporter, I have to disagree. There is only one person to blame for what the S*n did, the man who had overall editorial control over the paper, the man who decided to print that pack of lies.

Kelvin MacKenzie.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: boldie on August 15, 2009, 05:44:53 PM

Is it OK to read The Times?

Or work for Sky?

Of course not!


I haven't spoken to MrsB since she joined Sky.






I think it's why she joined them


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bagel on August 15, 2009, 05:49:42 PM
sharplea, we all know who editor was.does that mean you feel happy reading the s*n? if so i hope you enjoy gerrards interview.

btw what part of london are you from?


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Bainn on August 15, 2009, 05:51:49 PM

I think it's why she joined them


Probably.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Karabiner on August 15, 2009, 05:54:31 PM
 Making no sense to boldie is generally +EV


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Tuffster on August 15, 2009, 05:56:08 PM
sharplea, we all know who editor was.does that mean you feel happy reading the s*n? if so i hope you enjoy gerrards interview.

btw what part of london are you from?

I REALLY suggest you re-think that post.

EDIT: I agree with your original sentiment, but please do not attack people who you perceive to not be fully supporting you as it will diminish the sentiment you feel by angering others.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: KarmaDope on August 15, 2009, 06:07:03 PM
sharplea, we all know who editor was.does that mean you feel happy reading the s*n? if so i hope you enjoy gerrards interview.

btw what part of london are you from?

All my family are from Aigburth, Liverpool.

I do not read that shite. My point was simple, Murdoch is not to blame. MacKenzie is.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: steeveg on August 15, 2009, 06:16:25 PM
Does anyone know Gerrards fixers phone number ,thers nothing down for me when all the rest of the Liverpool supporters find out ive got the Sky full package. what is  Bagel anyway ,dosent it look something like a doughnut.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: G1BTW on August 15, 2009, 06:22:34 PM
Does anyone know Gerrards fixers phone number ,thers nothing down for me when all the rest of the Liverpool supporters find out ive got the Sky full package. what is  Bagel anyway ,dosent it look something like a doughnut.

I think it's a lot like a donut in its ingredients, but it's maybe dipped in boiling water at some point, before baking? Jewish tradition. A popular if chewy foodstuff, and often used to denote a score of zero points, noughty as it is.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: phatomch on August 15, 2009, 06:27:50 PM
the bloke has got his own opinions dont try goading him into responding and get the ban stick wielded, he has come across as a litle passionate but polite to tk for the previous posts and regulars trying to get a reaction coming across as twats.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bagel on August 15, 2009, 06:52:17 PM
apologies sharplea.i know aigburth well,my old man opened the batting there for years.nice part of pool.my lot are just up the road,woolton and calderstones park allerton.posh end.sorry to all if i seem dead moody but i have a lot on my plate right now.enjoy the game tmrw sharp,fingers crossed.walk on.

phatomch thx for the level headed remarks.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: KarmaDope on August 15, 2009, 06:54:09 PM
apologies sharplea.i know aigburth well,my old man opened the batting there for years.nice part of pool.my lot are just up the road,woolton and calderstones park allerton.posh end.sorry to all if i seem dead moody but i have a lot on my plate right now.enjoy the game tmrw sharp,fingers crossed.walk on.

phatomch thx for the level headed remarks.

no worries mate, no offence taken. YNWA.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: kinboshi on August 15, 2009, 07:00:25 PM
Yes, phatomch is right. 

Why can't people debate a point of view without attacking the other person?  Attack their argument, attack their point of view - but don't attack them.  It actually lessens the effectiveness of your debate.  There's no need to bait people or resort to ad hominem attacks.


As for the OP, I'm a passionate Liverpool fan.  I don't read the s*n, and detest it on many levels.  But you cannot boycott the entire Murdoch empire if you like to watch any TV, in particular sport on TV.  Kelvin MacKenzie was in charge at the s*n at the time, and still contributes for the paper.  He is a vile individual in many ways and an ideal bedfellow for that rag.  He appears on BBC radio from time to time, so does this mean you'll also boycott the BBC because of their association with him?  I have issues with the supermarket's control and total domination of the retail market - but I still shop in supermarkets. 

