|
Title: What would be a good ROI ? Post by: Karabiner on January 22, 2010, 12:04:25 PM I'm pretty hopeless when it comes to these new-fangled stat. things, but as an MTT player what would be considered:
Above average, average, below average. Title: Re: What would be a good ROE ? Post by: gatso on January 22, 2010, 12:06:15 PM best comes from sturgeon
Title: Re: What would be a good ROE ? Post by: RED-DOG on January 22, 2010, 12:08:44 PM Average.
(http://www.britsuperstore.com/acatalog/Princes_Pressed_Cod_Roe600g.jpg) Title: Re: What would be a good ROE ? Post by: AndrewT on January 22, 2010, 12:13:15 PM Holdem then Omaha is pretty standard.
Title: Re: What would be a good ROE ? Post by: RED-DOG on January 22, 2010, 12:14:17 PM Below average.
(http://www.nsknet.or.jp/~tomi-yasu/recipe/photo/064.jpg) Title: Re: What would be a good ROE ? Post by: Woodsey on January 22, 2010, 12:16:12 PM LOL I think you mean ROI?
Title: Re: What would be a good ROE ? Post by: Karabiner on January 22, 2010, 12:36:23 PM LOL I think you mean ROI? Yes that's what I meant, I told you I was crap at these stat.thingys. I've edited it now to make some sense ;dingdell; Title: Re: What would be a good ROI ? Post by: Longy on January 22, 2010, 12:42:22 PM http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/pokerstars/Moorman1/poker/results/FF5476D67F7B4FC5B4638387B2089491.html?t=2
http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/fulltiltpoker/MoormanI/poker/results/BA58EA0A1BEA4A37BD3ED2C83E96632C.html?t=2 obv. Seriously this is so dependent on what games you are playing but somewhere between 50 and 100%, i think is considered "good". The sick thing with mtts is that you could play for 2/3 years and get nowhere a decent sample size to get your expected roi, down to with +/- 20% error. Title: Re: What would be a good ROI ? Post by: pokefast on January 22, 2010, 12:55:06 PM Below average. (http://www.nsknet.or.jp/~tomi-yasu/recipe/photo/064.jpg) What on earth is that? Title: Re: What would be a good ROI ? Post by: Karabiner on January 22, 2010, 01:01:03 PM http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/pokerstars/Moorman1/poker/results/FF5476D67F7B4FC5B4638387B2089491.html?t=2 http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/fulltiltpoker/MoormanI/poker/results/BA58EA0A1BEA4A37BD3ED2C83E96632C.html?t=2 obv. Seriously this is so dependent on what games you are playing but somewhere between 50 and 100%, i think is considered "good". The sick thing with mtts is that you could play for 2/3 years and get nowhere a decent sample size to get your expected roi, down to with +/- 20% error. Cheers Longy, that explains it. It's not really a valid stat. Title: Re: What would be a good ROI ? Post by: RED-DOG on January 22, 2010, 01:35:35 PM Below average. (http://www.nsknet.or.jp/~tomi-yasu/recipe/photo/064.jpg) What on earth is that? Roe. Title: Re: What would be a good ROI ? Post by: AndrewT on January 22, 2010, 01:46:44 PM (http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/na/archive/00216/erica_roe_216040m.jpg)
Title: Re: What would be a good ROI ? Post by: RED-DOG on January 22, 2010, 01:51:58 PM (http://loyalkng.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/cupids_arrow.jpg)
Title: Re: What would be a good ROI ? Post by: Royal Flush on January 22, 2010, 03:44:47 PM I crush moormans volume....oh wait no i dont, his ROI is shit though.
|