Title: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: paulhouk03 on February 04, 2010, 02:32:36 PM PokerStars Game #39213700520: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2010/02/04 9:13:54 ET
Table 'Sulamitis IV' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: PAMBOS.L ($15.40 in chips) Seat 2: seanjustin9 ($30.95 in chips) Seat 3: S41_B ($97.20 in chips) Seat 4: canalla18 ($65.30 in chips) Seat 5: Corvette06 ($52.45 in chips) Seat 6: eticir ($20.20 in chips) Seat 7: Kop Koffie ($82.50 in chips) Seat 8: Dombra82 ($16.10 in chips) canalla18: posts small blind $0.50 Corvette06: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to S41_B [Jd Jc] eticir: raises $2 to $3 Kop Koffie: calls $3 Dombra82: folds PAMBOS.L: folds seanjustin9: raises $27.95 to $30.95 and is all-in S41_B:? is it too nitty to fold? or standard stack off utg raise quick call and a insta shove for 30 bbs Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: outragous76 on February 04, 2010, 02:36:56 PM jam for me
this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways. I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him? Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: EvilPie on February 04, 2010, 02:39:14 PM Original raiser only has 20 bucks so he's not a major concern anyway.
Jam. Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: kinboshi on February 04, 2010, 02:42:01 PM Player dependent for me, and without any player information you're getting it in. If you have the right info on the players, it can be a fold - just noticed what Matt said about the stack size of the original raiser - you're not folding here.
Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: paulhouk03 on February 04, 2010, 02:42:07 PM jam for me this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways. I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him? played too many tables to notice anything out line. not worried about shorties just the utg+1 insta call. utg is deffo calling imo utg+1 has been playing pretty solidly and capable of makeing some moves Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: NigDawG on February 04, 2010, 02:44:58 PM PokerStars Game #39213700520: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2010/02/04 9:13:54 ET Table 'Sulamitis IV' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: PAMBOS.L ($15.40 in chips) Seat 2: seanjustin9 ($30.95 in chips) Seat 3: S41_B ($97.20 in chips) Seat 4: canalla18 ($65.30 in chips) Seat 5: Corvette06 ($52.45 in chips) Seat 6: eticir ($20.20 in chips) Seat 7: Kop Koffie ($82.50 in chips) Seat 8: Dombra82 ($16.10 in chips) this might seem hypocritical cos i only play tourneys but this would tilt the f outta me on a cash table. oh and i jam Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: kinboshi on February 04, 2010, 02:52:01 PM jam for me this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways. I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him? played too many tables to notice anything out line. not worried about shorties just the utg+1 insta call. utg+1 is deffo calling imo utg+1 has been playing pretty solidly and capable of makeing some moves If the UTG+1 has a very strong hand, the call is ugly surely? It could end up with a host of callers after him thinking that there's value to call with their marginal hands - and then what flop do they want to see? Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: EvilPie on February 04, 2010, 02:58:07 PM jam for me this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways. I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him? played too many tables to notice anything out line. not worried about shorties just the utg+1 insta call. utg+1 is deffo calling imo utg+1 has been playing pretty solidly and capable of makeing some moves So when utg + 1 calls for $3 you think he deffo calls for $79.50 more? Seems strange but if that's the case then it's a pass as anyone who's definitely calling here is beating the crap out of jacks. Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: paulhouk03 on February 04, 2010, 02:59:00 PM jam for me this is eaxctly what the short stackers are looking for when they wake up with any pair A9+ and some suited broadways. I iso here, only concern is original raiser - any info on him? played too many tables to notice anything out line. not worried about shorties just the utg+1 insta call. utg+1 is deffo calling imo utg+1 has been playing pretty solidly and capable of makeing some moves So when utg + 1 calls for $3 you think he deffo calls for $79.50 more? Seems strange but if that's the case then it's a pass as anyone who's definitely calling here is beating the crap out of jacks. mod original post too Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: paulhouk03 on February 04, 2010, 03:44:17 PM are we always gonna be in good shape here?
we are gonna be against possible over pair, over cards the only hands we are crushing are smaller pairs and thats it. i dont think JJ plays that well 3 way Also if our shove is called by the utg+1 were basicly drawing to two outs. can we just call here? I dont think so Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: titaniumbean on February 04, 2010, 03:45:40 PM How do you know utg will call if we jam or do you mean he'll call if well fold every time?
Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: titaniumbean on February 04, 2010, 03:57:02 PM ok now i've looked at all players stack sizes JUST WHO CARES
JAKKKKKKS BABY FISH HOOOOOOOKS 25BBBBBBBBBBBB ITS LIKE A TOURNIE POST FLOP SKILLS FTW Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: EvilPie on February 04, 2010, 04:19:08 PM are we always gonna be in good shape here? No. But we are in good shape often enough to make jamming the correct play Quote we are gonna be against possible over pair, over cards the only hands we are crushing are smaller pairs and thats it. You could say this about every hand you ever play except aces. Quote i dont think JJ plays that well 3 way You should change this opinion. Quote Also if our shove is called by the utg+1 were basicly drawing to two outs. Then it's time to bink. Quote can we just call here? I dont think so You can if you're inducing the shove or if you're prepared to get it in on any flop. Also if you 100% know that oppo has AK so you know what to do on the flop. Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: snoopy1239 on February 05, 2010, 04:56:31 AM Jam. Evilpie is doing you a favour with the above post.
Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: Sack it off on February 05, 2010, 07:34:58 AM It's a call, then you go and look up game selection.
This isn't a v nice cash table to be on and i'd personally leave and find a new one Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: NigDawG on February 05, 2010, 09:32:01 AM It's a call, then you go and look up game selection. This isn't a v nice cash table to be on and i'd personally leave and find a new one its probably even worse to be on this table if you're folding jacks to a 3bet shove like this Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: Mitch on February 05, 2010, 04:20:07 PM It's a call, then you go and look up game selection. This isn't a v nice cash table to be on and i'd personally leave and find a new one its probably even worse to be on this table if you're folding jacks to a 3bet shove like this +1 50BB Min games FTW! Especially on stars as theres gonna be so many to chose from at those levels. Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: paulhouk03 on February 08, 2010, 04:04:54 PM Who said I folded?
Just wasn't too sure if I was ever in a good spot Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: EvilPie on February 08, 2010, 04:12:26 PM Who said I folded? Just wasn't too sure if I was ever in a good spot Did you call then? Did you lose? Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: paulhouk03 on February 08, 2010, 04:14:20 PM I shoved
Yes Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: EvilPie on February 08, 2010, 04:21:15 PM I shoved Yes Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee....... I got one right :) Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: AlexMartin on February 08, 2010, 04:22:07 PM nice table selection sir
p.s slowrollers dont go to heaven Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: pleno1 on February 08, 2010, 05:26:13 PM nice table selection sir p.s slowrollers dont go to heaven lol yeah come on, you know you're never ever folding here right? Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: paulhouk03 on February 08, 2010, 05:58:56 PM nice table selection sir p.s slowrollers dont go to heaven lol yeah come on, you know you're never ever folding here right? Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: titaniumbean on February 09, 2010, 07:36:53 PM nice table selection sir p.s slowrollers dont go to heaven lol yeah come on, you know you're never ever folding here right? if you fold start wearing dresses paul Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: paulhouk03 on February 09, 2010, 08:12:25 PM nice table selection sir p.s slowrollers dont go to heaven lol yeah come on, you know you're never ever folding here right? if you fold start wearing dresses paul Whats wrong with wearing dresses? Title: Re: JJ vs 3 players too nitty? Post by: titaniumbean on February 09, 2010, 08:15:00 PM nice table selection sir p.s slowrollers dont go to heaven lol yeah come on, you know you're never ever folding here right? if you fold start wearing dresses paul Whats wrong with wearing dresses? With your figure? darling you should be able to figure that out...... |