You don't want Gerrard to talk to the NOTW?  What about talking to Sky reporters and presenters?  What about when he appears as a guest in the studio of a Sky broadcast - do you protest at that?  There was an outcry when Souness sold hs story to the s*n, especially as it was on the anniversary of Hillsborough.  This is quite a different thing. I'm sure Gerrard is sensitive to the feelings of the families of the 96, after all, he's one of them.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Colchester Kev on August 15, 2009, 07:07:23 PM
Maybe he was acting in self defence when he accepted the cheque ;)


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bagel on August 15, 2009, 07:39:19 PM
ok i accept your point to an extent.i may be wrong but sg i would think is contractually obligated to talk to sky.i may well be wrong.however i am sure it is not in his contract to talk to notw.i adore what he has done for our club and city,i just feel he has been a bit daft doing this interview.maybe he can donate fee to HJC.

ANYWAY LETS ALL LAUGH AT EVERTON 4 DOWN AT HALF TIME.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: thetank on August 15, 2009, 08:01:30 PM
Pre-game haka didn't do the trick


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Indestructable on August 15, 2009, 09:35:37 PM
Hatred against individual newspapers is usually irrational and I am just as guilty of this. Due to an article (that i can't even remember) I vowed never to buy NOTW again. I am sure the writer of said piece and the editor have moved on years ago, but I will still never buy it.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: thetank on August 15, 2009, 09:54:39 PM
We were at war with Germany a while back but I still like a Bratwurst.

I don't read the Sun or NOTW coz they're wank. lol @ all the angry politics going on here.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: nirvana on August 15, 2009, 10:07:57 PM
I like the idea that not reading the sun or NOTW is a protest thang ! The people of Liverpool are truly stoic in resisting these papers





Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bolt pp on August 15, 2009, 10:09:53 PM
I like the idea that not reading the sun or NOTW is a protest thang ! The people of Liverpool are truly stoic in resisting these papers





lol


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: monkeyboy888 on August 16, 2009, 01:18:37 AM
Yes, phatomch is right. 

Why can't people debate a point of view without attacking the other person?  Attack their argument, attack their point of view - but don't attack them.  It actually lessens the effectiveness of your debate.  There's no need to bait people or resort to ad hominem attacks.


As for the OP, I'm a passionate Liverpool fan.  I don't read the s*n, and detest it on many levels.  But you cannot boycott the entire Murdoch empire if you like to watch any TV, in particular sport on TV.  Kelvin MacKenzie was in charge at the s*n at the time, and still contributes for the paper.  He is a vile individual in many ways and an ideal bedfellow for that rag.  He appears on BBC radio from time to time, so does this mean you'll also boycott the BBC because of their association with him?  I have issues with the supermarket's control and total domination of the retail market - but I still shop in supermarkets. 

You don't want Gerrard to talk to the NOTW?  What about talking to Sky reporters and presenters?  What about when he appears as a guest in the studio of a Sky broadcast - do you protest at that?  There was an outcry when Souness sold hs story to the s*n, especially as it was on the anniversary of Hillsborough.  This is quite a different thing. I'm sure Gerrard is sensitive to the feelings of the families of the 96, after all, he's one of them.

whats this S*n business?

If you write the word Sun will Rupert Murdoch or Kelvin MacKenzie appear and take a shit in your cornflakes or something?

While i understand the feelings towards the Sun from the people of Liverpool, I always think that ridiculous things like this tend to devalue whatever genuine issues you might have.

P


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: WarBwastard on August 16, 2009, 01:38:37 AM
I thought Fora was a butter you could spread straight from the fridge.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Horneris on August 16, 2009, 02:52:47 AM
my flatmate Richard Michael Hare reads the sun.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: kinboshi on August 16, 2009, 03:46:19 AM
Yes, phatomch is right. 

