Title: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: Royal Flush on March 21, 2010, 02:56:17 AM Just broke to 18, so new table first hand:
http://www.pokerhand.org/?5288703 (http://www.pokerhand.org/?5288703) Thoughts? Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: buzzharvey22 on March 21, 2010, 05:39:04 AM fold pre, OOP/shallow stacks etc etc
if u call then you have to be prepard to stack on a raggy board, or making a move, otherwise calling pre is awful if your just going to check fold as played never folding this flop, couldnt want much better for your hand Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: Cf on March 21, 2010, 02:27:03 PM I can't decide whether I like the flop raise size. On the one hand it looks bluffy and might get him to push with overs, but it also makes it easy for him to push higher pairs and get called. Guessing due to aggressive nature of this format though that people are pushing random trash here often enough to make it profitable.
As for pre, probably fold with your stack size? Marginal. dunno if I'd be 4betting here. Getting 60x in pre with two fives seems a bit spewy against an unknown. Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: NigDawG on March 21, 2010, 04:00:53 PM i like to fold to the 3bet pre with these stacks OOP
Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: The Camel on March 28, 2010, 10:59:57 PM To a random player in this I 4 bet.
But against this guy I pass. Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: 810ofclubs on March 29, 2010, 02:54:21 PM i like to fold to the 3bet pre with these stacks OOP u sure would hit the fold btn :) Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: Royal Flush on March 29, 2010, 06:29:03 PM To a random player in this I 4 bet. But against this guy I pass. Who is he? Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: railtard1 on March 30, 2010, 08:22:39 AM decent reg IMO
Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: railtard1 on March 30, 2010, 08:36:21 AM stick to being a bookie IMO fishy
Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: Royal Flush on March 30, 2010, 02:43:09 PM stick to being a bookie IMO fishy Ha any time buddy. Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: The Camel on March 30, 2010, 02:50:11 PM To a random player in this I 4 bet. But against this guy I pass. Who is he? No idea, just going by notes on him. Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: AlexMartin on March 30, 2010, 03:15:39 PM LOVE IT!
p.s might be better by an exponential factor related to stack depth and speed of hand in the air. Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: The Camel on March 30, 2010, 05:56:00 PM LOVE IT! p.s might be better by an exponential factor related to stack depth and speed of hand in the air. Can you repost this using words mortals might understand. Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: AlexMartin on March 31, 2010, 03:51:19 AM LOVE IT! p.s might be better by an exponential factor related to stack depth and speed of hand in the air. Can you repost this using words mortals might understand. just joshing, but meant that its understood that hero rarely has a hand strong enough to warrant raising on this board in a 3b pot, meaning villain will b/3b bluffjam all unimproved highcards expecting a decent amount of folds as heros line looks like bs/air (i mean if we had AA/KK/set why the hell would we raise given psr). The only issue is hero is commited with even his air because of stack sizes, deeper would get more bluffjams from good villains. you need your hand in the air to win a pot in poker in 2010 imo. Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: Royal Flush on March 31, 2010, 05:16:44 AM you need your hand in the air to win a pot in poker in 2010 imo. That was 2009, these days we keep the hand down. Title: Re: $109f stars 6max 18 left Post by: AlexMartin on March 31, 2010, 04:54:37 PM you need your hand in the air to win a pot in poker in 2010 imo. That was 2009, these days we keep the hand down. you always were advanced for your years, hence the hairline. |