|
Title: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Woodsey on January 04, 2010, 02:21:17 AM 1.52 for Pak to win, get on IMO.
If they lose a wicket any time soon get on again when the odds jump as well, or even just wait for this to happen. Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Woodsey on January 04, 2010, 06:27:17 AM LOL at still 1.51 despite being 160 ahead and 3 wickets left. I can't bet as out of country sighhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Woodsey on January 04, 2010, 09:29:10 AM 1.6 available now at close of play. Pak 204 ahead with 1 wicket left in 1st innings, wicket doing enough to make it hard for aussies when they bat again.
Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: TheChipPrince on January 04, 2010, 09:35:41 AM 1.6 available now at close of play. Pak 204 ahead with 1 wicket left in 1st innings, wicket doing enough to make it hard for aussies when they bat again. Still happy with that price Woodsey? Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Woodsey on January 04, 2010, 09:38:59 AM 1.6 available now at close of play. Pak 204 ahead with 1 wicket left in 1st innings, wicket doing enough to make it hard for aussies when they bat again. Still happy with that price Woodsey? I'd bet 1k if I could fucking get on betfair. Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Woodsey on January 04, 2010, 10:02:06 AM Managed to get at least some on with a bookie.
Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Longy on January 06, 2010, 01:09:52 AM Tempted to pile into the Aussies watching this.
Pakistan have been awful today, tactically and in execution. Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Woodsey on January 06, 2010, 02:18:01 AM Humphhhh, I've chickened out now and laid it off so get a small profit either way. Shame I can't get on betfair would have bigger profit.
I think the game could go either way as Pak can be so erratic, so Aus probably slightly value but don't quote me on it. Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: maldini32 on January 06, 2010, 02:51:06 AM 176 needed ftw if anyone can fuck it up its Pakistan!
Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Woodsey on January 06, 2010, 02:51:38 AM Sigh, wish I hadn't bothered now. WTF Pak, can't take any wickets all morning then insta take them all as soon as I lay it..................anyway small profit secured I suppose.
Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: TheChipPrince on January 06, 2010, 09:38:42 AM Sigh, wish I hadn't bothered now. WTF Pak, can't take any wickets all morning then insta take them all as soon as I lay it..................anyway small profit secured I suppose. Less sighing please! Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: GreekStein on January 06, 2010, 09:40:44 AM LOL
The Pakistanis are only inconsistent cos they're in bookies pockets obv. Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: Woodsey on January 06, 2010, 10:02:40 AM Phew got out of that one alive, could have been over a bag down!!!
Seriously, Pakistan have to be the only country that can donk off that kind of 1st innings advantage, only glad I happened to be a round at the time to bottle it and lay off. Don't think there's any thing dodgy about it though, but unfortunately they won't shrug off those sort of suspicions any time soon. Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: TightEnd on January 06, 2010, 10:22:23 AM The major factor was the really poor performance by the Pakistan wicketkeeper Akmaal in the second innings. Three times dropped Huseey, who then took the tail on to get the 175 lead.
Quite comical, three times Kaneria spun it onto the edge of Hussey's bat, three times the ball goes straight into the gloves and drops out. Once he has three goes to stop it spilling to the ground, and fails. "Iron Gloves" does not quite describe it. Get Hussey early, Aussies don't have a chance to set a target. Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: TightEnd on January 06, 2010, 10:48:31 AM and I see, he dropped him early today as well. 4 drops of the same player by the keeper.
Title: Re: Pak v Aus Odds Post by: GreekStein on January 06, 2010, 11:00:08 AM and I see, he dropped him early today as well. 4 drops of the same player by the keeper. Don't think there's any thing dodgy about it though Sure isn't! |