Why can't people debate a point of view without attacking the other person?  Attack their argument, attack their point of view - but don't attack them.  It actually lessens the effectiveness of your debate.  There's no need to bait people or resort to ad hominem attacks.


As for the OP, I'm a passionate Liverpool fan.  I don't read the s*n, and detest it on many levels.  But you cannot boycott the entire Murdoch empire if you like to watch any TV, in particular sport on TV.  Kelvin MacKenzie was in charge at the s*n at the time, and still contributes for the paper.  He is a vile individual in many ways and an ideal bedfellow for that rag.  He appears on BBC radio from time to time, so does this mean you'll also boycott the BBC because of their association with him?  I have issues with the supermarket's control and total domination of the retail market - but I still shop in supermarkets. 

You don't want Gerrard to talk to the NOTW?  What about talking to Sky reporters and presenters?  What about when he appears as a guest in the studio of a Sky broadcast - do you protest at that?  There was an outcry when Souness sold hs story to the s*n, especially as it was on the anniversary of Hillsborough.  This is quite a different thing. I'm sure Gerrard is sensitive to the feelings of the families of the 96, after all, he's one of them.

whats this S*n business?

If you write the word Sun will Rupert Murdoch or Kelvin MacKenzie appear and take a shit in your cornflakes or something?

While i understand the feelings towards the Sun from the people of Liverpool, I always think that ridiculous things like this tend to devalue whatever genuine issues you might have.

P

LOL - it's a parody. It's suggesting the word is a swear word in the same way as you'll often see f**k used. It's not a religious fear of the word.

Hope you understand now. Not sure how it devalues any position.

D


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Dingdell on August 16, 2009, 11:15:57 AM
Why is this post in the lounge? Shouldn't this be in sports discussions? I've just spent 2 mins I won't get back reading something about football and Tikay suggesting that people at sky do actually work. None of it makes sense. Move please, ty.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: tikay on August 16, 2009, 11:19:24 AM
Why is this post in the lounge? Shouldn't this be in sports discussions? I've just spent 2 mins I won't get back reading something about football and Tikay suggesting that people at sky do actually work. None of it makes sense. Move please, ty.

Oi!

As to why it's in The Lounge, we can't keep up with bagel's Duplicate Posts across the various Boards, & the Mod workload he's creating, so I guess it just slipped through.



Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Longy on August 16, 2009, 12:51:54 PM
my flatmate Richard Michael Hare reads the sun.

Such a "my flatmate can read" brag post.


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: bolt pp on August 16, 2009, 02:30:35 PM
my flatmate Richard Michael Hare reads the sun.

Such a "my flatmate can read" brag post.

he just looks at the pictures imo


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: G1BTW on August 16, 2009, 03:58:28 PM
Just found out the erotic picture stories in the *u* are all made up  :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: WarBwastard on August 16, 2009, 04:06:26 PM
Just found out the erotic picture stories in the *u* are all made up  :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

What all of them!?  Even the housewife from Oxfordshire who can't help seducing work men that come to her home to fix her faulty white goods because her wealthy workaholic husband pays her no mind?

You're telling me the last six weeks I've spent at the skills centre getting my plumbing certificate has all be a waste of time?


Title: Re: Post by "bagel" Moved.
Post by: Somerled on August 16, 2009, 04:23:52 PM

The Mods are discussing the reinstatememt of the Post - subject to the removal of the personal flaming.

The OP, a Member for several days, has complained to me as to it's removal, & given me guidance on what Fora are for, & I have thanked him for his advice.

 

Ban/suspension for this please.

It's *forums*.

It can be "forums" or "fora". Neither is wrong.

I hereby appeal against the ban.
redemptus es

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1430/1108285712_c2363c90f5.jpg)

Just for a  laugh

Mini RSQ. Name 3 old relics in this picture.
Simplus!

Is that Tikay in the red shirt beside the bushy tree?